Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Correction

Correction

Journal of Neuroscience 7 July 2010, 30 (27) 9335-9339
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

For the article “The Role of Background Statistics in Face Adaptation” by Jianhua Wu, Hong Xu, Peter Dayan, and Ning Qian, which appeared on pages 12035–12044 of the September 30, 2009 issue, the authors have issued the following correction: We greatly regret that there were the following errors in this article: (1) The program that calculated the summary data in Figures 3e, 4e, 6e, 7, and 9 subtracted a baseline incorrectly. (2) Some individual subjects' curves in supplemental Figures 1, 2, and 4 were mixed up. Corrected versions of these panels and figures are printed here. We have reanalyzed existing data and collected new data for the main experiment in Figure 9. All the statistical relationships we reported remain true, with one exception: the very small aftereffect for the mf-cf condition in Figure 4e is now significant (because the variability is small). However, the aftereffect for the mf-cf condition is indeed significantly smaller than that for the mf-mf condition. Therefore, all our original reported conclusions remain correct.

Figure 3e.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3e.
Figure 4e.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4e.
Figure 6e.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6e.
Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.
Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.
Supplemental Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Supplemental Figure 1.
Supplemental Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Supplemental Figure 2.
Supplemental Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Supplemental Figure 4.
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 27
7 Jul 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Correction
Journal of Neuroscience 7 July 2010, 30 (27) 9335-9339

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Correction
Journal of Neuroscience 7 July 2010, 30 (27) 9335-9339
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction: Sequerra, Goyal et al., “NMDA Receptor Signaling Is Important for Neural Tube Formation and for Preventing Antiepileptic Drug-Induced Neural Tube Defects”
  • Correction: Darbelli et al., “Quaking Regulates Neurofascin 155 Expression for Myelin and Axoglial Junction Maintenance”
  • Correction: Personius et al., “Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination”
Show more Correction
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.