Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Sox2 Induces Neuronal Formation in the Developing Mammalian Cochlea

Chandrakala Puligilla, Alain Dabdoub, Stephan D. Brenowitz and Matthew W. Kelley
Journal of Neuroscience 13 January 2010, 30 (2) 714-722; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-09.2010
Chandrakala Puligilla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Dabdoub
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan D. Brenowitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew W. Kelley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Neurog1 and NeuroD1 are expressed in spiral ganglion neurons. A, Cross-section through the cochlea at P0 illustrating expression of Neurog1 (red) and ΤuJ1 (green) in the spiral ganglion (arrow). B, High-magnification view of the spiral ganglion labeled as in A. Note that TuJ1 and Neurog1 are coexpressed in neuronal cells. C, Cross-section as in A illustrating expression of NeuroD1 (red) and NF-200 (green) in the spiral ganglion (arrow). D, High-magnification view of the spiral ganglion labeled as in C. NeuroD1 and NF-200 are colocalized in spiral ganglion neurons. E, Cross-section as in A, illustrating expression of Map2 (red) and Sox10 (green). Map2 is expressed in neurons while Sox10 is expressed in nuclei of spiral ganglion glia (arrow) and nonsensory cells in the cochlear duct. F, High-magnification view of the spiral ganglion labeled as in E. Large Map2-positive neurons are surrounded by smaller Sox10-positive glial cells. Scale bars: A (for A, C, E) 50 μm; B (for B, D, F) 20 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    NeuroD1 and Neurog1 induce neuronal phenotypes in nonsensory cells within the cochlea. A, Low-magnification image of a cochlear explant transfected with NeuroD1.EGFP (green) and labeled with anti-TuJ1 (red). The sensory epithelium (SE, dashed line) and two nonsensory regions, KO and the LER, are indicated. Arrows indicate multiple transfected cells that are positive for TuJ1. B, High-magnification view of three cells located in KO that have been transfected with Neurog1.EGFP (green). Each cell has extended a neurite (arrowheads). C, The same image as in B, except with TuJ1 labeling in red. Note that each cell body and neurite is positive for TuJ1. D, E, Example of a cluster of NeuroD1.EGFP-transfected cells (green) that are TuJ1 positive (red) and have developed neuronal phenotypes including extension of neurites (D, arrowheads) and the formation of a growth cone (arrow and inset in D). F, G, Cells transfected with either Neurog1.EGFP (green in F) or NeuroD1.EGFP (green in G; NeuroD1.EGFP abbreviated as NeuroD1) were also positive for Map2 (red). H, In contrast, cells transfected with Control.EGFP (green) alone were not positive for TuJ1 (red). I, J, In addition, control transfected cells had morphologies that were consistent with epithelial cells including lumenal and basal extensions. K, NeuroD1.EGFP transfected cells (green) were negative for the hair cell marker Myo6 (red) demonstrating that NeuroD1 does not induce a hair cell fate. L, M, In contrast, cells transfected with Atoh1.EGFP (green) were consistently positive for hair cell markers such as Myo7a (red in L) but were negative for TuJ1 (red in M). Scale bars: A, 20 μm; B (for B–G), 10 μm; H, 20 μm; I (for E, J, K–M) 10 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Ectopic neurons exhibit electrophysiological characteristics consistent with neurons. Whole-cell recordings from cochlear explant cultures. A, B, Voltage-clamp recording from a Neurog1.EGFP-transfected cell (A) and a non-transfected cell (B). Voltage steps of −70 mV to +10 mV were delivered for duration of 100 or 20 ms (right panel in A). C, D, Current clamp recording from a different Neurog1.EGFP-transfected cell (C) and a non-transfected cell (D) demonstrate the presence of both inward currents and an outward current. Current injections of 50–250 pA were delivered for a duration of 20 ms.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    SoxB1 gene expression correlates with spiral ganglion development. A–C, Cross-sections through the otocyst from E10.5 mouse embryos demonstrating the expression of Neurog1 (green in A), NeuroD1 (green in B), and Sox2 (green in C) in delaminating neuroblasts of the developing spiral ganglion (arrow in each). Filamentous actin is labeled with Phalloidin (red) in each panel. Note that Neurog1 and Sox2 are also expressed in cells within the otocyst while expression of NeuroD1 is restricted to delaminating neuroblasts. Orientation for sections A–C is indicated to the right of panel C. D–G, Low- and high-magnification cross-sections of the cochlear duct (D, F) or spiral ganglion (E, G). Coimmunolabeling of Sox2 (green in D, E) or Sox1 (green in F, G) with the neuronal marker TuJ1 (red) demonstrates that Sox2 and Sox1 are expressed in spiral ganglion neurons (arrows in D, F) at P0. H, I, Cross-sections as in D,E demonstrating the specificity of TuJ1 as a neuronal