Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleArticles, Cellular/Molecular

Unraveling the High- and Low-Sensitivity Agonist Responses of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

Kasper Harpsøe, Philip K. Ahring, Jeppe K. Christensen, Marianne L. Jensen, Dan Peters and Thomas Balle
Journal of Neuroscience 27 July 2011, 31 (30) 10759-10766; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1509-11.2011
Kasper Harpsøe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip K. Ahring
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeppe K. Christensen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianne L. Jensen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan Peters
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Balle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The α4β2 nAChR subtypes and the agonists used. A, Diagram of the (α4)2(β2)3 and (α4)3(β2)2 subtypes showing arrangement of subunits and location of agonist binding sites. The black arrows show the position of the confirmed orthosteric binding sites, and the gray arrow show the position of the hypothesized third agonist site of the (α4)3(β2)2 subtype. (+) and (−) refers to the principal and complementary components of the binding sites. B, Chemical structures of the endogenous ligand for α4β2 receptors, ACh, and a partial agonist, NS3573.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Sequence alignment used for homology modeling. The multi-template sequence alignment of α4 and β2 to the three templates used to construct the dimeric α4α4 and α4β2 homology models. The residues shown in bold were used as templates for modeling both α4 and β2, whereas framed residues were used only for α4. Residues that were not modeled on a template or not used as template are shown in gray. Numbering follows the PDB files for 1UW6 (AChBP with nicotine bound), 2BYQ (AChBP with epibatidine bound), and 2QC1 (mouse α1 nAChR ligand binding domain with toxin bound) and is according to P43681 and P17787 at www.uniprot.org for α4 and β2, respectively. The mutated residues are on a gray background, the secondary structure is indicated above the sequences, and the classical notation of the binding site regions (loops A–F) is given below the sequences.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Structural comparison of the α4β2 and α4α4 sites. Superimposition of the homology models of the α4β2 and α4α4 dimers with the protein backbone represented as cartoon, whereas nicotine and the three residues that differ between the sites are shown as sticks. From the top, these residues are His142, Gln150, and Thr152 in α4 (green carbon atoms) and Val136, Phe144, and Leu146 in β2 (slate carbon atoms). The identical (+)-side of the binding sites and nicotine are colored with white carbons and for clarity reasons only displayed from the α4α4 homology model.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Representative current traces for ACh and NS3573 in two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiological experiments in X. laevis oocytes. A, ACh concentration–response experiment in an oocyte injected with α4 and β2 nAChR subunits in a 1:4 ratio (representing a low-current amplitude experiments). B, NS3573 concentration–response experiment in an oocyte injected with α4 and β2 nAChR subunits in a 4:1 ratio (representing a high-current amplitude experiments). Application of compound is indicated by a bar above each trace, and “C” denotes an ACh control concentration of 1 μm (1:4 ratio) or 10 μm (4:1 ratio), “M” denotes a 3 mm AChmax concentration, “B” denotes a buffer application, and the numbers 1–12 denote increasing concentrations of ACh or NS3573 in half-log unit increments with minimal concentration of 316 pm in the first application and maximal concentration of 100 μm in the last application.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Functional concentration–response profiles of ACh and NS3573 on α4β2 wild-type and mutant receptors. A, ACh concentration–response curves from wild-type α4β2 receptors expressed in 1:4 and 4:1 ratios. B, ACh concentration–response curves on α4mβ2 mutant receptors expressed in 1:4 and 4:1 ratios and α4β2m mutant receptors expressed in a 4:1 ratio. C, NS3573 concentration–response curves from wild-type α4β2 receptors expressed in 1:4 and 4:1 ratios. D, NS3573 concentration–response curves on α4mβ2 mutant receptors expressed in 1:4 and 4:1 ratios and α4β2m mutant receptors expressed in a 4:1 ratio. Data points are presented as mean ± SEM. Potencies, fractions of the high-sensitivity component on biphasic curves, number of experiments, and statistics are presented in Table 1.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Functional concentration–response profiles for ACh and NS3573 on α4β2 receptors with different subunit ratios or concatenated subunits. A, B, ACh concentration–response curves from α4β2 receptors expressed in 20:1 and 100:1 ratios. C, ACh concentration–response curve from α4β2 receptors expressed from the dimeric concatenated β2-6-α4 construct and α4 in a 1:1 ratio. D, ACh concentration–response curve from α4β2 receptors expressed from the tetrameric concatenated β2-6-α4-9-β2-6-α4 construct and α4 in a 1:1 ratio. E, F, NS3573 concentration–response curves from α4β2 receptors expressed in 20:1 and 100:1 ratios. G, NS3573 concentration–response curve from α4β2 receptors expressed from the dimeric concatenated β2-6-α4 construct and α4 in a 1:1 ratio. H, NS3573 concentration–response curve from α4β2 receptors expressed from the tetrameric concatenated β2-6-α4-9-β2-6-α4 construct and α4 in a 1:1 ratio. Theoretical sigmoidal curves using the obtained fitted values are plotted as dotted lines to visualize the two fractions. Data points are presented as mean ± SEM. Potencies, fractions of the high-sensitivity component, number of experiments, and statistics are presented in Table 1.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Concentration–response data for ACh and NS3573 on wild-type, mutant, and concatenated α4β2 receptors expressed with different subunit ratios

