Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Cone Contacts, Mosaics, and Territories of Bipolar Cells in the Mouse Retina

Heinz Wässle, Christian Puller, Frank Müller and Silke Haverkamp
Journal of Neuroscience 7 January 2009, 29 (1) 106-117; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4442-08.2009

Abstract

We report a quantitative analysis of the different bipolar cell types of the mouse retina. They were identified in wild-type mice by specific antibodies or in transgenic mouse lines by specific expression of green fluorescent protein or Clomeleon. The bipolar cell densities, their cone contacts, their dendritic coverage, and their axonal tiling were measured in retinal whole mounts. The results show that each and all cones are contacted by at least one member of any given type of bipolar cell (not considering genuine blue cones). Consequently, each cone feeds its light signals into a minimum of 10 different bipolar cells. Parallel processing of an image projected onto the retina, therefore, starts at the first synapse of the retina, the cone pedicle. The quantitative analysis suggests that our proposed catalog of 11 cone bipolar cells and one rod bipolar cell is complete, and all major bipolar cell types of the mouse retina appear to have been discovered.

Introduction

Bipolar cells transfer the light signals from the photoreceptors (cones and rods) to amacrine and ganglion cells. There are at least nine morphological types of cone bipolar (CB) and one type of rod bipolar (RB) cells in the mammalian retina. They differ in their dendritic branching pattern, the number of cones contacted, and the shape and stratification level of their axons in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) (Masland, 2001; Wässle, 2004, 2008).

Functionally, bipolar cells can be subdivided, according to their light responses, into ON and OFF bipolar cells (Kolb and Nelson, 1995; Euler et al., 1996; Hartveit, 1997; DeVries, 2000). This functional dichotomy is the result of the expression of different glutamate receptors (GluRs) at the synapses between photoreceptors and bipolar cell dendrites (Nomura et al., 1994; Brandstätter et al., 1997; DeVries, 2000; Hack et al., 1999, 2001; Haverkamp et al., 2001).

The morphological classification of bipolar cells has been made more objective and more quantitative by immunocytochemical markers that selectively label specific cell types. Protein kinase C (PKCα) has been found to be expressed by RB cells (Negishi et al., 1988; Greferath et al., 1990). During recent years, several immunocytochemical markers of CB cells have been identified, such as antibodies against calcium binding proteins (CaB5, calbindin, recoverin, or calsenilin), transmitter receptors (neurokinin receptors NK1R and NK3R), membrane channels (hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide gated channels HCN1–HCN4), cell adhesion molecules (cluster of differentiation CD15), or synaptic vesicle proteins (synaptotagmin).

More recently, expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of specific promoters has been observed in specific types of bipolar cells of the mouse retina. All ON bipolar cells were labeled with GFP driven by the mGluR6 (metabotropic glutamate receptor 6) promoter (Dhingra et al., 2008). Type 7 cone bipolar cells expressed GFP under the control of the gustducin promoter (Gus–GFP) (Huang et al., 2003). Blue cone bipolar cells expressed Clomeleon (Clm) driven by the thy-1 promoter (Haverkamp et al., 2005; Berglund et al., 2006).

It was the aim of the present study to define and apply selective markers for all nine morphological types of cone bipolar cells of the mouse retina (Ghosh et al., 2004). The markers were antibodies and/or specific expression of fluorescent proteins in transgenic mouse lines. With the exception of Type 8 cells, we were able to define such markers for all bipolar cells and study, in retinal whole mounts, their cone contacts, densities, and axonal patterns. The dendritic overlap (coverage) of neighboring bipolar cells of the same type is small (coverage smaller than 2). However, a given cone, not considering true/genuine blue cones, is contacted by at least one bipolar cell of any given type. The sum of the bipolar cell densities measured here for the individual types is in close agreement with the total bipolar cell density reported by Jeon et al. (1998). The set of bipolar cells described in the present study appears, therefore, complete, meaning that no major class of mouse bipolar cells seems to be missing.

Materials and Methods

Wild-type mice (C57BL/6J) and the following transgenic mouse lines were used. Two mouse lines (genetic background C57BL/6J), Clm1 and Clm12, expressed Clomeleon, a genetically encoded ratiometric fluorescent indicator for [Cl−] under the thy-1 promoter (Feng et al., 2000; Berglund et al., 2006). One mouse line (genetic background C57BL/6J) expressed GFP under the gustducin promoter (Wong et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2003). One mouse line (genetic background C57BL/6NCrl) expressed enhanced GFP (EGFP) under the control of the serotonin 3 receptor (5-HT3R) (Haverkamp et al., 2009). The mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and killed by cervical dislocation. All procedures were approved by the local animal care committee and were in accordance with the law of animal experimentation issued by the German Government (Tierschutzgesetz). The eyes were removed and dissected, and the posterior eye cup containing the retina was immediately immersed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for 15–30 min. After fixation, the retina was dissected from the eyecup. For frozen sections, it was cryoprotected in graded sucrose solutions (10, 20, and 30% w/v, respectively), and cryostat sections were cut at 14 μm, mounted, and stored at −20°C. For retinal whole mounts, the tissue was cryoprotected and frozen and thawed several times. Whole mounts were processed free floating.

Antibodies.

Clomeleon consists of Topaz, a variant of the yellow fluorescent protein and cyan fluorescent protein fused together. Hence, it is already visible without immunostaining because of its green/yellow fluorescence. However, by applying antibodies against GFP, the fluorescence signal was substantially increased: rabbit anti-GFP (1:2000; Invitrogen) and mouse anti-GFP (1:500; Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents). The same antibodies were also used for the amplification of GFP and EGFP signals. Cone pedicles were labeled with a guinea pig antiserum against glycogen phosphorylase (glypho) (1:1000) (Pfeiffer-Guglielmi et al., 2003) (kind gift from B. Hamprecht and B. Pfeiffer-Guglielmi, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany) and with a goat antibody against GluR5C (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), which is expressed at the dendritic tips of OFF bipolar cells (Haverkamp et al., 2003). The layering within the inner plexiform layer was revealed by a mouse monoclonal antibody against calretinin (1:2000; Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents). Horizontal cells were labeled with a rabbit antibody against calbindin (CaBP, 1:2000; Swant). Cholinergic amacrine cells were immunostained with a goat antibody against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) (1:2000; Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents).

We used the following immunocytochemical markers for mouse bipolar cells (Fig. 1): anti-NK3R (rabbit, polyclonal, 1:500; kind gift from A. Hirano, Geffen School of Medicine at University of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) for Type 1/2 bipolar cells (Haverkamp et al., 2003; Ghosh et al., 2004; Pignatelli and Strettoi, 2004; Chang et al., 2006); anti-HCN4 (rabbit, polyclonal, 1:500; Alomone Labs) for Type 3a bipolar cells (Mataruga et al., 2007); anti-protein kinase A, regulatory subunit IIβ (PKARIIβ) (mouse, monoclonal, 1:3000; BD Biosciences) for Type 3b bipolar cells (Mataruga et al., 2007); anti-calsenilin (mouse, monoclonal, 1:2000; kind gift from W. Wasco, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA) for Type 4 bipolar cells (Haverkamp et al., 2008); and anti-synaptotagmin II (Syt2 or ZNP-1; mouse, monoclonal, 1:200; Zebrafish International Resource Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR) for Type 2 (Fox and Sanes, 2007) and Type 6 bipolar cells (described herein).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Bipolar cell types of the mouse retina (Ghosh et al., 2004) and the markers and transgenic mouse lines used in the present study. Csen, Calsenilin. For details, see Materials and Methods.

