Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

PIP2-Mediated HCN3 Channel Gating Is Crucial for Rhythmic Burst Firing in Thalamic Intergeniculate Leaflet Neurons

Shui-Wang Ying, Gareth R. Tibbs, Alessandra Picollo, Syed Y. Abbas, R. Lea Sanford, Alessio Accardi, Franz Hofmann, Andreas Ludwig and Peter A. Goldstein
Journal of Neuroscience 13 July 2011, 31 (28) 10412-10423; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0021-11.2011
Shui-Wang Ying
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gareth R. Tibbs
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandra Picollo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Syed Y. Abbas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Lea Sanford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessio Accardi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franz Hofmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Ludwig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. Goldstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    HCN3 is densely expressed in the IGL. A, A representative image of the IGL in a HCN2−/− mouse brain slice (30 μm); the IGL is marked by white dashed lines. NPY staining (green) as a marker for the IGL. B, C, Merged images showing immunolabeling for NPY (green) and HCN (red) in IGL neurons in the mouse (B, C) and the rat (Di, Dii), as indicated. Dii, HCN3-IR in a thick section (200 μm) from the rat. Images in B, C, and Di are from thin sections (30 μm). Note that dense labeling for HCN3 was present on the soma of both NPY-positive and -negative IGL cells in sections from both mice and rats; labeling for other 3 isoforms was essentially absent. Scale bar: 10 μm for all images in B–D.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Deletion of HCN2 does not alter properties of Ih recorded from IGL neurons. A (mouse), B (rat), Representative images for the IGL in live brain slices, as marked by white dotted lines; images for IGL neurons that were intracellularly biocytin-filled and fluorescently labeled (green). Scale: horizontal bars, 0.5 mm; vertical bars, 10 μm. C–E, Exemplar Ih current traces were recorded from regions as indicated, and were blocked by ZD7288 (50 μm). The same voltage protocol (−130 mV, 10 s, VH = −50 mV) was used for recordings in all neurons here. F, Bar graph for current density. *p < 0.001, HCN2−/− versus HCN2+/+ for vLGN neurons. G, Bar graph for activation time constant (Tauactivation). *p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with pairwise comparisons, n = 10/each.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Ih in IGL neurons exhibits the hallmark of HCN3 channels. A–C, Families of current traces from an HCN2−/− mouse IGL neuron (A), rat IGL neuron (B), and a rat vLGN neuron (C). The same protocol was used for all recordings (−50 to −130 mV, −10 mV/step, 10 s, VH = −50 mV). 8-Br cAMP (200 μm) was applied by superfusion in this and following figures. Color for all panels: Dark gray for control; orange for 8-Br cAMP. Normalized tail currents (Itail) are plotted as a function of voltage steps and are fit with the Boltzmann equation (right). Symbols for all panels: triangles, HCN2−/− IGL; squares, rat IGL; circles, rat vLGN. D, Group data showing effects of 8-Br cAMP on V1/2 (mV). *p < 0 0.05, 8-Br cAMP vs control for rat vLGN neurons. E, Time constants of activation (Tauactivation) and deactivation (Taudeactivation) in the absence and presence of 8-Br cAMP. *p < 0 0.05, cAMP versus control in rat vLGN neurons; one-way ANOVA, n = 15/each.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Depletion of endogenous PIP2 produces a hyperpolarizing shift in activation of native and recombinant HCN3 channels. A, Exemplar Ih traces recorded from IGL neurons preincubated for 40–50 min in (Ai, control) or wortmannin (Aii, wort) before or after superfusion with 200 μm 8-Br cAMP. B, Group data showing steady-state activation curves. Lines are fit using a Boltzmann function to normalized tail currents, yielding the V1/2 and slope factor (both in mV) of −89.2 ± 2.4 and 9.4 ± 1.1 for control (squares); −106.3 ± 3.5 and 8.2 ± 1.1 for wortmannin alone (circles); −105.6 ± 2.6 and 9.4 ± 0.9 for wortmannin + 8-Br cAMP (diamonds). Colored symbols used here represent the same conditions in subsequent panels for IGL neurons. There is a significant difference in V1/2 values between control and wortmannin groups, p < 0.001, t test, n = 22. C, D, Effect of the drugs on the activation time constant (at −110 mV (C) and the current density at −130 mV (D). Almost identical effects are observed in IGL neurons from rats (n = 8) and HCN2−/− mice (n = 10), and the two datasets were pooled. *p < 0.05, compared to control. E, HCN3 current traces recorded from intact oocytes following incubation in either control solution (which contains DMSO) (left) or wortmannin (right). F, Effects of wortmannin on steady-state activation curves; inset shows representative tail currents (left, wortmannin and right, control); red traces at −75 mV are for comparison. G, Negative shift in the V1/2 of HCN3 channel activation following incubation with vehicle DMSO (control, n = 10) or wortmannin for 40 (n = 10) or 60 (n = 4) min. Vehicle controls were indistinguishable from the controls in the absence of DMSO (data not shown) in all experiments. The wortmannin-treated populations were significantly different from vehicle control and each other (*p < 0.05, vs control, one-way ANOVA with a Holm–Sidak post hoc test).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    PIP2 enhances opening of Ih channels in IGL neurons. A, B, Current traces recorded from rat (A) and HCN2−/− mouse (B) IGL neurons in normal (control, dark gray) and PIP2 (10 μm, green)-containing intracellular solution. Activation curves for each neuron type are shown to the right. PIP2 shifts the V1/2 to a more depolarized potential and increases current density at physiological relevant membrane potentials (*p < 0.05). Symbols: squares for rat IGL and triangles for HCN2−/− IGL in the absence (gray) and presence of PIP2 (green) here and in subsequent panels. C, Time course for changes in V1/2 values in control and PIP2. Time 0 represents time immediately after break-in, and the dash line indicates 0 mV shift; n = 4/each point. D, Group data summarizing drug-induced changes in V1/2 values. 