Skip to main content

Umbrella menu

  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • SfN.org
  • eNeuro
  • The Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuronline
  • BrainFacts.org

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Preparing a Manuscript
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Fees
    • Journal Club
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Shared Mechanisms for Opioid Tolerance and a Transition to Chronic Pain

Elizabeth K. Joseph, David B. Reichling and Jon D. Levine
Journal of Neuroscience 31 March 2010, 30 (13) 4660-4666; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5530-09.2010
Elizabeth K. Joseph
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Reichling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon D. Levine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    In naive control rats prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) 100 ng induces mechanical hyperalgesia (*p < 0.001 compared with baseline at 30 min (30′, n = 12) that lasts <4 h. When injected with PGE2, μ-opioid receptor agonist DAMGO (1 μg) significantly inhibited PGE2 hyperalgesia (DAMGO/PGE2, †p < 0.001 compared with PGE2 alone, n = 6). Following DAMGOx3 treatment, at the fourth hour, injected with PGE2, DAMGO no longer inhibited PGE2 hyperalgesia (DAMGOx3, DAMGO/PGE2, p = NS, n = 12). However, unlike in the naive rats, PGE2 hyperalgesia was still present at fourth hour in the DAMGOx3-pretreated rats (DAMGOx3, fourth hour DAMGO/PGE2 ¶p < 0.001, n = 12). After three hourly injections of DAMGO, PGE2 alone also produced prolonged (>4 h) hyperalgesia (DAMGOx3, PGE2, ‡p < 0.001, n = 6). The tolerance to DAMGO inhibition of PGE2 hyperalgesia and prolongation of PGE2 hyperalgesia was still observed 5 d after 3 hourly doses of DAMGO (DAMGOx3, day 5, DAMGO/PGE2, both #p < 0.001, n = 6). In all experiments, measurement of paw withdrawal threshold was done at 30 min (30′) and 4 h (4 h) after the administration of the test agents.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A, Spinal intrathecal injection of oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) antisense (PKCε-AS) but not mismatch (PKCε-MM) for PKCε (20 μg in a volume of 20 μl, i.t.), daily for 3 d, prevented the development of tolerance and priming when on the fourth day 3 hourly injections of DAMGOx3 was followed at the fourth hour by DAMGO plus PGE2 (PKCε-ASx3, DAMGOx3, DAMGO/PGE2, *p < 0.001 compared with naive, n = 6 and PKCε-MMx3, DAMGOx3, DAMGO/PGE2, p = NS compared with naive, n = 6). B, Spinal intrathecal injection of PKCε-AS for 3 d prevented priming (hyperalgesia at the fourth hour), when on the fourth day whether PGE2 was injected with DAMGO, following 3 hourly injections of DAMGO (PKCε-ASx3, DAMGOx3, PGE2, p = NS, n = 6), or injected without DAMGO (PKCε-ASx3, PGE2, p = NS, n = 6); in both groups PGE2 hyperalgesia at 30 min was not affected. C, Intradermal injection of PKCεV1-2, a selective PKCε translocation inhibitor peptide (PKCεI, 1 μg), or pertussis toxin (PTX, 10 ng), a Gi-protein inhibitor, reversed (DAMGOx3-induced) tolerance and priming when injected 30 min (30′) before the fourth hourly injection of DAMGO plus PGE2 (DAMGOx3, PKCεI/DAMGO/PGE2, or DAMGOx3, PTX/DAMGO/PGE2, both *p < 0.001, n = 6/group).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A, DAMGO did not attenuate PGE2-induced hyperalgesia in carrageenan (CARR, 5 μl of 1% solution)- or protein kinase Cε activator (ψεRACK, 1 μg)-pretreated (5 d prior) rats (CARR, fifth day DAMGO/PGE2, p = NS, n = 6; ψεRACK, fifth day DAMGO/PGE2, p = NS, n = 6). PGE2 hyperalgesia was still present at the fourth hour in the CARR- and ψεRACK-pretreated rats. B, Spinal intrathecal injection of antisense (PKCε-AS) but not mismatch (PKCε-MM) ODN for PKCε (20 μg in a volume of 20 μl), for three d, prevented the development of tolerance and priming when CARR or ψεRACK were injected on the fourth day and the effect of DAMGO on PGE2 hyperalgesia was tested 5 d after the administration of CARR or ψεRACK. (PKCε-ASx3, CARR, DAMGO/PGE2 and