marker. There is no overlap between cells labeled with TuJ1 (green) and the glial marker Sox10 (red) in the ganglion. Scale bars: A (for A–C), 50 μm; D (for D, F, H), 50 μm; E (for E, G, I) 20 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Sox1 is neither necessary nor sufficient for spiral ganglion neuron formation. A, B, Low-magnification cross-sections through the cochlea of Sox1+/lacZ (control) or Sox1lacZ/lacZ (mutant) mice at P0 double-immunolabeled for ΤuJ1 (green) and Sox10 (red). Spiral ganglion neurons, with processes extending to the sensory epithelium, are present and surrounded by glia in both control and mutant cochleae. Inset, Whole-mount immunolabeling of Sox1+/lacZ (control) (A) or Sox1lacZ/lacZ (mutant) (B) cochlea using anti-NF-200 demonstrates no defects in the pattern of innervation in the absence of Sox1. C, Transfection of nonsensory cells with Sox1.EGFP (green) is not sufficient to induce the expression of TuJ1 (red) or development of a neuronal phenotype. Scale bars: B (for A, B), 50 μm; C, 20 μm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Sox2 is required for formation of the spiral ganglion. A, B, Low-magnification cross-sections through the cochleae of Sox2+/+ (control) and Sox2Lcc/Lcc (mutant) mice at E15.5. Spiral ganglion neurons (SG) are labeled with ΤuJ1 (green) and all cell nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Note the complete absence of spiral ganglion neurons, including cell nuclei (arrow) in the Sox2Lcc/Lcc cochlea. C–F, Double-immunolabeling for TuJ1 (green) and Sox10 (red) on cross-sections of Sox2+/+ (control) and Sox2Lcc/Lcc (mutant) cochlea at E15.5 (C, D) and P0 (E, F) demonstrates the absence of spiral ganglion neurons and glial cells in Sox2 mutants. Arrows in D and F indicate expected position of the spiral ganglion. Scale bars: B (for A, B), 50 μm; D (for C–F), 20 μm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Sox2 induces neuronal phenotypes in cochlear nonsensory cells. A, B, Low- (A) and high-magnification (B) images of Sox2.nucEGFP transfected cells (green) located in KO of cochlear explants labeled with anti-TuJ1 (red in A, B) or anti-Map2 (red in C). A subset of transfected cells are labeled with anti-TuJ1 and have developed a neuronal phenotype. Asterisk in A indicates a Sox2.nucEGFP transfected cell that is TuJ1-positive and has extended a single neurite (enlarged in inset). In contrast with Neurog1.EGFP or NeuroD1.EGFP, the Sox2.nucEGFP construct carries a nuclear localization signal sequence and is therefore restricted to the nucleus. Scale bars: A, 20 μm; B (for B, C), 10 μm.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Efficiency of neuronal induction by NeuroD1, Neurog1, and Sox2 at different ages

    cDNATotal number of explants (T); totalnumber of transfected cells (N)TuJ1-positive cells(% of total)
    Control.EGFP (E13.5)T = 4; N = 1661 (0.6%)
    NeuroD1.EGFP (E13.5)T = 5; N = 156114 (73%)
    NeuroD1.EGFP (E16.5)T = 4; N = 16067 (41%)
    NeuroD1.EGFP (P1)T = 3; N = 13033 (25%)
    Neurog1.EGFP (E13.5)T = 4; N = 11129 (26%)
    Neurog1.EGFP (E16.5)T = 5; N = 25340 (15%)
    Neurog1.EGFP (P1)T = 7; N = 14311 (7%)
    Sox2.nucEGFP (E13.5)T = 6; N = 505199 (39%)
    Sox2.nucEGFP (E16.5)T = 4; N = 52682 (16%)
    Sox2.nucEGFP (P1)T = 5; N = 33811 (3%)
    • Nonsensory cells located in either Kolliker's organ or the lesser epithelial ridge that were transfected with the indicated constructs were identified based on expression of GFP. Neuronal identity was established based on expression of TuJ1.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Figure
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (2)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 2
13 Jan 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sox2 Induces Neuronal Formation in the Developing Mammalian Cochlea
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Sox2 Induces Neuronal Formation in the Developing Mammalian Cochlea
Chandrakala Puligilla, Alain Dabdoub, Stephan D. Brenowitz, Matthew W. Kelley
Journal of Neuroscience 13 January 2010, 30 (2) 714-722; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-09.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Sox2 Induces Neuronal Formation in the Developing Mammalian Cochlea
Chandrakala Puligilla, Alain Dabdoub, Stephan D. Brenowitz, Matthew W. Kelley
Journal of Neuroscience 13 January 2010, 30 (2) 714-722; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3852-09.2010
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • IGFBP2–Ceramide Pathway Mediates Divergent Myelin Breakdown in the PNS and CNS Following Injury
  • Smg5 Enhances Oligodendrocyte Differentiation via Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay of Hnrnpl Variant Transcripts
  • Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling through Müller Glia Regulates Neuroprotection, Accumulation of Immune Cells, and Neuronal Regeneration in the Rodent Retina
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.