Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Interactions between Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Visual Auditory Integration in the Forebrain of the Barn Owl

Amit Reches, Shai Netser and Yoram Gutfreund
Journal of Neuroscience 19 May 2010, 30 (20) 6991-6998; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5723-09.2010
Amit Reches
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shai Netser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoram Gutfreund
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Comparison between responses to rare and frequent presentations. A, Outline of the bimodal oddball test. Each line represents a sample sequence from a single oddball block. Squares designate the auditory stimuli, circles designate the visual stimuli, and filled squares designate the bimodal stimuli. Gray filled shapes specify the peripheral position (Loc 1), and black shapes specify the central position (Loc 2). Bold arrows point to examples of rare occurrences of auditory (blue), visual (red), and bimodal (cyan) stimuli. Light arrows point to corresponding examples of frequent occurrences. B–G, PSTHs of responses to rare occurrences (green lines) are shown together with the corresponding responses to frequent occurrences (blue lines). Responses to the two auditory stimuli are shown in B,C, the two visual stimuli in D,E, and the two bimodal stimuli in F,G. Results from stimuli at the peripheral location are presented on the left, and results from stimuli at the center are presented on the right. Gray filled squares mark stimulus onset and duration. H–K, The PSTHs of responses to the two bimodal stimuli (cyan lines) are overlaid with the PSTHs of responses to their visual (red) and auditory (blue) components. Comparison is performed twice, once for rare occurrences (H, J) and once for frequent occurrences (I, K).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Summary of results from all recording sites. A, A scatter plot showing SI1 versus SI2 measured from the responses to the auditory sequences. The dashed lines mark the first quadrant, in which both SIs are positive. The diagonal line marks the nonspecific adaptation line (see Results). B, A histogram showing the distribution of the NIs measured from all auditory oddball tests. The dashed vertical line indicates NI = 0. C, D, Results from all visual oddball tests. E, F, Results from all bimodal oddball tests. Format as in A and B.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Interaction between SSA and multisensory integration. A, The difference between the bimodal NI and the visual NI was measured for each site. The histogram shows the distribution of all differences. B, Scatter plot of EIs measured from frequent occurrences (x-axis) versus the corresponding EIs measured from deviant occurrences (y-axis). The diagonal line shows the line of equality.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Results from incongruent bimodal oddball tests. A–H, An example from a single recording site. PSTHs of responses to rare occurrences (green lines) are shown together with the corresponding responses to frequent occurrences (blue lines). Results are presented for auditory (A, B), visual (C, D), congruent bimodal (E, F), and incongruent bimodal (G, H) stimuli. Left column shows average responses to the visual stimuli in the peripheral location (Loc 1), and right column shows responses to the visual stimuli in the central location (Loc 2). I, The novelty response of visual (red), congruent bimodal (cyan), and incongruent bimodal (purple) stimulation. J, A histogram showing the distribution of all differences between the congruent bimodal NIs and the visual NIs. K, Same as J but showing results from the incongruent bimodal tests.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Comparison between responses to strong and normal visual stimuli. A–D, An example from a single recording site. PSTHs of responses to rare occurrences (green lines) are presented together with the corresponding responses to frequent occurrences (blue lines). Results are presented for normal visual stimulation (A, B) and strong visual stimulation (C, D). E, Scatter plot of EIs (computed as the enhancement of responses to strong visual stimuli over the responses to normal visual stimuli) measured from frequent occurrences (x-axis) versus the corresponding EIs measured from rare occurrences (y-axis). The diagonal line is the line of equality. The inset compares the population average PSTHs for the responses to rare occurrences of the strong visual stimuli (red trace) and the normal visual stimuli (blue trace). F, The distribution of the differences between the NI of the strong visual stimuli and the NI of the normal visual stimuli for all sites. Loc 1, Responses to the visual stimuli in the peripheral location; Loc 2, responses to the visual stimuli in the central location.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Schematic representation of the two basic models. A, Visual and auditory inputs are integrated at the first stage. At a later stage, the bimodal responses undergo through an SSA filter. B, Each input channel, auditory or visual, is filtered separately through an SSA channel. The filtered responses are then fed to the multisensory integrator. The bars represent a sequence of frequent events (dark bars) with one rare event (light bar). The height of each bar represents the hypothetical responses at the various stages of the model.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (20)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 20
19 May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interactions between Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Visual Auditory Integration in the Forebrain of the Barn Owl
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Interactions between Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Visual Auditory Integration in the Forebrain of the Barn Owl
Amit Reches, Shai Netser, Yoram Gutfreund
Journal of Neuroscience 19 May 2010, 30 (20) 6991-6998; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5723-09.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Interactions between Stimulus-Specific Adaptation and Visual Auditory Integration in the Forebrain of the Barn Owl
Amit Reches, Shai Netser, Yoram Gutfreund
Journal of Neuroscience 19 May 2010, 30 (20) 6991-6998; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5723-09.2010
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
  • Musical Expertise Induces Audiovisual Integration of Abstract Congruency Rules
  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.