Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Behavioral and Other Phenotypes in a Cytoplasmic Dynein Light Intermediate Chain 1 Mutant Mouse

Gareth T. Banks, Matilda A. Haas, Samantha Line, Hazel L. Shepherd, Mona AlQatari, Sammy Stewart, Ida Rishal, Amelia Philpott, Bernadett Kalmar, Anna Kuta, Michael Groves, Nicholas Parkinson, Abraham Acevedo-Arozena, Sebastian Brandner, David Bannerman, Linda Greensmith, Majid Hafezparast, Martin Koltzenburg, Robert Deacon, Mike Fainzilber and Elizabeth M. C. Fisher
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2011, 31 (14) 5483-5494; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5244-10.2011
Gareth T. Banks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matilda A. Haas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Line
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hazel L. Shepherd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mona AlQatari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sammy Stewart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ida Rishal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amelia Philpott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernadett Kalmar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Kuta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Groves
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Parkinson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abraham Acevedo-Arozena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Brandner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Bannerman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Greensmith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Majid Hafezparast
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Koltzenburg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Deacon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mike Fainzilber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth M. C. Fisher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Partial sequence and domains of wild-type and mutant DYNC1LI1. A, Multiple sequence alignment of cytoplasmic dynein light intermediate chain 1. Asparagine 235 is mutated in the Dync1li1N235Y mouse but is highly conserved throughout the animal kingdom and also in amoebae and fungi. B, Protein domain map of DYNC1LI1, showing the location of the DYNC1LI11N235Y mutation as a red bar. The map was created using the domains identified by Bielli et al. (2001), Hughes et al. (1995), and Tynan et al. (2000).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Behavior of Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice. A, Dync1li1N235Y/N235 mice displayed significantly lower levels of spontaneous locomotor activity compared with wild-type littermates. B, On the elevated plus maze (EPM), the Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice spent significantly less time in the open arms and more time in the closed arms. C, They also made significantly fewer entries to both the open and closed arms. D, On the successive alleys task Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice spent less time in the more anxiogenic alleys compared with wild types. E, They also made fewer entries to these alleys (the Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice did not make any entries to alleys 3 or 4). F, Footprint analysis using the CatWalk system found that compared with wild types, Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice displayed a significantly greater difference between the BOS of their front legs and hind legs due to a relative narrowing of the front BOS and a widening of the hind BOS; a representative sample from one animal is shown. Green, Right front foot; dark green, right hind foot; red, left front foot; dark red, left hind foot. Animals walked from right to left.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Morphology of wild-type and mutant Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y cortical neurons. A, Cortical neurons were electroporated in vivo at E15, then cultured in vitro from E17 embryos. At 10 DIV they were analyzed to compare morphology of wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y cortical neurons. GFP-positive neurons (i) were hand-traced using Neurolucida software (ii). B, The length of dendritic trees for wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y neurons, in vitro. i, Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y dendrites were significantly longer than in wild-type neurons (p = 0.0029). ii, Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y dendrites terminated significantly further from the soma than wild-type dendrites (p = 0.00281). C, Low magnification of the cortex from a wild-type brain electroporated with GFP at E15 and harvested at P15. GFP-positive neurons occupy a discreet band corresponding to cortical layers II/III. D, i, Higher-magnification image showing the orientation of a pyramidal neuron in layer II. ii, Neighboring neurons align in the same orientation with apical dendrites projecting toward the pial surface. E, The cortex