Antibodies were diluted in PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.5–1% Triton X-100 and 0.05% sodium azide with either 3% normal donkey serum or 5% Chemiblocker (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents) or without a blocking substance in the case of NK3R staining. Immunocytochemical labeling was performed using the indirect fluorescence method. Cryostat sections were incubated overnight in the primary antibodies, followed by incubation (1 h) in the secondary antibodies, which were conjugated to Alexa TM 488 (green fluorescence; Invitrogen), cyanine 3 (red fluorescence; Dianova), or cyanine 5 (dark red fluorescence). In double-labeling experiments, sections were incubated in a mixture of primary antibodies, followed by a mixture of secondary antibodies. Whole mounts were incubated for 2 d in the primary and for 2 h in the secondary antibody solution. The Alexa 594-conjugated lectin peanut agglutinin (PNA) (Invitrogen) was used at a 1:200 concentration, and whole mounts were incubated for 2 h.

Light microscopy.

Fluorescent specimens were viewed with a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope with a fluorescent filter set that was wedge corrected, i.e., shifting from one filter to the other did not introduce displacements. Black-and-white images were taken by using a cooled CCD camera (AxioCam Mrm; Zeiss). By using the Zeiss AxioVision 4.2 software, images taken with the different fluorescence filters were pseudocolored and superimposed. The microscope was equipped with the Zeiss Apotome oscillating grating in the epifluorescence beam, which resulted in a significant reduction of out-of-focus stray light. Images were taken with a Plan-Neofluar 63×/1.4 oil-immersion objective as stacks of up to 30 optical sections taken from the cone pedicles to the bipolar cell axon terminals. The cone contacts, dendritic trees, and axon terminals were analyzed by looking through the individual sections. Density measurements were made by collapsing selected parts of the stacks into a single plane. Confocal micrographs were taken using a Zeiss LSM Pascal fluorescence microscope equipped with an argon and a helium/neon laser. High-resolution scanning was performed with a Plan-Apochromate 63×/1.4 objective. Usually, a stack of 12 sections was taken from the inner nuclear layer (INL) to the outer plexiform layer (OPL) (z-axis step size, 0.6 μm). Another stack was taken afterward from the INL to the axon terminals.

The densities of cone pedicles and bipolar cells were always measured in the same retinal fields that were double labeled for a cone pedicle marker (PNA, glypho, or GluR5) and a type-selective bipolar cell marker. Usually, ∼10 fields (141 μm long and 106 μm wide) were analyzed. They were sampled from different eccentricities and from two or three different retinal whole mounts. For each field, the cone density, the bipolar cell density, and the ratio of cone density to bipolar cell density were measured. The arithmetic means of the measurements are listed in Table 1. The numbers of cones contacted by an individual bipolar cell were measured from well isolated individual bipolar cells and are shown by frequency histograms.

View this table:
Table 1.

Comparison of the cone and bipolar cell densities

The brightness and the contrast of the final images were adjusted using Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems).

Comparison of mouse strains.

Because it is known that various mouse strains differ with respect to allelic variants that control nerve cell numbers, we compared in preliminary experiments retinal cell densities of C57BL/6J (purchased from The Jackson Laboratory) and C57BL/6NCrl (purchased from Charles River Laboratories). Retinal whole mounts were triple stained for PNA to reveal cone pedicles, calbindin to label horizontal cells, and ChAT to stain OFF and ON cholinergic amacrine cells. It had been shown that the densities of these cells vary in different mouse strains (Raven et al., 2005; Reese et al., 2005; Keeley et al., 2007; Whitney et al., 2008). Supplemental Figure 1 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) shows labeled cone pedicles, horizontal cells, and OFF and ON cholinergic amacrine cells in retinal whole mounts. The following densities (cells per square millimeter) were measured from eight fields (four peripheral and four central): C57BL/6J mice, cone pedicles, 13,435 ± 1961; horizontal cells, 1120 ± 133; OFF cholinergic amacrine cells, 1259 ± 261; ON cholinergic amacrine cells, 1084 ± 104; C57BL/6NCrl mice, cone pedicles, 12,760 ± 818; horizontal cells, 1128 ± 78; OFF cholinergic amacrine cells, 1220 ± 170; ON cholinergic cells, 1071 ± 110. The densities of the four cell types did not differ significantly between the two substrains and are in agreement with published data of C57BL/6 mice (Jeon et al., 1998; Strettoi and Pignatelli, 2000; Whitney et al., 2008). On this basis, we assume that data gained from either substrain of C57BL/6 mice are interchangeable.

Results

Cone contacts and retinal mosaic of Type 7 bipolar cells

In transgenic mice (Gus–GFP), which express GFP under the control of the gustducin promoter (Huang et al., 2003; Lin and Masland, 2005), Type 7 bipolar cells and their axons terminating in sublamina 4 of the IPL are prominently labeled (Fig. 2A). Less intense GFP expression is also found in RB cells and their axon terminals in sublamina 5, close to the ganglion cell layer. Across the retinal surface of Gus–GFP mice, staining of Type 7 bipolar cells is patchy; in some areas, all cells express GFP, whereas in other areas only individual cells are labeled. Figure 2B shows a well isolated Type 7 cell in a horizontal view with the focus on the dendrites. The dendrites branch into many small terminals, which are the sites of contact with cone pedicles. With the plane of focus in sublamina 4, the axon terminal of this cell becomes apparent (Fig. 2C), and, in sublamina 5, RB axon terminals are found (Fig. 2D). Focusing through a retinal whole mount thus reveals the whole Type 7 cell, dendrites, cell body, and axon terminal. The cone pedicles were labeled in the same whole mounts with antibodies against glypho, alternatively for PNA, or by the staining of GluR5 in bipolar cell dendritic tips (Haverkamp et al., 2005).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Bipolar cells of the Gus–GFP transgenic mouse line. A, Vertical section through a Gus–GFP mouse retina immunostained for GFP (green) and calretinin (red). The retinal layers are indicated (OPL, INL, IPL, subdivided into 5 sublayers of equal thickness; GCL, ganglion cell layer). Scale bar, 25 μm. B, Horizontal view of a Type 7 bipolar cell dendritic tree. Four rod bipolar cells are more weakly labeled. C, Axon terminal of the cell in B. D, Axon terminals of rod bipolar cells.

The convergence of cones onto Type 7 bipolar cells was measured in well isolated Type 7 dendritic trees (Fig. 3A–D). The cell in Figure 3A (same cell as in Fig. 2B,C) was in contact with seven cone pedicles, and that in Figure 3C contacted nine cones. The histogram in Figure 3E shows, measured for a sample of 94 cells, the frequency of cone contacts, which ranged from 5 to 12 with a mean ± SD of 8.4 ± 1.4 (n = 94).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Cone contacts of Type 7 bipolar cells. A, C, Dendritic trees of two Type 7 bipolar cells. B, D, Their cone contacts (red label, GluR5 marking cone pedicles). E, Frequency histogram of the number of cone contacts of individual Type 7 cells. F, Group of neighboring Type 7 cells. G, Same field as in F (red label, glypho-stained cone pedicles). H, Blue circles mark cones contacted by two bipolar cells, and white circles mark cones contacted by one bipolar cell. I, Dendritic fields of Type 7 bipolar cells outlined by white lines. J, Axon terminals of the bipolar cells in I, outlined by the white lines. Scale bar: A–D, 12.5 μm; F–H, 15 μm; I, J, 20 μm.

Cone pedicles close to the center of a bipolar cell dendritic field receive more dendritic terminals, and cone pedicles innervated by distal dendrites receive fewer contacts (Fig. 3A,B) (supplemental Fig. 2A, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). This was quantified by measuring the area of contact between dendritic terminals and cone pedicles in relation to distance from the center (supplemental Fig. 2B, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The sizes of the contacts decreased for distal dendrites and dropped to 50% at ∼12.5 μm eccentricity (supplemental Fig. 2C, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Comparable results have been found by P. W. Keeley and B. E. Reese (personal communication). They counted the number of dendritic terminals per pedicle and found six in the center, which dropped to 3 at 12.5 μm eccentricity. Cone pedicles in the center of the bipolar cell dendritic field provide, therefore, a stronger input than peripheral ones, and the sensitivity profile of a bipolar cell will be bell shaped (Dacey et al., 2000). However, it has to be emphasized that the feedback from horizontal cells and the electrical coupling of neighboring cones both will also have major influences on the overall shape of the sensitivity profile (Hornstein et al., 2004).

