Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Recalling and Forgetting Dreams: Theta and Alpha Oscillations during Sleep Predict Subsequent Dream Recall

Cristina Marzano, Michele Ferrara, Federica Mauro, Fabio Moroni, Maurizio Gorgoni, Daniela Tempesta, Carlo Cipolli and Luigi De Gennaro
Journal of Neuroscience 4 May 2011, 31 (18) 6674-6683; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0412-11.2011
Cristina Marzano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Ferrara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federica Mauro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Moroni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Gorgoni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Tempesta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlo Cipolli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi De Gennaro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    REM sleep. A, One 20 s segment of the PSG recording of tonic REM sleep preceding morning awakening. B, The mean proportion of time [Pepisode (f)] of the EEG segment shown in A, where oscillations were detected at each frequency in the 0.25–25.00 Hz frequency range. The detection of oscillations has been made by the BOSC detection method (see Materials and Methods) on the 19 EEG electrodes. Error bars denote interlocation variability. Units of frequency are in hertz and are plotted in five logarithmically spaced frequency values.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Stage 2 sleep. A, One 20 s segment of the PSG recording of stage 2 sleep preceding morning awakening. B, The detection of oscillations in the segment of stage 2 sleep by the BOSC method, as in Figure 1.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    EEG power spectra (mean over all 19 scalp locations, obtained by collapsing EEG power across all the derivations) of EEG activity during REM sleep in the REC (black line) and NREC (gray line) groups. Mean absolute values (expressed in logarithmic scale) are plotted in the frequency range from 0.50 to 24.75 Hz for 0.25 Hz bins. SEs refer to interlocation variability.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    From the left, the first two columns show the topographic distribution of absolute EEG power during REM sleep in the REC group and in the NREC group. The maps were scaled between minimal (min) and maximal (max) power values in the REC and NREC groups. The first column on the right shows topographic statistical EEG power differences (assessed by unpaired t tests) between the REC and NREC groups. Values are expressed in terms of t values: positive t values indicate a prevalence of the REC over the NREC group, and vice versa. The two-tailed level of significance (p ≤ 0.00738) corresponds to t ≥ 2.60. Average values are normalized by total power, color coded, plotted at the corresponding position on the planar projection of the scalp surface, and interpolated (biharmonic spline) between electrodes. The maps are based on the 19 unipolar EEG derivations of the international 10–20 system with averaged mastoid reference. Maps are plotted for the following EEG bands: delta (0.50–4.75 Hz), theta (5.00–7.75 Hz), alpha (8.00–11.75 Hz), sigma (12.00–15.75 Hz), and beta (16.00–24.75 Hz).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    EEG power spectra (mean over all 19 scalp locations, obtained by collapsing EEG power across all the derivations) of EEG activity during stage 2 NREM sleep in the REC (black line) and NREC (gray line) groups. Mean absolute values (expressed in logarithmic scale) are plotted in the frequency range from 0.50 to 24.75 Hz for 0.25 Hz bins. SEs refer to interlocation variability.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    From the left, the first two columns show the topographic distribution of absolute EEG power during stage 2 NREM sleep in the REC and NREC groups. The maps were scaled between minimal (min) and maximal (max) power values in the REC and NREC groups. The first column on the right shows topographic statistical EEG power differences (assessed by unpaired t tests) between the REC and NREC groups. Values are expressed in terms of t values: positive t values indicate a prevalence of the REC over the NREC group, and vice versa. The two-tailed level of significance (p ≤ 0.00447) corresponds to a t ≥ 2.78. Average values are normalized by total power, color coded, plotted at the corresponding position on the planar projection of the scalp surface, and interpolated (biharmonic spline) between electrodes. The maps are based on the 19 unipolar EEG derivations of the international 10–20 system with averaged mastoid reference. Maps are plotted for the following EEG bands: delta (0.50–4.75 Hz), theta (5.00–7.75 Hz), alpha (8.00–11.75 Hz), sigma (12.00–15.75 Hz), and beta (16.00–24.75 Hz).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    The topographic distribution of correlation values (rho values) between the actual number of dreams recalled after morning awakenings with the amount of theta activity in REM sleep (top map) and with alpha activity in stage 2 (bottom map). Values are expressed in terms of rho values: positive rho values indicate the presence of a positive correlation, and vice versa. The alpha level for REM and NREM sleep was, respectively, adjusted to 0.007 (ρ ≥ 0.47) and to 0.004 (ρ ≥ 0.46). Average values were normalized by total power, color coded, plotted at the corresponding position on the planar projection of the scalp surface, and interpolated (biharmonic spline) between electrodes. The maps are based on the 19 unipolar EEG derivations of the international 10–20 system with averaged mastoid reference.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Mean proportion of time [Pepisode (f)] of EEG activity during REM sleep during which oscillations were detected at each frequency in the 0.50–25.00 Hz frequency range. Individual oscillations detected across all frequencies by the BOSC method have been averaged across all subjects, and error bars denote SEM Pepisodes (f). Units of frequency are in hertz and are plotted in five logarithmically spaced frequency values. See Materials and Methods for more details on the BOSC method.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Mean proportion of time [Pepisode (f)] of EEG activity during stage 2 sleep during which oscillations were detected by the BOSC method at each frequency in the 0.25–25.00 Hz frequency range, as in Figure 8.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    Theta activity during REM sleep and alpha activity during stage 2 across consecutive sleep cycles. The maps report topographic statistical EEG power differences (assessed by unpaired t tests) between the REC and NREC groups. Values are expressed in terms of t values: positive t values indicate a prevalence of the REC over the NREC group, and vice versa. The two-tailed level of significance (p ≤ 0.003) corresponds to t ≥ 3.34 in the second and third sleep cycles and to t ≥ 3.38 in the fourth sleep cycle for REM sleep; for stage 2, the level of significance (p ≤ 0.004) corresponds to a t ≥ 3.12 in the second and third sleep cycles and to t ≥ 3.13 in the fourth sleep cycle. Average values are normalized by total power, color coded, plotted at the corresponding position on the planar projection of the scalp surface, and interpolated (biharmonic spline) between electrodes. The maps are based on the 19 unipolar EEG derivations of the international 10–20 system with averaged mastoid reference.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Means and SEs of the PSG variables of the REC and NREC groups awakened from REM sleep

