Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Commentary

We've Got NERVE: A Call to Arms for Neuroscience Education

Kyle J. Frantz, Colleen D. McNerney and Nicholas C. Spitzer
Journal of Neuroscience 18 March 2009, 29 (11) 3337-3339; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0001-09.2009
Kyle J. Frantz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colleen D. McNerney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas C. Spitzer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Are we neuroscientists doing our part to help revive science education, to stimulate teachers' ingenuity, and diversify the intellectual capital among the next generation of scientists? Certainly we support progressive initiatives, including a major international Brain Awareness Campaign, local chapter grants for Society for Neuroscience (SfN) members, and activist committees for media relations, but are we doing enough? To enable neuroscientists worldwide to step out of the laboratory or office periodically to visit nontraditional neuroscience education venues, the Society for Neuroscience Public Education and Communication Committee has launched NERVE, the Neuroscience Education Resources Virtual Encycloportal (Fig. 1). This web-based compendium of teaching materials went live in September 2008 and has already received >10,000 visits from >100 countries around the globe. NERVE's offerings are many: videos to stimulate discussion at town hall meetings, lesson plans for visits to local schools, and hands-on activities to break up long lectures, just to name a few. Regardless of the topic or venue, NERVE aims to meet our neuroscience education needs.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

NERVE home page.

The state of science education today surely calls for our involvement. Scientific advance has always required nurturing young minds and bringing fresh perspectives into the scientific community, but high demands on often under-prepared teachers working in ill-equipped classrooms can result in some uninspiring science education efforts and a decline in the versatility of the global workforce. One alarming example is that only 28% of United States high-school students are well prepared for college-level biology (American College Testing, 2008). Particularly now that we are faced with a global economic crisis, threats to environmental stability, and rapidly expanding technological demands, scientists and teachers worldwide need to revolutionize their approaches to education (DeHaan, 2005) and avoid declines in science literacy that may jeopardize scientific advancement and future economic growth [National Science Board (NSB), 2004; Teachers College, 2005; Committee for Economic Development (CED), 2006; American Electronics Association, 2007].

Recommendations for change in education emphasize active teaching and learning approaches, real-world applications, problem-based formats, and inquiry in and outside the classroom [National Research Council (NRC), 1996, 2000, 2003a,b, 2005; NSB, 2004; CED, 2006]. Neuroscience, with its many facets, lends easily to these approaches (Moreno, 1999; Cameron and Chudler, 2003). The study of brains, nervous systems, and behavior has wide appeal to learners of all ages with curiosities and concerns in areas such as learning and neurogenesis, memory loss and neurodegenerative disease, drug addiction and stress, traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder, phantom limbs, savantism, and even synesthesia. Interactive models, exciting videos, and detailed graphics can effectively demonstrate basic concepts in neuroscience, as can excited neuroscientists. We can and must play a role in ensuring that education systems produce the next generation of critically needed scientists and innovators.

In fact, neuroscientists have both the opportunity and the responsibility to serve their communities as stewards of science (Zardetto-Smith et al., 2006). As members of the SfN, we should endorse the mission of the Society, which exhorts us to “promote public information and general education about the nature of scientific discovery and the results and implications of the latest neuroscience research” (Society for Neuroscience, 2009). Many Society members heed this call already by leading Brain Awareness Campaigns around the globe, promoting and obtaining grants for education initiatives, and providing countless informal classroom visits, lab tours, and research apprenticeships. Underscoring these important steps toward emphasizing education, 50% of SfN members wishing to be more involved in the Society expressed a specific desire to participate in public education and outreach to schools, according to a 2007 membership survey (Society for Neuroscience, 2007). Nevertheless, our field lags behind others. Physicists teamed up a decade ago to create a Force Concept Inventory that probes student understanding of basic ideas related to Newtonian force (Hestenes et al., 1992). This inventory is based on qualitative research that revealed student misconceptions; it has been validated in many student populations, and is disseminated widely for course assessment purposes. The American Physiological Society publishes Advances in Physiology Education and the American Society for Cell Biology together with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute publishes CBE—Life Sciences Education; both are quarterly education journals. Peer-reviewed publications in these journals report results from education research partnerships between education and basic science faculty members, and provide data on the best practices for teaching physics and life sciences. Neuroscientists should work toward establishing the core faculty members, community, goals, and partnerships that will support them in igniting the interests of our novice, but very curious, student counterparts.

To progress toward providing solid neuroscience education for all members of our local communities, the Society for Neuroscience Public Education and Communication Committee presents NERVE. This web-based Neuroscience Education Resources Virtual Encycloportal is as jam-packed with teaching and learning links as it sounds. The purpose of NERVE is to provide easy access to good education tools. Hundreds of resources are categorized and searchable by general topic, grade level, format (e.g., web resource, video, PDF), or a Google search within the site. NERVE is dynamic, updated weekly, and invites users to submit new resources, suggest additional topics, and provide feedback. With many resources aligned to United States national science education teaching standards (NRC, 1996), it is easy to identify learning objectives to help fulfill classroom requirements. At our fingertips, we will be pleased to find resources such as “Dangerous Decibels,” a K–8 curriculum on the anatomy and physiology of hearing, hearing loss, and noise pollution. Already complete with online interactive games and diagrams, a downloadable teacher's guide, and worksheets to help assess student learning, “Dangerous Decibels” (or other modules like it) can easily be combined with a short slide presentation on our own neuroscience research to round out exciting and informative classroom visits. Alternatively, NERVE provides ideas for Brain Awareness activities, teacher professional development workshops, and even university classes. Many of the grade 9–12 resources are easily modified for more advanced students. If you would like to contribute resources to NERVE, please use the “Suggest a Resource” button on the site, which puts you in direct contact with the site curator.

