Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 17 December 2008, 28 (51) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Intrinsic Membrane Properties Vary Across Cortical Regions

Mark N. Miller, Benjamin W. Okaty, and Sacha B. Nelson

(see pages 13716–13726)

A neuron's function is determined by many factors, including its connections, morphology, and molecular makeup, and these characteristics, together with anatomical positions, are used to draw ever finer distinctions between neuronal classes. Miller and colleagues have found that expression of YFP under control of the Thy-1 promoter labels ∼25% of pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of cortex. The authors now report that although YFP-labeled cells present in primary motor and sensory cortices have similar morphology, projections (in the pyramidal tract), and transcriptional sets, they respond differently to sustained current injection. Cells in sensory cortex fired at a constant rate upon current injection, whereas cells in motor cortex exhibited delayed and then accelerating spiking. These differences were attributed to expression of voltage-dependent, slowly inactivating outward currents mediated by potassium Kv1 channels in motor cortex. Such differences in intrinsic membrane properties are likely to contribute to the functional specification of cortical regions.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Five Distinct Glial Types Inhabit Adult Drosophila CNS

Takeshi Awasaki, Sen-Lin Lai, Kei Ito, and Tzumin Lee

(see pages 13742–13753)

Awasaki et al. have conducted an extensive analysis of glia in adult Drosophila CNS, laying groundwork for further elucidation of the functions of five identified classes. Each class has a distinct morphology and anatomical position, and each is likely to express different proteins and develop from a distinct lineage. The outer surface of the brain contained oblong glia, which proliferated postembryonically by symmetric cell division, likely on the brain surface. Large, sheet-like glia were present below this outer layer, and these probably form the blood–brain barrier. The cortex of the brain contained mesh-like glia, each of which encapsulated several neuronal somata. These are likely generated embryonically, and may provide metabolic support to neurons. The neuropile contained two types of glia, which proliferate postembryonically and probably migrate after proliferation. Fibrous, lamellar glia lined the boundaries of neuropile subcompartments and may provide electrical insulation. Dendritic glia filled the interior of the neuropile and may perform astrocyte-like functions.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Cortex glia cells (green) are one of five types of glia present in adult Drosophila. These glia form a mesh that surrounds neuronal cell bodies (neuronal nuclei are blue in right panel). Scale bars, 50 μm. See the article by Awasaki et al. for details.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

ACC and OFC Have Distinct Roles in Decision Making

Peter H. Rudebeck, Timothy E. Behrens, Steven W. Kennerley, Mark G. Baxter, Mark J. Buckley, Mark E. Walton, and Matthew F. S. Rushworth

(see pages 13775–13785)

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are involved in making decisions based on expectations of reward, but their distinct roles have been unclear. Previous studies have suggested that ACC may be involved in predicting reward associated with a specific action, whereas the OFC estimates the reward associated with a given stimulus. To test this hypothesis, Rudebeck et al. directly compared monkeys with lesions to one of these regions on tasks that required a choice between either actions or visual stimuli. The probability of receiving a reward for each action or stimulus varied, so monkeys had to integrate information over several trials to make the optimal choice. As predicted, only ACC lesions impaired a monkey's ability to choose appropriate actions based on reward probability, whereas only OFC impaired decisions about visual stimuli. Both areas appear to be specifically involved in updating estimates of reward probability based on the outcome of multiple trials.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

LIF Cytokine Delays Photoreceptor Degeneration

Sandrine Joly, Christina Lange, Markus Thiersch, Marijana Samardzija, and Christian Grimm

(see pages 13765–13774)

Neural stress or injury activates opposing signaling pathways that promote survival and cell death. A thorough understanding of these pathways could allow researchers to effectively shift the balance in favor of survival without exacerbating damage. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is one of many pro-survival cytokines that are induced by neural injury. This week, Joly et al. demonstrate the importance of LIF in protecting photoreceptors from degeneration resulting from excessive light exposure or from a mutation that causes retinal degeneration. LIF was upregulated in a subset of Müller glia cells under both conditions compared to control, and LIF knock-out accelerated photoreceptor degeneration. LIF knock-out also prevented upregulation of other proteins in response to injury, notably fibroblast growth factor 2, which is thought to be a key neuroprotective factor. Injecting LIF into the eyes reversed the effect of knock-out on protein expression, but its effect on degeneration has yet to be demonstrated.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (51)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 51
17 Dec 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 17 December 2008, 28 (51) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 17 December 2008, 28 (51) i
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.