from a Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y brain electroporated with GFP at E15 and harvested at P15 (rostrocaudally matched with C). Compared with C, GFP-positive cells were more distributed, with more neurons residing in the uppermost part of the cortex (arrows). F, The cell body and apical dendrite of neurons located closer to the pial surface in Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mutants were mis-oriented. G, Neurons in layer II of Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y cortex also often displayed incorrect orientation. H, Comparison of the proportion of electroporated neurons located in upper layers of the neocortex, as measured by fluorescence intensity. I, Higher-magnification imaging from wild-type cortex in more caudal sections showed most GFP-positive neurons within layer II/II. J, In contrast to I, GFP-expressing cells in Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y cortex occupied a location much closer to the pial surface. K, The apical dendrite of neurons Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y cortex were often thickened and projected in an incorrect orientation. Scale bars: A, C, E, I, J, 100 μm; D, F, G, K, 50 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Dync1li1N235Y point mutation increases branching in cultured sensory neurons. A, Fluorescent images of DRG neurons from wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y homozygous mice under naive and injury conditions. Right leg sciatic nerves of wild-type and mutant mice were crush-lesioned 3 d before dissection of L4–5 DRGs for primary culture of sensory neurons; corresponding contralateral DRGs were used for naive controls. Cultures were imaged by automated fluorescent microscopy after 20 h in vitro, to obtain 150 images per slide, at magnification 10×. B, Quantification shows a significant increase in branching of naive sensory neurons from Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y homozygotes (29.4% increase over wild type). Increased branching was also observed in homozygous Dync1li1N235Y/N235 sensory neurons after injury, although the difference is less pronounced than in naive neurons, apparently due to a more robust injury response in the wild-type neurons. ***p < 10−6; *p < 0.05 (Student's t test). Scale bar, 100 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Neurophysiological and histological analysis of Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice. A, Dync1li1N235Y/N235 have mice a significant reduction of the peak-to-peak amplitude of A-fiber compound action potential in the saphenous nerve compared with wild-type littermates. *p < 0.05. B, QSum plots of the neuronal profile area distribution of neurofilament-immunoreactive neurons (giving rise to large myelinated A-fibers; round symbols) and of peripherin-immunoreactive cells (giving rise to C-fibers; square symbols) in lumbar dorsal root ganglia. The cell profile size in both populations is reduced in Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice compared with wild-type littermates.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Golgi reassembly in wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y MEFs. A, MEFs were treated with cold (4°C) for 20 min and nocodazole for 3 h, washed and then allowed to recover at 37°C for the times indicated. Golgi are shown in red, cytoskeleton in green (α-tubulin) and nuclei in blue (DAPI). The scale bar represents 30 μm. B, The total number of discrete spots and the total area of Golgi complex were measured to calculate the ratio of spots/total area per cell; 5 cells per genotype were assessed. In wild-type and heterozygous cells, after 50 min of recovery, the Golgi complex has reformed and is not significantly different from that in untreated cells. However, in the Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y homozygous mutant cells, the Golgi complex has a significant defect in recovery after 50 min compared with untreated cells and treated wild-type and heterozygous cells at the same time point.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Endosomal trafficking chase of Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated EGF in wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y MEFs. A, MEFs were pulsed with EGF for 10 min and chased at 37°C for the times indicated. EGF is shown in red, cytoskeleton (α-tubulin) in green and nuclei in blue (DAPI). Ten cells per genotype per time point were assessed. Scale bar, 30 μm. B, The number of EGF-positive vesicles per cell in wild-type and homozygous MEFs at 0, 20, and 40 min time points. At 0 min wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y homozygous mutant cells have similar numbers of vesicles, however, after 20 and 40 min Dync1liN235Y/N235 homozygous mutant cells have significantly more vesicles remaining than wild-type cells.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Cell profile size distribution in cervical and lumbar DRGs for NFH- and peripherin-positive neurons in wild-type and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y mice

