Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Journal Club

Two Modes of GABAB: Specific Localized Inhibition and Global Network Inhibition

Martine R. Groen
Journal of Neuroscience 8 June 2011, 31 (23) 8327-8328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1957-11.2011
Martine R. Groen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

GABAB receptors are inhibitory metabotropic receptors that modulate neuronal excitability. Clinically, baclofen, the agonist of the GABAB receptor, has been used to treat various disorders such as alcohol addiction, epilepsy, and spasticity (Dario et al., 2007). However, GABAB expression in the brain is widespread and complex, with both presynaptic and postsynaptic components, resulting in a complex clinical phenotype after baclofen administration (Vigot et al., 2006).

Recently Chalifoux and Carter (2011) investigated how activating this GABAB network influences calcium currents in different dendritic compartments of L2/3 pyramidal cells in prefrontal cortex (PFC). Specifically, they used two-photon calcium imaging in acute brain slices of C57BL/6 mice to look at calcium currents evoked by back-propagating action potentials, the main feedback signal from a soma to its dendrites.

The first main finding was that GABAB activation by baclofen reduced the amplitude of calcium currents. Although receptor activation decreased membrane resistance via inward rectifying potassium channels and induced a slow inhibitory current, the decrease in calcium currents resulted primarily from a direct modulation of the voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs). The second main finding was that the reduction in calcium currents by GABAB occurred to an equal extent in basal and apical dendritic compartments, and it occurred in both dendritic shafts and spines. The latter is surprising because in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, GABAB activation reduced calcium currents only in apical spines, not in apical dendrites, basal dendrites, or basal spines (Sabatini and Svoboda, 2000).

These findings support the hypothesis that GABAB has different modes of action depending on the cell type and region. The first mode, exemplified by hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells (Sabatini and Svoboda, 2000), is inhibition of specific synaptic inputs to neurons, allowing a neuron to inhibit some inputs while listening to others. This type of inhibition is suitable for input-specific synaptic plasticity required for hippocampal encoding. The second mode of action of GABAB, which Chalifoux and Carter (2011) have found in L2/3 pyramidal neurons, is a global inhibition of dendritic excitability of a single neuron or across a small network of neurons (Wang et al., 2010). This might be useful when the brain switches attention from one task to another task requiring a different brain network, a function attributed to prefrontal cortex.

Although these two modes of GABAB action have not been shown explicitly, multiple lines of evidence support this hypothesis. Electron microscopic analysis has shown that GABAB receptors are present both at the synaptic cleft and outside synapses on the dendritic shaft (López-Bendito et al., 2002; Kulik et al., 2003). Synaptic GABAB receptors can keep tight control of synapse dynamics, blocking or mediating the signal coming onto the synapse. Extrasynaptic GABAB receptors, conversely, can modulate dendritic signals being transmitted to the soma as well as the antidromic back-propagating action potentials.

These two locations of GABAB receptors are thought to correspond to the two types of inhibitory currents measured in neurons, namely, phasic and tonic inhibition. Phasic GABAB inhibition is a short, fast, inward current (on the order of hundreds of milliseconds), after activation of an inhibitory synapse (Chalifoux and Carter, 2011). This would correspond to activation of synaptic GABAB receptors. In contrast, tonic inhibition, which lasts for many minutes, is thought to result from the constant presence of GABA, as mediated by extrasynaptic synapses (Wang et al., 2010). Again, this follows the idea of two functions of GABAB, one of fast, specific inhibition and another involving slow, more generalized inhibition.

This hypothesis, although supported by some circumstantial evidence, still needs to be tested directly. Immunolabeling of GABAB receptors has shown global expression of the receptor in both cortex and hippocampus (Charles et al., 2001; Vigot et al., 2006). However, this method cannot discriminate between pyramidal cells and interneurons. In addition, GABAB has a prominent role in presynaptic terminals, influencing release probability, resulting in additional labeling of presynaptic sites (Sakaba and Neher, 2003). Therefore, a full dendritic electron microscopy reconstruction of pyramidal neurons in CA1 hippocampus and layer 2/3 prefrontal cortex with immunogold labeling of GABAB receptors is essential to establish the synaptic and dendritic localization that could underlie functional differences. Determining the proportion of extrasynaptic versus synaptic receptors will give an indication of whether GABAB has different local or global functions in the two regions.

From a functional approach, an experiment that monitors global GABA concentration both in L2/3 and in the hippocampus while an animal performs different types of attention tasks using, for example, spectroscopy and fMRI, would be informative (Gaetz et al., 2011). The hypothesis predicts that tonic GABA concentrations will remain stable in the hippocampus while varying in L2/3 of PFC.