    VariablesRECNRECF(1,28)p
    MeanSEMeanSE
    Stage 1 latency (min)7.321.559.472.350.610.44
    Stage 2 latency (min)11.112.3213.272.370.340.56
    REM latency (min)84.786.8786.0011.360.0090.92
    Stage 1 (%)6.280.686.641.180.080.78
    Stage 2 (%)60.001.3959.261.540.110.74
    SWS (%)10.541.628.161.450.890.35
    REM (%)23.170.8825.941.702.580.12
    WASO (min)32.018.4223.564.100.470.50
    TST (min)443.309.32435.278.790.300.59
    SEI % (TST/TBT)91.981.6392.871.080.130.72
    • The results of the one-way ANOVA are also reported.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Means and SEs of the PSG variables of the REC and NREC groups awakened from stage 2

    VariablesRECNRECF(1,33)p
    MeanSEMeanSE
    Stage 1 latency (min)8.892.089.512.940.030.86
    Stage 2 latency (min)12.932.4416.024.500.410.52
    REM latency (min)91.646.0987.099.340.180.67
    Stage 1 (%)11.925.267.170.880.600.44
    Stage 2 (%)61.771.6258.601.821.690.20
    SWS (%)9.501.4910.571.670.230.64
    REM (%)21.811.0723.661.271.240.27
    WASO (min)31.514.7440.449.290.840.36
    TST (min)441.726.20437.0014.430.070.80
    SEI % (TST/TBT)88.941.9888.432.410.030.87
    • The results of the one-way ANOVA are also reported.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (18)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 18
4 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recalling and Forgetting Dreams: Theta and Alpha Oscillations during Sleep Predict Subsequent Dream Recall
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Recalling and Forgetting Dreams: Theta and Alpha Oscillations during Sleep Predict Subsequent Dream Recall
Cristina Marzano, Michele Ferrara, Federica Mauro, Fabio Moroni, Maurizio Gorgoni, Daniela Tempesta, Carlo Cipolli, Luigi De Gennaro
Journal of Neuroscience 4 May 2011, 31 (18) 6674-6683; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0412-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Recalling and Forgetting Dreams: Theta and Alpha Oscillations during Sleep Predict Subsequent Dream Recall
Cristina Marzano, Michele Ferrara, Federica Mauro, Fabio Moroni, Maurizio Gorgoni, Daniela Tempesta, Carlo Cipolli, Luigi De Gennaro
Journal of Neuroscience 4 May 2011, 31 (18) 6674-6683; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0412-11.2011
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
  • Generation of Intensity Selectivity by Differential Synaptic Tuning: Fast-Saturating Excitation But Slow-Saturating Inhibition
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.