Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

GABAB Receptor Modulation of Voltage-Sensitive Calcium Channels in Spines and Dendrites

Jason R. Chalifoux and Adam G. Carter
Journal of Neuroscience 16 March 2011, 31 (11) 4221-4232; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4561-10.2011
Jason R. Chalifoux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam G. Carter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    AP Ca signals in all dendritic compartments. A, 2PLSM image stack of a layer 2/3 pyramidal neuron, with different dendritic domains labeled. The inset shows a line scan (yellow dashed line) through the spine (S) and dendrite (D). B, Top, Current-clamp recording with brief current injection (arrow) to elicit an AP. Middle, A 500 Hz line scan through the spine (S) and dendrite (D) shows a green AP Ca signal ([Ca]bAP). Bottom, [Ca]bAP quantified as ΔG/Gsat, in spine (red) and dendrite (black). [Ca]bAP amplitude is calculated over a 20 ms window after the AP (gray box). C, Average [Ca]bAP in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of the VSCC mixture (black) in spines (left) and dendrites (right). SEM is represented by the shaded regions for baseline (pink) and after wash-in of the VSCC mixture (gray). D, [Ca]bAP amplitude versus radial distance from the soma for spines (red) and dendrites (black) in apical (left) and basal (right) dendrites. [Ca]bAP amplitude versus radial distance for spines (red line) and dendrites (black line) was fit with a single exponential.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Modulation of AP Ca signals in apical and basal spines and dendrites. A, Average [Ca]bAP for apical oblique spines (left) and dendrites (right) in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). B, Summary of changes in [Ca]bAP amplitude after wash-in of ACSF (blue) or 5 μm baclofen (green) in apical oblique, apical main, and apical tuft spines and dendrites. The box plots show median, interquartile range, and 10–90% range. The circles indicate individual experiments. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between ACSF and 5 μm baclofen. C, Average [Ca]bAP for proximal (<75 μm) basal spines (left) and dendrites (right) in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). D, Summary of changes in [Ca]bAP amplitude after wash-in of ACSF (blue) or 5 μm baclofen (green) in proximal and distal basal spines and dendrites. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between ACSF and 5 μm baclofen.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Modulation of excitability. A, Left, Average hyperpolarization in response to a −30 pA current injection for 300 ms in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). Right, Average AP elicited by brief current injection in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). The ADP was measured by taking the width at 10% amplitude (width10%) (dashed blue line). B, Summary of changes in input resistance (Rin), AP amplitude (Amp), half-width (width50%), and width10% after wash-in of ACSF (blue) or 5 μm baclofen (green). The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between ACSF and 5 μm baclofen. C, Positive correlation between width10% and Rin for individual cells (circles) in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). The data were fit with a linear regression (blue line) with a Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.85. D, Left, No correlation between the change in [Ca]bAP and the change in Rin in either spines (red) or dendrites (black). Right, No correlation between the change in [Ca]bAP and the change in width10% in either spines (red) or dendrites (black).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Local modulation of AP Ca signals and excitability. A, 2PLSM image stack of a layer 2/3 pyramidal neuron with pressure ejection of Alexa 488 (green) from a bent glass pipette (asterisk) positioned adjacent to a dendritic segment in the apical tuft. B, Average [Ca]bAP for the apical tuft (top) and distal basal (bottom) spines (left) and dendrites (right) in baseline conditions (red) and after puffing of 15 μm baclofen (black). C, Summary of changes in [Ca]bAP amplitude after puffing of ACSF (blue) or 15 μm baclofen (green) in apical tuft and distal basal spines and dendrites. D, Top, Summary of changes in Rin after puffing of ACSF or 15 μm baclofen in apical and basal dendrites. Bottom, No correlation between the change in [Ca]bAP and the change in Rin after puffing of baclofen in either spines (red) or dendrites (black). E, Top, Summary of changes in width10% after puffing of ACSF or 15 μm baclofen in apical and basal dendrites. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between ACSF and 15 μm baclofen. Bottom, No correlation between the change in [Ca]bAP and the change in width10% after puffing of baclofen in either spines (red) or dendrites (black).