Abstract
In the adult brain, neural stem cells proliferate within the subventricular zone before differentiating into migratory neuroblasts that travel along the rostral migratory stream (RMS) to populate the olfactory bulb with new neurons. Because neuroblasts have been shown to migrate to areas of brain injury, understanding the cues regulating this migration could be important for brain repair. Recent studies have highlighted an important role for endocannabinoid (eCB) signaling in the proliferation of the stem cell population, but it remained to be determined whether this pathway also played a role in cell migration. We now show that mouse migratory neuroblasts express cannabinoid receptors, diacylglycerol lipase α (DAGLα), the enzyme that synthesizes the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), and monoacylglycerol lipase, the enzyme responsible for its degradation. Using a scratch wound assay for a neural stem cell line and RMS explant cultures, we show that inhibition of DAGL activity or CB1/CB2 receptors substantially decreases migration. In contrast, direct activation of cannabinoid receptors or preventing the breakdown of 2-AG increases migration. Detailed analysis of primary neuroblast migration by time-lapse imaging reveals that nucleokinesis, as well as the length and branching of the migratory processes are under dynamic control of the eCB system. Finally, similar effects are observed in vivo by analyzing the morphology of green fluorescent protein-labeled neuroblasts in brain slices from mice treated with CB1 or CB2 antagonists. These results describe a novel role for the endocannabinoid system in neuroblast migration in vivo, highlighting its importance in regulating an additional essential step in adult neurogenesis.
Introduction
In the adult brain, neural stem (NS) cells proliferate in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and generate neuroblasts that migrate along the rostral migratory stream (RMS) to populate the olfactory bulb with new neurons (Alvarez-Buylla et al., 2000). Importantly, neuroblasts can also divert away from the RMS and migrate to damaged areas in the brain in which they might limit damage and/or restore function (Arvidsson et al., 2002; Goings et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007). In-depth knowledge of the factors that regulate neuroblast migration is therefore essential to facilitate translational research in this area.
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), such as neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) (Ono et al., 1994; Hu et al., 1996), matrix metalloproteinases (Bovetti et al., 2007; Murase et al., 2008), the ephrin family of receptor tyrosine kinases (Conover et al., 2000; Anton et al., 2004), and growth factors such, as BDNF (Chiaramello et al., 2007), hepatocyte growth factor (Garzotto et al., 2008), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (Paratcha et al., 2006), vascular endothelial growth factor (Zhang et al., 2003), and IGF-1 (Hurtado-Chong et al., 2009), can regulate neuroblast migration. Many of these molecules have the potential to cross-talk to endocannabinoid (eCB) signaling pathways in cells. For example, eCB signaling couples NCAM and FGF receptor signaling to axonal growth (Williams et al., 2003), a migratory response that functions at the level of the neuronal growth cone. eCB signaling also regulates the migration of many cell types, including immune (Miller et al., 2008), hematopoietic (Jordà et al., 2002; Patinkin et al., 2008), and cancer (Joseph et al., 2004; Preet et al., 2008) cells. Interestingly, the eCB pathway is also often upregulated after brain injury (Mechoulam et al., 2007). This clearly appears to be an adaptive pathway with the potential to integrate a number of extracellular signals to migratory responses.
There is an emerging consensus that eCB signaling plays a major role in adult neurogenesis. In this context, substantial reductions in NS cell proliferation are seen in both the hippocampus and SVZ when CB1 and/or CB2 receptor function is inhibited by selective antagonists (Jin et al., 2004; Aguado et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2005; Palazuelos et al., 2006; Goncalves et al., 2008). Similar effects are seen when diacylglycerol lipases, DAGLα or DAGLβ, the enzymes that synthesize 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) (the major eCB in the brain), are knocked out (Gao et al., 2010) or inhibited by RHC80267 (O,O′-[1,6-hexanediylbis(iminocarbonyl)]dioxime cyclohexanone) or tetrahydrolipstatin (THL) (Goncalves et al., 2008). Whereas eCB function has been investigated in NS cell proliferation, a direct role in other important steps in adult neurogenesis such as stem cell-derived neuroblast migration has not been investigated.
Here, we show that eCB signaling is required for the migration of an NS cell line in a wound closure assay and for the migration of neuroblasts out of cultured RMS explants. Targeting the eCB system markedly affects nucleokinesis and causes dramatic changes in the number and length of processes extending from neuroblasts. Importantly, inhibiting eCB receptor function in vivo produces similar effects on the morphology of migratory neuroblasts within the RMS.
Materials and Methods
Animals.
Both male and female CD-1 mice were used (Charles River) in these studies. All procedures were performed in accordance with United Kingdom Home Office Regulations (Animal Scientific Procedures Act, 1986).
Cell lines.
Protocols used for the culture of NS cells have been described in detail previously (Conti et al., 2005). In this study, we used COR-1 cells that are derived from mouse fetal cortex. Briefly, cells were expanded as adherent cultures on gelatin-coated flasks (Iwaki) in Euromed-N media (Euroclone) supplemented with N2 (Invitrogen) and 10 ng/ml each of epidermal growth factor and FGF-2 (Peprotech).
Scratch wound assay.