    SubunitsRatioImax (nA)aAChNS3573
    EC50_1 (μm)bEC50_2 (μm)bFrac.cndF value (DFn, DFd)eEC50_1 (nm)bEC50_2 (μm)bFrac.cndF value (DFn, DFd)e
    α4:β21:49201.662320
    α4:β24:138000.95830.161738 (2,197)9.87.90.242431 (2,279)
    α4m:β21:43600.977207
    α4m:β24:114003.28228
    α4m:β2100:115003.892710
    α4:β2m4:1660014072311
    α4:β220:129001.41410.142058 (2,216)4.4100.261463 (2,131)
    α4:β2100:127001.91700.152480 (2,284)4.04.00.241242 (2,138)
    α4:β2-6-α41:124001.31300.211047 (2,116)6.36.30.23512 (2,56)
    α4:β2-6-α-9-β2-6-α41:133002.51300.24842 (2,80)5.07.90.26964 (2,103)
    β2-6-α-9-β2-6-α4:β21:12901.3121813
    • ↵aAverage of maximal ACh-evoked current amplitudes in X. laevis oocyte experiments. Oocytes were clamped at holding potentials ranging from −40 to −100 mV. Peak AChmax-evoked current amplitudes from each experiment were recorded and baseline subtracted. Average current levels for all experiments on a given receptor population were rounded off to two significant digits, and SEM values were typically 10%.

    • ↵bEC50_1 and EC50_2 correspond to the high- and low sensitivity potencies observed from the wild-type α4β2 in a 4:1 ratio, respectively.

    • ↵cFraction of the high-sensitivity component on receptors resulting in biphasic activation profiles.

    • ↵dNumber of experiments behind the data.

    • ↵eFor the experiments in which data were best fitted to biphasic Hill equations, the results from the best-model F test with p < 0.0001 are given as follows: F value (degrees of freedom for the numerator, degrees of freedom for the denominator).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (30)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 30
27 Jul 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unraveling the High- and Low-Sensitivity Agonist Responses of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Unraveling the High- and Low-Sensitivity Agonist Responses of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Kasper Harpsøe, Philip K. Ahring, Jeppe K. Christensen, Marianne L. Jensen, Dan Peters, Thomas Balle
Journal of Neuroscience 27 July 2011, 31 (30) 10759-10766; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1509-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Unraveling the High- and Low-Sensitivity Agonist Responses of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Kasper Harpsøe, Philip K. Ahring, Jeppe K. Christensen, Marianne L. Jensen, Dan Peters, Thomas Balle
Journal of Neuroscience 27 July 2011, 31 (30) 10759-10766; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1509-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • An Atypical, Staged Cell Death Pathway Induced by Depletion of SNARE-Proteins MUNC18-1 or Syntaxin-1
  • USP1/UAF1-stabilized METTL3 promotes reactive astrogliosis and improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury through m6A modification of YAP1 mRNA
  • Mechanisms that underlie expression of estradiol-induced excitatory synaptic potentiation in the hippocampus differ between males and females
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.