The divergence of the cone signal, that is the number of Type 7 bipolar cells to which a given cone is connected, was studied in well stained patches, in which all Type 7 cells were labeled (Fig. 3F–H). The dendritic trees of the cells were more or less isolated (Fig. 3F), but, in some instances, peripheral dendrites of neighboring cells terminated at the same cone pedicle (Fig. 3F, arrows). As mentioned above, peripheral dendrites provide smaller contacts with cone pedicles, which might be compensated by such double innervation. Figure 3G shows the cone pedicle in addition to the bipolar cells, and Figure 3H presents an analysis of the cone contacts. White circles show cone pedicles contacted by dendrites of only one bipolar cell, and blue circles indicate pedicles that innervate two bipolar cells. The mean number of Type 7 bipolar cells a given cone connects, the divergence of the cone signal, is between 1 and 2. There is not much redundancy in this connectivity pattern; it just ensures that each and all cone pedicles in Figure 3H are contacted by at least one Type 7 bipolar cell without any “blind spots.” Figure 3I shows the cell bodies and dendritic territories of Type 7 cells in a larger area (which includes the cells analyzed in Fig. 3F–H). The dendritic fields (white outlines) do not show much overlap.

The same holds true for the axon terminals (Fig. 3J). By following the descending axons through the stack of optical sections, it was possible to delineate the individual axon terminals (Fig. 3J, white outlines). Neighboring axons do not overlap; they are strictly territorial.

We analyzed the density of Type 7 bipolar cells together with the cone density in nine fields (141 × 106 μm wide) and found, as shown in Table 1, a mean ± SD bipolar cell density of 2256 ± 221/mm2 (n = 9) and a mean ± SD cone density of 14,833 ± 2602/mm2 (n = 9). There were 6.6 ± 1.2 times (mean ± SD; n = 9) more cones than Type 7 bipolar cells, which means that Type 7 bipolar cells have to contact at least 6.6 cones to provide a coverage of 1. As shown in Figure 3E, Type 7 bipolar cells contact a mean of 8.4 cones, and, therefore, the coverage is 8.4/6.6 = 1.3.

In conclusion, dendritic trees and axon terminals of Type 7 cells tile the retina without much overlap; they are territorial. Type 7 bipolar cells contact on average 8.4 cones. All cones (leaving aside blue cones) are contacted by at least one Type 7 cell (coverage of 1.3). In the ventral retina of the mouse, most cones express both M- and S-opsin (Szél et al., 1992). When we mention “blue cones,” we refer to the genuine blue cones that express only S-opsin and comprise <5% of mouse cones (Haverkamp et al., 2005). We did not specifically label blue cone pedicles in the present study and did not address the question as to whether certain bipolar cell types contact or avoid blue cone pedicles.

Cone contacts and retinal distribution of Type 3 bipolar cells

By the application of two immunocytochemical markers, antibodies against HCN4 channels and antibodies against PKARIIβ, Mataruga et al. (2007) could show that Type 3 bipolar cells can be subdivided in Type 3a and Type 3b. Type 3a and 3b cells were originally considered to represent one morphological type because their axons terminate in a narrow stratum in sublamina 2 of the IPL (Fig. 1). Differences in their dendritic morphology and their axon terminals did not show up in the vertical view of Lucifer-yellow-injected cells on which the classification of Ghosh et al. (2004) was based.

We applied in the present study antibodies against HCN4 and PKARIIβ to retinal whole mounts and analyzed the cone contacts and retinal distributions of Type 3a and Type 3b bipolar cells (Fig. 4). Type 3a cells have curly dendrites (Fig. 4A), and the dendritic terminals surround the cone pedicles like nests. Type 3b cells have more crescent-shaped dendrites that approach the cone pedicles more directly (Fig. 4D). Close inspection of Figure 4, A and B, shows that all cone pedicles are in contact with bipolar cell dendritic terminals. However, both Type 3a and 3b cells have dendritic terminals that are not associated with cone pedicles (Fig. 4A,B, arrows), and we interpret such terminals as contacts with rod spherules (Mataruga et al., 2007). We also measured the number of cones contacted by individual Type 3a (Fig. 4C) and Type 3b cells (Fig. 4F), the convergence of the cone signal. It was found that Type 3a cells contacted a mean ± SD of 7.6 ± 2.2 (n = 89) cones, whereas Type 3b contacted a mean ± SD of 6.2 ± 2 (n = 62) cones only. This is compensated by the higher density of Type 3b cells. The density of Type 3a cells (Table 1) was 1866 ± 605/mm2 (mean ± SD; n = 16), and that of Type 3b cells was 3254 ± 536 (n = 11). There were 6.1 ± 0.9 times (mean ± SD; n = 16) more cones than Type 3a bipolar cells and 4.0 ± 0.4 times (mean ± SD; n = 11) more cones than Type 3b cells. The resulting coverage of Type 3b cells was 7.6/6.1 = 1.25, and that of Type 3b cells was 6.2/4.0 = 1.55. This shows that each and all cones (leaving aside blue cones) are contacted by at least one Type 3a and one Type 3b cell.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Retinal distribution and cone contacts of Type 3a and Type 3b bipolar cells. A, Dendritic trees of Type 3a bipolar cells immunostained for HCN4 (green), cone pedicles are marked by GluR5 (red). B, Axon terminals of the Type 3a bipolar cells in A. C, Frequency histogram of the number of cone contacts of Type 3a cells. D, Dendritic trees of Type 3b bipolar cells immunostained for PKARIIβ (green), cone pedicles are marked by GluR5 (red). E, Axon terminals of the Type 3b bipolar cells in D. F, Frequency histogram of the number of cone contacts of Type 3a and Type 3b cells. Scale bar, 25 μm.

The axon terminals of Type 3a cells (Fig. 4B) are thicker and more varicose than those of Type 3b cells (Fig. 4E). The white outlines show the axonal territories. The axon terminals of Type 3a cells do not overlap their next neighbors (Fig. 4B), and the same holds true for the axon terminals of Type 3b cells (Fig. 4E). However, it has to be emphasized that they both costratify in sublamina 2, and, therefore, axon terminals of Type 3a and 3b cells must intermingle. This predicts that the territorial behavior of axon terminal has to be regulated by highly type-specific interactions and signals.

Bipolar cells immunostained for calsenilin and the neurokinin receptor NK3R

A retinal whole mount that was triple immunostained for GluR5, calsenilin, and NK3R is shown in Figure 5, A and B. GluR5 marks the cone pedicles, and calsenilin reveals the dendritic network of Type 4 bipolar cells (Fig. 5A) (Haverkamp et al., 2008). Type 4 bipolar cells have more diffuse axon terminals within sublamina 1 and 2 of the IPL (Fig. 1). Unfortunately, in the whole mount, we were not able to separate the axon terminals because calsenilin-labeled additional cells in the ganglion cell layer and their dendrites overlapped with the Type 4 axon terminals. However, we could count the number of cones contacted by individual Type 4 cells and found a mean ± SD convergence of 7.4 ± 1.1 (n = 31). The mean ± SD density of Type 4 cells was 3005 ± 573/mm2 (n = 12), and the mean ± SD cone density was 13,836 ± 1530/mm2 (n = 12) (Table 1). There were 4.6 ± 0.7 times (mean ± SD; n = 12) more cones than Type 4 cells, and the resulting coverage of Type 4 cells was 7.4/4.6 = 1.6. This shows that each and all cones (leaving aside blue cones) are contacted by at least one Type 4 bipolar cell.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Dendritic trees of bipolar cells in a retinal whole mount that was triple labeled for calsenilin (Csen), NK3R, and GluR5. A, Dendritic trees of Type 4 bipolar cells immunolabeled for calsenilin (green), cone pedicles are marked by GluR5 (red). B, Dendritic trees of Type 1 and Type 2 bipolar cells immunolabeled for NK3R (green), cone pedicles are marked by GluR5 (red). Scale bar, 25 μm.