Briefly, COR-1 cells were grown in normal growth media and plated out on Essen Image Lock 24-well plates at 600,000 cells per well. After 24 h, confluent cell layers were scratched using the Essen Woundmaker to create a cell-free wound ∼800–900 μm wide. After scratching, cells were treated with various drugs in normal growth media, including a CB1 antagonist (AM251 [N-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-N-1-piperidinyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide]) (0.25–1 μm), a CB2 antagonist (JTE-907 [N-(benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyl)-7-methoxy-2-oxo-8-pentyloxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxamide]) (0.25–1 μm), a CB1 agonist (ACEA [arachidonyl-2′-chloroethylamide/(all Z)-N-(2-cycloethyl)-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenamide]) (0.25–1 μm), and a CB2 agonist (JWH-133 [3-(1919dimethylbutyl)-1-deoxy-D8-tetrahydrocannabinol]) (0.25–1 μm), well-characterized drugs that are selective for their targets (Pertwee, 2006), and the DAGL inhibitors RHC80267 (10–50 μm) and THL (5–10 μm) (Bisogno et al., 2003). Drugs were obtained from Tocris Bioscience, and their effects on COR-1 cells, including dose–response curves, have been reported previously (Goncalves et al., 2008). For this reason, we generally show results obtained with the most efficacious concentration of each drug, but representative examples of dose–response curves can be seen in supplemental Figure 1 (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The plate was placed into the Incucyte (Essen) in which wound width was measured every 2 h for 24 h. The rate of migration was obtained by measuring the area under the curve representing the change in wound width over time.
SVZ explant migration assay.
Briefly, brains from postnatal day 5 (P5) to P8 CD1 mice were sliced coronally with a tissue chopper and placed in HBSS with 5 mm HEPES and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Ward et al., 2005b). Under a high-magnification dissecting microscope (Leica), the RMS was identified by its translucent appearance and was dissected from the surrounding brain tissue. Explants were then cut up into smaller pieces of ∼200 μm in diameter. After being resuspended in Neurobasal medium (containing 30% glucose, 2 mm l-glutamine, and B27 supplement; all from Invitrogen), explants were embedded in Matrigel (BD Biosciences) diluted 3:1 with fresh Neurobasal medium containing the drug of interest onto glass coverslips. When the Matrigel matrix had solidified (after ∼15 min at 5% CO2 and 37°C), medium was added containing various drugs targeting the endocannabinoid system essentially as described above but in addition including a third more potent DAGL inhibitor, OMDM188 (N-formyl-l-isoleucine-(1S)-1-[[(2S,3S)-3-hexyl-4-oxo-2-oxetanyl] methyl]dodecyl ester) (0.25 μm), a kind gift from Dr. Vincenzo Di Marzo (Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, Napoli, Italy) (Ortar et al., 2008), and the monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor JZL-184 (4-nitrophenyl 4-[bis(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)(hydroxy)methyl]piperidine-1-carboxylate) (0.5 μm), a kind gift from Dr. Ben Cravatt (Scripps Institute, La Jolla, CA) (Long et al., 2009). Explants were maintained for up to 1 d in vitro at 5% CO2 and 37°C.
To obtain cultures of dissociated neuroblasts, RMS explants were triturated in HBSS with 0.25 mg/ml trypsin (Invitrogen) and 20 μg/ml DNase (Worthington) and plated in Neurobasal medium with supplements on coverslips previously coated with poly-ornithine (0.5 mg/ml) and laminin (10 μg/ml) (Sigma).
Postnatal electroporation.
P3 mice pups, both male and female, were anesthetized with isoflurane (0.6 L/min). Using a pulled glass capillary (diameter, 1.5 mm; Clarke Electromedical Instruments), 3 μl of 1 μg/μl pCX–enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) plasmid (a kind gift from Dr. Masaru Okabe, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) were injected into the right ventricle. Animals were then subjected to five electrical pulses of 99.9 V for 50 ms with 850 ms intervals using the CUY21SC electroporator (Nepagene) and 5 mm tweezer electrodes (Sonidel) coated with conductive gel (CEFAR). Animals were then reanimated under oxygen and returned to their mother. Fourteen days later, the pups were injected intraperitoneally with 50 μl of a CB1 antagonist, AM251 or LY320135, or a CB2 antagonist, JTE-907 or AM630, at 5 mg/kg in 0.8% DMSO (all drugs from Tocris Bioscience). Twenty-four hours later, the pups were killed and their brains analyzed. Much longer-term treatment of animals with these drugs has no obvious effects on the general morphology of the SVZ, RMS, or olfactory bulb (Goncalves et al., 2008). Visual inspection of tissue sections stained for Hoechst to label all nuclei, GFAP to label astrocytes, or polysialic acid (PSA)-NCAM or doublecortin (DCX) to label neuroblasts from control and drug-treated animals revealed no obvious difference in the general morphology of the RMS or in the expression of these markers (supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).
Immunohistochemistry.
