Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Homeostatic Strengthening of Inhibitory Synapses Is Mediated by the Accumulation of GABAA Receptors

Matthew D. Rannals and Jaideep Kapur
Journal of Neuroscience 30 November 2011, 31 (48) 17701-17712; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4476-11.2011
Matthew D. Rannals
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaideep Kapur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Action potential firing rate of neurons homeostatically stabilized after depolarization-induced increase. A, One minute traces show action potentials from representative untreated control and 7 mm [K+]-treated neurons before, during, and after acute depolarization with 7 mm [K+] external solution. B, The action potential firing rate increased in response to acute depolarization and was smaller in 7 mm [K+]-treated neurons than in controls. Loose patch recordings were obtained from untreated control neurons and from neurons that had been grown in medium treated with an elevated 7 mm [K+]. C, D, One minute traces from representative untreated control and 7 mm [K+]-treated neurons (C) show similar action potential firing rates (D). Recordings from 7 mm [K+]-treated neurons were performed in external medium with 7 mm [K+], whereas those from control neurons were in standard external medium containing 2.5 mm [K+]. *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    High activity treatment increased amplitude and frequency of mIPSCs. A, Trace of averaged mIPSCs from a representative HA-treated neuron had a larger amplitude than that from an untreated neuron (inset, normalized traces). B, One minute recordings from representative HA-treated and untreated neurons. C, Normalized mIPSC amplitude distribution histograms from representative HA-treated and untreated neurons revealed a shift toward higher amplitude events after HA treatment. D, Cumulative probability plot of mIPSC frequency from representative HA-treated and untreated neurons demonstrating a shift toward higher frequency of events after HA treatment.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Firing rate of HA-treated neurons increases when inhibitory transmission is reduced to control levels. A, Traces of averaged mIPSCs from representative neurons after 48 h of HA treatment (left, center) along with a trace of averaged mIPSCs from an untreated control neuron (right). Application of 0.1 μm bicuculline in the external solution during a whole-cell recording reduced the amplitude of mIPSCs of an HA-treated neuron to control levels (center). B, The firing rate of HA-treated neurons significantly increases when inhibitory transmission is reduced to the level of untreated controls using 0.1 μm bicuculline.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    mIPSC amplitude increased before frequency increased during HA treatment. A, Traces of averaged mIPSCs from representative neurons after 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of HA treatment, and from untreated control neuron. B, After 12 h of HA treatment, mIPSC amplitude was larger than in untreated controls. Larger amplitudes are also observed after 24 and 48 h of HA treatment. C, Increased mIPSC frequency occurred at 48 h of HA treatment (see Table 1 for details). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    GABAR γ2 subunit surface expression increased in HA-treated neurons while total expression remained unchanged. A, B, A biotinylation assay was used to label surface GABARs containing the γ2 subunit, and both surface and total γ2 subunit protein expression were measured by Western blot. Blots were reprobed with an actin antibody. A representative blot shows total expression of the γ2 subunit was similar in both HA-treated and control sample (A), whereas surface expression of the γ2 subunit was significantly higher in HA-treated samples (B). C, Total expression of the γ2 subunit in HA-treated samples expressed as a percentage fraction of control γ2 subunit expression. D, Surface expression of the γ2 subunit in HA-treated samples expressed as a percentage fraction of control γ2 subunit expression. *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Both postsynaptic and presynaptic elements of GABAergic synapses were larger after 48 h of HA treatment. A–E, Clusters of GABAR immunoreactivity on the surface of untreated control neurons (A, B) and HA-treated neurons (C, D). γ2 clusters were larger after 48 h of HA treatment (E). F–J, GAD-65 immunoreactivity in untreated control neurons (F, G) and in HA-treated neurons (H, I). GAD-65 puncta were larger after 48 h of HA treatment (J). K–O, γ2 clusters colocalized with GAD-65 puncta in untreated neurons (K) (magnified inset, L) and in HA-treated neurons (M) (magnified inset, N). Colocalized puncta were larger after 48 h of HA treatment (O). Scale bar, 20 μm. **p < 0.005.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    GABAR immunoreactivity increase precedes presynaptic GAD-65 increase during HA treatment. A, γ2 subunit-containing GABAR clusters, GAD-65 puncta, and colocalized puncta in neuronal dendrites. B, γ2 clusters were larger than controls at 6 h of HA treatment, GAD-65 were larger at 24 h of HA treatment, and colocalized puncta were larger at 12 h of HA treatment. All increases in puncta size were maintained at subsequent time points through the 48 h treatment. Scale bar, 10 μm. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    High activity attenuated the decrease of synaptic strength after brefeldin A treatment. A, Averaged trace from a representative neuron after 90 min of brefeldin A (BFA) treatment superimposed on an average trace from a representative untreated neuron. The mean of median amplitudes for brefeldin A-treated neurons was smaller than untreated neurons. B, Average trace from a representative HA-treated neuron after 90 min of brefeldin A treatment superimposed on an average trace from a representative HA-treated neuron that was not incubated with brefeldin A. The mean of median amplitudes for HA-treated neurons was smaller in those treated with brefeldin A. C, γ2 subunit-containing GABAR clusters in dendrites from untreated and brefeldin A-treated neurons. γ2 clusters in neurons were smaller after 90 min of brefeldin A treatment. D, γ2 subunit-containing GABAR clusters in dendrites from HA-treated neurons under untreated and brefeldin A-treated conditions. In HA-treated neurons the brefeldin A treatment did not result in a decrease in cluster size. Scale bar, 10 μm.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    GABARs were internalized more slowly in HA-treated neurons. A, An antibody-feeding technique was used to measure the rate of internalization of GABARs containing a labeled γ2 subunit. Representative neurons from 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min of incubation time show more rapid loss of fluorescence from the surface of untreated neurons than from HA-treated neurons. B, The half-life of receptors on the surface was larger in the HA-treated neurons. Scale bar, 20 μm.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    mIPSC kinetics for control and treated neurons