NK3R immunoreactivity in Figure 5B is found in thick processes, and they also contact every cone pedicle. However, as has been described previously, two bipolar cell types, Type 1 and Type 2, are immunoreactive for NK3R (Haverkamp et al., 2003; Ghosh et al., 2004; Pignatelli and Strettoi, 2004). The axons of Type 1 and Type 2 cells terminate in sublaminas 1 and 2, and they form a dense plexus in NK3R-labeled retinal sections and cannot be separated. Apparently, the same holds true for the dendrites, and, consequently, the thick processes in Figure 5B may not represent individual dendrites but several dendrites fused into a single bundle. The mean ± SD density of NK3R-immunoreactive bipolar cell bodies was 4556 ± 1491/mm2 (n = 11), and the mean ± SD cone density was 11,185 ± 3186/mm2 (n = 11) (Table 1). This is nearly twice the bipolar cell density encountered so far, and the high density supports the conclusion that NK3R immunoreactivity is found in two bipolar cell types. In the following, selective markers will be presented that separate these two bipolar cell types.

Bipolar cells immunoreactive for synaptotagmin 2

Fox and Sanes (2007) have shown that the synaptic vesicle-associated protein synaptotagmin 2 (Syt2) is expressed in bipolar cells with axon terminals in sublamina 1/2 of the IPL. They demonstrated that these bipolar cells are also recoverin positive, which is unique for Type 2 cells (Haverkamp et al., 2003). Figure 6A shows a vertical section of a mouse retina double labeled for Syt2 and calretinin. Syt2 immunoreactivity was present in rod spherules of the OPL, in bipolar cell bodies in the INL, and in two distinct groups of bipolar cell axon terminals in the IPL. The outer stratifying, brightly labeled axon terminals in sublamina 1/2 are those of Type 2 bipolar cells as described by Fox and Sanes (2007). The inner, less intensely stained terminals in sublamina 3/4/5 we classify as the axon terminals of Type 6 bipolar cells. When compared with the schematic drawing of the Type 6 cell in Figure 1, the Syt2-labeled axon terminals follow the general description of Type 6, but they are more varicose and most of their branches are found in sublamina 4/5. Type 7 bipolar cells and rod bipolar cell axons (Figs. 1, 2) terminate also in sublamina 4/5 of the IPL, and, therefore, one has to exclude that Syt2 is expressed in these cells. We double labeled a section of the retina of the Gus–GFP mouse for GFP (Fig. 7B) and Syt2 (Fig. 7A). Syt2-labeled axon terminals in sublamina 4/5 intermingle with GFP-labeled Type 7 and RB axon terminals (Fig. 7C), but they are not double labeled. A confusion of Syt2-labeled axon terminals with Type 8 or Type 9 cell axons is not possible, because Type 8 cells have much wider axon terminals and Type 9 cells are much more sparsely distributed.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Syt2 immunostaining of Type 2 and Type 6 bipolar cells. A, Vertical section, double labeled for Syt2 (green) and calretinin (red). Axon terminals of Type 2 cells (in sublamina 1 and 2) are strongly labeled, and those of Type 6 cells (in sublamina 3–5) are weakly labeled. B, Axon terminals of Type 2 cells immunostained in a retinal whole mount for Syt2. C, Axon terminals of Type 6 cells. Scale bar, 25 μm.

Figure 7.
Figure 7.

Analysis of the bipolar cells immunoreactive for Syt2. A–C, Vertical section through the retina of a Gus–GFP mouse. A, Syt2 immunoreactivity (red) in axon terminals of Type 2 and Type 6 bipolar cells. B, GFP labeling (green) of Type 7 and rod bipolar cell axon terminals. C, Superposition of A and B shows no colocalization. D–F, Vertical section through the retina of a Clm12 mouse. D, Syt2 immunoreactivity (red). E, GFP labeling (green). F, Superposition of D and E shows that all Syt2-immunoreactive bipolar cells in D express also Clomeleon. Scale bar, 25 μm.

It was also possible to study Syt2-immunostained Type 2 and Type 6 axon terminals in retinal whole mounts. With the focus plane in sublamina 1/2, the axon terminals of Type 2 (Fig. 6B) and in sublamina 4/5 the axon terminals of Type 6 (Fig. 6C) became apparent. The white outlines define the area occupied by individual axon terminals, and, as described above for other types of bipolar cells, they are territorial and do not overlap with neighboring axon terminals. From the density of their axon terminals, we could estimate the mean ± SD density of Type 6 bipolar cells (Table 1) as 3379 ± 372/mm2 (n = 8) at a mean ± SD cone density of 12,916 ± 1006/mm2 (n = 8). The resulting cone to bipolar cell ratio of 3.9 ± 0.5 (mean ± SD; n = 9) predicts that Type 6 bipolar cells have to contact at least four cones (convergence) to provide a coverage of 1. Unfortunately, only the axon terminals of Type 6 cells expressed Syt2; the dendrites were not labeled and their cone contacts could not be studied.

Type 2 bipolar cells express GFP in the Clm12 mouse retina

The Clm12 mouse is one of the transgenic mouse lines that express Clomeleon under the control of the thy-1 promoter. Because of the known variegation of this promoter, different retinal neurons express Clomeleon in the different mouse lines (Berglund et al., 2006). A retinal section of the Clm12 mouse line, immunostained for GFP, is shown in Figure 7E. Many ganglion and amacrine cells, as well as a sparse population of bipolar cells, are labeled. The section was also immunostained for Syt2 (Fig. 7D), which labels Type 2 cells. Type 6 axon terminals are not visible in Figure 7D; they are too faintly stained. The superposition of the two figures in Figure 7F shows that all GFP-immunoreactive bipolar cells also express Syt2 and are, therefore, Type 2 cells. However, the dendrites of the GFP-labeled cells (Fig. 7E) are not obscured by rod spherules, and, therefore, the dendritic branching pattern of Type 2 cells could be studied in Clm12 mice.

Figure 8A shows the dendritic network of Type 2 cells labeled for GFP in a whole mount of the Clm12 mouse retina. The cone pedicles were stained for PNA. Every single cone pedicle is in contact with a dendrite of a Type 2 cell. Some of the cells were well isolated and the convergence could be studied (Fig. 8C). Type 2 cells (Fig. 8B) contacted between three and eight cones (mean ± SD, 5.6 ± 1.2; n = 66). The outlines of the dendritic fields in Figure 8, C and D, show that there is not much overlap between dendritic fields of neighboring Type 2 cells. This is also supported by the density measurements (Table 1). The mean ± SD density of Type 2 cells was 3212 ± 543/mm2 (n = 11), and the mean ± SD density of cones sampled from the same retinal positions was 11,806 ± 1371/mm2 (n = 11). The cone to bipolar ratio was 3.8 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD; n = 11), and the coverage was 5.6/3.8 = 1.5. Comparable with the other bipolar cells analyzed above, each and all cones (leaving aside blue cones) are contacted by one or two Type 2 bipolar cells.

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Dendritic network and cone contacts of Type 2 bipolar cells. A, Dendritic network of Type 2 bipolar cells in the Clm12 mouse (green) and cone pedicles (PNA labeled, red). B, Frequency histogram of the number of cone contacts of Type 2 bipolar cells. C, Dendritic trees of the Type 2 bipolar cells in A. D, Overlap of the dendritic trees in C. Scale bar: A, 25 μm; C, D, 22 μm.

