Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Enhanced Visual Motion Perception in Major Depressive Disorder

Julie D. Golomb, Jenika R. B. McDavitt, Barbara M. Ruf, Jason I. Chen, Aybala Saricicek, Kathleen H. Maloney, Jian Hu, Marvin M. Chun and Zubin Bhagwagar
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2009, 29 (28) 9072-9077; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1003-09.2009
Julie D. Golomb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jenika R. B. McDavitt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara M. Ruf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason I. Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aybala Saricicek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen H. Maloney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Hu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marvin M. Chun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zubin Bhagwagar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experimental task. Each trial began with a flickering black and white fixation dot for 1600 ms, followed by a 500 ms blank screen. A sinusoidal grating of either high (92%) or low (2.8%) contrast and small (0.7°) or large (5.0°) size then appeared in the center of the screen. The grating drifted at a rate of 2°/s to either the left or the right; the duration of the drift was staircased to achieve ∼77% accuracy (Fig. 2). Minimum duration was set at a single 120 Hz frame refresh (8.33 ms); no maximum was set, but duration did not surpass 600 ms for any subject. Once the grating disappeared, the subject made a two-alternative forced-choice response discriminating the direction of motion. The next trial began 500 ms after the response. Trials were blocked by condition, with each block containing 150 trials. ITI, Intertrial interval.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Estimation of duration thresholds. Data from a single representative subject. For each condition, data from both staircases were combined; accuracy is plotted as a function of stimulus duration (binned into 25 ms intervals). Psychometric functions were approximated with best-fitting Weibull functions (solid lines). For each condition, duration threshold was calculated by solving the Weibull function for the stimulus duration that produced 77% accuracy (dotted lines). A, Low-contrast stimuli: the low-contrast small stimulus (gray) required a longer duration threshold than the low-contrast large stimulus (black). B, High-contrast stimuli: the high-contrast small stimulus (gray) required a shorter duration threshold than the high-contrast large stimulus (black).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Motion discrimination thresholds. Mean motion discrimination thresholds are plotted for the recovered depressed group and control group for each of the four conditions: low-contrast small, low-contrast large, high-contrast small, and high-contrast large stimuli. Thresholds were calculated by fitting the duration/accuracy data for each subject and condition with psychometric Weibull functions and determining the duration required for 77% accurate performance (Fig. 2). Higher thresholds indicate that more time was needed to reliably discriminate the direction of motion for a particular condition, implying increased difficulty perceiving the motion stimulus. Error bars are SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Suppression indices. High-contrast suppression indices are plotted for each individual recovered depressed patient as a function of the total number of lifetime months the patient reported having spent depressed, a measure of MDD illness load. Suppression index was calculated as log10(high-contrast large threshold) − log10(high-contrast small threshold); positive values indicate suppression. Scatter plots were fit with the linear best-fit regression line; r = −0.51; p = 0.04; n = 16. See Results for group means.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Summation indices. Low-contrast summation indices are plotted for each individual recovered depressed patient as a function of the number of months since the patient's most recent reported depression episode, a measure of MDD recovery duration. Summation index was calculated as log10(low-contrast large threshold) − log10(low-contrast small threshold); negative values indicate summation. Scatter plots were fit with the linear best-fit regression line; r = 0.68; p = 0.004; n = 16. See Results for group means.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic data for healthy control and recovered depressed groups

    Healthy controlsRecovered depressedp (one-way ANOVA)
    Gender7 male, 9 female7 male, 9 female1.00
    Age (years)21.4 (2.00)23.2 (4.25)0.15
    Decimal visual acuity1.71 (0.31)1.65 (0.35)0.59
    Contrast sensitivity172.2 (48.9)163.8 (63.3)0.67
    WRAT percentile83.1 (12.3)86.8 (14.8)0.46
    HAM-D1.07 (1.58)2.44 (2.31)0.07*
    • ↵Mean (SD) for each group and significance level for between-group statistics. *Note that although the HAM-D difference trended toward significance, both groups were well within the euthymic range (<7).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (28)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 28
15 Jul 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhanced Visual Motion Perception in Major Depressive Disorder
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Enhanced Visual Motion Perception in Major Depressive Disorder
Julie D. Golomb, Jenika R. B. McDavitt, Barbara M. Ruf, Jason I. Chen, Aybala Saricicek, Kathleen H. Maloney, Jian Hu, Marvin M. Chun, Zubin Bhagwagar
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2009, 29 (28) 9072-9077; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1003-09.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Enhanced Visual Motion Perception in Major Depressive Disorder
Julie D. Golomb, Jenika R. B. McDavitt, Barbara M. Ruf, Jason I. Chen, Aybala Saricicek, Kathleen H. Maloney, Jian Hu, Marvin M. Chun, Zubin Bhagwagar
Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2009, 29 (28) 9072-9077; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1003-09.2009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • The role of cortical surround-suppression in this psychophysical effect is disputed
    Craig R Aaen-Stockdale
    Published on: 14 August 2009
  • Published on: (14 August 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for The role of cortical surround-suppression in this psychophysical effect is disputed
    The role of cortical surround-suppression in this psychophysical effect is disputed
    • Craig R Aaen-Stockdale, Postdoctoral Research Assistant

    In this paper, Golomb et al. use a psychophysical technique developed by Tadin et al (2003) to measure surround-suppressive interactions in visual cortex. However, there is actually very little evidence that thresholds obtained with this technique have anything to do with center-surround antagonism. My colleagues and I published data, concurrently with Golomb et al., which suggest that the paradoxical "impairments" in...

    Show More

    In this paper, Golomb et al. use a psychophysical technique developed by Tadin et al (2003) to measure surround-suppressive interactions in visual cortex. However, there is actually very little evidence that thresholds obtained with this technique have anything to do with center-surround antagonism. My colleagues and I published data, concurrently with Golomb et al., which suggest that the paradoxical "impairments" in motion perception in normal subjects (and therefore perceived "improvements" in abnormal populations) are a consequence of how the contrast and size of the stimulus are co-varied (Aaen-Stockdale et al., 2009). We found that motion discrimination thresholds are entirely predictable from the observer's contrast threshold at each stimulus size. These low-level factors can explain the effect reasonably well without any need to invoke center-surround antagonism. It remains to be seen what is causing the difference between normal subjects and recovered depressives, but we suspect that it is not surround suppression. This obviously throws doubt on the speculative connection with degraded GABAergic center-surround mechanisms in the depressed population.

    Aaen-Stockdale, C. R., Thompson, B., Huang, P.-C., & Hess, R. F. (2009). Low-level mechanisms may contribute to paradoxical motion percepts. Journal of Vision, 9(5):9, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/9/5/9/, doi:10.1167/9.5.9.

    Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2003). Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature, 424, 312–315.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
  • Musical Expertise Induces Audiovisual Integration of Abstract Congruency Rules
  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.