Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Short-Latency Activation of Striatal Spiny Neurons via Subcortical Visual Pathways

Jan M. Schulz, Peter Redgrave, Carsten Mehring, Ad Aertsen, Koreen M. Clements, Jeff R. Wickens and John N. J. Reynolds
Journal of Neuroscience 13 May 2009, 29 (19) 6336-6347; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4815-08.2009
Jan M. Schulz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Redgrave
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carsten Mehring
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ad Aertsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koreen M. Clements
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff R. Wickens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John N. J. Reynolds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Morphological and electrophysiological properties of striatal spiny neurons. A, Biocytin-filled spiny neuron. The dendrites are densely studded with spines. B, Membrane potential response to linear current steps. The inset shows the current–voltage relationship; the input resistance was derived from the slope of the regression line.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effects of light flash stimulation on spontaneous activity of a spiny neuron (representative example). A, Top, All-amplitude histogram generated from a 9 s segment of recording. Thresholds for detection of up-state transitions are indicated. Bottom, A sample of the smoothed trace from the same recording. Up threshold (dotted line), down-state onsets (triangles), 200 ms interval for amplitude measurement (black bar), and up-state latency (lat.) are indicated (for definitions, see Materials and Methods). B, C, Left, Time-resolved probability distribution for the neuron to depolarize from the down-state membrane potential (y-axis) during no-light epochs (B) (n = 34 random sample from 236) and light epochs (C) (n = 30); black depicts a high probability, the lightest gray shade represents one trial; timescale is the same as in C. Right, Amplitude distributions of depolarizations from the down state. Note that, after a light flash, stronger depolarizations were measured in this neuron (6.5 vs 2.3 mV; Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p < 0.01). D, The distribution of up-state latencies reveals shortened latencies after light flash stimulation (255 ms; compared with 312 ms for no light; Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p < 0.05).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Typical effects of BIC ejection into the SC on spontaneous and visual-evoked neural activity. A, Immediate effects of BIC ejection into the SC on fluctuations in neural activity in the striatum (top), cortex (middle), and superior colliculus (bottom). B, Before BIC (left), the spiny neuron showed no visual response, only the normal spontaneously occurring up states. Note the absence of a VEP in the LFP recorded from the SC (bottom trace). After BIC (right), when a strong negative deflection marked the VEP in the SC, light stimulation evoked a short-latency up transition in the spiny neuron.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Time course of visual responsiveness induced by BIC ejection into the SC in dopamine-intact and AMPT-treated animals. A–D, Medians of up-state latencies (A, B) and early depolarization amplitudes measured from the down state (C, D) are shown as mean ± SEM across neurons. Time on the x-axis is given in relation to BIC ejection (dotted line at 0). Dashed lines, No-light epochs; solid lines, light epochs in neurons from AMPT-treated (n = 7) and untreated animals (n = 7). The asterisks above each subplot indicate significant differences between no-light and light epochs at 5 min after BIC ejection (Wilcoxon's signed rank test, p < 0.05). Note the similar time course and magnitude of visual responses in the AMPT-treated and untreated group after BIC (Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p > 0.1). Also, note the tendency to smaller early depolarization amplitudes in light as well as no-light epochs of the AMPT-treated group before and >15 min after BIC.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Effects of BIC on visual responsiveness of the SC and a spiny neuron in single trials. Time on the x-axis is given in relation to BIC ejection (dashed line at 0). A, Time-resolved membrane potential distribution. Grayscale indicates the probability for the neuron to be at a respective membrane potential (y-axis); black depicts a high probability, and white depicts a low probability. Colored circles indicate point of early depolarization amplitude achieved during the first 200 ms after the light flash; a red circle indicates that the SC was visually responsive at the time (see C). B, Up-state latencies of light responses. Note the consistently short latencies when the SC was responsive (red circles). C, Amplitudes of the collicular VEP. Amplitudes after BIC exceeding the 99th percentile of no-light responses (indicated by the horizontal dotted line) were considered as significant visual responses (red circles). D, The EEG power at 1 Hz. Note the decrease after BIC ejection. E, F, Scatter plots of up-state latencies (E; from B) and early depolarization amplitudes (F; from A) versus the amplitude of the VEP (from C). The vertical dotted lines represent the 99th percentile of SC no-light responses. Only data points of significant collicular VEPs after BIC were included in the regression fits (red circles). Correlation coefficients (R2) were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Changes in visual sensitivity of primary visual cortex and striatal spiny neurons are not correlated. The left panels show a typical example of a mean cortical VEP before (gray) and after (black) BIC ejection; lighter shades indicate SEM. The right panels show distribution of up-state latencies measured simultaneously (except in C) in a striatal spiny neuron in box plots; median (central line), quartiles (bar limits), range (error bars), and outliers (+) are indicated. The asterisks indicate that latencies are significantly shorter than in light epochs before BIC (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). A, BIC ejection into the SC induces visual responses in spiny neurons but also affects the cortical VEP. B, BIC ejected into the visual cortex increases the VEP recorded through the adjacent LFP electrode but fails to induce visual responsiveness in the striatal spiny neuron. C, The cortical VEP (gray) recorded before the penetration of the neuron is suppressed after MUS ejection onto the cortex (black). Nevertheless, BIC ejection into the SC still induces visual responses in the spiny neuron.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Effects of muscimol-mediated inhibition of the parafascicular nucleus of the thalamus on BIC-induced visual responses in a spiny neuron in single trials. Time on the x-axis is given in relation to first BIC ejection (dashed line at 0). Time of combined muscimol/baclofen (MUS) ejection into the parafascicular nucleus is indicated (arrows). A, Time-resolved membrane potential distribution. Grayscale indicates the probability for the neuron to be at the respective membrane potential (y-axis); black depicts a high probability, and white depicts a low probability. The colored circles indicate the early depolarization amplitude measured from the down state during the first 200 ms after light flash; a red circle indicates that the SC is visually responsive at the same time (see C). B, Up-state latencies of light responses. Note the relatively longer latencies in response to BIC after the second MUS ejection. C, Amplitudes of the collicular VEP. The 99th percentile of no-light responses is indicated by the horizontal dotted line. D, E, Scatter plots of up-state latencies (D; from B) and early depolarization amplitudes (E; from A) versus the amplitude of the VEP (from C) before and after both ejections of MUS (constructed over the periods indicated by gray bars below A). The dotted vertical lines represent the 99th percentile of SC no-light responses. Only data points of significant collicular VEPs after BIC were included in the regression fits (red circles). The asterisks at R2 values indicate a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05). Note that the early depolarization amplitudes were greatly decreased after MUS despite the repeated ability to induce a significant VEP in the SC after BIC, indicating that the most direct transmission pathway from the SC to the striatum had been blocked.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of results from intracellular recordings during light and no-light epochs