Identification of Type 1 bipolar cells in Clm1 transgenic mice

In the retina of Clm1 transgenic mice, the blue cone bipolar cells (Type 9) were prominently labeled, and their selective contacts with blue cones and retinal distribution could be studied (Haverkamp et al., 2005). In addition to blue cone bipolar cells, additional bipolar cells were more weakly labeled, their labeling was patchy across the retina, and they comprised several morphological types (Duebel et al., 2006). Figure 9 shows a retinal whole mount of a Clm1 transgenic mouse that was triple labeled for Clm, NK3R, and Syt2. Type 1 and Type 2 bipolar cells together are immunoreactive for NK3R (Fig. 9A), whereas only Type 2 cells are immunolabeled for Syt2 (Fig. 9B). The superposition of NK3R and Syt2 labeling (Fig. 9C), therefore, shows Type 2 cells double labeled and Type 1 cells single labeled for NK3R. Figure 9D shows the NK3R labeling and the bipolar cells expressing Clm. Most Clm-labeled bipolar cells within that field are also immunoreactive for NK3R; hence, they are either Type 1 or Type 2 cells. Figure 9E shows for the same field Clm expression and Syt2 labeling, and none of the Clm-labeled cell bodies express Syt2, which shows that they must represent Type 1 cells. Figure 9F finally is a collapsed stack of the Clm-labeled bipolar cells, and the dendritic fields of two Type 1 cells are delineated by the white outline.

Figure 9.
Figure 9.

Whole mount of a Clm1 mouse retina, triple labeled for NK3R, Syt2, and GFP. A, NK3R-labeled bipolar cell perikarya (red). B, Same field as in A; Syt2 labeling of Type 2 cell bodies (green). C, Superposition of A and B shows that Type 2 cells are double labeled for NK3R and Syt2. Bipolar cells expressing only NK3R represent Type 1 cells. D, Same field as in A double labeled for NK3R (red) and Clm (GFP, blue). With one exception (arrowhead), all GFP-labeled, blue cell bodies express also NK3R (red). E, Same field as in A double labeled for Syt2 (green) and Clm (GFP, blue). All GFP-labeled, blue cell bodies do not express Syt2 (green). F, Same field as in A, showing the dendritic fields of the Clm (GFP, blue)-labeled bipolar cells. The two bipolar cells marked by the arrows are not immunoreactive for Syt2 in B and E but are immunoreactive for NK3R in A and D and thus represent Type 1 bipolar cells. Their dendritic fields are outlined. Scale bar, 25 μm.

To estimate the density of Type 1 cells, whole mounts were triple labeled for glypho, which labels cones, for NK3R that labels Type 1 and Type 2 cells, and for Syt2 that labels only Type 2 cells (data not shown). By subtracting the density of Syt2-labeled cells from the density of NK3R-labeled cells the density of Type 1 cells was calculated. Alternatively, the bipolar cells were counted that expressed only NK3R but not Syt2. From these counts, a mean ± SD density of Type 1 cells of 2233 ± 399/mm2 (n = 10) and a mean ± SD density of cones of 11,840 ± 1315/mm2 (n = 10) were found (Table 1). There were 5.4 ± 0.9 times (mean ± SD; n = 10) more cones than Type 1 bipolar cells. Clm1-labeled Type 1 bipolar cells contacted a mean ± SD number of 8 ± 1 cones (n = 15), and, therefore, the coverage is 8/5.4 = 1.48. All cones (leaving aside blue cones) are contacted by one or two Type 1 bipolar cells.

Identification of Type 5 bipolar cells in 5-HT3R–EGFP transgenic mice

In vertical sections through the retina of transgenic mice that express EGFP under the control of the 5-HT3R promoter, exclusively bipolar cells were labeled (Fig. 10A). Double labeling the retina for calretinin and GFP (Fig. 10B) shows that the axons of GFP-labeled bipolar cells terminate in a narrow stratum representing sublamina 3 of the IPL, which corresponds to Type 5 bipolar cells (Fig. 1) (Ghosh et al., 2004). We studied the EGFP-expressing Type 5 cells and the cones also in retinal whole mounts (Fig. 10C,D). We had no difficulties in measuring the densities of Type 5 bipolar cells together with the cone densities. We could follow the axons descending into the IPL, but the axon terminals formed such a dense, overlapping meshwork that we failed to delineate individual axon terminals. The same was true for the dendritic trees. They contacted usually more than five cone pedicles, but we could not reliably define individual dendritic trees because of the strong overlap of dendrites. The mean ± SD density of Type 5 bipolar cells was 5001 ± 631/mm2 (n = 10) at a mean ± SD cone density of 12,687 ± 1755/mm2 (n = 10).

Figure 10.
Figure 10.

Type 5 bipolar cells are labeled in the 5-HT3R–EGFP mouse retina. A, Vertical section through the retina of the 5-HT3R–EGFP mouse. B, Vertical section double labeled for GFP (green) and calretinin (red). C, D, Same field of a whole mount of a 5-HT3R–EGFP retina. C, Focus on the cell bodies of GFP-labeled bipolar cells. D, Focus on the cone pedicles marked by GluR5 immunostaining (red). Scale bar: A, B, 25 μm; C, D, 32 μm.

As can be seen in Table 1, the density of Type 5 bipolar cells is approximately twice that of other bipolar cells. We also listed at the bottom of Table 1 NK3R-immunostained cells and Type 3 cells, which both comprise two types, for comparison with the Type 5 cells. Their densities and cone to bipolar cell ratios are closely similar, and the numbers predict that 5-HT3R–EGFP (Type 5) cells actually are two types, Type 5a and Type 5b. This is supported by the dense network of their dendrites and axon terminals, which is probably the result of the superposition of two independent dendritic and axonal territories. In the rat retina, a subdivision of rat Type 5 bipolar cells by the application of antibodies against the different HCN channels HCN1, HCN2, and HCN4 has been described previously (Fyk-Kolodziej and Pourcho, 2007). However, application of the same antibodies to the mouse retina did not distinguish the Type 5a and 5b cells postulated here (F. Müller, unpublished observations). Other markers that separate mouse Type 5a and 5b cells will hopefully be found in the future.

Discussion

Is the catalog of mouse bipolar cells complete?

Five putative OFF cone bipolar cells were analyzed in the present study by selective markers (Fig. 11). Type 1 bipolar cells were found to be immunoreactive for NK3R, and they could also be identified in Clm1 transgenic mice. Type 2 bipolar cells expressed NK3R and Syt2 immunoreactivity (Fox and Sanes, 2007). Type 3a and Type 3b cells were immunostained for HCN4 and PKARIIβ, respectively (Mataruga et al., 2007), and Type 4 cells expressed calsenilin (Haverkamp et al., 2008). In the case of ON cone bipolar cells, markers for four types were described. Type 5 bipolar cells were labeled in the 5-HT3R–EGFP mouse, but they represent two types (Fig. 11, named 5a and 5b). Type 6 bipolar cells were partially identified because their axons stratifying in sublamina 4/5 express Syt2. Type 7 bipolar cells were labeled in the Gus–GFP mouse (Huang et al., 2003). Type 9, the blue cone bipolar cell, has been identified in Clm1 mice (Haverkamp et al., 2005). Rod bipolar cells have been immunostained for PKCα (Negishi et al., 1988; Greferath et al., 1990). This list suggests that, with the exception of Type 8 bipolar cells, selective markers, which stain the whole population, are available for all bipolar cell types of the mouse retina. We would argue that this catalog of 11 cone bipolar and one rod bipolar types is complete for the following reason. The sum of the bipolar cell densities listed in Table 1 is 39,975/mm2, and the average ± SD cone density is 12,867 ± 1142 (n = 10). Jeon et al. (1998) have performed a quantitative study of the major cell populations of the C57BL/6NCrl mouse retina and described an average cone density of 12,400/mm2 and an average bipolar cell density of 41,221/mm2. The difference between the bipolar cell densities of the present study and that of Jeon et al. (1998) is 1246/mm2 at a cone density of 12,400/mm2. This allows, postulating a coverage of 1, the presence of an additional bipolar cell type that contacts a minimum of 10 cones. Type 8 bipolar cells have a wide dendritic field and a wide axon terminal (Ghosh et al., 2004) and thus may represent this type. This analysis suggests that the catalog of 11 cone bipolar cells and one rod bipolar cell is complete, and all major bipolar cell types of the mouse retina appear to have been discovered.

