Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

The Influence of Language on Perception: Listening to Sentences about Faces Affects the Perception of Faces

Ayelet N. Landau, Lisa Aziz-Zadeh and Richard B. Ivry
Journal of Neuroscience 10 November 2010, 30 (45) 15254-15261; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-10.2010
Ayelet N. Landau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Aziz-Zadeh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard B. Ivry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    a, Timeline of the experimental procedure for sentence priming in experiment 1. Priming sentences, presented through headphones, either referred to faces or scenes. The picture probes were either of a face or a place. Colored fixation crosses (red and blue) prompted each plausibility response. b, Event-related response to face picture probes appearing after face sentence primes (red) and place sentence primes (blue). Shaded areas represent the SE of the difference between the two waveforms. Consequently, the same error term is superimposed on both waveforms.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    a, Timeline of the experimental procedure for picture priming in experiment 2. Primes were either pictures of faces or scenes and were followed by face or place picture probes. b, Event-related response to face picture probes appearing after a face picture primes (red) and place picture primes (blue). Shaded areas represent the SE of the difference between the two waveforms as in Figure 1.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Peak amplitude of the N170 response to face probes in experiment 1 (left side) and experiment 2 (right side). Within each experiment, the data are plotted for the left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres, as a function of whether the prime referred to a face or place. Error bars correspond to SE of the difference between the two conditions for each type of prime.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Reaction time data for experiment 3. Participants made a speeded response, classifying a face probe as male or female. These pictures were preceded by sentence (auditory) or picture (visual) primes that either referred to or depicted a face or place. Error bars correspond to SE of the difference between the two conditions for each type of prime.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (45)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 45
10 Nov 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Influence of Language on Perception: Listening to Sentences about Faces Affects the Perception of Faces
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Influence of Language on Perception: Listening to Sentences about Faces Affects the Perception of Faces
Ayelet N. Landau, Lisa Aziz-Zadeh, Richard B. Ivry
Journal of Neuroscience 10 November 2010, 30 (45) 15254-15261; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-10.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
The Influence of Language on Perception: Listening to Sentences about Faces Affects the Perception of Faces
Ayelet N. Landau, Lisa Aziz-Zadeh, Richard B. Ivry
Journal of Neuroscience 10 November 2010, 30 (45) 15254-15261; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-10.2010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.