Learning whether GABAB can function at local and global inhibitory levels in different brain regions is essential for therapeutic purposes. If the hypothesis holds true, promoting GABAB activation to reduce dendritic excitability in the cortex in the case of epilepsy might have adverse effects upon dendritic processing underlying hippocampal memory (Dario et al., 2007). Therefore, studies identifying cellular mechanisms of GABAB-mediated function play an important role in understanding inhibitory effects in the brain at local and global levels.

Footnotes

  • Editor's Note: These short, critical reviews of recent papers in the Journal, written exclusively by graduate students or postdoctoral fellows, are intended to summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. For more information on the format and purpose of the Journal Club, please see http://www.jneurosci.org/misc/ifa_features.shtml.

  • This project was funded by Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) TopTalent Grant 021.002.082.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Martine R. Groen, Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, Room B-452, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. martine.groen{at}cncr.vu.nl

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chalifoux JR,
    2. Carter AG
    (2011) GABAB receptor modulation of voltage-sensitive calcium channels in spines and dendrites. J Neurosci 31:4221–4232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Charles KJ,
    2. Evans ML,
    3. Robbins MJ,
    4. Calver AR,
    5. Leslie RA,
    6. Pangalos MN
    (2001) Comparative immunohistochemical localization of GABA(B1a), GABA(B1b) and GABA(B2) subunits in rat brain, spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion. Neuroscience 106:447–467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dario A,
    2. Pisani R,
    3. Sangiorgi S,
    4. Pessina F,
    5. Tomei G
    (2007) Relationship between intrathecal baclofen and the central nervous system. Acta Neurochir Suppl 97:461–464.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Gaetz W,
    2. Edgar JC,
    3. Wang DJ,
    4. Roberts TP
    (2011) Relating MEG measured motor cortical oscillations to resting gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration. Neuroimage 55:616–621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kulik A,
    2. Vida I,
    3. Luján R,
    4. Haas CA,
    5. López-Bendito G,
    6. Shigemoto R,
    7. Frotscher M
    (2003) Subcellular localization of metabotropic GABA(B) receptor subunits GABA(B1a/b) and GABA(B2) in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 23:11026–11035.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. López-Bendito G,
    2. Shigemoto R,
    3. Kulik A,
    4. Paulsen O,
    5. Fairén A,
    6. Luján R
    (2002) Expression and distribution of metabotropic GABA receptor subtypes GABABR1 and GABABR2 during rat neocortical development. Eur J Neurosci 15:1766–1778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Sabatini BL,
    2. Svoboda K
    (2000) Analysis of calcium channels in single spines using optical fluctuation analysis. Nature 408:589–593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Sakaba T,
    2. Neher E
    (2003) Direct modulation of synaptic vesicle priming by GABA(B) receptor activation at a glutamatergic synapse. Nature 424:775–778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Vigot R,
    2. Barbieri S,
    3. Bräuner-Osborne H,
    4. Turecek R,
    5. Shigemoto R,
    6. Zhang YP,
    7. Luján R,
    8. Jacobson LH,
    9. Biermann B,
    10. Fritschy JM,
    11. Vacher CM,
    12. Müller M,
    13. Sansig G,
    14. Guetg N,
    15. Cryan JF,
    16. Kaupmann K,
    17. Gassmann M,
    18. Oertner TG,
    19. Bettler B
    (2006) Differential compartmentalization and distinct functions of GABAB receptor variants. Neuron 50:589–601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Neubauer FB,
    3. Lüscher HR,
    4. Thurley K
    (2010) GABAB receptor-dependent modulation of network activity in the rat prefrontal cortex in vitro. Eur J Neurosci 31:1582–1594.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (23)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 23
8 Jun 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Two Modes of GABAB: Specific Localized Inhibition and Global Network Inhibition
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Two Modes of GABAB: Specific Localized Inhibition and Global Network Inhibition
Martine R. Groen
Journal of Neuroscience 8 June 2011, 31 (23) 8327-8328; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1957-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Two Modes of GABAB: Specific Localized Inhibition and Global Network Inhibition
Martine R. Groen
Journal of Neuroscience 8 June 2011, 31 (23) 8327-8328; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1957-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mixed Excitatory and Inhibitory Projections from the Basolateral Amygdala to the Mediodorsal Thalamic Nucleus
  • Selective and Systems-Level Face Processing Impairments in ASD
  • Transplanted Astrocytes Show Functional Flexibility in the Recipient Brain
Show more Journal Club
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.