For the RMS explant migration assays, explants were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 45 min, 6 h, or 24 h after embedding. The explants were blocked in 15% goat serum/0.3% Triton X-100/PBS for 1 h and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488–phalloidin (1:200; Invitrogen) overnight at 4°C. The coverslips were then mounted with Mowiol. For the staining of dissociated RMS cultures, cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 45 min 2 or 5 d after plating. Cells were blocked with 1% BSA/0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 1 h and then incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C: rabbit anti-DCX (1:100; Abcam), guinea pig anti-DAGLα (1:100; a kind gift from Dr. Masahiko Watanabe, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan) (Yoshida et al., 2006), rabbit anti-CB1 receptor (1:200; a kind gift from Dr. M. Elphick, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK), rabbit anti- CB2 receptor (1:500; Cayman Chemical), and goat anti-MAGL (1:100; Abcam). The DAGLα antibodies used in the present study specifically label structures involved in eCB signaling with no staining seen throughout the brains of DAGLα knock-out mice (Gao et al., 2010). In the present study, we confirmed DAGLα antibody specificity for cultured cells by showing that the antibodies only stain COS-7 cells after the expression of transfected DAGLα (supplemental Fig. 3, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). The CB1, CB2, and the Abcam MAGL antibodies have also had their specificity validated by use of tissues from knock-out mice (Bridges et al., 2003; Gong et al., 2006) (C.H., unpublished observations). In addition, in the case of DAGLα, the CB1 receptor, and MAGL, results presented were verified using independent antibodies obtained from Abcam for DAGLα (Gao et al., 2010) and Dr. Ken Mackie (Indiana University, Bloomington, IN) for the CB1 receptor and MAGL (Twitchell et al., 1997; Straiker et al., 2009). The specificity of these antibodies has also been independently validated for cultured cells (Mulder et al., 2008; Keimpema et al., 2010). After three PBS washes, the appropriate secondary antibodies were added (Alexa Fluor 594 or 488 at 1:1000; Invitrogen) for 2 h at room temperature. The cells were also stained with Hoechst (1:10,000; Sigma) and in some cases with Alexa Fluor 488–phalloidin (1:200; Invitrogen) for 2 h at room temperature, washed, and mounted with Mowiol. Images were taken using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 710).
For histological analysis of GFP-labeled neuroblasts, brains were fixed in 4% PFA overnight and subsequently hemisected. The right side of the brain was mounted in 20% gelatin (Sigma) and fixed overnight in 4% PFA. Brains were then cut in 50 μm slices on a vibratome (VT10005; Leica) and kept in PBS with 0.1% sodium azide. For staining, slices were blocked for 1 h with 1% BSA/0.1% Triton X-100/PBS and then incubated with rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000; Invitrogen) overnight at 4°C. After washing in PBS, slices were incubated with the Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000) and Hoechst (1:5000; Sigma) for 3 h at room temperature and then mounted in Mowiol. Images were taken using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM 710). Labeled neuroblasts were sampled throughout the entire length of the RMS, and we found no evidence to suggest regional variations in responsiveness to the treatments.
For immunohistochemical localization of DAGLα, PSA-NCAM, and GFAP in the RMS, 5 μm paraffin wax coronal sections were used. Sections were first dewaxed in xylene, heated in citric acid (10 mm, pH 6) until boiling, and then washed under running tap for 5 min. Sections were then blocked with 1% BSA for 15 min, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with the primary antibody: rabbit anti-GFAP (1:3000; Dako), mouse anti-PSA-NCAM (1:600; Sigma), rabbit anti-DCX (1:1500; Abcam), and guinea pig anti-DAGLα (1:100). The sections were then incubated with the corresponding fluorescent secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594; 1:1000; Invitrogen) and/or Hoechst 33342 (1:10,000; Sigma).
Data analysis.
To quantify migration out of the explants, pictures were taken on an Apotome microscope (Carl Zeiss). Using NIH Image J, we measured the distance between the edge of the explant and the farthest cell (identified by Hoechst staining) for at least 10 different positions around the explant to obtain the average distance migrated out of each explant. The presented data are obtained from three independent experiments, with at least 10 explants per condition per experiment.
For time-lapse imaging analysis, RMS explants were embedded in Matrigel onto Hi-Q4 multi-experiment dishes (Nikon) and imaged with a Nikon Biostation every 4 min for 24 h while at 37°C and 5% CO2. The movies were then analyzed using Volocity Software (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences).
For analysis of time-lapse imaging of migrating neuroblasts, we examined nuclear movement, process length, and branching. First, the position of the cell nucleus was tracked in each frame to obtain the distance migrated by the nucleus per frame. Each cell was tracked for at least 1 h. Second, the length of any protrusion originating from the cell body was measured for each frame for each cell. The lengths obtained were averaged to calculate the average process length for a given cell over time. Finally, we quantified the number of branching points per cell per timeframe. A branching point can be described as either a protrusion from the cell body or from the leading process itself. For this analysis, at least 40 cells were tracked for each condition, from explants dissected on 3 different days.
For morphological analysis of neuroblasts in brain slices, process length and branching were also examined. The length of the leading process for each cell was measured using NIH Image J. In addition, the number of cells that displayed secondary branching was counted. Secondary branching was defined as a protrusion from the leading process >1 somal length from the tip of the growth cone, to differentiate from a branched growth cone (Koizumi et al., 2006). In this experiment, n = 4 for controls, n = 5 for AM251- and JTE-907-treated groups, and n = 6 for AM630- and LY320135 (4-[6-methoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-benzofuran-3-carbonyl]benzonitrile)-treated groups, with at least 100 cells analyzed per condition.
Statistical analysis.
Student's two-sided t test was used for all statistical analysis. When shown, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (all relative to control).