Have we considered increasing our involvement in education initiatives, but felt hindered by the “publish or perish” realities of tenure dossiers and grant reviews? Consider this: science education research is a rigorous and well developed field of scholarly activity, complete with myriad peer-reviewed journals and a searchable database, the Education Resources Information Center. In partnership with colleagues in education research, basic scientists can learn to take a scientific approach to teaching: make observations, identify a problem, search existing literature for theoretical explanations or methods of exploration, develop hypotheses, test them, modify hypotheses, repeat, and publish (Handelsman et al., 2004). The end result might help to transition activities often called “service” into accomplishments called “professional development” by contributing scholarly work to a diverse publication record including science education research reports, as well as basic clinical, bench, or field research reports.

With an area of scientific focus as intriguing and prominent as neuroscience, we owe it to the world to get involved in science education. To accelerate the progress already underway in neuroscience education, NERVE eases scientists from the lab into education settings by posting links to excellent education resources on many topics for various audiences. If we couple NERVE with a rigorous approach to our teaching opportunities, then we can contribute valuable data to the education research field while diversifying our own career portfolios. So heed this call to education arms. We've got NERVE for neuroscience education; let's use it.

References

  1. ↵
    1. American College Testing
    (2008) ACT high school profile, HS graduating class of 2008, National Report, Code 999999. Retrieved February 13, 2009 from http://www.act.org/news/data/08/data.html.
  2. ↵
    1. American Electronics Association
    (2007) Losing the competitive advantage: the challenge for science and technology in the United States. Retrieved March 9, 2009 from http://www.aeanet.org/Publications/idjj_CompetitivenessMain2007.asp.
  3. ↵
    1. Cameron W,
    2. Chudler E
    (2003) A role for neuroscientists in engaging young minds. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:763–768.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Committee for Economic Development
    (2006) Learning for the future: changing the culture of math and science education to ensure a competitive workforce. Retrieved February 18, 2009 from http://www.ced.org/docs/report/report_scientists.pdf.
  5. ↵
    1. DeHaan RL
    (2005) The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. J Sci Educ Tech 14:253–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Handelsman J,
    2. Ebert-May D,
    3. Beichner R,
    4. Bruns P,
    5. Chang A,
    6. DeHaan R,
    7. Gentile J,
    8. Lauffer S,
    9. Stewart J,
    10. Tilghman SM,
    11. Wood WB
    (2004) Scientific teaching. Science 304:521–522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Hestenes D,
    2. Wells M,
    3. Swackhamer G
    (1992) Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher 30:141–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Moreno N
    (1999) K–12 science education reform—a primer for scientists. BioScience 49:569–576.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. National Research Council
    (1996) National science education standards (National Academies, Washington, DC).
  10. ↵
    1. Bransford JD,
    2. Brown AL,
    3. Cocking RR,
    4. Donovan MS,
    5. Pellegrino JW
    1. National Research Council
    (2000) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school, eds Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, Donovan MS, Pellegrino JW (Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National Academies, Washington, DC).
  11. ↵
    1. National Research Council
    (2003a) BIO 2010, transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists (Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century, National Academies, Washington, DC).
  12. ↵
    1. National Research Council
    (2003b) Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: report of a workshop (Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academies, Washington, DC).
  13. ↵
    1. Donovan MS,
    2. Bransford JD
    1. National Research Council
    (2005) How students learn: science in the classroom, eds Donovan MS, Bransford JD (Committee on How People Learn, National Academies, Washington, DC).
  14. ↵
    1. National Science Board
    (2004) A companion to science and engineering indicators. Retrieved Frebruary 13, 2009 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsb0407/.
  15. ↵
    1. Society for Neuroscience
    (2007) Membership survey (McKinley Marketing, Washington, DC).
  16. ↵
    1. Society for Neuroscience
    (2009) Mission statement (Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC).
  17. ↵
    1. Teachers College
    (2005) the Campaign for Educational Equity Inaugural Symposium (October, New York), Social costs of inadequate education. Paper presented at.
  18. ↵
    1. Zardetto-Smith AM,
    2. Mu K,
    3. Carruth LL,
    4. Frantz KJ
    (2006) Brains rule!: A model program for developing professional stewardship among neuroscientists. CBE Life Sci Educ 5:158–166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (11)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 11
18 Mar 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
We've Got NERVE: A Call to Arms for Neuroscience Education
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
We've Got NERVE: A Call to Arms for Neuroscience Education
Kyle J. Frantz, Colleen D. McNerney, Nicholas C. Spitzer
Journal of Neuroscience 18 March 2009, 29 (11) 3337-3339; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0001-09.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
We've Got NERVE: A Call to Arms for Neuroscience Education
Kyle J. Frantz, Colleen D. McNerney, Nicholas C. Spitzer
Journal of Neuroscience 18 March 2009, 29 (11) 3337-3339; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0001-09.2009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Neuroscience Milestones: Developing Standardized Core-Competencies for Research-Based Neuroscience Trainees
  • Lessons from the Stories of Women in Neuroscience
  • Toward an Anti-Racist Approach to Biomedical and Neuroscience Research
Show more Commentary
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.