Article Information
PubMed
Published By
History
- Received February 28, 2010
- Revision received June 15, 2010
- Accepted June 17, 2010
- First published August 25, 2010.
- Version of record published August 25, 2010.
Copyright & Usage
Copyright © 2010 the authors 0270-6474/10/3011300-05$15.00/0
Author Information
- 1Neuroinformatics and Computational Neuroscience Doctoral Training Centre, Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, United Kingdom,
- 2Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QX, United Kingdom, and
- 3St. John's College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3JP, United Kingdom
- Correspondence should be addressed to Nicolas Heess, Neuroinformatics and Computational Neuroscience Doctoral Training Centre, Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK. n.m.o.heess{at}sms.ed.ac.uk
Author contributions
Disclosures
- Received February 28, 2010.
- Revision received June 15, 2010.
- Accepted June 17, 2010.
-
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship in the Basic Biomedical Sciences. N.H. was supported by an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council/Medical Research Council scholarship from the Neuroinformatics and Computational Neuroscience Doctoral Training Centre at the University of Edinburgh. W.B. was also supported by a Science Research Fellowship at St. John's College, Oxford. We thank Anitha Pasupathy, Pamela Baker, and Douglas McLelland for comments on the manuscript.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Nicolas Heess, Neuroinformatics and Computational Neuroscience Doctoral Training Centre, Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK. n.m.o.heess{at}sms.ed.ac.uk
Online Impact
Article usage
In this issue
Direction Opponency, Not Quadrature, Is Key to the 1/4 Cycle Preference for Apparent Motion in the Motion Energy Model