Results
eCB function is required for stem cell migration in culture
The eCB system drives proliferation of NS cells in the adult brain (see Introduction). However, it is not known whether eCB signaling is required for other aspects of adult neurogenesis, such as stem cell and/or neuroblast migration. The recently characterized COR-1 NS cell line can be expanded in culture without losing its ability to be differentiated into neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes (Conti et al., 2005; Pollard et al., 2006). The cells express DAGLα and DAGLβ, as well as the CB1 and CB2 receptors, and importantly, like endogenous NS cells in the adult brain, DAGL-dependent activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors is required for optimal proliferation (Goncalves et al., 2008). It follows that they are likely to be a useful model for initial studies aimed at determining whether eCB signaling is required for NS cell migration.
Cell migration was assessed in full growth medium using live cell imaging in a “scratch wound” assay. This involves making a scratch wound in an established confluent cell monolayer; closure of the wound is driven primarily by cell migration from the edge of the scratch with the rate of migration calculated by measuring the change in wound width over time (Etienne-Manneville et al., 2001). When confluent monolayers of COR-1 cells are scratched, the wound typically fills in over a period of ∼24 h (Fig. 1A,B). Importantly, we found no evidence of significant proliferation in these conditions during the time of the assay, and wound closure is not inhibited by the anti-proliferative drug mitomycin C (supplemental Fig. 4, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). In contrast, as shown in Figure 1, A and B, wound closure was significantly inhibited by a selective CB1 receptor antagonist (AM251, 1 μm). Results pooled from three independent experiments show a ∼50% (p < 0.05) reduction in wound closure rate in the presence of this drug (Fig. 1C). A similar decrease (∼40%, p < 0.05) was observed with a selective CB2 antagonist (JTE-907, 1 μm) (Fig. 1C). Inhibition of both CB1 and CB2 receptors caused a more substantial decrease in migration (∼80%, p < 0.01) (Fig. 1C). Because DAGL activity appears to sustain eCB tone in COR-1 and other NS cell lines (Goncalves et al., 2008), we investigated whether DAGL activity was also important for NS cell migration in culture. RHC80267 inhibits the activity of DAGLα and DAGLβ at 10–50 μm (Bisogno et al., 2003). At concentrations of 25 and 50 μm, RHC80267 substantially decreased (∼60%, p < 0.05 and ∼80%, p < 0.01, respectively) the rate of migration of COR-1 cells to a level similar to that seen with the combination of CB1 and CB2 antagonists (Fig. 1C). THL, another inhibitor of DAGLα and DAGLβ activity (Bisogno et al., 2003), also significantly decreased the rate of migration of COR-1 cells (Fig. 1C). Recent evidence suggests that, because the overlap in target profiles for serine hydrolases in the brain with RHC80267 and THL is limited to two enzymes other than the DAGLs that do not exhibit significant hydrolytic activity using 1stearoyl-2-AG as a substrate, any pharmacological effects seen with both drugs can be viewed as good evidence for a DAGLα/β-dependent event (Hoover et al., 2008). Overall, these results suggest that a DAGL-driven eCB pathway is required for the migration of COR-1 cells.
Activation of cannabinoid receptors increases stem cell migration in culture
After demonstrating that blocking CB receptors decreased the migration of COR-1 cells in the wound assay, we wanted to investigate whether wound closure could be stimulated by CB1 and/or CB2 receptor agonists. As seen in Figure 2A, when COR-1 cells were treated with a selective CB1 agonist (ACEA, 0.75 μm), the rate of wound closure was greater than that of the control untreated culture (Fig. 2A,B). Overall, treatment with the CB1 receptor agonist increased the rate of closure by ∼50% (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2C). This effect was completely blocked by the selective CB1 antagonist (AM251, 1 μm) (Fig. 2C). Treatment with a selective CB2 agonist (JWH-133, 1 μm) also significantly (p < 0.05) increased the rate of wound closure but by a more muted 25% (Fig. 2C). This increase was prevented when a selective CB2 antagonist was included in the medium (JTE-907, 1 μm) (Fig. 2C). Together, these results suggest that the eCB signaling system in a NS cell line can couple to and regulate a migratory response.
Migrating neuroblasts express the main components of the eCB signaling system
The above results suggest that, within the NS cell lineage, parental stem cells make and respond to 2-AG. We then wanted to determine whether migrating neuroblasts, and in particular those derived from stem cells that reside in the SVZ, retain expression of DAGLα. Figure 3A shows the RMS in a young mouse labeled with antibodies to PSA-NCAM, a well characterized marker for migrating neuroblasts. The majority of the cells in the RMS also clearly expressed DAGLα as demonstrated with antibodies validated to be specific for this enzyme (Yoshida et al., 2006; Gao et al., 2010) (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, at higher magnification, it can be seen that GFAP-positive astrocytes in the RMS do not express detectable levels of DAGLα (Fig. 3C). We also cultured primary mouse RMS neuroblasts on a laminin/poly-ornithine substrate for 24–72 h and then stained the cultures for the various components of the eCB system. At low magnification, all neuroblasts (labeled with DCX or PSA-NCAM) are positive for DAGLα, the CB1 and CB2 receptors, and MAGL (supplemental Fig. 5, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). Higher-magnification images show that DAGLα is highly expressed in the neuroblast, all the way to the tip of the filopodia in the terminal growth cone-like structure (Fig. 3D,F). The CB1 receptor shows a punctate distribution throughout the cell (Fig. 3E,F) partially overlapping with DAGLα (Fig. 3F). Thus, migrating neuroblasts clearly retain the machinery to make 2-AG and to respond to it.
