Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Modulation of BK Channel Gating by the β2 Subunit Involves Both Membrane-Spanning and Cytoplasmic Domains of Slo1

Urvi S. Lee, Jingyi Shi and Jianmin Cui
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 2010, 30 (48) 16170-16179; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2323-10.2010
Urvi S. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingyi Shi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianmin Cui
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic of BK channel structure. Top, S0–S6 are transmembrane segments, and RCK1 and RCK2 are located in cytoplasm. PGD, Pore-gate domain. Star (★) represents the location of Ca2+ binding sites. The sequence and secondary structure of the N terminus including S0 and the C-Linker and AC region are shown below. Asterisk (*) identifies conserved residues.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Differential modulation by β2ND on Ca2+ sensitivity of mSlo1 and dSlo1. A, Macroscopic currents of mSlo1 and dSlo1 with WT hβ2 at ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i (left). The voltage pulses are from −100 to +150 mV for 1 s with 25 mV increments (shown only the first 20 ms), and the prepulse potential is −140 mV for 195 ms (shown only the last 5 ms). The dotted line represents the biexponential fit of the inactivation profile, and the long dashed line represents the zero current line for each current trace. On the right, voltage dependence of the inactivation time constant is shown. The fast and slow components of τInact were obtained by fitting current traces with a biexponential function from the peak amplitude to steady state (n = 10 for mSlo1 + WT β2, except at +150 mV, n = 9; n = 5 for dSlo1 + WT β2, except at +150 mV, n = 4). B, Macroscopic currents of mSlo1 and dSlo1 with and without β2ND at ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i. Voltage pulses are from −200 to 100 mV with 10 mV increments, and the repolarizing potential is −50 mV, except for mSlo1 + β2ND, which is −80 mV. The dashed line represents the zero current line for each current trace. C, Mean G–V relationship of mSlo1/dSlo1 with and without β2ND in 0, ∼2, and ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i, fitted with Boltzmann equation (smooth lines). The error bars in this and other figures show the SEM. D, V½ versus [Ca2+]i plot of mSlo1/dSlo1 with and without β2ND. The number of patches for each dataset are for the following (μm): [Ca2+]i, 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 30, 100; mSlo1, 118, 33, 29, 29, 42, 25, 56; mSlo1 + β2ND, 44, 8, 8, 11, 9, 12, 28; dSlo1, 0, 0, 11, 19, 15, 9, 27; dSlo1 + β2ND, 0, 0, 3, 4, 7, 8, 14.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effects of chimeras of mSlo1/dSlo1 on the β2ND modulation of Ca2+ dependence. The black bars show the change in Ca2+ sensitivity between with and without β2ND, normalized to mSlo1 (see Results for definitions). The gray bars show the Ca2+ response at ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i between with and without β2ND. The symbol * means that ∼2 μm [Ca2+]i was used for comparison, and ** means that the G–V could not be determined at 0 or ∼2 μm [Ca2+]i. Bottom shows the schematic of different chimeras of mSlo1 and dSlo1 used in the top. The number of patches for each dataset are as follows for either ∼0/2 and 100 μm [Ca2+]i: C1, 3, 5; C1 + β2ND, 9, 11; C2, 4, 3; C2 + β2ND, 5, 4; C3, 7, 4; C3 + β2ND, 5, 5; C4, 5, 5; C4 + β2ND, 8, 3; C5, 7, 5; C5 + β2ND, 3, 4; m[dS0]: 9, 6; m[dS0] + β2ND, 4, 7; m[dLinker + dAC], 7, 20; m[dLinker + dAC] + β2ND, 0, 20; m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC], 5, 14; m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC] + β2ND: 2, 9; d[mS0], 3, 20; d]mS0] + β2ND, 0,12; d[mLinker + mAC], 13, 7; d[mLinker + mAC] + β2ND, 23, 13; d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c], 11, 16; d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c] + β2ND, 15, 14.