Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Structural Plasticity Underlies Experience-Dependent Functional Plasticity of Cortical Circuits

Linda Wilbrecht, Anthony Holtmaat, Nick Wright, Kevin Fox and Karel Svoboda
Journal of Neuroscience 7 April 2010, 30 (14) 4927-4932; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6403-09.2010
Linda Wilbrecht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Holtmaat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nick Wright
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Fox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karel Svoboda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Chessboard whisker deprivation and response potentiation. a, Protocol used to induce and record response potentiation in L5 of the barrel cortex. b, Representation of chessboard deprivation with alternating spared and deprived whiskers. c, Average number of spikes measured in response to stimulation of a spared or principal whisker in deprived, border, and spared regions of the barrel field L5. Red columns indicate data from deprived mice. *A significant difference in average spike response to the spared whisker was found for cells in the border between barrels within 50 μm of the septal center (t(72) = −2.71, p < 0.01). The response to principal whisker stimulation in the spared barrel was not affected by deprivation (histogram bars on right).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    In vivo imaging protocol and analysis of new spine formation and stabilization. a, Timeline for imaging and definitions of spine categories. Spines observed during every imaging session were AP (yellow circles and arrows); spines that were first observed on imaging day 8 or thereafter, and were present for the last 8 d of imaging were NP (orange); TN spines (green) include all spines that were first observed between day 8 and 20. b, c, Examples of spine categories in a: b, Images from a WT mouse. c, Images from an αCaMKII-T286A +/+ mouse. Scale bars, 5 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The growth of new persistent spines is enhanced near the border between spared and deprived barrel columns. a, An overview of L1 apical arbors of L5B neurons imaged in vivo. b, CO-stained tangential section through the L4 barrel field. The arrow points to a GFP-positive apical dendrite of a L5B neuron, corresponding to the left dendritic arbor in a (between barrel D3 and D2). c, The reconstructed L5B neuron placed in a schematic of the barrel field. The apical dendrite travels in the septal column at the border of the two barrels (gray), between spared (white) and deprived (black) barrel columns. d, Coronal view of c. e, The number of total new spines per length of dendrite (TN mm−1) for neurons in different locations within the barrel field. f, The probability that new spines persist after whisker trimming (NP/TN). Each symbol represents a cell. Blue, Untrimmed control; red, trimmed experimental. “Deprived” indicates neurons with apical dendrites that passed through a deprived barrel column in L4 (filled black as in c); “Border,” septal column neurons located within 50 μm of the septal center (filled gray as in c); “Spared,” spared barrel column neurons. Triangles, GFP-M transgenic background only; circles, WT mice from the CaMKII-T286A × GFP-M cross; *p < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Lack of experience-dependent spine stabilization in αCaMKII-T286A mutant mice. All data are from septal column neurons in barrel border regions. a, The number of total new spines per length of dendrite (TN mm−1). b, The probability that new spines persist after whisker trimming (NP/TN). *p < 0.01; ns, nonsignificant.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 14
7 Apr 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structural Plasticity Underlies Experience-Dependent Functional Plasticity of Cortical Circuits
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Structural Plasticity Underlies Experience-Dependent Functional Plasticity of Cortical Circuits
Linda Wilbrecht, Anthony Holtmaat, Nick Wright, Kevin Fox, Karel Svoboda
Journal of Neuroscience 7 April 2010, 30 (14) 4927-4932; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6403-09.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Structural Plasticity Underlies Experience-Dependent Functional Plasticity of Cortical Circuits
Linda Wilbrecht, Anthony Holtmaat, Nick Wright, Kevin Fox, Karel Svoboda
Journal of Neuroscience 7 April 2010, 30 (14) 4927-4932; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6403-09.2010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.