eCB tone is important for the migration of neuroblasts out of RMS explants
To investigate the role of the eCB system in neuroblast migration, freshly dissected RMS tissue explants from the early postnatal brain were embedded in a Matrigel three-dimensional matrix, a technique which has been described previously to recreate the chain migration of neuroblasts known to occur in vivo (Wichterle et al., 1997) (Fig. 4A). Staining of RMS explants embedded in Matrigel confirmed that virtually all cells migrating out of the explant were positive for migrating neuroblast markers, such as PSA-NCAM and DCX (Lois et al., 1996; Brown et al., 2003) (data not shown). We then treated the RMS explants with different cannabinoid receptor antagonists and DAGL inhibitors and measured the migration of neuroblasts out of the explant. Explants were initially treated with the CB1 antagonist AM251 at 0.5 μm and fixed after 6 h (Fig. 4B). We chose as short an assay period as possible because we were concerned that endogenous factors that might drive eCB signaling could be lost with time. The migration distance was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced by 30% after treatment with AM251 (Fig. 4D). Similarly, treatment with the CB2 antagonist JTE-907 at 0.5 μm also caused a significant (p < 0.05) 40% decrease in migration after 6 h (Fig. 4C,D). Simultaneous addition of both antagonists did not further increase the effect obtained by each single antagonist on its own. Moreover, no less than three different DAGL inhibitors, RHC80267 (50 μm), THL (20 μm), and OMDM188 (0.25 μm), significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the migration of neuroblasts to an extent similar to treatment with the CB1 and CB2 antagonists and did so at concentrations that are required to block DAGLα and DAGLβ activity in intact cells (Bisogno et al., 2003; Ortar et al., 2008) (Fig. 4D). To confirm that the effect observed was not attributable to an effect on cell proliferation, explants were stained for nuclear cell proliferation antigen Ki67 (Kee et al., 2002). When treated with the drugs mentioned above, no changes in the number of Ki67-positive cells were observed, confirming that the effects seen were attributable to changes in migration and not proliferation (data not shown). These results indicate that eCB signaling, and more specifically a DAGL/CB1/CB2 pathway, is required for SVZ-derived neuroblast migration.
Activation of cannabinoid receptors increases the migration of neuroblasts out of RMS explants
After showing that an endogenous eCB tone is important for the migration of SVZ-derived neuroblasts in culture, we wanted to investigate whether activation of the cannabinoid receptors could stimulate migration. After dissection, explants were treated with 0.5 μm CB1 agonist ACEA for 24 h. The CB1 agonist had a clear and pronounced effect on cell migration out of the explants (Fig. 5A,B), with cells on average migrating 65% farther compared with control cultures (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5C). This increase in migrated distance was blocked by the CB1 antagonist AM251, confirming this was a CB1-mediated effect (Fig. 5C). Likewise, treatment with the CB2 agonist JWH-133 (0.5 μm) also led to a significant (p < 0.05) ∼50% increase in migrated distance, with this effect blocked by the CB2 antagonist (JTE-907, 1 μm) (Fig. 5C). Treatment with both agonists at the same time did not further potentiate the effect of each agonists added separately (Fig. 5C). Interestingly, although the CB1 and CB2 antagonists readily blocked the migratory activity of the respective agonists over a 24 h period, they did not reduce migration to below the level seen in the control cultures (Fig. 5C). This suggests that the eCB tone revealed by drug inhibition over the initial 6 h after explant embedding is lost over a longer period of culture, perhaps as a result of the washout of factors driving the pathway. We also found that treatment with ACEA significantly increased the number of cells present at any given distance, and this effect was blocked by the CB1 antagonist AM251 (data not shown). Similar effects were seen when explants were treated with the CB2 agonist JWH-133 (data not shown). Therefore, stimulation of cannabinoid receptors increased not only the extent of migration but also the number of cells migrating out of the explants.
Another way to enhance cannabinoid signaling is to inhibit the hydrolysis of 2-AG, one of the main endocannabinoids in the brain. Mice treated with the selective MAGL inhibitor JZL-184 had an eightfold increase in 2-AG levels but also displayed behaviors that are normally seen with cannabinoid receptor stimulation (Long et al., 2009). Treatment with JZL-184 (0.5 μm) led to a significant 30% increase in migration out of the explants (Fig. 5D). Inhibition of this effect required the simultaneous block of CB1 or CB2 receptors, suggesting that both receptors contribute to the response (Fig. 5D). In addition, as expected, the response was not seen in cultures treated with a DAGL inhibitor (RHC80267) (Fig. 5D), suggesting that 2-AG synthesis is required for the response. Overall, these data support the hypothesis that 2-AG is the eCB responsible for the migratory response and that this response can be driven by activation of the CB1 or CB2 receptors on the migratory neuroblasts.