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    GABA uncaging. A, Left, 2PLSM image stack of a layer 2/3 pyramidal neuron, displaying uncaging locations (asterisks) at the soma and at 10 μm intervals away. Right, Uncaging-evoked sIPSPs evoked at 10 μm intervals away from the soma. sIPSPs are color-coded to corresponding uncaging locations in 2PLSM image. B, sIPSP amplitude normalized to the response at the soma, as a function of distance from the soma. The vertical bars are the SEM. Points were fit with a single exponential (blue dashed line). C, Average sIPSP evoked by uncaging at the soma in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 2 μm CGP-55845 (black).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Rapid local modulation of AP Ca signals and membrane potential. A, Average [Ca]bAP for apical oblique (top) and proximal basal (bottom) spines (left) and dendrites (right) with no uncaging (red) and 200 ms after uncaging of RuBi-GABA (black). B, Summary of changes in [Ca]bAP amplitude with uncaging (green) or uncaging in the presence of 2 μm CGP-55845 (blue) in apical oblique and proximal basal spines and dendrites. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between recording conditions. C, Summary of sIPSP amplitude elicited by uncaging (green) or uncaging in the presence of 2 μm CGP-55845 (blue) in apical and basal dendrites. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between uncaging conditions. D, No correlation between the uncaging-evoked change in [Ca]bAP and sIPSP amplitude in spines (red) or dendrites (black).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Direct modulation of VSCCs. A, Average [Ca]step for apical oblique (top) and proximal basal (middle) spines (left) and dendrites (right) in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). Bottom, Schematic of the voltage step used to elicit the [Ca]step. B, Summary of changes in [Ca]step amplitude after wash-in of ACSF (blue) or 5 μm baclofen (green) in apical oblique and proximal basal spines and dendrites. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100% or between ACSF and 5 μm baclofen. C, Left, Summary of changes in Rin after wash-in of ACSF (blue) or 5 μm baclofen with either Cs-gluconate (green) or K-gluconate (yellow) internal. Right, Change in holding current in these different recording conditions. The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100%, or between different conditions.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Modulation of multiple VSCC subtypes. A, Average [Ca]step in baseline conditions (red) and after wash-in of the VSCC mixture (black) in spines (left) and dendrites (right). B, Summary of changes in [Ca]step after wash-in of ACSF, mibefradil (Mib), nimodipine (Nim), SNX-482, ω-conotoxin-MVIIC, or the VSCC mixture, in proximal basal spines (blue) and dendrites (green). The asterisks indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from 100%, and the number signs (#) indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from ACSF. C, Average [Ca]step in proximal basal spines (left) and dendrites (right) in the presence of the mixture (red) and after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen (black). D, Summary of changes in [Ca]step in proximal basal spines (blue) and dendrites (green) after wash-in of 5 μm baclofen in the presence of ACSF, mibefradil, nimodipine, SNX-482, ω-conotoxin-MVIIC, or VSCC mixture. The ranges for 90–100% block (top gray box) and 0–10% block (bottom gray box) were calculated using Equation 1 (see Materials and Methods), except for the spine in MVIIC, because MVIIC did not significantly influence the [Ca]step in B. All conditions are significant (p < 0.05) from 100%, and the asterisks have been omitted for clarity. The number signs (#) indicate significant (p < 0.05) difference from ACSF.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (11)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 11
16 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GABAB Receptor Modulation of Voltage-Sensitive Calcium Channels in Spines and Dendrites
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
GABAB Receptor Modulation of Voltage-Sensitive Calcium Channels in Spines and Dendrites
Jason R. Chalifoux, Adam G. Carter
Journal of Neuroscience 16 March 2011, 31 (11) 4221-4232; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4561-10.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
GABAB Receptor Modulation of Voltage-Sensitive Calcium Channels in Spines and Dendrites
Jason R. Chalifoux, Adam G. Carter
Journal of Neuroscience 16 March 2011, 31 (11) 4221-4232; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4561-10.2011
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.