Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Preferred Sites of Exocytosis and Endocytosis Colocalize during High- But Not Lower-Frequency Stimulation in Mouse Motor Nerve Terminals

Michael A. Gaffield, Lucia Tabares and William J. Betz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 December 2009, 29 (48) 15308-15316; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4646-09.2009
Michael A. Gaffield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucia Tabares
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William J. Betz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    FM4-64 spots appear during 100 Hz stimulation. A, Average FM4-64 fluorescence measured versus time in resting terminals. FM4-64 (3 μm) was added at t = 0. Filled circles indicate measurements and the solid line a single-exponential best fit to the data (time constant = 87 s). Experiments for FM4-64 spot data were started ∼120 s after dye application. B, Left, NMJ in the presence of FM4-64, which shows outline of nerve terminal before stimulation. Middle, Same NMJ after 30 s, 100 Hz nerve stimulation; fluorescent spots have appeared. Right, Difference between middle and left panels revealing FM4-64 spots; the terminal is outlined. Scale bar, 2 μm. C, The change in fluorescence intensity for spots compared with the whole terminal as a fraction of initial fluorescence is plotted versus time. During the time indicated by the gray bar, 100 Hz stimulation was delivered.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    FM4-64 spots and spH spots have similar properties. A, Top, Typical difference in spH or FM4-64 fluorescence intensity after a 30 s, 100 Hz stimulation (different preparations). Bottom, Spots identified in the top images by the automatic spot-finding program (see Materials and Methods). Scale bar, 3 μm. B, Cumulative probability plot of spH spot sizes (solid black line) and FM4-64 spot sizes (solid gray line). For comparison to the overall synaptic vesicle population, the synaptic vesicle distribution was assessed after loading with FM dye (dotted line). Inset, A typical FM dye-loaded terminal. The average spot sizes were 0.92 ± 0.05, 0.98 ± 0.06, and 2.07 ± 1.10 μm2 for spH spots, FM4-64 spots, and FM dye load, respectively. The dashed line represents the spot size distribution after randomly mixing terminal pixel locations. Data are averaged from 298 spH spots, 220 FM4-64 spots, and 466 FM dye load spots. Scale bar, 3 μm. C, Same plot as Figure 1C with the rise in FM4-64 spot fluorescence shown (filled circles). For comparison, peak spH spot fluorescence was normalized to match the peak FM4-64 spot fluorescence and plotted (open circles). The mean time to half maximum was 14.5 ± 1.3 s and 13.3 ± 0.6 s for spH and FM4-64 spots, respectively (p = 0.38, Student's t test). The gray bar indicates 100 Hz stimulation.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    FM4-64 spots persist well after spH endocytosis and reacidification. A, Raw change in fluorescence (in arbitrary units) is plotted versus time for either FM4-64 spots (black line) or nonspot areas of the terminal (gray line; arrow marks end of stimulus train). Fluorescence in the FM4-64 spots dispersed slowly after stimulation (train duration indicated by gray bar), particularly when compared with the time course of synaptic vesicle endocytosis and reacidification (spH fluorescence, dotted line). Fluorescence in FM4-64 spots was estimated to match nonspot area fluorescence ∼17 min after stimulation. Data are averaged from five different terminals. For clarity, error bars are shown for every fifth data point. B, spH labels 35% of the vesicles labeled by FM4-64 at the end of 100 Hz stimulation. Inset, Electrophysiological recording of EPPs during 100 Hz stimulation. The vertical calibration bar indicates the peak amplitude of the first EPP, and the horizontal calibration bar indicates 2 s. Main plot, Quanta (m) are plotted versus shock number. The upper solid line indicates the summed quantal release from EPPs. The lower line indicates the “surface vesicles” or those expected to be visible with spH fluorescence based on a simple model using the spH recovery time constant (see Materials and Methods). Actual FM4-64 fluorescence was scaled to match EPP data (filled circles). The gray circles show the average spH fluorescence rise during stimulation after scaling to the theoretical surface vesicle number (lower solid line).