eCB signaling regulates nucleokinesis
Neuronal migration is generally characterized by several discrete steps, one of the most crucial being nucleokinesis, the saltatory movement of the nucleus into the leading process (Schaar et al., 2005; Marin et al., 2010). We used time-lapse imaging to better examine nucleokinesis in the neuroblasts migrating out of RMS explants. In control medium, the nucleus of migrating neuroblasts displayed periods in which it was essentially immobile coupled with periods of greater movement, generally covering distances up to 10–15 μm. A representative trace showing the movement of a single nucleus over an ∼4 h period in control conditions is shown in Figure 6A. For quantitative purposes, we considered only single nuclear movements longer than 5 μm. Following this criterion, on average, control cells display ∼1.5 saltatory nuclear movements per hour (Fig. 6C). Interestingly, nucleokinesis was dramatically impaired when cells were treated with a CB1 antagonist (AM251, 1 μm) with a highly significant (p < 0.001) approximately threefold reduction of nuclear movements per hour relative to the control (Fig. 6A,C). In contrast, treatment with a CB1 agonist (ACEA, 0.5 μm) led to a highly significant (p < 0.001) more than twofold increase in the number of saltatory movements (Fig. 6B,C). Targeting the CB2 receptor led to similar, although more muted, responses (Fig. 6C). In addition, JZL-184, a selective inhibitor of MAGL (Long et al., 2009), the enzyme responsible for most of the hydrolysis of 2-AG in the brain (Blankman et al., 2007), also significantly increased the number of saltatory movements per hour (Fig. 6C). On the contrary, inhibition of eCB signaling increased nuclear oscillations over very small distances (Fig. 6A and data not shown), ultimately affecting the neuroblast ability to migrate out of the explants. Representative movies of migrating cells can be viewed at http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/biohealth/research/wolfson/supplementarymaterial.html.
Together, these data suggest that eCB signaling can play an important role in the regulation of nucleokinesis in migrating neuroblasts.
The cannabinoid system regulates process length and branching of migrating neuroblasts
Another discrete step in the migratory process is the extension of a single leading process that can affect both the rate and direction of movement. This event shares many features with axonal growth, and, in this context, eCB signaling promotes axonal outgrowth (Williams et al., 2003). We measured the average length of the leading process of the migratory neuroblasts (see Materials and Methods) in control conditions and in the presence of CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists or antagonists. Representative images of the morphology of the phalloidin-stained cells can be seen in Figure 7A–C. As with many of the responses described above, the most dramatic effects were observed with drugs that target the CB1 receptor. Indeed, the CB1 agonist increases process length, whereas the CB1 antagonist decreases it. These effects were highly significant relative to the controls (p < 0.001), and remarkably there was a sixfold difference between the average process length measured between agonist- and antagonist-treated cultures (Fig. 7D). The CB2 agonist had a similar effect to the CB1 agonist, but the CB2 antagonist did not significantly affect process length (Fig. 7D). Again, effects similar to the CB1/CB2 agonists were elicited by the selective MAGL inhibitor, implicating 2-AG in the physiological pathway controlling process extension.
Migrating neurons have been shown to change direction through repeated rounds of process extension and retraction, forming new protrusions either by extending a new process from the side of an existing process or directly from the cell soma (Ward et al., 2005a). Branching defects in migrating neurons have been reported previously to impact the rate of migration (Gupta et al., 2003; Koizumi et al., 2006). Therefore, we wanted to investigate whether the eCB system also plays a role in process formation and quantified the number of branching points per neuroblast per frame. Treatment with cannabinoid receptor agonists, or the selective MAGL inhibitor, had no effect on the number of branching points (Fig. 7E), and in these conditions neuroblasts tended to display a highly polarized morphology characterized by a single long protrusion (Fig. 7B). However, inhibiting either CB1 or CB2 receptors caused a dramatic threefold to fivefold increase in branching compared with control (Fig. 7C,E). This effect was primarily attributable to enhanced secondary branches extending from the main protrusion. Overall, these data suggest that the eCB system contributes to maintain a polarized morphology in the migrating neuroblasts by promoting the extension of a single major leading process.
The cannabinoid system regulates process length and branching of migrating neuroblasts in the brain
Our experiments with RMS explant cultures strongly support a role for the endocannabinoid system in neuroblast migration. Therefore, we wanted to examine whether the eCB system might have a function in neuroblast migration in vivo. To do so, we labeled RMS migrating neuroblasts by postnatal electroporation of a GFP-expressing plasmid in the SVZ (Boutin et al., 2008) (Fig. 8A). The GFP-labeled cells found in the RMS (Fig. 8B) are SVZ-derived migrating neuroblasts, which are positive for PSA-NCAM (data not shown). Fourteen days after electroporation, animals were treated with one of four cannabinoid receptor inhibitors: two independent CB1 antagonists, AM251 and LY320135, and two independent CB2 antagonists, JTE-907 and AM630 (6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl), at 5 mg/kg via intraperitoneal injections (Goncalves et al., 2008). Animals were killed 24 h later, and their brains were sliced and subsequently stained for GFP to study the morphology of migratory neuroblasts. In control animals, neuroblasts within the RMS generally extend a single process with an average length of 45 μm (Fig. 8C,F,I); this is usually oriented toward the olfactory bulb. In the animals treated with CB1 or CB2 antagonists, average process length was significantly shorter than in vehicle-treated animals (Fig. 8J,K). Indeed, treatment with cannabinoid antagonists caused a 40–50% reduction (p < 0.01) in the leading process length of neuroblasts sampled throughout the RMS (Fig. 8L), suggesting that eCB signaling operates along the entire stream. In vehicle-treated animals, 80% of migrating neuroblasts had one main protrusion, with occasional branching at the tip of the growth cone (Fig. 8C,F,I). Treatment with CB1 and CB2 antagonists caused a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the percentage of cells displaying secondary branching (Fig. 8M), defined as a protrusion from their leading process >1 somal length removed from the tip of the growth cone, to differentiate it from a branched growth cone (Koizumi et al., 2006), or additional protrusions extending directly from the soma. Indeed, some cells displayed long branches from the cell body (Fig. 8D,E), whereas others exhibited short branches forming all along the leading process (Fig. 8G,H). There were no obvious differences in the phenotype of cells treated with CB1 relative to CB2 antagonists. Importantly, these effects are similar to those observed in cultured neuroblasts and strongly point to a crucial role for the eCB system in the regulation of neuroblast migration in the postnatal RMS.