PKCε-ASx3, ψεRACK, DAMGO/PGE2, both *p < 0.001, n = 6/group; PKCε-MMx3, CARR, DAMGO/PGE2 and PKCε-MMx3, ψεRACK, DAMGO/PGE2, both p = NS, n = 6/group). C, Intradermal injection of PKCεV1-2, a selective PKCε translocation inhibitor peptide (PKCεI, 1 μg), also reversed tolerance and priming when PKCεI was injected 30 min (30′) before DAMGO/PGE2 on the fifth day following the administration of CARR or ψεRACK (CARR, PKCεI/DAMGO/PGE2 and ψεRACK, PKCεI/DAMGO/PGE2, both *p < 0.001, n = 6/group). D, Intradermal injection of pertussis toxin, a Gi inhibitor (PTX, 10 ng), also reversed tolerance and priming when it was injected 30 min (30′) before DAMGO/PGE2 on the fifth day following the administration of CARR or ψεRACK (CARR, PTX/DAMGO/PGE2 and ψεRACK, PTX/DAMGO/PGE2, both *p < 0.001, n = 6/group).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    A, Intradermal injection of CTOP (1 μg), a selective μ-opioid antagonist, at the fourth hour following three hourly injections of DAMGO produced hyperalgesia (DAMGOx3, CTOP, *p < 0.001 compared with baseline, n = 6) and this hyperalgesia was still present at the fourth hour after CTOP administration. Injection of PKCε inhibitor (PKCεV1-2) or the Gi-protein inhibitor PTX 30 min (30′) before CTOP reversed CTOP hyperalgesia (DAMGOx3, PKCεI/CTOP, †p < 0.001, n = 6; DAMGOx3, PTX/CTOP, ¶p < 0.001, n = 6). B, Intradermal injection of CTOP in CARR-pretreated rats (5 d prior) produced significant hyperalgesia (CARR, fifth day, CTOP, *p < 0.001, n = 6). Injection of PKCεV1-2 or PTX 30 min (30′) before CTOP reversed CTOP hyperalgesia (CARR, PKCεI/CTOP, †p < 0.001, n = 6; CARR, PTX/CTOP, ¶p < 0.001, n = 6). C, Intradermal injection of CTOP in ψεRACK-pretreated rats (5 d prior) produced significant hyperalgesia (ψεRACK, fifth day, CTOP, *p < 0.001, n = 6). Injection of PKCεV1-2 or the PTX 30 min (30′) before CTOP reversed CTOP hyperalgesia (ψεRACK, PKCεI/CTOP, †p < 0.001, n = 6; ψεRACK, PTX/CTOP, ¶p < 0.001, n = 6).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    A proposed mechanism relating the transition to chronic pain and the loss of analgesic efficacy. A, In a nociceptor (purple) in the hindpaw of a naive animal, a proinflammatory cytokine (PGE2), causes acute pain (hyperalgesia lasting <4 h) that is mediated by activation of a Gs-protein-coupled receptor for prostaglandin (EP-R) causing increased adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity and activation of PKA, ultimately leading to increased membrane excitability and nerve activity, which underlies acute pain. In the naive animal, μ-opioids act at their receptor (μ-R) to inhibit the second messenger pathway mediating acute pain (μ-R activates a Gi/o protein which inhibits AC). B, The transition to chronic pain and loss of analgesic efficacy is due to a change in second messenger signaling in the nociceptor (priming). This change can be induced by exposure either to a proinflammatory cytokine or to an opioid analgesic. In this primed state, both the prostaglandin and opioid receptors become coupled to PKCε (via Gi/o) and can produce prolonged hyperalgesia, a model of chronic pain and opioid tolerance and dependence.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (13)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 13
31 Mar 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Shared Mechanisms for Opioid Tolerance and a Transition to Chronic Pain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Shared Mechanisms for Opioid Tolerance and a Transition to Chronic Pain
Elizabeth K. Joseph, David B. Reichling, Jon D. Levine
Journal of Neuroscience 31 March 2010, 30 (13) 4660-4666; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5530-09.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Shared Mechanisms for Opioid Tolerance and a Transition to Chronic Pain
Elizabeth K. Joseph, David B. Reichling, Jon D. Levine
Journal of Neuroscience 31 March 2010, 30 (13) 4660-4666; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5530-09.2010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2021 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.