Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Brief Communications

Short-Latency Influence of Medial Frontal Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex during Action Selection under Conflict

Rogier B. Mars, Miriam C. Klein, Franz-Xaver Neubert, Etienne Olivier, Ethan R. Buch, Erie D. Boorman and Matthew F. S. Rushworth
Journal of Neuroscience 27 May 2009, 29 (21) 6926-6931; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1396-09.2009
Rogier B. Mars
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miriam C. Klein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franz-Xaver Neubert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etienne Olivier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ethan R. Buch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erie D. Boorman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew F. S. Rushworth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    a, On each trial of the action reprogramming task participants were presented with a centrally displayed white square. Subsequently, two colored flankers (red and green, sides random) appeared on either side of fixation. Four hundred and fifty to six hundred milliseconds after flanker onset, a central colored cue appeared, to which participants responded with the index finger of the hand on the side with the congruent color. Trials were blocked into groups with the same cue color, so that as soon as flankers were presented, participants could anticipate and thus prepare an action based on the cue color presented in the previous trial. The prepared response would, however, be incorrect when the central cue color changed from one trial to the next (switch trials, boxed letters). Correct actions are indicated by “R” (right) and “L” (left). b, The M1 test pulse was applied 75, 125, or 175 ms after the central color cue onset. A pre-SMA conditioning pulse preceded the M1 test pulse by 6 ms on half of the TMS trials.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    a, In the switch and stay experiments, the test coil (black) was placed over left M1, whereas the conditioning coil (white) was placed over pre-SMA. b, Example of MEPs recorded on a single pulse (black) and a dual pulse (gray) trial. The conditioning pulse can modulate peak-to-peak MEP amplitude. c, Sagittal views of the mean anatomical image indicating pre-SMA (left) and M1 (right) TMS sites. Each circle represents the coil location in one participant.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    a, Behavioral data in the main switch and stay experiments indicate participants reported faster (top) and more accurate (bottom) on switch compared with stay trials. b, The effect of pre-SMA conditioning pulses on M1 test pulse-elicited MEP amplitudes was specific to behavioral context and SOA. Pre-SMA/M1 functional connectivity significantly increased on switch trials. * indicates significant modulation of MEP amplitudes in dual-pulse compared with respective single-pulse trials. c, Context-specific facilitations of MEP amplitude at a SOA of 125 ms were only present when the conditioning coil was place over pre-SMA and were absent when the conditioning coil was over PMd or M1.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Additional results. a, Significant MEP facilitation was seen when switching toward the contralateral hand at 6 and 12 ms interpulse intervals, but no significant effect was seen when switching to the ipsilateral hand. b, A negative correlation was present between the relative facilitation of the contralateral, compared with the ipsilateral, hand and the RT on switch trials. c, Example location of significant correlation between MEP effect size and white matter intensity and scatter plot of individual data within this cluster.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (21)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 21
27 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Short-Latency Influence of Medial Frontal Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex during Action Selection under Conflict
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Short-Latency Influence of Medial Frontal Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex during Action Selection under Conflict
Rogier B. Mars, Miriam C. Klein, Franz-Xaver Neubert, Etienne Olivier, Ethan R. Buch, Erie D. Boorman, Matthew F. S. Rushworth
Journal of Neuroscience 27 May 2009, 29 (21) 6926-6931; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1396-09.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Short-Latency Influence of Medial Frontal Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex during Action Selection under Conflict
Rogier B. Mars, Miriam C. Klein, Franz-Xaver Neubert, Etienne Olivier, Ethan R. Buch, Erie D. Boorman, Matthew F. S. Rushworth
Journal of Neuroscience 27 May 2009, 29 (21) 6926-6931; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1396-09.2009
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Brief Communications

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.