Figure 11.
Figure 11.

Summary diagram of the bipolar cell types as defined in the present study. A total of 11 cone bipolar cells and one rod bipolar cell could be distinguished by immunocytochemical staining (outlines) or by GFP/Clomeleon expression in transgenic mouse lines (green cells).

Convergence and divergence of the cone signals

The number of cone pedicles contacted by individual bipolar cells varied from an average of 5.6 for Type 2 cells to an average of 8.4 for Type 7 cells. Midget bipolar cells, which contact a single cone in the primate retina (Polyak, 1941), have not been observed in the mouse retina. The divergence of the cone signal (coverage) varied between 1 and 2 and did not differ significantly between the bipolar cell types. However, the quantitative analysis of the present study has shown that each and all cones are connected to at least one member of any given type of bipolar cell (leaving aside the blue cone pathway) (Haverkamp et al., 2005). Consequently, each cone pedicle is connected to a minimum of 10 different bipolar cells. They represent 10 separate channels that transfer the light signal into the IPL. Parallel processing, therefore, starts at the first synapse of the retina, the cone pedicle (Boycott and Wässle, 1999; Roska and Werblin, 2001).

Dendritic field and axon territories of bipolar cells

All cones within the dendritic tree of a given bipolar cell are contacted by this cell. Cone pedicles in the center of the dendritic field receive more dendritic terminals; cone pedicles innervated by distal dendrites receive fewer contacts (Fig. 3A,B) (supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). It is, therefore, to be expected that cones in the center contribute more weight to the light response than peripheral cones, and the sensitivity profile of bipolar cells is bell shaped (Dacey et al., 2000). Distal dendrites of two neighboring bipolar cells often contact the same cone pedicle (Fig. 3F–H), which could compensate for the lower input weight to either bipolar cell. The summed sensitivity could thus be smooth giving every individual cone the same weight in the bipolar cell network (Borghuis et al., 2008).

The axon terminals of the different bipolar cell types showed a territorial behavior, and neighboring axon terminals of the same type did not overlap but filled the available space evenly with their varicosities. A comparable tiling has been described for rod bipolar axon terminals in the rabbit (Young and Vaney, 1991), for OFF midget bipolar cells in the primate (Milam et al., 1993; Wässle et al., 1994), and for calbindin-immunostained bipolar cells of the rabbit (Massey and Mills, 1996).

Such even distribution of axon terminals may also have the consequence that the output synapses of these bipolar cells are evenly distributed within their specific sublamina. An interesting question is how the precisely layered and territorial arrangement of axon terminals is formed during retinal development. Type-specific interactions have to be postulated because, as shown for the Type 3a and 3b bipolar cell axon terminals (Fig. 4B,E), terminals of different types can overlap within the same sublamina. Yamagata and Sanes (2008) have presented evidence that, during embryonic development, proteins such as Dscam and Sidekick are involved in lamina-specific segregations of neuronal processes within the IPL.

Axon terminals of neurons that project from the lamina to the medulla in Drosophila show a type-specific segregation into different layers and a territorial columnar organization, which is comparable with the bipolar cell axons of the mouse retina (Millard et al., 2007). It has been shown by Millard et al. (2007) that elimination of Dscam2 abolishes the territorial behavior of L1 axons. They proposed homophilic Dscam2 interactions between neighboring axons followed by contact-dependent repulsion as the mechanism to make axon terminals territorial. Such contact dependent repulsion of axons has also been described recently for the axons of R8 photoreceptors in Drosophila (Tomasi et al., 2008). It is an attractive idea to postulate comparable mechanisms for the development of bipolar cell axon terminals in the mouse retina.

Genetic markers of bipolar cells in the murine retina

It has been shown that expression of specific genes is required for cone bipolar cell development. Irx5, a member of the Iroquois homeobox gene family, is expressed in developing bipolar cells and is localized to a specific subset of cone bipolar cells in the mature mouse retina (Cheng et al., 2005). In Irx5-deficient mice, defects were observed in Type 2 and Type 3 cone bipolar cells. The differentiation of these two bipolar cell types has been shown previously to require the homeodomain–CVC transcription factor Vsx1 (visual system homeobox 1) (Chow et al., 2004). More recently, novel genetic markers of murine bipolar cells have been found (Kim et al., 2008a,b). They have been attributed to ON cone, OFF cone, and rod bipolar cells by RNA in situ hybridization analysis. However, an attribution to specific types has not yet been possible. Badea and Nathans (2004) were able to identify different bipolar cell types of the mouse retina by a genetically directed alkaline phosphatase reporter. They performed a cluster analysis of the labeled cells, which accounted for parameters such as stratification and diameter of axon terminals. A total of eight clusters of bipolar cells was identified, and some of the clusters showed close correspondence to the classification applied in the present study. Cluster 4 appears to represent blue cone bipolar cells (Type 9), and cluster 8 is similar to Type 8 cells.

Comparison of bipolar cell types among mammals

There are at least nine morphological types of cone bipolar cells in the mammalian retina, which have been classified according to their branching pattern, the number of cones contacted, and the shape and stratification of their axons in the IPL (cat: Famiglietti, 1981; Kolb et al., 1981; McGuire et al., 1984; Pourcho and Goebel, 1987; Cohen and Sterling, 1990a,b; rabbit: Famiglietti, 1981; Mills and Massey, 1992; Jeon and Masland, 1995; McGillem and Dacheux, 2001; monkey: Boycott and Wässle, 1991; rat: Euler and Wässle, 1995; Euler et al., 1996; mouse: Ghosh et al., 2004; Pignatelli and Strettoi, 2004). During recent years, several immunocytochemical markers of cone bipolar cells have been identified. Unfortunately, some of these markers are expressed in different bipolar cell types among different species. Recoverin immunolabeling, for instance, is expressed in OFF midget bipolar cells of the macaque monkey retina (Milam et al., 1993; Wässle et al., 1994), in OFF and ON bipolar cells of the rat retina (Euler and Wässle, 1995), and in OFF bipolar cells of the mouse retina (Haverkamp et al., 2003). In the marmoset monkey, CD15 is expressed in OFF midget and DB6 ON cone bipolar cells (Chan et al., 2001), in the rabbit, CD15 labels an ON cone bipolar cell (Brown and Masland, 1999), whereas in the mouse, CD15 is expressed in OFF cone bipolar cells (Jakobs et al., 2003; Ivanova et al., 2006). These examples show that a comparison of bipolar cell types between different species has to rely on multiple features, such as the expression of glutamate receptors (kainate or AMPA) (DeVries, 2000), the axonal stratification, and the cone convergence (midget or diffuse), and at present, a unifying classification scheme of mammalian bipolar cells is not yet possible.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR 701, PE 38/16-1). We are grateful to Dr. Hannah Monyer and Dr. Dragos Inta for providing the 5-HT3R–EGFP mouse line. We thank B. Marshallsay for technical assistance and I. Odenthal for typing this manuscript.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Heinz Wässle, Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, Deutschordenstrasse 46, D-60528 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. waessle{at}mpih-frankfurt.mpg.de