8-Br cAMP (200 μm) was added by superfusion ∼15 min after PIP2 dialysis through the recording pipette. Symbols for each treatment are indicated at bottom. E, F, Group data showing effects of drugs on activation and deactivation kinetics. Data from rat IGL neurons are shown in E, while data from HCN2−/− mice are shown in F. Symbols are the same as in D. *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA (* for each condition, as compared to corresponding control), n = 10/each.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    PIP2 increases Ih-dependent burst firing in IGL neurons. A, Intrinsic temporal summation producing burst firing was initiated by intracellular injection of a train containing five current pulses (100 pA); the protocol shown at bottom was previously described (Ying et al., 2005). EPSC-shaped current pulses were generated with the following function: I(t) = A × (1 − e−t/τrise)n e−t/τdecay, where A is the infinite time amplitude of the current (in picoamperes), n is an integer, and τrise (0.5 ms) and τdecay (5 ms) are rising and falling time constants, respectively (Magee, 1998). The latency was measured as indicated by vertical arrows. The horizontal arrow indicates the holding membrane potential of −80 mV in control before injection of the train in all panels. Bi, Overlay showing comparison of response to ZD7288 (ZD, 30 μm) to control in the same neuron as in A. Bii, Overlay showing effects of ZD7288 and ZD7288 plus DC compensation. Ci, In a different neuron, the control response was recorded within 50 s of obtaining the whole-cell configuration [before dialysis of PIP2 (10 μm) into the cell]. Cii, Overlay showing comparison of control, PIP2 (after 15 min dialysis) and PIP2 plus ZD7288 (30 μm). D, Bar graph showing effects of drugs on the latency of burst onset. E, Plot showing dependence of the latency on membrane potential. *p < 0.01, versus control, Tukey test; n = 14, 6, and 6 for control, ZD7288, and PIP2, respectively. Horizontal error bars are not shown for clarity. Symbol colors correspond to bar colors in D.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Upregulation of HCN channel function facilitates rebound burst firing in HCN2−/− IGL neurons. A–C, Rebound bursts were elicited in IGL neurons using a hyperpolarizing current pulse (see Materials and Methods) in the absence (gray) and presence of ZD7288 (ZD, red), wortmannin (wort, cyan), or PIP2 (green); drugs were applied as in Figure 6. The membrane potential was held at −60 mV by DC injection before the current pulse was applied; traces are overlaid for comparison between control and drug. A short horizontal bar indicates the segment shown on an expanded time scale for better viewing of rebound delay. Calibration: 500 ms for main traces and 30 ms for insets. D, Bar graph summarizing effects of drugs on the number of action potentials/burst. E, The sag amplitude is plotted against rebound delay. Symbols: gray circle, control; green triangle, PIP2; cyan square, wortmannin (wort); red circle, ZD7288. SEs for rebound delay are small (±2.2 to ±3 ms) and are omitted for clarity. *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA versus control (n = 24), n = 8/each for drug.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    PIP2 is required for spontaneous LTS oscillations in HCN2−/− IGL neurons. A, Rhythmic burst firing of low-threshold spikes (LTSs) was recorded in IGL neurons in the absence (dark gray) and presence of wortmannin (15 μm, cyan). The last burst in each trace is shown on an expanded time scale (right). Membrane potential (in millivolts) is shown to the left of each trace. B, PIP2 (10 μm, green) in the recording pipette. C, Bar graph summarizing effects of drugs on IBI. ZD7288 (30 μm) was applied by superfusion. *p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, versus control, n = 6/each. D, The number of bursts is plotted against IBI to show the regularity of burst firing; each trace is the average of 6 cells. SEs are omitted for clarity.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (28)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 28
13 Jul 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PIP2-Mediated HCN3 Channel Gating Is Crucial for Rhythmic Burst Firing in Thalamic Intergeniculate Leaflet Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
PIP2-Mediated HCN3 Channel Gating Is Crucial for Rhythmic Burst Firing in Thalamic Intergeniculate Leaflet Neurons
Shui-Wang Ying, Gareth R. Tibbs, Alessandra Picollo, Syed Y. Abbas, R. Lea Sanford, Alessio Accardi, Franz Hofmann, Andreas Ludwig, Peter A. Goldstein
Journal of Neuroscience 13 July 2011, 31 (28) 10412-10423; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0021-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
PIP2-Mediated HCN3 Channel Gating Is Crucial for Rhythmic Burst Firing in Thalamic Intergeniculate Leaflet Neurons
Shui-Wang Ying, Gareth R. Tibbs, Alessandra Picollo, Syed Y. Abbas, R. Lea Sanford, Alessio Accardi, Franz Hofmann, Andreas Ludwig, Peter A. Goldstein
Journal of Neuroscience 13 July 2011, 31 (28) 10412-10423; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0021-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Acute ethanol modulates synaptic inhibition in the basolateral amygdala via rapid NLRP3 inflammasome activation and regulates anxiety-like behavior in rats
  • KCNQ2/3 Gain-of-Function Variants and Cell Excitability: Differential Effects in CA1 versus L2/3 Pyramidal Neurons
  • Tonic activation of NR2D-containing NMDARs exacerbates dopaminergic neuronal loss in MPTP-injected Parkinsonian mice
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.