Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Timescale-Invariant Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by a Bursting Neuron

Felix Creutzig, Sandra Wohlgemuth, Andreas Stumpner, Jan Benda, Bernhard Ronacher and Andreas V. M. Herz
Journal of Neuroscience 25 February 2009, 29 (8) 2575-2580; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0599-08.2009
Felix Creutzig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Wohlgemuth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Stumpner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Benda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Ronacher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas V. M. Herz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Bursts of action potentials contain stimulus-specific information. A, Acridid grasshoppers produce species-specific acoustic communication signals by rasping their hindlegs across their forewings. This generates an amplitude-modulated broadband noise signal (AM signal). Shown are two such “songs” from males of the species C. biguttulus. Each song consists of many repetitions of a pair of basic patterns, called “syllable” and “pause,” episodes of high and low amplitude, respectively. B, Conspecific female grasshoppers respond to a certain range of syllable and pause durations, as tested with artificial block stimuli. Within the gray area, a female responded positively in at least 20% of all trials [data were taken from von Helversen and von Helversen (1994) with permission]. C, Enlarged AM signal with song parameters analyzed in the present study. The calculated amplitude threshold for this cell was 55.4 dB SPL. For illustrative purposes, pauses are only marked for threshold crossings that are followed by, on average, at least one spike per trial. Smaller amplitude modulations are neglected; they are also not perceived as pauses by the animal, as shown by behavioral experiments (Wohlgemuth, 2008 A. Einhäupl and B. Ronacher, unpublished results). D, Spike trains of a particular ascending auditory interneuron, the AN12. Syllable onsets trigger burst responses. The response latency of ∼12ms is attributable to acoustic delays, response latencies of the receptor neurons, axonal and synaptic delays, and the intrinsic AN12dynamics. E, IBSC as a function of the burst index (i.e., the position of the burst within the particular calling song). For the two songs in A, the black lines denote the median IBSC, and the gray lines indicate upper and lower quartiles. F, Probability of correctly classifying one of eight songs by IBSC only (chance level, 1/8). Dotted line, Classification using IBSCs from one burst index; solid line, classification by cumulating the information contained in IBSCs from the 10th burst up to the indicated burst. These data demonstrate that songs can be classified successfully in >90% of all trials if IBSCs from 12 or more bursts are used. Hence, the spike count within bursts is sufficient for conspecific song discrimination. Data shown in D–F are from one sample cell.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    IBSC encodes preceding pause duration. A, Burst-triggered average (i.e., mean stimulus before a burst with given IBSC); for comparison, the spike-triggered average over all action potentials is depicted too. As shown by these data, bursts with large IBSC occur preferentially after long phases of low sound intensity. B, Pause duration is linearly correlated with the IBSC of the following burst [R2 = 0.69 ± 0.15 (SD); p < 10−5; Pearson's]; the gray lines indicate upper and lower quartiles. With a y-intercept of only −1.1 ± 2.1 ms, the best fit agrees with a direct proportionality of pause duration and IBSC. The pause duration was defined individually for each cell by setting a threshold for the sound amplitude level of all songs (Fig. 1C); to account for global amplitude differences between the songs, amplitudes were first normalized with respect to mean and SD. C, Correlation coefficient between pause duration and intraburst spike count, as a function of the amplitude threshold used for defining pauses. The smooth maximum demonstrates that the definition in B is robust against variations of the threshold, here shown relative to the mean song amplitude. D, For artificial block stimuli, IBSC is again linearly correlated with pause duration (R2 = 0.76 ± 0.15; p < 10−5). Different colors correspond to stimuli with different syllable durations. E, For natural songs, the onset amplitude, but not onset slope, is partially correlated with IBSC (R2 = 0.27 ± 0.08; p < 10−5) because of covariations of pause duration and onset amplitude in natural songs. The ordinate depicts amplitude (in decibels) for the solid curve, and amplitude/time (in decibels/millisecond) for the dashed curve. Data in A–C and E are from one sample cell; D refers to a second neuron. The statistics refer to all cells tested.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Total spike count is invariant to temporal stimulus rescaling. A, Sketch of two simple auditory sound signals. The lower stimulus is obtained by stretching the upper stimulus by a factor of 2.5. Assuming that the IBSC scales linearly with the preceding pause duration, this rescaling results in 4 instead of 10 bursts, but each burst has now 5 instead of only 2 spikes. Both effects compensate each other so that the total spike count stays constant. B, Measured AN12 responses to two conspecific grasshopper songs. Although the songs differ strongly in their pause durations, the total spike count is approximately equal because the syllable-to-pause ratios of both songs are approximately the same (1.41 for the upper and 1.40 for lower song, respectively), in agreement with the model prediction. C, Total spike count (window length, 500 ms) of responses to the eight tested songs, as a function of the duration of one syllable plus one pause. The duration of this basic song element differs for each song, resulting in the eight different values on the abscissa. Each of the six curves represents data from one neuron, with the species indicated by line type. Error bars indicate upper and lower quartiles of total spike count across eight repetitions. The total spike count varies from cell to cell but without overall correlation to the syllable-plus-pause duration (R2 = 0.00 ± 0.14). Downstream neurons thus have access to the behaviorally relevant syllable-to-pause ratio in a timescale-invariant manner.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 29 (8)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 29, Issue 8
25 Feb 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Timescale-Invariant Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by a Bursting Neuron
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Timescale-Invariant Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by a Bursting Neuron
Felix Creutzig, Sandra Wohlgemuth, Andreas Stumpner, Jan Benda, Bernhard Ronacher, Andreas V. M. Herz
Journal of Neuroscience 25 February 2009, 29 (8) 2575-2580; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0599-08.2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Timescale-Invariant Representation of Acoustic Communication Signals by a Bursting Neuron
Felix Creutzig, Sandra Wohlgemuth, Andreas Stumpner, Jan Benda, Bernhard Ronacher, Andreas V. M. Herz
Journal of Neuroscience 25 February 2009, 29 (8) 2575-2580; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0599-08.2009
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.