Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Cover ArticleArticles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Intact Bilateral Resting-State Networks in the Absence of the Corpus Callosum

J. Michael Tyszka, Daniel P. Kennedy, Ralph Adolphs and Lynn K. Paul
Journal of Neuroscience 19 October 2011, 31 (42) 15154-15162; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1453-11.2011
J. Michael Tyszka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel P. Kennedy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph Adolphs
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn K. Paul
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    a, b, Representative parasagittal anatomy in control (a) and AgCC (b) subjects (x = −6.0 mm). c, In AgCC, callosal fibers fail to cross midline during development, instead forming Probst bundles (white arrows, z = +20 mm). d–f, A combined midspace template was constructed by iterative nonlinear registration to an initial MNI-space target template of all T1-weighted structural images from both AgCC and control subjects: mean control contribution (d), mean AgCC contribution (e), and combined control and AgCC midspace templates (f).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    a, b, Mean interregional correlations in BOLD signal from 48 Harvard–Oxford atlas labels in both hemispheres for AgCC subjects (a) and control subjects (b). Homotopic correlations appear on the diagonal of the upper right quadrants of the Fisher z-transformed correlation matrices. c, Pairwise comparison of homotopic correlations (z-transformed) for all 48 regions. Only three regions—intracalcarine (23), precuneus (30), and cuneal (31) cortices—show uncorrected significant differences (*α = 0.05), none of which survive FDR correction (q = 0.05). Regions with partial clipping by the calculation mask in either group are indicated with solid bars (see Results, Atlas-based BOLD correlation). d, e, Location and extent in sagittal (d) and axial (e) sections of the three regions with reduced functional correlation in AgCC identified in c. These regions correspond to areas of significantly increased local deformation in AgCC (Fig. 6).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Spatial correlation matching of group-level ICs. a, Full correlation matrix, C, for all neuronal ICs identified in the ICA of control and AgCC groups. Searching rows and columns for the maximum correlation coefficient identifies candidate pairings of ICs from each group. A pairing is defined as invertible if the corresponding matrix element contains the maximum correlation in both row and column. b, Reduced correlation matrix, C̃, composed of the reordered invertible IC pairings.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    a, Invertible matches between AgCC and control group independent component spatial maps, ordered by decreasing spatial correlation coefficient from highest (A7–C40, r = 0.695) to lowest (A4–C5, r = 0.328). b, Additional pairings (by inspection) from the remaining ICs without invertible matches. c, Unmatched ICs: a bilateral cerebellar component in AgCC (A10) and a medial occipital (C8) and lateral parietal (C12) component in controls. d, Suboptimal invertible matches occur when networks in either group are split into subcomponents by the ICA. For example, the dorsal parietal-frontal networks are lateralized in control subjects (C4 and C11) but split anterior–posterior in AgCC (A16 and A41). Similarly, the default mode network is a single component in the control group (C41), but split into frontal and parietal components in AgCC (A2 and A43).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Interhemispheric temporal BOLD correlations for each of the group-level ICs. Masks were defined within the left and right hemispheres for suprathreshold voxels for each group-level IC. Extracted BOLD time series (corrected for white matter and CSF time courses) were correlated and mean Fisher z-transformed correlation calculated for all subjects. a, No significant difference was observed between groups in an unpaired comparison of all neuronal ICs (p = 0.778). b, Interhemispheric correlations for the invertible IC pairs from each group. Only one IC pair showed a significant difference in interhemispheric correlation (*A21–C39, left cerebellum, p = 0.0026 FDR corrected). c, Left–right percentage symmetry of the group IC masks used for calculating the BOLD temporal correlations in a and b did not differ between groups (for symmetry definition, see Materials and Methods). d, Left–right percentage symmetry for the ICs that comprise the 17 invertible IC pairings.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Mean absolute deformation within suprathreshold regions for each of the 19 IC pairs illustrated in Figure 4. The combination of A16 and A41 has been paired with C4 and C11, as has A2 and A43 with C41, as described in the Results, Morphological variability and independent component differences. IC pairs with significantly higher regional deformation in AgCC compared with controls (*) all correspond to posterior midline locations, which also show significantly reduced homotopic temporal correlation (Fig. 2c).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Correspondences of group-level AgCC neuronal independent components to control group and literature components

    IC numberBest control IC matchCorrelation coefficientExplained varianceAssignmentCorresponding IC in Smith et al. (2009)
    Invertible
        A7C400.6954.28%Auditory (frontal)720
        A12C340.6893.48%Caudate-putamen—
        A34C90.6540.82%Ventral visual320
        A26C20.5951.47%Auditory (temporal)720
        A5C140.5864.70%Premotor—
        A8C30.5484.10%Visual120 (part)
        A19C360.5272.73%Visual220
        A2C410.4975.61%DMN (with A43)420
        A32C270.4760.88%Cerebellum (right)520 (part)
        A40C380.4240.04%Posterior cingulate420 (part)
        A41C40.4070.08%Parietal-frontal (with A16)920,1020
        A43C200.3820.67%DMN (with A19)420
        A21C390.3482.49%Cerebellum (left)520 (part)
        A16C110.3463.09%Parietal-frontal (with A41)920,1020
        A15C210.3393.20%vmPFC820 (part)
        A25C160.3321.88%Frontal pole820 (part)
        A4C50.3284.79%dlPFC—
    Noninvertible
        A9C104.09%Somatomotor620
        A10—3.96%Cerebellum520 (part)
        A27C181.43%dlOC—
    Total53.79%
    • Seventeen of the 20 components were matched invertibly to control ICs and two noninvertible components were matched by inspection (A9 and A27). DMN, Default mode network; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; dlOC, dorsolateral occipital cortex.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (42)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 42
19 Oct 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intact Bilateral Resting-State Networks in the Absence of the Corpus Callosum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Intact Bilateral Resting-State Networks in the Absence of the Corpus Callosum
J. Michael Tyszka, Daniel P. Kennedy, Ralph Adolphs, Lynn K. Paul
Journal of Neuroscience 19 October 2011, 31 (42) 15154-15162; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1453-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Intact Bilateral Resting-State Networks in the Absence of the Corpus Callosum
J. Michael Tyszka, Daniel P. Kennedy, Ralph Adolphs, Lynn K. Paul
Journal of Neuroscience 19 October 2011, 31 (42) 15154-15162; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1453-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
  • Generation of Intensity Selectivity by Differential Synaptic Tuning: Fast-Saturating Excitation But Slow-Saturating Inhibition
  • Episodic Reinstatement in the Medial Temporal Lobe
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.