References

  1. ↵
    1. Badea TC,
    2. Nathans J
    (2004) Quantitative analysis of neuronal morphologies in the mouse retina visualized by using a genetically directed reporter. J Comp Neurol 480:331–351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Berglund K,
    2. Schleich W,
    3. Krieger P,
    4. Loo LS,
    5. Wang D,
    6. Cant NB,
    7. Feng G,
    8. Augustine GJ,
    9. Kuner T
    (2006) Imaging synaptic inhibition in transgenic mice expressing the chloride indicator, Clomeleon. Brain Cell Biol 35:207–228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Borghuis BG,
    2. Ratliff CP,
    3. Smith RG,
    4. Sterling P,
    5. Balasubramanian V
    (2008) Design of a neuronal array. J Neurosci 28:3178–3189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Boycott B,
    2. Wässle H
    (1999) Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. The Proctor Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1313–1327.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Boycott BB,
    2. Wässle H
    (1991) Morphological classification of bipolar cells in the macaque monkey retina. Eur J Neurosci 3:1069–1088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Brandstätter JH,
    2. Koulen P,
    3. Wässle H
    (1997) Selective synaptic distribution of kainate receptor subunits in the two plexiform layers of the rat retina. J Neurosci 17:9298–9307.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Brown SP,
    2. Masland RH
    (1999) Costratification of a population of bipolar cells with the direction-selective circuitry of the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol 408:97–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Chan TL,
    2. Martin PR,
    3. Clunas N,
    4. Grünert U
    (2001) Bipolar cell diversity in the primate retina: morphologic and immunocytochemical analysis of a new world monkey, the marmoset Callithrix jacchus. J Comp Neurol 437:219–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chang B,
    2. Heckenlively JR,
    3. Bayley PR,
    4. Brecha NC,
    5. Davisson MT,
    6. Hawes NL,
    7. Hirano AA,
    8. Hurd RE,
    9. Ikeda A,
    10. Johnson BA,
    11. McCall MA,
    12. Morgans CW,
    13. Nusinowitz S,
    14. Peachey NS,
    15. Rice DS,
    16. Vessey KA,
    17. Gregg RG
    (2006) The nob2 mouse, a null mutation in Cacna1f: anatomical and functional abnormalities in the outer retina and their consequences on ganglion cell visual responses. Vis Neurosci 23:11–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Cheng CW,
    2. Chow RL,
    3. Lebel M,
    4. Sakuma R,
    5. Cheung HO,
    6. Thanabalasingham V,
    7. Zhang X,
    8. Bruneau BG,
    9. Birch DG,
    10. Hui CC,
    11. McInnes RR,
    12. Cheng SH
    (2005) The Iroquois homeobox gene, Irx5, is required for retinal cone bipolar cell development. Dev Biol 287:48–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Chow RL,
    2. Volgyi B,
    3. Szilard RK,
    4. Ng D,
    5. McKerlie C,
    6. Bloomfield SA,
    7. Birch DG,
    8. McInnes RR
    (2004) Control of late off-center cone bipolar cell differentiation and visual signaling by the homeobox gene Vsx1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:1754–1759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Cohen E,
    2. Sterling P
    (1990a) Demonstration of cell types among cone bipolar neurons of cat retina. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 330:305–321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Cohen E,
    2. Sterling P
    (1990b) Convergence and divergence of cones onto bipolar cells in the central area of the cat retina. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 330:323–328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dacey D,
    2. Packer OS,
    3. Diller L,
    4. Brainard D,
    5. Peterson B,
    6. Lee B
    (2000) Center surround receptive field structure of cone bipolar cells in primate retina. Vision Res 40:1801–1811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. DeVries SH
    (2000) Bipolar cells use kainate and AMPA receptors to filter visual information into separate channels. Neuron 28:847–856.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Dhingra A,
    2. Sulaiman P,
    3. Xu Y,
    4. Fina ME,
    5. Veh RW,
    6. Vardi N
    (2008) Probing neurochemical structure and function of retinal ON bipolar cells with a transgenic mouse. J Comp Neurol 510:484–496.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Duebel J,
    2. Haverkamp S,
    3. Schleich W,
    4. Feng G,
    5. Augustine GJ,
    6. Kuner T,
    7. Euler T
    (2006) Two-photon imaging reveals somatodendritic chloride gradient in retinal ON-type bipolar cells expressing the biosensor clomeleon. Neuron 49:81–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Euler T,
    2. Wässle H
    (1995) Immunocytochemical identification of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina. J Comp Neurol 361:461–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Euler T,
    2. Schneider H,
    3. Wässle H
    (1996) Glutamate responses of bipolar cells in a slice preparation of the rat retina. J Neurosci 16:2934–2944.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Famiglietti EV Jr.
    (1981) Functional architecture of cone bipolar cells in mammalian retina. Vision Res 21:1559–1563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Feng G,
    2. Mellor RH,
    3. Bernstein M,
    4. Keller-Peck C,
    5. Nguyen QT,
    6. Wallace M,
    7. Nerbonne JM,
    8. Lichtman JW,
    9. Sanes JR
    (2000) Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28:41–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Fox MA,
    2. Sanes JR
    (2007) Synaptotagmin I and II are present in distinct subsets of central synapses. J Comp Neurol 503:280–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Fyk-Kolodziej B,
    2. Pourcho RG
    (2007) Differential distribution of hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in cone bipolar cells of the rat retina. J Comp Neurol 501:891–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ghosh KK,
    2. Bujan S,
    3. Haverkamp S,
    4. Feigenspan A,
    5. Wässle H
    (2004) Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 469:70–82, Erratum (2004) 476:202–203].
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Greferath U,
    2. Grünert U,
    3. Wässle H
    (1990) Rod bipolar cells in the mammalian retina show protein kinase C-like immunoreactivity. J Comp Neurol 301:433–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Hack I,
    2. Peichl L,
    3. Brandstätter JH
    (1999) An alternative pathway for rod signals in the rodent retina: rod photoreceptors, cone bipolar cells, and the localization of glutamate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14130–14135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Hack I,
    2. Frech M,
    3. Dick O,
    4. Peichl L,
    5. Brandstätter JH
    (2001) Heterogeneous distribution of AMPA glutamate receptor subunits at the photoreceptor synapses of rodent retina. Eur J Neurosci 13:15–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hartveit E
    (1997) Functional organization of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina. J Neurophysiol 77:1716–1730.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Haverkamp S,
    2. Grünert U,
    3. Wässle H
    (2001) Localization of kainate receptors at the cone pedicles of the primate retina. J Comp Neurol 436:471–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Haverkamp S,
    2. Ghosh KK,
    3. Hirano AA,
    4. Wässle H
    (2003) Immunocytochemical description of five bipolar cell types of the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 455:463–476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Haverkamp S,
    2. Wässle H,
    3. Duebel J,
    4. Kuner T,
    5. Augustine GJ,
    6. Feng G,
    7. Euler T
    (2005) The primordial, blue cone color system of the mouse retina. J Neurosci 25:5438–5445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Haverkamp S,
    2. Specht D,
    3. Majumdar S,
    4. Zaidi NF,
    5. Brandstätter JH,
    6. Wasco W,
    7. Wässle H,
    8. Tom Dieck S
    (2008) Type 4 OFF cone bipolar cells of the mouse retina express calsenilin and contact cones as well as rods. J Comp Neurol 507:1087–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Haverkamp S,
    2. Inta D,
    3. Monyer H,
    4. Wässle H
    (2009) Characterization of green fluorescent protein expressing retinal neurons in four transgenic mouse lines. Neuroscience, in press.
  34. ↵
    1. Hornstein EP,
    2. Verweij J,
    3. Schnapf JL
    (2004) Electrical coupling between red and green cones in primate retina. Nat Neurosci 7:745–750.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Huang L,
