Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 14 October 2009, 29 (41) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Different PSD-95 Domains Regulate Synaptic Stability and Plasticity

James F. Sturgill, Pascal Steiner, Brian L. Czervionke, and Bernardo L. Sabatini

(see pages 12845–12854)

Neurotransmitter receptors, ion channels, second messengers, and cytoskeletal proteins are organized in the postsynaptic density (PSD) by scaffolding proteins such as PSD-95. Although the PSD is fairly stable, its makeup can be altered by neuronal activity to produce long-term potentiation (LTP) or depression (LTD). To study the dynamics of the PSD, Sturgill et al. tagged proteins with photoactivatable GFP and followed their turnover after two-photon laser photoactivation in dendritic spines in rat hippocampal slices. Turnover of PSD-95 was slower than that of other PSD proteins, suggesting it is a highly stable component. Brief application of NMDA to chemically induce LTD led to a rapid decrease in PSD-95 in the spine. Expressing various modified forms of PSD-95 in place of or in addition to endogenous PSD-95 revealed that only the two N-terminal protein-interaction domains were required for stable retention of PSD-95 in the spine and for the loss of stability after NMDA treatment.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Development of Perineuronal Nets Parallels Song Maturation

Timothy S. Balmer, Vanessa M. Carels, Jillian L. Frisch, and Teresa A. Nick

(see pages 12878–12885)

Much evidence suggests that ocular dominance plasticity is driven by a subset of fast-spiking, parvalbumin-expressing inhibitory interneurons that emerge as the critical period opens. As development proceeds, the somata and proximal dendrites of these interneurons become encapsulated by perineuronal nets composed of extracellular matrix proteins, and this might close the critical period. Similar mechanisms are thought to regulate critical periods in other sensory systems, and according to Balmer et al., also in the sensorimotor song system of zebra finches. In songbirds, sensory experience shapes the development of neuronal circuits required for producing normal song, and the premotor area HVC, which responds to auditory input and is essential for song production, is thought to be important in learning. The number of parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and the percentage of those with perineuronal nets increased during the critical period. Delaying the critical period decreased the percentage of neurons expressing parvalbumin and decreased intensity of labeling of perineuronal nets.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The percentage of parvalbumin-expressing neurons (red) that have perineuronal nets (green) increases during development in the zebra finch HVC. See the article by Balmer et al. for details.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

FM Directional Selectivity Is Amplified in Bat Inferior Colliculus

Joshua X Gittelman, Na Li, and George D. Pollak

(see pages 13030–13041)

Most sounds bats produce for communication and echolocation exhibit frequency modulation (FM); the sound sweeps upward or downward through a range of frequencies. Some neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) are selective for upward or downward sweeps, and this selectivity is thought to be generated within the IC based on the relative timing of nonselective excitatory and inhibitory inputs. But Gittelman et al. now show that the inputs to IC have some directional selectivity, producing EPSPs of different magnitudes. IC neurons received excitatory input regardless of the FM sweep direction, but the sweeps in the preferred direction produced larger EPSPs that were more likely to elicit spikes. Although the timing of inputs was sometimes appropriate for producing directional selectivity, this was not always true, and modeling indicated that the magnitude of inputs was a stronger determinant of directionality in the recorded neurons. The authors note, however, that other IC cells might use timing asymmetries to construct FM directionality.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

γ-Secretase Cleaves APP Terminal Fragment Multiple Times

Mako Takami, Yu Nagashima, Yoshihisa Sano, Seiko Ishihara, Maho Morishima-Kawashima, et al.

(see pages 13042–13052)

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is cleaved by α-, β-, and γ-secretases, yielding various intracellular and extracellular fragments. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with an increase in the levels of 42-amino-acid amyloid-β (Aβ42) relative to Aβ40, which results from a specific cleavage sequence by β-secretase then γ-secretase. Many mutations linked to AD are thought to increase processing of APP along this pathway. Whether AD pathology stems mainly from changes in the relative levels of Aβ or from the loss of products of alternative cleavage sequences is not clear, but regardless, driving APP toward nonpathological processing might be an effective treatment. Takami et al. have therefore studied how γ-secretase produces Aβ. They determined that the C-terminal fragment generated by β-secretase is first cleaved by γ-secretase at the membrane–cytoplasm border, producing Aβ48 and Aβ49. Subsequently, γ-secretase removes 2–3 tripeptides to produce Aβ42 or Aβ40, respectively. Conditions that favor cleavage to produce Aβ49 might therefore reduce AD pathology.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (41)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 41
14 Oct 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 14 October 2009, 29 (41) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 14 October 2009, 29 (41) i
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.