Figure 6. PIP2 increases Ih-dependent burst firing in IGL neurons. A, Intrinsic temporal summation producing burst firing was initiated by intracellular injection of a train containing five current pulses (100 pA); the protocol shown at bottom was previously described (Ying et al., 2005). EPSC-shaped current pulses were generated with the following function: I(t) = A × (1 − e−t/τrise)n e−t/τdecay, where A is the infinite time amplitude of the current (in picoamperes), n is an integer, and τrise (0.5 ms) and τdecay (5 ms) are rising and falling time constants, respectively (Magee, 1998). The latency was measured as indicated by vertical arrows. The horizontal arrow indicates the holding membrane potential of −80 mV in control before injection of the train in all panels. Bi, Overlay showing comparison of response to ZD7288 (ZD, 30 μm) to control in the same neuron as in A. Bii, Overlay showing effects of ZD7288 and ZD7288 plus DC compensation. Ci, In a different neuron, the control response was recorded within 50 s of obtaining the whole-cell configuration [before dialysis of PIP2 (10 μm) into the cell]. Cii, Overlay showing comparison of control, PIP2 (after 15 min dialysis) and PIP2 plus ZD7288 (30 μm). D, Bar graph showing effects of drugs on the latency of burst onset. E, Plot showing dependence of the latency on membrane potential. *p < 0.01, versus control, Tukey test; n = 14, 6, and 6 for control, ZD7288, and PIP2, respectively. Horizontal error bars are not shown for clarity. Symbol colors correspond to bar colors in D.