    2. Max M,
    3. Margolskee RF,
    4. Su H,
    5. Masland RH,
    6. Euler T
    (2003) G protein subunit Gγ13 is coexpressed with Gαo, Gβ3, and Gβ4 in retinal ON bipolar cells. J Comp Neurol 455:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Ivanova E,
    2. Müller U,
    3. Wässle H
    (2006) Characterization of the glycinergic input to bipolar cells of the mouse retina. Eur J Neurosci 23:350–364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Jakobs TC,
    2. Ben Y,
    3. Masland RH
    (2003) CD15 immunoreactive antacrine cells in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 465:361–371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Jeon CJ,
    2. Masland RH
    (1995) A population of wide-field bipolar cells in the rabbit's retina. J Comp Neurol 360:403–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Jeon CJ,
    2. Strettoi E,
    3. Masland RH
    (1998) The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J Neurosci 18:8936–8946.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Keeley PW,
    2. Whitney IE,
    3. Raven MA,
    4. Reese BE
    (2007) Dendritic spread and functional coverage of starburst amacrine cells. J Comp Neurol 505:539–546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Kim DS,
    2. Ross SE,
    3. Trimarchi JM,
    4. Aach J,
    5. Greenberg ME,
    6. Cepko CL
    (2008a) Identification of molecular markers of bipolar cells in the murine retina. J Comp Neurol 507:1795–1810.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kim DS,
    2. Matsuda T,
    3. Cepko CL
    (2008b) A core paired-type and POU homeodomain-containing transcription factor program drives retinal bipolar cell gene expression. J Neurosci 28:7748–7764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Djamgoz MBA,
    2. Archer SN,
    3. Vallerga S
    1. Kolb H,
    2. Nelson R
    (1995) in Neurobiology and clinical aspects of the outer retina, The organization of photoreceptor to bipolar synapses in the outer plexiform layer, eds Djamgoz MBA, Archer SN, Vallerga S (Chapman and Hall, London), pp 273–296.
  44. ↵
    1. Kolb H,
    2. Nelson R,
    3. Mariani A
    (1981) Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: a Golgi study. Vision Res 21:1081–1114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Lin B,
    2. Masland RH
    (2005) Synaptic contacts between an identified type of ON cone bipolar cell and ganglion cells in the mouse retina. Eur J Neurosci 21:1257–1270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Masland RH
    (2001) The fundamental plan of the retina. Nat Neurosci 4:877–886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Massey SC,
    2. Mills SL
    (1996) A calbindin-immunoreactive cone bipolar cell type in the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol 366:15–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Mataruga A,
    2. Kremmer E,
    3. Müller F
    (2007) Type 3a and Type 3b OFF cone bipolar cells provide for the alternative rod pathway in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 502:1123–1137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. McGillem GS,
    2. Dacheux RF
    (2001) Rabbit cone bipolar cells: correlation of their morphologies with whole-cell recordings. Vis Neurosci 18:675–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. McGuire BA,
    2. Stevens JK,
    3. Sterling P
    (1984) Microcircuitry of bipolar cells in cat retina. J Neurosci 4:2920–2938.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  51. ↵
    1. Milam AH,
    2. Dacey DM,
    3. Dizhoor AM
    (1993) Recoverin immunoreactivity in mammalian cone bipolar cells. Vis Neurosci 10:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Millard SS,
    2. Flanagan JJ,
    3. Pappu KS,
    4. Wu W,
    5. Zipursky SL
    (2007) Dscam2 mediates axonal tiling in the Drosophila visual system. Nature 447:720–724.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Mills SL,
    2. Massey SC
    (1992) Morphology of bipolar cells labeled by DAPI in the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol 321:133–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Negishi K,
    2. Kato S,
    3. Teranishi T
    (1988) Dopamine cells and rod bipolar cells contain protein kinase C-like immunoreactivity in some vertebrate retinas. Neurosci Lett 94:247–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Nomura A,
    2. Shigemoto R,
    3. Nakamura Y,
    4. Okamoto N,
    5. Mizuno N,
    6. Nakanishi S
    (1994) Developmentally regulated postsynaptic localization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor in rat rod bipolar cells. Cell 77:361–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Pfeiffer-Guglielmi B,
    2. Fleckenstein B,
    3. Jung G,
    4. Hamprecht B
    (2003) Immunocytochemical localization of glycogen phosphorylase isozymes in rat nervous tissues by using isozyme-specific antibodies. J Neurochem 85:73–81.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Pignatelli V,
    2. Strettoi E
    (2004) Bipolar cells of the mouse retina: a gene gun, morphological study. J Comp Neurol 476:254–266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Polyak SL
    (1941) The retina (University of Chicago, Chicago).
  59. ↵
    1. Pourcho RG,
    2. Goebel DJ
    (1987) A combined Golgi and autoradiograpphic study of 3H-glycine-accumulating cone bipolar cells in the cat retina. J Neurosci 7:1178–1188.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  60. ↵
    1. Raven MA,
    2. Stagg SB,
    3. Reese BE
    (2005) Regularity and packing of the horizontal cell mosaic in different strains of mice. Vis Neurosci 22:461–468.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Reese BE,
    2. Raven MA,
    3. Stagg SB
    (2005) Afferents and homotypic neighbors regulate horizontal cell morphology, connectivity, and retinal coverage. J Neurosci 25:2167–2175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Roska B,
    2. Werblin F
    (2001) Vertical interactions across ten parallel, stacked representations in the mammalian retina. Nature 410:583–587.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Strettoi E,
    2. Pignatelli V
    (2000) Modifications of retinal neurons in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:11020–11025.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Szél A,
    2. Röhlich P,
    3. Caffé AR,
    4. Juliusson B,
    5. Aguirre G,
    6. Van Veen T
    (1992) Unique topographic separation of two spectral classes of cones in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 325:327–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Tomasi T,
    2. Hakeda-Suzuki S,
    3. Ohler S,
    4. Schleiffer A,
    5. Suzuki T
    (2008) The transmembrane protein golden goal regulates R8 photoreceptor axon-axon and axon-target interactions. Neuron 57:691–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Wässle H
    (2004) Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:747–757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Basbaum AI,
    2. Kaneko A,
    3. Shepherd GM,
    4. Westheimer G
    1. Wässle H
    (2008) in The senses: a comprehensive reference, Decomposing a cone's output (parallel processing) eds Basbaum AI, Kaneko A, Shepherd GM, Westheimer G (Academic, San Diego), pp 313–340.
  68. ↵
    1. Wässle H,
    2. Grünert U,
    3. Martin PR,
    4. Boycott BB
    (1994) Immunocytochemical characterization and spatial distribution of midget bipolar cells in the macaque monkey retina. Vision Res 34:561–579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Whitney IE,
    2. Keeley PW,
    3. Raven MA,
    4. Reese BE
    (2008) Spatial patterning of cholinergic amacrine cells in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol 508:1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Wong GT,
    2. Ruiz-Avila L,
    3. Margolskee RF
    (1999) Directing gene expression to gustducin-positive taste receptor cells. J Neurosci 19:5802–5809.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Yamagata M,
    2. Sanes JR
    (2008) Dscam and Sidekick proteins direct lamina-specific synaptic connections in vertebrate retina. Nature 451:465–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Young HM,
    2. Vaney DI
    (1991) Rod-signal interneurons in the rabbit retina. 1. Rod bipolar cells. J Comp Neurol 310:139–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Cone Contacts, Mosaics, and Territories of Bipolar Cells in the Mouse Retina
Heinz Wässle, Christian Puller, Frank Müller, Silke Haverkamp
Journal of Neuroscience 7 January 2009, 29 (1) 106-117; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4442-08.2009
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.