Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Immediate-Early Gene Expression at Rest Recapitulates Recent Experience

Diano F. Marrone, Michael J. Schaner, Bruce L. McNaughton, Paul F. Worley and Carol A. Barnes
Journal of Neuroscience 30 January 2008, 28 (5) 1030-1033; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4235-07.2008
Diano F. Marrone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Schaner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce L. McNaughton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul F. Worley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol A. Barnes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A timeline shows gene expression patterns indicative of cellular activity (top) and each group's behavior (bottom) during each episode. Cells were labeled with digoxigenin-conjugated Homer 1a (H1a, red), fluorescein-conjugated Arc (green), and counterstained with TO-PRO-3 iodide (blue). Cells active 60 min before the animals were killed exhibit cytoplasmic H1a (left), when E-R-E animals explored a novel environment and R-E-E animals rested. Thirty minutes before being killed, R-E-E animals explored and E-R-E animals rested. Cells active during this time exhibit cytoplasmic Arc and intranuclear H1a (middle). Five minutes before the animals were killed, active cells exhibit intranuclear Arc. Both R-E-E and E-R-E animals explored at this time (right). A third group (R-R-R) remained undisturbed in their home cages.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A, The proportion of CA1 principal cells transcribing IEGs across episodes. During exploration (hatched bars), IEG transcription is significantly higher in both E-R-E (white) and R-E-E (light gray) animals than controls (R-R-R; dark gray), whereas transcription during rest is comparable with controls. Most cells active during the first exploration are active in the second (behavioral overlap). B, The proportion of cells active in rest and both explorations (solid), and the overlap expected by random chance (cross-hatched). Significantly more cells were active during all episodes in E-R-E than R-R-R animals, and in R-R-R and E-R-E animals this overlap is significantly greater than expected by random chance, suggesting transcription recapitulates previous experience both in the exploration and home cage environments (mean ± SEM; **p < 0.001 vs R-R-R; ††p < 0.001 between behavioral groups; ‡p < 0.05 vs chance overlap).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A schematic diagram illustrates the main observations made in the experiment. At left, schematic illustrations show cells (blue) displaying typical patterns of Homer 1a (H1a; red) and Arc (green) expression in the three groups examined in this experiment. At right, Venn diagrams depict the degree of overlap in the active cell populations during episodes 1 (red), 2 (yellow), and 3 (green). A, B, In rest-rest-rest animals (A), a small number of neurons (∼10%) actively transcribe IEGs during any episode, and the degree of overlap in the activities during each episode is far greater than expected by random chance (B). C, In R-E-E animals, exploration induces a robust increase in cells expressing intranuclear H1a (indicating activity 30 min before the animal was killed), and both cytoplasmic and nuclear Arc (indicating activity at 30 and 5 min before the animal was killed, respectively), corresponding to the time of the two explorations. Relatively little cytoplasmic H1a, corresponding to activity during the initial rest period, can be observed. D, In addition, ∼40% of CA1 principle cells are active during the first exploration (yellow), and ∼90% of cells active during the first exploration are again active after returning to the same environment (green). Moreover, the degree of overlap between the population of cells that are active during rest (red) and those that are active during exploration is no greater than would be expected by random chance. E, F, Exploration induces a similar increase in IEG transcription in E-R-E animals (E), appearing as a large number of cells expressing cytoplasmic H1a (indicating activity 60 min before the animal was killed), and intranuclear Arc (indicating activity 5 min before the animal was killed) with only ∼10% of cells transcribing IEGs during the intervening rest period. In these animals (F), ∼40% of CA1 principle cells are active during the first exploration (red), and ∼90% of these cells are also active during the second exploration (green), similar to R-E-E animals. However, the majority of cells that are active during rest in E-R-E animals are the same cells activated by exploration (yellow). This degree of overlap is significantly greater than would be expected by random chance, and is a significant shift relative to the degree of overlap observed in R-E-E animals (dashed circle).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (5)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 5
30 Jan 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immediate-Early Gene Expression at Rest Recapitulates Recent Experience
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Immediate-Early Gene Expression at Rest Recapitulates Recent Experience
Diano F. Marrone, Michael J. Schaner, Bruce L. McNaughton, Paul F. Worley, Carol A. Barnes
Journal of Neuroscience 30 January 2008, 28 (5) 1030-1033; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4235-07.2008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Immediate-Early Gene Expression at Rest Recapitulates Recent Experience
Diano F. Marrone, Michael J. Schaner, Bruce L. McNaughton, Paul F. Worley, Carol A. Barnes
Journal of Neuroscience 30 January 2008, 28 (5) 1030-1033; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4235-07.2008
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.