Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Does Asynchronous Neuronal Activity Average out on a Macroscopic Scale?

Tjeerd W. Boonstra, Sanne Houweling and Michael Muskulus
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2009, 29 (28) 8871-8874; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2020-09.2009
Tjeerd W. Boonstra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanne Houweling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Muskulus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Spectral analysis of simple models of neuronal activity. A, Typical spike train generated by a single Poisson process. B, The interarrival times of spikes in the Poisson process are independent of earlier interarrival times, i.e., the Poisson process is memoryless. This implies that spikes are not correlated in time, and the autocorrelation function of the signal is zero for positive time lags. C, The power spectral density is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function and quantifies the amount of variance (“power”) per frequency component. For the Poisson process the power spectral density is flat. D, Three Poisson processes (#1–3) with distinct intensities (“firing rates”) contribute to the total signal (bottom). Only one process is active at each time, as determined by a hidden Markov process. The time series to be analyzed is the number of spikes in each fixed, small time interval along the time axis (interval length 2 ms, not shown). E, The autocorrelation function of the spike count time series falls off slowly for increasing time lags and indicates long-range correlations. F, The estimated power spectral density of the spike count time series seemingly follows a 1/fα power-law, as assessed by fitting a line (dashed, slope −α ≈ −1.8) in a double-logarithmic plot. Similar power law behavior is often seen in spectral densities from electrophysiological recordings. Note that both power spectral densities have been smoothed by a moving average filter for easier visualization.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Glossary of technical terms

    TermDescription
    1/f noiseA signal with a frequency content such that its power spectral density S(f) is proportional to a small power α of the reciprocal of the frequency, i.e., S(f) ≈ 1/fα, where the exponent α satisfies 0 ≤ α ≤ 3. Such signals are characteristic of complex processes without a preferred timescale, e.g., long-range-dependent signals.
    Continuous-time Markov chainA stochastic process X(t) in continuous time for which the conditional probability distribution at time t depends only on a finite number n of values X(s1), X(s2), …, X(sn) from its past, s1 < s2 < … < sn < t. Such a process is also called a process with finite memory. The special case where n = 0 is a memoryless process.
    EigenvaluePrincipal component analysis decomposes the covariance matrix of a multivariate data set into an ordered set of eigenvectors along which the data varies the most. The corresponding eigenvalues represent the variance of the data explained by each eigenvector.
    Eigenvector coefficientsThe components of a principal mode (or eigenmode), i.e., of an eigenvector of the covariance matrix in principal component analysis.
    Hilbert transformA tool from signal processing that shifts the phase factors of a bandpass-filtered signal. Adding the Hilbert transform as imaginary part to the original signal results in an analytic signal, from which the instantaneous phase and the envelope of the signal can be calculated.
    Hurst exponentThe Hurst exponent H (where 1/2 ≤ H ≤ 1) quantifies the self-similarity of a signal. A stochastic process X(t) is called self-similar if X(at) has the same probability distribution as aHX(t) for each a > 0. Long-range-dependent signals (e.g., arising from a process with a 1/f power spectral density) exhibit values of H close to 1.
    Long-range dependenceA stochastic process is long-range dependent if its autocorrelation function R(τ) falls off slower than exponentially for large values of the lag τ. Such processes have infinite memory and typically give rise to power spectral densities with a 1/f distribution.
    Power spectral densityThe power spectral density S(f) is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function of a stochastic process X(t). It is closely related to the Fourier transform of the signal (which does not exist if X(t) is long-range dependent) and quantifies the frequency content of X(t), i.e., S(f) is the contribution to the variance (or ″power″) of X(t) at the frequency f.
    Projection weightThe scalar product of the original signal with an eigenvector of the covariance matrix in principal component analysis, i.e., the coefficient the eigenvector has when the signal is written as a linear combination of all eigenvectors. This quantifies the amount the eigenvector in question contributes to the signal.
    Wavelet decompositionA time–frequency representation of a signal X(t) that quantifies its local frequency content, similar to windowed Fourier analysis. The signal X(t) is convolved with a family of short test signals that are rescaled and translated copies of a single ″mother″ signal (wavelet).
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (28)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 28
15 Jul 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does Asynchronous Neuronal Activity Average out on a Macroscopic Scale?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Does Asynchronous Neuronal Activity Average out on a Macroscopic Scale?
Tjeerd W. Boonstra, Sanne Houweling, Michael Muskulus
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2009, 29 (28) 8871-8874; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2020-09.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Does Asynchronous Neuronal Activity Average out on a Macroscopic Scale?
Tjeerd W. Boonstra, Sanne Houweling, Michael Muskulus
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2009, 29 (28) 8871-8874; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2020-09.2009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mixed Excitatory and Inhibitory Projections from the Basolateral Amygdala to the Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus
  • Selective and Systems-Level Face Processing Impairments in ASD
  • Transplanted Astrocytes Show Functional Flexibility in the Recipient Brain
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.