Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleBrief Communications

Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model

Roland Schaette and David McAlpine
Journal of Neuroscience 21 September 2011, 31 (38) 13452-13457; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011
Roland Schaette
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David McAlpine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Published eLetters

Guidelines

As a forum for professional feedback, submissions of letters are open to all. You do not need to be a subscriber. To avoid redundancy, we urge you to read other people's letters before submitting your own. Name, current appointment, place of work, and email address are required to send a letter, and will be published with your review. We also require that you declare any competing financial interests. Unprofessional submissions will not be considered or responded to.

Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    Murray Grossan, M.D.
    Submitted on: 30 September 2011
  • Submitted on: (30 September 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    • Murray Grossan, M.D., Otolaryngology

    Tinnitus may be at 200 or 10,000 khz, which we normally do not test for. Also, you don't need 100% of the hair cells working well to get a normal audiogram. Suppose for example, that 60% of the hair cells were functioning, and you could still get a normal audiogram? Then the tinnitus could arise from the damaged 40%

    We see this in ears where the DPOE shows damage at certain tones, but the audiogram is normal, an...

    Show More

    Tinnitus may be at 200 or 10,000 khz, which we normally do not test for. Also, you don't need 100% of the hair cells working well to get a normal audiogram. Suppose for example, that 60% of the hair cells were functioning, and you could still get a normal audiogram? Then the tinnitus could arise from the damaged 40%

    We see this in ears where the DPOE shows damage at certain tones, but the audiogram is normal, and the tinnitus is at that tone.

    We also see patients who insist they have difficulty hearing speech, yet their audiogram is normal. In some patients, we find abnormal or reduced hair cell function on DPOE.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (38)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 38
21 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model
Roland Schaette, David McAlpine
Journal of Neuroscience 21 September 2011, 31 (38) 13452-13457; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model
Roland Schaette, David McAlpine
Journal of Neuroscience 21 September 2011, 31 (38) 13452-13457; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    Murray Grossan, M.D.
    Published on: 30 September 2011
  • Published on: (30 September 2011)
    Page navigation anchor for Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    Tinnitus with normal audiogram
    • Murray Grossan, M.D., Otolaryngology

    Tinnitus may be at 200 or 10,000 khz, which we normally do not test for. Also, you don't need 100% of the hair cells working well to get a normal audiogram. Suppose for example, that 60% of the hair cells were functioning, and you could still get a normal audiogram? Then the tinnitus could arise from the damaged 40%

    We see this in ears where the DPOE shows damage at certain tones, but the audiogram is normal, an...

    Show More

    Tinnitus may be at 200 or 10,000 khz, which we normally do not test for. Also, you don't need 100% of the hair cells working well to get a normal audiogram. Suppose for example, that 60% of the hair cells were functioning, and you could still get a normal audiogram? Then the tinnitus could arise from the damaged 40%

    We see this in ears where the DPOE shows damage at certain tones, but the audiogram is normal, and the tinnitus is at that tone.

    We also see patients who insist they have difficulty hearing speech, yet their audiogram is normal. In some patients, we find abnormal or reduced hair cell function on DPOE.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.