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Effects of the N terminus and the C-Linker/AC region of dSlo1 in mSlo1 background on the β2ND modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity. A, Macroscopic currents of m[dS0], m[dLinker + dAC], and m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC] with and without β2ND at ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i. Voltage pulses are from −200 to 200 mV with 10 mV increments, and the repolarizing potential is −50 mV, except for m[dS0] and m[dLinker + dAC] with β2ND, which is −80 mV. The dashed line represents the zero current line for each current trace. B, G–V relations of chimeras compared with that of mSlo1 (orange) at low (0, ∼2, or ∼10 μm) and ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i. Because of the apparent inactivation of the channels, the G–V relations were measured from both the peak currents and tail currents, and both methods resulted in the same V½. C, V½ versus [Ca2+]i plots of chimeras compared with that of mSlo1 and dSlo1 with and without β2ND. The number of patches for each dataset are as follows (in μm): [Ca2+]i, 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 30, 100; m[dS0], 9, 6, 4, 4, 4, 4, 6; m[dS0] + β2ND, 4, 3, 3, 4, 3, 5, 7; m[dLinker + dAC], 0, 0, 7, 14, 15, 6, 20; m[dLinker + dAC] + β2ND, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 5, 20; m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC], 0, 0, 5, 4, 4, 4, 14; m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC] + β2ND, 0, 0, 2, 3, 4, 2, 9.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Effects of the N terminus and C-Linker/AC region of mSlo1 in dSlo1 background on the β2ND modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity. A, Macroscopic currents of d[mS0], d[mLinker + mAC], and d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c] with and without β2ND at ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i. Voltage pulses are from −200 to 200 mV, except for d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c] + β2ND, which are from −200 to 100 mV, with 10 mV increments. The repolarizing potential is −50 mV. The dashed line represents the zero current line for each current trace. B, G–V relations of chimeras with and without β2ND at low (0 or ∼2 μm) and ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i compared with that of dSlo1 (blue). C, V½ versus [Ca2+]i plots of chimeras compared with that of mSlo1 and dSlo1 with and without β2ND. The number of patches for each dataset are as follows (in μm): [Ca2+]i, 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 30, 100; d[mS0], 0, 0, 3, 10, 6, 4, 20; d[mS0] + β2ND, 0, 0, 0, 3, 2, 3, 16; d[mLinker + mAC], 13, 5, 4, 4, 4, 4, 7; d[mLinker + mAC] + β2ND, 23, 5, 3, 3, 5, 5, 13; d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c], 11, 2, 4, 7, 6, 16; d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c] + β2ND, 15, 5, 5, 5, 6, 14.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    MWC model fittings of WT and chimera channels. G–V relationships (symbols) for mSlo1, dSlo1, m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC], and d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c] with and without β2ND fitted with the MWC model (lines). The [Ca2+]i for each symbol is shown.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    The role of the C-Linker and AC region of mSlo1 in the β1 and β2ND modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity. A, G–V relations of mSlo1 and m[dLinker + dAC] with and without β1 or β2ND in ∼100 μm [Ca2+]i. B, V½ versus [Ca2+]i plots of mSlo1 and m[dLinker + dAC] with β1 (left) or β2ND (right). The number of patches are as follows (in μm): [Ca2+]i, 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 30, 100: mSlo1 + β1, 38, 13, 15, 11, 12, 8, 21; m[dLinker + dAC] + β1, 0, 0, 0, 10, 6, 9, 26.