Discussion
The directed migration of SVZ-derived neuroblasts out of the RMS could offer the possibility of neuronal repair within the damaged brain. Indeed, focal ischemia triggers SVZ cell proliferation, leading to neuroblast migration toward the striatum, which has been observed for >1 year after the initial injury (Arvidsson et al., 2002; Kokaia et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2004, 2007). A full understanding of the pathways regulating migration might provide new therapeutic opportunities. In the present study, we have investigated the role of eCB signaling in neuroblast migration for several reasons. First, SVZ-derived neuroblasts are the progeny of NS cells that express the main components of the eCB signaling system, and whereas a role in the proliferation of these cells is well established, a role in their migration had remained unexplored. Second, eCBs are upregulated in the injured brain, and they can regulate the migration of many other cell types, suggesting that they might be candidates for regulating neuroblast migration in the injured brain. Finally, several of the factors that play a role in neuroblast migration in the RMS are capable of activating eCB signaling (discussed below).
Initially, we tested a role for eCB signaling in migration using the COR-1 NS cell line because these cells express DAGLα/β and both cannabinoid receptors, and like NS cells in the adult hippocampus and SVZ, they require eCB signaling for proliferation (Goncalves et al., 2008). Using a scratch wound assay, our results show that, when the cells are maintained in full growth media, both CB1 and CB2 antagonists can substantially inhibit their migration (by up to 80%), a response also seen with two distinct DAGL inhibitors. Under similar high-density culture conditions, these drugs have no effect on proliferation or survival, so these are not confounding issues (data not shown). A recent microarray-based analysis shows that the CB1 and CB2 receptors regulate the expression of a common set of transcripts in COR-1 cells (Doherty laboratory, unpublished observation), including some that encode for molecules known to regulate migration, e.g., the Smurf1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (Huang, 2010), the small GTPase Cdc42 (Jaffe et al., 2005), or myosin1C (Diefenbach et al., 2002). Thus, both cannabinoid receptors appear to couple to common second-messenger cascades. Indeed, the increased speed of wound closure obtained with selective cannabinoid agonists further supports the coupling of both CB receptors to a migratory response, as reported in hematopoietic cells (Patinkin et al., 2008) and vascular endothelial cells (Blázquez et al., 2003).
The above eCB signaling components continue to be expressed in SVZ-derived neuroblasts, in which they appear also to be important for polarized migration. Indeed, CB1/CB2 antagonists and no less than three independent DAGL inhibitors inhibit migration of neuroblasts out of RMS explants. This effect was seen during the initial 6 h period of culture but not at 24 h. This suggests that factors driving an eCB tone in the explants might be washed out over longer periods of time (note that the culture media for the explants was not supplemented with exogenous growth factors). Nonetheless, this provides a good control to demonstrate that the drugs do not have any general nonspecific effects on migration, which would be expected to be exacerbated over time. Importantly, the cells retain the ability to migrate in response to eCB signaling as CB1 or CB2 receptor agonists, and a drug that prevents 2-AG breakdown stimulated migration from the explants over a 24 h period.
The migration of many cells, including neuroblasts, is characterized by several typical features. Migratory cells are generally highly polarized with a single leading process. Cellular movement relies on efficient nucleokinesis, the highly regulated translocation of the nucleus along the leading process (Marin et al., 2010). Our live cell imaging analysis has uncovered a substantial role for the eCB pathway in neuroblast migration. For example, we found a sixfold increase in both the number of nuclear saltatory movements and the mean length of the leading process when cells are subjected to eCB signaling activation compared with cells treated with selective CB antagonists, which also caused a striking fivefold increase in the number of branch points. Overall, these results strongly support a role for eCBs in ensuring an efficient polarized migration. The exact molecular mechanism underlying this function, which is likely to involve modulation of the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton as well as localization of polarity regulators, remains to be clarified.
