Featured ArticleBrief Communications

Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model

Roland Schaette and David McAlpine
Journal of Neuroscience 21 September 2011, 31 (38) 13452-13457; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011

Article Information

DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011
PubMed 
21940438
Published By 
Society for Neuroscience
History 
  • Received April 30, 2011
  • Revision received July 13, 2011
  • Accepted July 25, 2011
  • First published September 21, 2011.
  • Version of record published September 21, 2011.
Copyright & Usage 
Copyright © 2011 the authors 0270-6474/11/3113452-06$15.00/0

Author Information

  1. Roland Schaette and
  2. David McAlpine
  1. University College London Ear Institute, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom
View Full Text

Author contributions

  1. Author contributions: R.S. and D.M. designed research; R.S. performed research; R.S. analyzed data; R.S. and D.M. wrote the paper.

View Abstract

Disclosures

    • Received April 30, 2011.
    • Revision received July 13, 2011.
    • Accepted July 25, 2011.

  • This study was supported by the British Tinnitus Association. We thank Paul Radomskij for helpful discussions about the ABR experiments, Thomas Cracknell and Leon Cox for assistance in the measurements, Lucy Anderson for blind analysis of the ABR data, and Jennifer Linden for valuable comments on the manuscript.

  • The authors have no competing financial interests.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Roland Schaette, UCL Ear Institute, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom. r.schaette{at}ucl.ac.uk

Online Impact

 

Article usage

Article usage: January 2018 to February 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Jan 201868333103
Feb 20183423570
Mar 20181333891
Apr 20183331183
May 20181627871
Jun 20181224642
Jul 20186017976
Aug 20185816489
Sep 20188521596
Oct 201896321144
Nov 20189930885
Dec 201879245108
Total 201865331731058
Jan 201998287100
Feb 20197724896
Mar 2019129277164
Apr 2019117303160
May 201974274112
Jun 20196928385
Jul 201918322697
Aug 2019100261110
Oct 20198126581
Nov 20197218085
Dec 20197018369
Total 2019107027871159
Jan 20204822268
Feb 20207617862
Mar 20205614754
May 20205818778
Jun 20206424270
Jul 20205018444
Aug 20204718553
Sep 20208121971
Oct 20207421580
Nov 202094489245
Dec 20206322463
Total 20207112492888
Jan 20214322852
Feb 20215525873
Mar 202169251100
Apr 202182206102
May 20218125772
Jun 20215620392
Jul 20214022147
Aug 20214918756
Sep 20215324762
Oct 20214927584
Nov 20214426067
Dec 20216231455
Total 20216832907862
Jan 20226137995
Feb 20227444696
Mar 202276472169
Apr 202266503116
May 20226250595
Jun 20223843168
Jul 20224344242
Aug 20224550574
Sep 20225759282
Oct 20227452980
Nov 20224416030
Dec 20222724333
Total 20226675207980
Jan 20235878891
Feb 20231240
Total 20235981291
Total3843173785038
Back to top

In this issue

Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model
Roland Schaette, David McAlpine
Journal of Neuroscience 21 September 2011, 31 (38) 13452-13457; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • Published on: (30 September 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    Tinnitus with normal audiogram

    Tinnitus may be at 200 or 10,000 khz, which we normally do not test for. Also, you don't need 100% of the hair cells working well to get a normal audiogram. Suppose for example, that 60% of the hair cells were functioning, and you could still get a normal audiogram? Then the tinnitus could arise from the damaged 40%

    We see this in ears where the DPOE shows damage at certain tones, but the audiogram is normal, an...

    Show More
    Competing Interests: None declared.