Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Notch Signaling Regulates the Extent of Hair Cell Regeneration in the Zebrafish Lateral Line

Eva Y. Ma, Edwin W Rubel and David W. Raible
Journal of Neuroscience 27 February 2008, 28 (9) 2261-2273; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4372-07.2008
Eva Y. Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edwin W Rubel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Raible
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Hair cell regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line after neomycin-induced death. A–D, Confocal maximum projections of representative neuromasts of H2AZ-GFP transgenic zebrafish. GFP (green) was expressed in all nuclei, whereas mature HCs were labeled with FM1–43FX (red). Scale bar, 20 μm. Larvae 5 dpf (A) were treated with 400 μm neomycin (Neo) for 1 h (B) to kill HCs, rinsed, and left to recover. New HCs were observed at 24 h (C) and increased in number by 48 h (D). E, Graph of HC regeneration as seen with FM1–43FX. Results are graphed as mean percentages of HCs (± 1 SEM) normalized to the control at 5 dpf. n = 6 fish per condition, 7 neuromasts per fish; p < 0.001 (ANOVA). F, Graph of HC regeneration assayed with myosin VI and HCS-1 antibodies. Fish were concurrently labeled and counted for both HC markers. Results are normalized to 5 dpf controls for each neuromast for the specific marker. Error bars represent ±1 SEM (n = 6 fish per condition, 7 neuromasts per fish). G, Number of regenerated HCs correlates with the original size of the neuromast. Mean HC numbers (±1 SEM) for seven neuromasts, as labeled with myosin-VI, at 72 h after neomycin exposure are plotted relative to the 5 dpf control siblings. The line of best fit and correlation coefficient was calculated and drawn. H–L, New HCs mainly originate from proliferative progenitors. Continuous exposure to BrdU after neomycin exposure was used to label all proliferating cells and their progeny. Fish were colabeled for both BrdU (red) and myosin-VI (green) (I–L). H, Stacked graph of mean (±1 SEM) myosin-VI-labeled HCs per neuromast either colabeled with BrdU (red) or BrdU-negative (green). n = 4 fish per condition, 3 neuromasts per fish. I–L, Confocal maximum projections of representative neuromasts continuously exposed to BrdU, collected at 24 and 48 h after initial neomycin exposure. BrdU-positive (asterisks) and BrdU-negative (arrowheads) HCs were observed. Scale bar, 10 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Support cell proliferation temporarily increases after neomycin exposure. A, Experimental protocol for BrdU pulse-fix time course. Larvae were pulsed with 10 mm BrdU for 1 h before fixing. B, C, Time course graphs of SC proliferation showing neuromast cells in S-phase (B) as assayed with BrdU pulse fix, and M-phase (C) as seen with anti-phosphohistone (H3) antibody labeling. A significant transient increase in proliferation occurring after neomycin exposure was seen with both proliferation markers (ANOVA; p < 0.001). Error bars represent ±1 SEM (n = 10 fish per condition; 7 neuromasts per fish). D, Schematic showing the internal (yellow) and peripheral (green) SC subpopulations within a representative neuromast. The schematic was drawn from the confocal image on the right, a neuromast labeled with 1 h of BrdU (red) at 15 h after neomycin treatment and counterstained with SYTOX (green). E, BrdU pulse-fix time course graph of SC proliferation after mock (blue, circle) or neomycin (red, triangle) treatment, subdivided as internal (solid lines, solid shape) or peripheral (dotted lines, open shape) based on neuromast cell position. Error bars represent ±1 SEM (n = 10 fish per condition; 3 neuromasts per fish). F–H, Confocal maximum projections of representative neuromasts at 17 h after mock treatment (F) or neomycin exposure (Post-Neo) (G) incubated with BrdU (1 h) before fixing. A subset of the neomycin-treated BrdU-pulsed fish were then rinsed and left to recover in fresh EM for an additional 31 h (48 h time point) (H). Immunohistochemistry was performed for both BrdU (red) and acetylated tubulin (green), another HC marker. BrdU label was present in a subset of HCs (asterisks) after additional recovery (H), indicating that these new HCs were generated from proliferating SCs at 17 h after neomycin exposure. Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expression of atoh1a, notch3, and deltaA are elevated in neuromasts during HC regeneration. Whole-mount RNA in situ hybridizations were performed to assess atoh1a (A–F), notch3 (G–L), and deltaA (M, N) expression within regenerating neuromasts. A–R, Bright-field images of representative O1 neuromasts are shown. In sibling mock-treated controls, moderate levels of atoh1a (A, B) and notch3 (G, H) were observed at 5 dpf (12 h) and decreased over time. Little deltaA expression (M, N) was detected, which also decreased slightly with time. During HC regeneration, all three transcripts were upregulated between 12 and 24 h (C–E, I–K, O–Q), correlating with the peak of SC proliferation. Expression returned to control levels by 48 h (F, L, R). FISHs of notch3 (S, T) and deltaA (U, V) were performed on regenerating neuromasts 17 h after neomycin treatment to evaluate expression