    Amplitude (pA)Frequency (Hz)10–90% Rise timeτw
    Control (n = 18)42.5 ± 1.40.3 ± 0.051.5 ± 0.0661.2 ± 3.6
    6 h (n = 7)40.2 ± 3.80.4 ± 0.11.7 ± 0.1146.5 ± 5.2
    12 h (n = 11)52.8 ± 2.2*0.3 ± 0.051.4 ± 0.0957.9 ± 6.3
    24 h (n = 9)65.4 ± 2.8**0.4 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.1057.3 ± 6.4
    48 h (n = 11)66.1 ± 4.4**0.6 ± 0.1**1.4 ± 0.1937.7 ± 7.5*
    • ↵*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's multiple-comparison test, n = number of neurons.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Sizes of GABAergic postsynaptic and presynaptic markers and colocalization

    γ2GAD-65Colocalized
    Control (n = 48)18.3 ± 0.757.0 ± 1.528.1 ± 1.2
    6 h (n = 39)22.1 ± 0.5**53.9 ± 1.329.2 ± 0.9
    12 h (n = 39)21.7 ± 0.5**54.9 ± 1.132.7 ± 1.3*
    24 h (n = 66)23.4 ± 0.4**70.4 ± 1.5**35.5 ± 0.6**
    48 h (n = 45)22.1 ± 0.5**76.2 ± 2.1**34.3 ± 1.0**
    • ↵*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's multiple-comparison test. Units = μm2, n = number of neurons.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Densities of GABAergic postsynaptic and presynaptic markers and colocalization

    γ2GAD-65Colocalized
    Control (n = 48)2.5 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.1
    6 h (n = 39)2.7 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.1
    12 h (n = 39)2.3 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.1
    24 h (n = 66)2.9 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.1
    48 h (n = 45)2.9 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.1
    • *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's multiple-comparison test. Units = number per 10 μm2, n = number of neurons.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (48)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 48
30 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Homeostatic Strengthening of Inhibitory Synapses Is Mediated by the Accumulation of GABAA Receptors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Homeostatic Strengthening of Inhibitory Synapses Is Mediated by the Accumulation of GABAA Receptors
Matthew D. Rannals, Jaideep Kapur
Journal of Neuroscience 30 November 2011, 31 (48) 17701-17712; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4476-11.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Homeostatic Strengthening of Inhibitory Synapses Is Mediated by the Accumulation of GABAA Receptors
Matthew D. Rannals, Jaideep Kapur
Journal of Neuroscience 30 November 2011, 31 (48) 17701-17712; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4476-11.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Structural and functional development of inhibitory connections from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body to the superior paraolivary nucleus
  • Presynaptic kainate receptors onto somatostatin interneurons are recruited by activity throughout development and contribute to cortical sensory adaptation
  • Notch signaling plays a dual role in regulating the neuron-to-oligodendrocyte switch in the developing dorsal forebrain
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.