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Images show close proximity of spH and FM4-64 spots. Images showing the fluorescence change in response to a 30 s, 100 Hz stimulation measured for both spH (first column) and FM4-64 (0.75 μm, second column). The overlay (third column) shows considerably colocalization (yellow). We also number other areas of interest: an spH spot flanked by two FM4-64 spots (spot labeled 1), an spH spot without a nearby FM4-64 spot (spot labeled 2), and an FM4-64 spot without a nearby spH spot (spot labeled 3). The fourth column shows the spot outlines for spH (green) and FM4-64 (red). Scale bar, 3 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Quantification of spH and FM4-64 spot overlap. A, Cumulative probability plot of the nearest-neighbor distances for FM4-64 spots visible after a 30 s, 100 Hz stimulation (open circles). The automatic spot detection prevents any two similar spot types from existing within ∼1 μm of each other (pixel size = 270 nm, vertical gray line). Spots placed randomly in the terminal (1000 iterations) have an average distribution indicated by the solid gray line with 95% of all random trials falling between the dashed gray lines. Data represent 105 spots from five different terminals. B, Cumulative probability plot of the nearest-neighbor distances for FM4-64 spots to spH spots (open circles). Spots centered within one pixel distance lie to the left of the vertical gray line (270 nm). Spots placed randomly in the terminal 1000 times have an average distribution indicated by the dark gray line with 95% of all random trials falling within the dashed gray lines. C, For each fluorescent label, the total fluorescence change in each pixel was determined, then pixels were sorted based on their relative fluorescence changes during the 30 s, 100 Hz train. The x-axis shows the percentage of those sorted pixels (for example, 10% represents the 10% of all terminal pixels with the largest fluorescence change during stimulation). The overlap in pixel locations for spH and FM4-64 fluorescence is plotted from 0% to 100% (black line with error bars). Overlap is considerably more than by random chance (dashed line). Some of the overlap is lost if the FM4-64 channel is shifted by one pixel in both the x and y directions (solid gray line), suggesting that the original alignment between the two channels was optimal.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Images show little overlap of spH and FM4-64 spots after moderate stimulation. Images showing the fluorescence change in response to a 30 s, 40 Hz stimulation measured for both spH (first column) and FM4-64 (0.75 μm, second column). The overlay (third column) shows mostly greens and reds with little colocalization (yellow). The fourth column shows spot outlines for spH (green) and FM4-64 (red). Scale bar, 3 μm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Quantification of spH and FM4-64 spot overlap after moderate stimulation. Plots similar to Figure 5. A, Cumulative probability plot of the nearest-neighbor distances for spH spots identified after a 30 s, 40 Hz stimulation (open circles). Data represent 132 spots from four different terminals. Spots placed randomly in the terminal 1000 times have an average distribution indicated by the dark gray line with 95% of all random trials falling within the dashed gray lines. Pixel size is indicated by the vertical gray line. B, Cumulative probability plot of the nearest-neighbor distances for spH spots to FM4-64 spots (open circles). Spots placed randomly in the terminal 1000 times have an average distribution indicated by the dark gray line with 95% of all random trials falling within the dashed gray lines. Pixel size is indicated by the vertical gray line. C, The overlap in sorted pixel locations for spH and FM4-64 fluorescence is plotted from 0% to 100% of the pixels (black line with error bars). Overlap is only modestly more than expected by random chance (dashed gray line).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (48)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 48
2 Dec 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preferred Sites of Exocytosis and Endocytosis Colocalize during High- But Not Lower-Frequency Stimulation in Mouse Motor Nerve Terminals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Preferred Sites of Exocytosis and Endocytosis Colocalize during High- But Not Lower-Frequency Stimulation in Mouse Motor Nerve Terminals
Michael A. Gaffield, Lucia Tabares, William J. Betz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 December 2009, 29 (48) 15308-15316; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4646-09.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Preferred Sites of Exocytosis and Endocytosis Colocalize during High- But Not Lower-Frequency Stimulation in Mouse Motor Nerve Terminals
Michael A. Gaffield, Lucia Tabares, William J. Betz
Journal of Neuroscience 2 December 2009, 29 (48) 15308-15316; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4646-09.2009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Neural Stem Cell Transplantation Induces Stroke Recovery by Upregulating Glutamate Transporter GLT-1 in Astrocytes
  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Stimulation of PPC Affects the Mapping between Motion and Force Signals for Stiffness Perception But Not Motion Control
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Rod Photoreceptors Avoid Saturation in Bright Light by the Movement of the G Protein Transducin
  • Loxhd1 Mutations Cause Mechanotransduction Defects in Cochlear Hair Cells
  • Calcium Channel-Dependent Induction of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity at Excitatory Golgi Cell Synapses of Cerebellum
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.