    Up-state latency (ms)Early depolarization amplitude (mV)
    No lightLightNo lightLight
    No treatment (n = 14)Baseline394 ± 23319 ± 271.8 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.7
    BIC into SC (n = 7)Baseline531 ± 59475 ± 531.5 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.5
    5 min after SC BIC358 ± 71115 ± 144.2 ± 1.313.3 ± 1.8
    AMPT/BIC into SC (n = 7)Baseline375 ± 23359 ± 190.5 ± 0.21.9 ± 0.3b
    5 min after SC BIC338 ± 39125 ± 83.3 ± 0.813.7 ± 2.1
    BIC into Cx (n = 4)Baseline491 ± 54480 ± 551.9 ± 0.83.6 ± 0.7
    5 min after Cx BIC490 ± 62505 ± 80a1.7 ± 0.62.6 ± 0.8a
    MUS onto Cx (n = 4)Baseline after MUS699 ± 204652 ± 2500.7 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.3b
    5 min after SC BIC411 ± 68136 ± 171.7 ± 0.613.4 ± 3.0
    MUS/BAC into thalamus (n = 5)Baseline after MUS/BAC725 ± 93768 ± 1290.7 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.3b
    5 min after SC BIC463 ± 77215 ± 39a1.1 ± 0.33.2 ± 0.7a
    • BIC ejection into the SC induced visual responses characterized by short up-state latencies and large early depolarization amplitudes measured from the down state (highlighted).

    • ↵aA significantly weaker visual response after BIC compared with the BIC into SC group (Wilcoxon's rank sum test, p < 0.05). Note that (1) BIC ejection into the cortex (Cx) failed to induce increased visual responsiveness and that (2) only MUS/BAC ejection into the thalamus significantly diminished visual response strength after BIC into the SC.

    • ↵bSignificantly decreased membrane potential fluctuations at baseline induced by AMPT or MUS pretreatment (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon's rank sum test).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (19)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 19
13 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Short-Latency Activation of Striatal Spiny Neurons via Subcortical Visual Pathways
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Short-Latency Activation of Striatal Spiny Neurons via Subcortical Visual Pathways
Jan M. Schulz, Peter Redgrave, Carsten Mehring, Ad Aertsen, Koreen M. Clements, Jeff R. Wickens, John N. J. Reynolds
Journal of Neuroscience 13 May 2009, 29 (19) 6336-6347; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4815-08.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Short-Latency Activation of Striatal Spiny Neurons via Subcortical Visual Pathways
Jan M. Schulz, Peter Redgrave, Carsten Mehring, Ad Aertsen, Koreen M. Clements, Jeff R. Wickens, John N. J. Reynolds
Journal of Neuroscience 13 May 2009, 29 (19) 6336-6347; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4815-08.2009
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
  • Individual Differences in Amygdala-Medial Prefrontal Anatomy Link Negative Affect, Impaired Social Functioning, and Polygenic Depression Risk
  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.