Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Symposia and Mini-SymposiaM

Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making

Cyriel M. A. Pennartz, Joshua D. Berke, Ann M. Graybiel, Rutsuko Ito, Carien S. Lansink, Matthijs van der Meer, A. David Redish, Kyle S. Smith and Pieter Voorn
Journal of Neuroscience 14 October 2009, 29 (41) 12831-12838; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3177-09.2009
Cyriel M. A. Pennartz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua D. Berke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann M. Graybiel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rutsuko Ito
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carien S. Lansink
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthijs van der Meer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. David Redish
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle S. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pieter Voorn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic representation of frontal hemisections through the rat forebrain and ventral mesencephalon. Axonal projections from the shell target cells in VTA and SNpc that project either (back) to the shell, to the core, or to sensorimotor-related caudate–putamen (blue-green). Fibers originating from the core reach areas in SNpr associated with axonal projections from SNpc to striatal sectors with inputs from anterior cingulate (blue) or prelimbic (purple) cortex. The blue-green region in medial SNpc and dorsal VTA receives inputs from the shell and contains retrogradely labeled cells after tracer injection in sensorimotor striatum. ac, Anterior commissure; SNpr, substantia nigra pars reticulata.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Effect of disconnection lesions of the hippocampus (HPC) and nucleus accumbens shell on cue and spatial conditioning. A, Schematic representation of asymmetric, unilateral excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus and shell. B, Schematic diagram of one chamber of the Y-maze apparatus (only one of the three trays and CS lights are represented here). C, Acquisition of place-cue retrieval following core, shell, disconnection lesions, or disconnection sham operations. The difference score is the number of approaches to CS+ minus the number of approaches to CS−. D, Conditioned place preference performance expressed as the percentage of time spent in each chamber. Data are from Ito et al. (2008).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Schematic representation of spontaneous cross-structural replay of place and reward information. A, As a rat runs along a track, hippocampal neurons (HC1–HC4) are activated at specific locations (blue ellipses), whereas a ventral striatal neuron (VS1) is firing before and after reward (R) reception (red ellipse, yellow dot). B, Spike patterns during three task episodes plotted along with hippocampal local field potentials (HC LFP). During posttrack rest periods, replay of firing patterns takes place on an ∼10 times accelerated time scale. Hippocampal neurons are reactivated shortly before the ventral striatal neuron. During pretrack rest, firing patterns were dissimilar to those during track running. See the study by Lansink et al. (2009) for further details.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Schematic diagram of parallel cortical–basal ganglia loops contributing to habit formation and maintenance, involving the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (IL) within the limbic–cognitive loop and DLS within the sensorimotor loop. The pseudocolor plot depicts task-related neuronal activity recorded in DLS during training on a T-maze task (modified from Barnes et al., 2005). With overtraining and habit formation, firing patterns develop to accentuate the task start and end (red = greater normalized firing frequency).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Striatal microcircuitry in the context of cortical–basal ganglia macrocircuits. Within striatum (STR), FSIs (red) receive complex combinations of cortical inputs and participate in local information processing by influencing nearby MSNs (blue). FSIs also receive a specific feedback input from globus pallidus (GP) that may serve as a more broadly distributed control signal (Gage et al., 2008).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (41)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 41
14 Oct 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making
Cyriel M. A. Pennartz, Joshua D. Berke, Ann M. Graybiel, Rutsuko Ito, Carien S. Lansink, Matthijs van der Meer, A. David Redish, Kyle S. Smith, Pieter Voorn
Journal of Neuroscience 14 October 2009, 29 (41) 12831-12838; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3177-09.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making
Cyriel M. A. Pennartz, Joshua D. Berke, Ann M. Graybiel, Rutsuko Ito, Carien S. Lansink, Matthijs van der Meer, A. David Redish, Kyle S. Smith, Pieter Voorn
Journal of Neuroscience 14 October 2009, 29 (41) 12831-12838; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3177-09.2009
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cycling Behavior and Memory Formation
  • Extrasynaptic GABAA Receptors: Form, Pharmacology, and Function
Show more Symposia and Mini-Symposia
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.