Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles

Absence of [125I] alpha-bungarotoxin binding to motor nerve terminals of frog, lizard and mouse muscle

SW Jones and MM Salpeter
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 1983, 3 (2) 326-331; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-02-00326.1983
SW Jones
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MM Salpeter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The existence of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) on the motor nerve terminals of vertebrates has long been controversial. We have re- examined this issue by electron microscope autoradiography with [125I] alpha-bungarotoxin, following separation of nerve terminals from muscle fibers by collagenase and protease treatment. We found no label over nerve terminal membranes other than that due to background, and we calculate upper limits of less than 0.1% of the postsynaptic AChR density for nerve terminals in frogs, lizards, and mice. We conclude that there are essentially no presynaptic acetylcholine receptors that bind alpha-bungarotoxin at vertebrate neuromuscular junctions.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 3 (2)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 3, Issue 2
1 Feb 1983
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Absence of [125I] alpha-bungarotoxin binding to motor nerve terminals of frog, lizard and mouse muscle
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Absence of [125I] alpha-bungarotoxin binding to motor nerve terminals of frog, lizard and mouse muscle
SW Jones, MM Salpeter
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 1983, 3 (2) 326-331; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-02-00326.1983

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Absence of [125I] alpha-bungarotoxin binding to motor nerve terminals of frog, lizard and mouse muscle
SW Jones, MM Salpeter
Journal of Neuroscience 1 February 1983, 3 (2) 326-331; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-02-00326.1983
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.