localization. Samples were immunostained with myosin-VI to label HCs (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue) to visualize cell nuclei. Confocal images of a surface view projection (S, U) and an optical section (T, U) are shown for representative neuromasts. Both notch3 and deltaA were not expressed in HCs (S–V). notch3 was mainly expressed throughout the internal SCs, with little to no expression in the peripheral cells (S, T). Expression of deltaA was localized in a few cells adjacent to the HCs within the internal SC population (U, V), which we hypothesize to be HC precursors. Scale bar, 10 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Notch inhibition results in excess regenerated hair cells. A, Graph of HC regeneration after 400 μm neomycin (Neo) exposure as seen with FM1–43FX in larvae with 50 μm DAPT incubation, a Notch inhibitor, or 0.5% DMSO vehicle control. Results are graphed as mean percentages of HCs (±1 SEM) normalized to the control at 5 dpf (n = 8 fish per condition; 6 neuromasts per fish). B–E, Confocal maximum projections of representative neuromasts under continuous BrdU incorporation for 48 h, with and without 50 μm DAPT. Hair cells were labeled with myosin-VI (green), and BrdU-labeled cells are red. Scale bar, 10 μm. F, Stacked graph of average myosin-VI-labeled HCs per neuromast either colabeled with BrdU (red) or are BrdU-negative (green). Excess HCs with 50 μm DAPT incubation all contained the BrdU label, indicating mitotic origin. Error bars represent ±1 SEM (n = 4 fish per condition; 3 neuromasts per fish).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Proliferation of support cell subpopulations is differentially affected by Notch inhibition. A, BrdU pulse-fix time course graph of SC proliferation in control and regenerating neuromasts with 50 μm DAPT or 0.5% DMSO vehicle incubation. B, BrdU pulse-fix time course graph after 400 μm neomycin treatment with 50 μm DAPT (triangle) or 0.5% DMSO (circle) vehicle incubation. BrdU-labeled SCs were subdivided as internal (solid lines, solid shape) or peripheral (dotted lines, open shape) based on neuromast cell position. DAPT incubation increased the number and duration of internal SC proliferation, whereas peripheral cells decreased in proliferation. C, BrdU pulse-fix time course graph of mock-treated control siblings with 50 μm DAPT (triangle) or 0.5% DMSO (circle) vehicle incubation. Both internal (solid lines, solid shape) and peripheral (dotted lines, open shape) SC proliferation decreased with DAPT incubation compared with the vehicle control, but effects were difficult to interpret because of the small numbers of BrdU-positive cells observed. Error bars represent ±1 SEM (n = 10 fish per condition, 7 neuromasts per fish for all 3 graphs) (A–C).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Working models of HC regeneration. A, In undamaged neuromasts, local signaling between mature HCs and internal SCs keeps cells quiescent. This process is not Notch dependent, and the inhibitory signal from the mature HCs is still unknown. After neomycin-induced death, internal SCs (IS) divide and give rise to two postmitotic HC precursors (HP). These HC precursors then differentiate into two new HCs. A second signal from the HC precursors signals to the adjacent internal SCs to inhibit proliferation and limit HC production. This second inhibitory signal is via Delta-Notch, which regulates and limits the number of regenerated HCs. B, When Notch signaling is inhibited with DAPT during regeneration, an increased number of internal SCs enter the cell cycle caused by no inhibition, resulting in an overproduction of HCs.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Legend
    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure 1
    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure 2
    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure 3
    • supplemental material - Supplemental Table
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 28 (9)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 28, Issue 9
27 Feb 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Notch Signaling Regulates the Extent of Hair Cell Regeneration in the Zebrafish Lateral Line
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Notch Signaling Regulates the Extent of Hair Cell Regeneration in the Zebrafish Lateral Line
Eva Y. Ma, Edwin W Rubel, David W. Raible
Journal of Neuroscience 27 February 2008, 28 (9) 2261-2273; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4372-07.2008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Notch Signaling Regulates the Extent of Hair Cell Regeneration in the Zebrafish Lateral Line
Eva Y. Ma, Edwin W Rubel, David W. Raible
Journal of Neuroscience 27 February 2008, 28 (9) 2261-2273; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4372-07.2008
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • LUZP1 Regulates Dendritic Spine Maturation and Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus of Mice
  • Acoustic Enrichment Prevents Early Life Stress-Induced Disruptions in Sound Azimuth Processing
  • Concentration-Dependent Bidirectional Modification of Evoked Synaptic Transmission by Gadolinium and Adverse Effects of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.