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Dependence of the β1 and β2 modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity on Ca2+ binding sites in mSlo1. A, Bar graph of the G–V shift in response to a [Ca2+]i change from 0–100 μm WT, single Ca2+ binding site mutations (D367A and 5D5N), double Ca2+ binding site mutation (D367A/5D5N), and double Ca2+ binding site plus the Mg2+ binding site mutation (D367A/5D5N/E399N) without (black) and with β1 (white) or β2ND (gray). B, Differences in ΔV½ from A of β1 (white) and β2ND (gray) with WT, single, double, and triple binding site mutations. The number of patches for each dataset are as follows for ∼0 and ∼100 μm [Ca2+]I, respectively: mD367A, 10, 9; mD367A + β1, 9, 9; mD367A + β2ND, 5, 7; 5D5N, 6, 11; 5D5N + β1, 8, 9; 5D5N + β2ND, 4, 8; mD367A/5D5N, 14, 6; mD367A/5D5N + β1, 6, 5; mD367A/5D5N + β2ND, 5, 5; mD367A/5D5N/E399N, 15, 15; mD367A/5D5N/E399N + β1, 5, 9; mD367A/5D5N/E399N + β2ND, 8, 12.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    A structural model for the β2 subunit modulation. Two opposing mSlo1 and β2 (orange) subunits of BK channels are shown in which the diagrams for the VSD and S0 segment are constructed around the pore of the MthK channel (Protein Data Bank identification number 1LNQ) (Jiang et al., 2002). The gating ring of the BK channel (Protein Data Bank identification number 3MT5) (Yuan et al., 2010) is aligned to the MthK channel using Chimera version 1.4.1 (University of California, San Francisco). VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics) version 1.8.7 (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) was used to show the aligned structure in diagram and surface representation. The helices in the VSD are shown as cylinders and are positioned according to the KV1.2 channel. The TM segments of the β2 subunit are positioned according to Zakharov et al. (2009). Green regions in the Slo1 subunit (S0, C-Linker and AC) are involved in the β2 modulation of Ca2+ sensitivity.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Residue information of mSlo1–dSlo1 chimeras

    Chimera nameResidues from
    dSlo1mSlo1
    C11-596580-1169
    C21-336323-1169
    C31-248234-1169
    C41-215201-1169
    C51-147134-1169
    m[dS0]1-7044-1169
    m[dLinker + dAC]340-4321-325 and 419-1169
    m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC]1-70 and 340-43244-325 and 419-1169
    d[mS0]71-11641-43
    d[mLinker + mAC]1-339 and 433-1164326-418
    d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c]71-346 and 559-11641-43 and 320-543
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Parameters for MWC model fits

    L0zKC (μm)KO (μm)1/c
    mSlo19.20E+031.287.360.7210.25
    mSlo1 + β2ND9.41E+031.2532.510.6252.35
    dSlo15.50E+050.8822.000.5143.48
    dSlo1 + β2ND5.51E+050.7823.950.5345.28
    m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC]9.98E+051.1212.360.4030.60
    m[dS0 + dLinker + dAC] + β2ND9.80E+051.029.450.3626.18
    d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c]3.50E+041.0730.763.309.32
    d[mS0 + mLinker + mRCK1c] + β2ND7.90E+031.0871.002.4528.98
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 30 (48)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 30, Issue 48
1 Dec 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modulation of BK Channel Gating by the β2 Subunit Involves Both Membrane-Spanning and Cytoplasmic Domains of Slo1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Modulation of BK Channel Gating by the β2 Subunit Involves Both Membrane-Spanning and Cytoplasmic Domains of Slo1
Urvi S. Lee, Jingyi Shi, Jianmin Cui
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 2010, 30 (48) 16170-16179; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2323-10.2010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Modulation of BK Channel Gating by the β2 Subunit Involves Both Membrane-Spanning and Cytoplasmic Domains of Slo1
Urvi S. Lee, Jingyi Shi, Jianmin Cui
Journal of Neuroscience 1 December 2010, 30 (48) 16170-16179; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2323-10.2010
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Cofilin Inhibition Ameliorates PIEZO2 and AMPA Dysfunction in a Mouse Model of Angelman Syndrome
  • TREK1 Channels Shape Spindle-Like Oscillations, Neuronal Activity, and Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Thalamocortical Circuits
  • High-pressure freezing EM tomography of entire ribbon synapses in the retina
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.