Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Brief Communications

When Attention Wanders: How Uncontrolled Fluctuations in Attention Affect Performance

Marlene R. Cohen and John H. R. Maunsell
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2011, 31 (44) 15802-15806; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-11.2011
Marlene R. Cohen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. R. Maunsell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    When the task involves differences in orientation as well as location, strong attention impairs subjects' ability to detect large orientation changes. A, Proportion correct as a function of normalized orientation change sorted by attention axis position as in Figure 1B, for recording sessions in which the orientation of the two stimuli differed by <45° (28/49 recording sessions). B, Proportion correct as a function of position on the attention axis for the largest and smallest orientation change bins. Conventions as in Figure 1C. C, D, Same as A and B for recording sessions in which the orientation of the two stimuli differed by >45° (21/49 recording sessions).

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Fluctuations in attention change both the thresholds and slopes of psychometric curves. A, Schematic of the orientation change detection task. Two Gabor stimuli synchronously flashed on for 200 ms and off for a randomized 200–400 ms period. At an unsignaled time picked from an exponential distribution (minimum 1000 ms, mean 3000 ms, maximum 5000 ms), one of the stimuli was presented in a different orientation, and the monkey was rewarded for making a saccade to the stimulus that changed. Attention was cued in blocks, and the cue was valid on 80% of trials, meaning that on an “attend-left” block of trials (depicted here), 80% of orientation changes were to the left stimulus. The monkey was rewarded for correctly detecting any change, even on the unattended side. All analyses were performed on responses to the stimulus before the orientation change (black outlined panel). B, Fitted psychometric curves sorted by position on attention axis. Strong attention (red lines and large positive values) improves performance on difficult trials relative to weak attention (blue lines). Arrows indicate the two orientation change bins plotted in C. C, Proportion correct as a function of position on the attention axis for the largest and smallest orientation change bins. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. D, E, Fitted threshold (D) and slope (E) as a function of attention axis position. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (44)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 44
2 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
When Attention Wanders: How Uncontrolled Fluctuations in Attention Affect Performance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
When Attention Wanders: How Uncontrolled Fluctuations in Attention Affect Performance
Marlene R. Cohen, John H. R. Maunsell
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2011, 31 (44) 15802-15806; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
When Attention Wanders: How Uncontrolled Fluctuations in Attention Affect Performance
Marlene R. Cohen, John H. R. Maunsell
Journal of Neuroscience 2 November 2011, 31 (44) 15802-15806; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-11.2011
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Brief Communications

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.