Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Vibrotactile Masking Experiments Reveal Accelerated Somatosensory Processing in Congenitally Blind Braille Readers

Arindam Bhattacharjee, Amanda J. Ye, Joy A. Lisak, Maria G. Vargas and Daniel Goldreich
Journal of Neuroscience 27 October 2010, 30 (43) 14288-14298; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1447-10.2010
Arindam Bhattacharjee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda J. Ye
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joy A. Lisak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria G. Vargas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Goldreich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Perceptual tasks. A, Simple vibrotactile. B, Amplitude discrimination. C, Backward masking, target–masker delay, 100 ms. D, Backward masking, target–masker delay, 50 ms. E, Forward masking, masker–target delay, 100 ms. F, Forward masking, masker–target delay, 50 ms. In all tasks except amplitude discrimination, the participant's goal was to detect which interval contained the target tap (a 20 Hz sinusoidal pulse, 25 ms in duration, with amplitude ranging from 1 to 100 μm). In amplitude discrimination, the goal was to select the interval with the stronger tap. A and C–F show only the interval containing the tap.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Adaptive psychophysical procedure. A, Performance of a participant (∘, correct; x, incorrect) on the simple vibrotactile detection task. The participant reported the perceived target interval by pressing one of two response keys. Target amplitude for each trial was selected using the modified ψ method. B, Most probable psychometric function, given the participant's performance. The dashed vertical line shows the stimulus level corresponding to 76% correct response probability. C, Posterior PDF for the participant's vibrotactile detection threshold. The mean of the PDF was taken as the best estimate of the participant's threshold.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Posterior PDFs for thresholds of a single CBPR participant (top panels) and a single sighted participant (bottom panels) on all six tasks. Left, SV (solid lines) and AD (dashed lines). Middle, BM. Right, FM. In middle and right panels, the solid line indicates 100 ms target–masker delay, and the dashed line indicates 50 ms target–masker delay. Note that the estimated target detection thresholds at 50 ms delay are higher than those that at 100 ms delay; target detection thresholds under forward masking are higher than under backward masking; and the thresholds of the sighted participant on each task are higher than those of the CBPR participant.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Mean performance of the five participant groups on the nonmasking tasks. A, SV. B, AD. Error bars indicate ±1 SE. S, Sighted.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Mean masking performance metric of the five participant groups. A–D, Backward masking, 100 ms, 50 ms; forward masking, 100 ms, 50 ms. Error bars indicate ±1 SE. For masked target detection thresholds in micrometers, see supplemental Figure 3 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Mean masking decay time constants of the five participant groups. A, Backward masking decay time constant. B, Forward masking decay time constant. Error bars indicate ±1 SE.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Mean time taken to read the Braille test passage for each of the proficient Braille reader groups. Error bars indicate ±1 SE.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Masking task performance metric of proficient Braille readers plotted against time required to read the Braille test passage. A–D, Backward masking, 100 ms, 50 ms; forward masking, 100 ms, 50 ms.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Estimated COA during Braille reading plotted against masking decay time constants. A, Backward masking decay time constant. B, Forward masking decay time constant. For breakdown by proficient reader group, see supplemental Figure 5 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Age distributions of the blind and sighted participants

    Age (years)Blind (N = 57)Sighted (N = 89)
    19–3026.3 (15)21.3 (19)
    30–405.3 (3)9.0 (8)
    40–5014.0 (8)15.7 (14)
    50–6031.6 (18)24.7 (22)
    60–7017.5 (10)19.1 (17)
    70–805.3 (3)10.1 (9)
    • Percentages (and numbers) of participants are shown in each group, for each age decade.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics of the four blind groups and sighted

    CBPR (N = 22)EBPR (N = 11)LBPR (N = 10)LBNR (N = 14)Sighted (S) (N = 89)
    Median age (years)52.549.647.759.053.5
    Age range (years)20.2–74.223.1–71.021.2–65.719.5–72.020.0–78.1
    Women, men17, 55, 64, 66, 850, 39
    NLP, LP15, 710, 12, 83, 11—
    OHR, THR12, 105, 66, 4——
    • NLP, No light perception; LP, residual light perception; OHR, one-hand reader; THR, two-hand reader. The bottom three rows list numbers of participants.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (43)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 43
27 Oct 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vibrotactile Masking Experiments Reveal Accelerated Somatosensory Processing in Congenitally Blind Braille Readers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Vibrotactile Masking Experiments Reveal Accelerated Somatosensory Processing in Congenitally Blind Braille Readers
Arindam Bhattacharjee, Amanda J. Ye, Joy A. Lisak, Maria G. Vargas, Daniel Goldreich
Journal of Neuroscience 27 October 2010, 30 (43) 14288-14298; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1447-10.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Vibrotactile Masking Experiments Reveal Accelerated Somatosensory Processing in Congenitally Blind Braille Readers
Arindam Bhattacharjee, Amanda J. Ye, Joy A. Lisak, Maria G. Vargas, Daniel Goldreich
Journal of Neuroscience 27 October 2010, 30 (43) 14288-14298; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1447-10.2010
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • The Laminar Development of Direction Selectivity in Ferret Visual Cortex
  • Individual Differences in Amygdala-Medial Prefrontal Anatomy Link Negative Affect, Impaired Social Functioning, and Polygenic Depression Risk
  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.