    CervicalLumbar
    Wild type (n = 3)Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y (n = 4)Wild type (n = 3)Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y (n = 4)
    Total number of NFH-positive profile areas measured201286165240
    Mean NFH cell profile area739 ± 80 (579–833)676 ± 37 (568–739)773 ± 46 (714–864)680 ± 33 (595–734)
    Total number of peripherin-positive profile areas measured338496319430
    Mean peripherin cell profile area339 ± 32 (279–387)307 ± 6 (279–323)351 ± 31 (294–299)285 ± 18 (245–319)
    • For mean ± SEM values, the values in parentheses are ranges.

    • Neurofilament: There was no significant difference (p > 0.1, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) in the distribution of the profile areas of cervical NFH-immunoreactive DRG neurons between wild-type mice (719 ± 324 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 201, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (664 ± 275 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 286, nanimals = 4). Data not shown. The distribution of the profile areas of lumbar NFH-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.025, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (765 ± 296 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 165, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (686 ± 280 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 240, nanimals = 4) (Fig. 5B).

    • Peripherin: The distribution of the profile areas of cervical peripherin-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.025, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (335 ± 152 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 338, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (307 ± 165 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 496, nanimals = 4). Data not shown. The distribution of the profile areas of lumbar peripherin-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.001, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (353 ± 199 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 319, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (286 ± 151 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 430, nanimals = 4) (Fig. 4C).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Cell profile size distribution in cervical and lumbar DRG for CGRP- and parvalbumin-positive neurons

    CervicalLumbar
    Wild type (n = 3)Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y (n = 4)Wild type (n = 3)Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y (n = 3)
    Total number of CGRP-positive profile areas measured239315255389
    Mean CGRP cell profile area459 ± 69 (378–595)420 ± 27 (383–498)485 ± 26 (469–502)435 ± 26 (395–484)
    Total number of parvalbumin-positive profile areas measured264285233339
    Mean parvalbumin cell profile area508 ± 26 (477–559)477 ± 21 (416–509)474 ± 7 (418–578)378 ± 7 (364–388)
    • For mean ± SEM values, the values in parentheses are ranges.

    • CGRP: The distribution of the profile areas of cervical CGRP-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.005, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (478 ± 276 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 239, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (421 ± 229 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 315, nanimals = 4). Data not shown. The distribution of the profile areas of lumbar CGRP-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.005, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (484 ± 280 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 255, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (432 ± 254 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 389, nanimals = 4). Data not shown.

    • Parvalbumin: The distribution of the profile areas of cervical parvalbumin-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.001, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (503 ± 260 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 264, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (468 ± 282 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 285, nanimals = 4). Data not shown. The distribution of the profile areas of lumbar parvalbumin-immunoreactive DRG neurons is significantly different (p < 0.001, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) between wild-type mice (465 ± 276 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 233, nanimals = 3) and Dync1li1N235Y/N235Y littermates (376 ± 196 μm2, mean ± SD; ncells = 393, nanimals = 4) (Fig. 5D).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • supplemental material - Supplemental Material
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 14
6 Apr 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Behavioral and Other Phenotypes in a Cytoplasmic Dynein Light Intermediate Chain 1 Mutant Mouse
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Behavioral and Other Phenotypes in a Cytoplasmic Dynein Light Intermediate Chain 1 Mutant Mouse
Gareth T. Banks, Matilda A. Haas, Samantha Line, Hazel L. Shepherd, Mona AlQatari, Sammy Stewart, Ida Rishal, Amelia Philpott, Bernadett Kalmar, Anna Kuta, Michael Groves, Nicholas Parkinson, Abraham Acevedo-Arozena, Sebastian Brandner, David Bannerman, Linda Greensmith, Majid Hafezparast, Martin Koltzenburg, Robert Deacon, Mike Fainzilber, Elizabeth M. C. Fisher
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2011, 31 (14) 5483-5494; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5244-10.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Behavioral and Other Phenotypes in a Cytoplasmic Dynein Light Intermediate Chain 1 Mutant Mouse
Gareth T. Banks, Matilda A. Haas, Samantha Line, Hazel L. Shepherd, Mona AlQatari, Sammy Stewart, Ida Rishal, Amelia Philpott, Bernadett Kalmar, Anna Kuta, Michael Groves, Nicholas Parkinson, Abraham Acevedo-Arozena, Sebastian Brandner, David Bannerman, Linda Greensmith, Majid Hafezparast, Martin Koltzenburg, Robert Deacon, Mike Fainzilber, Elizabeth M. C. Fisher
Journal of Neuroscience 6 April 2011, 31 (14) 5483-5494; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5244-10.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Cleavage of VAMP2/3 Affects Oligodendrocyte Lineage Development in the Developing Mouse Spinal Cord
  • P2Y6 receptor-dependent microglial phagocytosis of synapses during development regulates synapse density and memory
  • Acute ethanol modulates synaptic inhibition in the basolateral amygdala via rapid NLRP3 inflammasome activation and regulates anxiety-like behavior in rats
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.