Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Sex Differences in the Use of Anticipatory Brain Activity to Encode Emotional Events

Giulia Galli, Noham Wolpe and Leun J. Otten
Journal of Neuroscience 24 August 2011, 31 (34) 12364-12370; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-11.2011
Giulia Galli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noham Wolpe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leun J. Otten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic representation of the scalp sites used to record and analyze electrical brain activity. Activity was recorded from all 32 sites that are shown. The statistical analyses were based on the 24 black sites to allow partitioning of sites into four quadrants defined by anterior–posterior and left–right location.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Anticipatory brain activity predicting later memory performance. a–c, Depicted are group-averaged ERP waveforms (collapsed across men and women) at a frontal electrode site (site 21 from montage 10; www.easycap.de/easycap/e/electrodes/13_M10.htm) elicited by cues preceding pleasant pictures (a), unpleasant pictures (b), and neutral pictures (c). Anticipatory activity related to successful encoding is evident for unpleasant cues. For graphical purposes, the waveforms were low-pass filtered at 19.4 Hz.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Anticipatory brain activity elicited by cues preceding unpleasant pictures separated according to the biological sex of the individual. a, c, In women (a), but not men (c), anticipatory activity is predictive of later memory performance. Waveforms are shown for the same frontal scalp site as used in Figure 2. For graphical purposes, the waveforms were low-pass filtered at 19.4 Hz. b, Voltage spline map illustrating that the effect in women is largest over right hemisphere scalp sites. The map shows the difference between activity preceding later remembered and forgotten pictures in the 300–1500 ms interval following cue onset.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Brain activity following picture onset. a–c, Group-averaged ERP waveforms (collapsed across men and women) are shown for pleasant pictures (a), unpleasant pictures (b), and neutral pictures (c) that were later remembered or forgotten. The frontal electrode site used in Figures 2 and 3 is shown again here (site 21 from montage 10; www.easycap.de/easycap/e/electrodes/13_M10.htm). A positive-going, frontally distributed subsequent memory effect is elicited by all picture types. Waveforms were low-pass filtered at 19.4 Hz for display purposes.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Proportions of responses in the recognition memory task

    Recognition typePicture type
    PleasantUnpleasantNeutral
    Hits, remember0.42 (0.16)0.45 (0.17)0.40 (0.18)
    Hits, know0.31 (0.15)0.27 (0.13)0.29 (0.14)
    Misses0.27 (0.11)0.28 (0.13)0.31 (0.12)
    Correct rejections0.75 (0.13)0.81 (0.11)0.84 (0.10)
    • Standard deviations are displayed in parentheses.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (34)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 34
24 Aug 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex Differences in the Use of Anticipatory Brain Activity to Encode Emotional Events
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Sex Differences in the Use of Anticipatory Brain Activity to Encode Emotional Events
Giulia Galli, Noham Wolpe, Leun J. Otten
Journal of Neuroscience 24 August 2011, 31 (34) 12364-12370; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Sex Differences in the Use of Anticipatory Brain Activity to Encode Emotional Events
Giulia Galli, Noham Wolpe, Leun J. Otten
Journal of Neuroscience 24 August 2011, 31 (34) 12364-12370; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1619-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.