On the basis of our in vitro results, we asked whether an eCB tone is directly affecting neuroblast migration within the RMS in the living animal. To this end, we fluorescently labeled SVZ-derived neuroblasts by in vivo electroporation and allowed them to migrate along the RMS for several days. We then treated the animals for 24 h with selective CB antagonists and subsequently examined neuroblast morphology within the RMS. Remarkably, the effects of CB1 and CB2 antagonists on the morphology of neuroblasts within the RMS were very similar to the effects observed on cultured neuroblasts. In this context, inhibiting eCB signaling resulted in a 50% decrease in the length of the leading process and a twofold increase in the percentage of cells with secondary branching, both of which have been described to disrupt normal migration (Gupta et al., 2003; Kappeler et al., 2006; Nasrallah et al., 2006). Interestingly, deletion of DCX from neuroblasts caused a similar decrease in primary process length and increase in secondary branching, and these were associated with defects in nuclear translocation and a decreased rate of migration (Koizumi et al., 2006). It was suggested that branching defects could lead to nuclear translocation defects and that these two events could be temporally related. The changes caused by cannabinoid antagonists on process length and branching observed both in ex vivo cultures and in vivo could be therefore responsible for the impaired nuclear translocation and, as a consequence, the decreased rate of migration.
2-AG is one of two well-established eCBs, the other being anandamide (Devane et al., 1992). Our results suggest that 2-AG drives eCB signaling in migratory neuroblasts. In this context, migrating neuroblasts selectively express DAGLα within their leading processes, and whereas three drugs that inhibit DAGL-dependent 2-AG synthesis (RHC80267, THL, and OMDM188) reduced neuroblast migration out of RMS explants, a drug that selectively prevents 2-AG hydrolysis (JZL-184) increased it. Indeed, the effects of the selective MAGL inhibitor on neuroblast morphology were indistinguishable from those elicited by a number of CB1/CB2 agonists and the opposite of those seen with the DAGL inhibitors and CB1/CB2 antagonists. These results therefore suggest that 2-AG plays an important role in the regulation of neuroblast migration. The possibility of off-target effects affecting the interpretation of our results is extremely unlikely because results with any single drug (e.g., AM251) are internally consistent with the results obtained with numerous agents that we use to target the synthesis, action, and termination of the action of 2-AG at CB1/CB2 receptors and generally supported by the use of a similar drug from a different chemical class.
DAGL activity can in principle be activated by any receptor that stimulates the production of DAG, e.g., the FGF receptor (Williams et al., 2003), or any agent that increases intracellular calcium (Bisogno et al., 2003). Therefore, the eCB pathway could be integrating signals from several players. BDNF, which increases neuronal sensitivity to eCBs by increasing the level of CB1 transcripts (Maison et al., 2009), can also regulate the migration of neuroblasts through TrkB activation (Chiaramello et al., 2007). In addition, TrkB receptor transactivation was shown to mediate eCB-induced chemotaxis of cholecystokinin-expressing interneurons (Berghuis et al., 2005). Finally, NCAM function is required for neuroblast migration in the RMS (Tomasiewicz et al., 1993), and this is one of a number of CAMs that promotes neurite outgrowth by activating eCB signaling (Williams et al., 2003). Future studies will address which, if any, of the above actually activate eCB signaling in SVZ-derived neuroblasts.
Methods for enhancing neuroblast migration to sites of injury could be developed as a way of promoting brain repair. There is evidence that eCBs can direct the migration of immune system cells (Jordà et al., 2002; Lunn et al., 2006), and in the CNS, eCBs can be released by activated microglia and damaged neurons at sites of injury (Witting et al., 2006; Mechoulam et al., 2007). Thus, eCBs might attract neuroblasts to injury sites in the CNS; however, we think this is unlikely to attract cells from the RMS because 2-AG has a very short half-life and might not be expected to signal over considerable distances (Rouzer et al., 2002). Interestingly, NCAMs ability to promote neurite outgrowth is inhibited by removal of polysialic acid (Doherty et al., 1990), and a similar removal of polysialic acid from NCAM on migratory neuroblasts triggers their dispersion away from the RMS into the CNS, including the cortex and striatum (Battista et al., 2010). It follows that disrupting migration within the RMS with CB1 and/or CB2 antagonists might encourage the neuroblasts to leave their normal pathway and go to damaged areas of the brain.
In summary, we propose a new role for the eCB system in the regulation of neuroblast migration in the RMS in the postnatal brain. The key signaling molecules are the DAGLs, which drive an eCB tone via activation of both CB1 and CB2 receptors. Future studies will address the nature of the molecules that activate DAGL, as well as the signaling pathways that operate downstream from the CB1/CB2 receptors to regulate the cytoskeleton.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. We thank Jennifer Shieh for her valuable advice on RMS explant cultures, Dr. Masaru Okabe for the pCX-EGFP plasmid, Dr. Alain Chedotal as well as Athena Ypsilanti for their help in learning the in vivo electroporation technique, and Dr. Bia Goncalves for her help with the injections. We thank Dr. Maurice Elphick for the CB1 antibody, Dr. Ken Mackie for the CB1 and MAGL antibodies, Dr. Masahiko Watanabe for the DAGLα antibody, Dr. Tarek Samad for tissue from the MAG lipase knock-out mouse, and Dr. Ben Cravatt's laboratory for the MAGL inhibitor. Finally, we thank Drs. Giorgio Ortar and Vincenzo Di Marzo for providing us with the novel DAGL inhibitor, OMDM188.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Prof. Patrick Doherty, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK. Patrick.Doherty{at}kcl.ac.uk