Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Genetic Variants of Nogo-66 Receptor with Possible Association to Schizophrenia Block Myelin Inhibition of Axon Growth

Stéphane Budel, Thihan Padukkavidana, Betty P. Liu, Zeny Feng, Fenghua Hu, Sam Johnson, Juha Lauren, James H. Park, Aaron W. McGee, Ji Liao, Althea Stillman, Ji-Eun Kim, Bao-Zhu Yang, Stefano Sodi, Joel Gelernter, Hongyu Zhao, Fuki Hisama, Amy F. T. Arnsten and Stephen M. Strittmatter
Journal of Neuroscience 3 December 2008, 28 (49) 13161-13172; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3828-08.2008
Stéphane Budel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thihan Padukkavidana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Betty P. Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeny Feng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fenghua Hu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sam Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juha Lauren
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James H. Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron W. McGee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji Liao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Althea Stillman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji-Eun Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bao-Zhu Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefano Sodi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel Gelernter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongyu Zhao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fuki Hisama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy F. T. Arnsten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen M. Strittmatter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Figure 7.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Selectively impaired working memory in NGR−/− mice. Mice were tested on a battery of tests to assess affective and cognitive responses. A, B, The light/dark exploration test was performed by placing the mouse in a cage (44 × 21 × 21 cm) that has one dark chamber (Dark) and one light chamber (Light). The animal was initially placed in the lighted side, and transitions between sides (trans) and the time spent in each chamber were recorded for 10 min using computer-monitored photocell beams. Mice were from a mixed 129 × C57BL/6 strain background. No significant difference of anxiety-like behavior was observed between WT and NGR−/− animals (n = 21, 10 WT, 11 −/−). C, The importance of NgR1 signaling to the spatial working memory functions of the prefrontal cortex in mice. NGR-deficient mice (−/−; n = 8) performed significantly worse on the spatial delayed alternation task than WT mice (+/+; n = 5). All mice were of a pure C57BL/6J genetic background (>10 backcrosses for the NGR mutation). Data represent mean ± SEM percentage correct over the 30 daily test sessions; *p = 0.017. D, NGR heterozygote and null littermate mice from a mixed strain background were subjected to a 2 d six-arm radial-arm water-maze paradigm as described previously (Morgan et al., 2000). To minimize odor cues, the goal arm was randomly assigned for each mouse. The start arm was varied for each trial, with the goal arm remaining constant. The mice were tested in the same manner on day 2. The number of incorrect arm entries (errors) was measured for 1 min. Mice made an arm choice within 20 s in every experiment. Each mouse's errors for five consecutive trials were averaged. E, Passive avoidance testing was performed in a mouse passive avoidance chamber (Ugo Basile). Mice used were from mixed 129 × C57BL/6 background. Testing occurred on 3 consecutive days; for all trials, the mouse was initially placed in the light chamber. On day 1, the mouse was allowed to move freely between the two compartments for 5 min. On day 2 (preshock), the entry latency into the dark chamber was measured; after entry, the door between the light and dark compartments closed, and a 2 s electric shock (0.2 mA) was administered through the grid floor. On day 3 (postshock), entry latency into the dark chamber was recorded. No differences in passive avoidance learning were observed in the WT and NGR−/− mice (n = 34, 17 WT, 17 −/−). F, Tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive fibers in the prefrontal cerebral cortex and the caudate nucleus were visualized in sections from WT and NGR−/− adult mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. All data are mean ± SEM.

  View article

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 43 (4)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 43, Issue 4
25 Jan 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Figure 7.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Figure 7.
Journal of Neuroscience Dec 1969,

Citation Manager Formats

Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Figure 7.
Journal of Neuroscience Dec 1969,
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.