Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

Wnt5a Is a Transcriptional Target of Dlx Homeogenes and Promotes Differentiation of Interneuron Progenitors In Vitro and In Vivo

Sara Paina, Donatella Garzotto, Silvia DeMarchis, Marco Marino, Alessia Moiana, Luciano Conti, Elena Cattaneo, Marzia Perera, Giorgio Corte, Enzo Calautti and Giorgio R. Merlo
Journal of Neuroscience 16 February 2011, 31 (7) 2675-2687; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3110-10.2011
Sara Paina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donatella Garzotto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia DeMarchis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Marino
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessia Moiana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luciano Conti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Cattaneo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marzia Perera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giorgio Corte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enzo Calautti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giorgio R. Merlo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Corrections - April 06, 2011

Abstract

During brain development, neurogenesis, migration, and differentiation of neural progenitor cells are regulated by an interplay between intrinsic genetic programs and extrinsic cues. The Dlx homeogene transcription factors have been proposed to directly control the genesis and maturation of GABAergic interneurons of the olfactory bulb (OB), subpallium, and cortex. Here we provide evidence that Dlx genes promote differentiation of olfactory interneurons via the signaling molecule Wnt5a. Dlx2 and Dlx5 interact with homeodomain binding sequences within the Wnt5a locus and activate its transcription. Exogenously provided Wnt5a promotes GABAergic differentiation in dissociated OB neurons and in organ-type brain cultures. Finally, we show that the Dlx-mutant environment is unfavorable for GABA differentiation, in vivo and in vitro. We conclude that Dlx genes favor interneuron differentiation also in a non-cell-autonomous fashion, via expression of Wnt5a.

Introduction

In the developing brain, neural progenitor cells (NPCs) exit the cell cycle and leave the germinal layers, while progressively initiating region- and time-specific programs of neuronal differentiation (Nguyen et al., 2006; Doe, 2008). The balance between proliferation and differentiation of NPCs is the result of a complex interplay between genetically determined cellular programs and local environmental cues, largely to be deciphered (Zaki et al., 2003; Fukuda and Taga, 2005; Hämmerle and Tejedor, 2007). The fate of differentiating neurons is established by the patterned expression of transcription factors, often of the homeobox class (Flames et al., 2007; Fogarty et al., 2007; Guillemot, 2007; Hébert and Fishell, 2008; Wigle and Eisenstat, 2008).

GABA+ interneurons derive from subpallial NPCs residing in the medial (MGE) and lateral (LGE) ganglionic eminences, which migrate toward the cortex/hippocampus and olfactory bulb (OB), respectively (Wichterle et al., 2001; Marín and Rubenstein, 2003; Métin et al., 2006; Wonders and Anderson, 2006). The Dlx homeogenes play major roles in the control of migration and differentiation of subpallial NPCs, as revealed by the brain phenotypes of mice null for individual genes (Dlx1−/−, Dlx2−/−, and Dlx5−/−) or combinations of them (Anderson et al., 1997; Levi et al., 2003; Long et al., 2003, 2007). In the absence of Dlx5, the number of TH+, calretinin-positive (CR+), and GABA+ olfactory interneurons is reduced, although the Dlx5+ cell lineage is not depleted. Thus, a role of Dlx proteins to drive GABA differentiation cell-autonomously (Stühmer et al., 2002) appears well established.

Wnt molecules regulate NPC proliferation, commitment, and differentiation during development (Ciani and Salinas, 2005; Ille and Sommer, 2005; Malaterre et al., 2007). Binding of Wnts to the Frizzled/LRP complex activates the “canonical” β-catenin-dependent pathway. Alternatively, “noncanonical” pathways are known, which include the Ca2+/PKC and JnK ones (Eisenmann, 2005; Gordon and Nusse, 2006; Barker, 2008; Huang and He, 2008), and novel receptor/signal routes have recently been uncovered (Lyu et al., 2008).

Several published results indicate that Wnt/β-catenin signaling is essential to maintain the proliferation potential of hippocampal, cortical, and midbrain NPCs in vivo (Zechner et al., 2003; Lie et al., 2005; Adachi et al., 2007; Nusse, 2008); for instance, expression of stabilized β-catenin in cortical NPCs leads to the expansion of NPCs in the forebrain (FB) (Chenn and Walsh, 2003; Woodhead et al., 2006). Likewise, Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the subpallium is required for proliferation of NPCs, while it does not influence their migration or differentiation (Gulacsi and Anderson, 2008).

Wnt signaling also promotes NPC differentiation (Kléber and Sommer, 2004; Muroyama et al., 2004). Wnt3 and Wnt7a specifically favor neuronal differentiation of late, but not of early, cortical NPCs (Hirabayashi et al., 2004; Hirabayashi and Gotoh, 2005; Yu et al., 2006), and Wnt5a stimulates the differentiation of dopaminergic neurons (Castelo-Branco and Arenas, 2006; Andersson et al., 2008). As Wnt ligands elicit such a variety of responses, their functions need to be determined in a cell type- and context-dependent manner.

Here we provide evidence that Dlx genes promote differentiation of olfactory interneurons by regulating the expression of Wnt5a, hence non-cell-autonomously. We also show that Wnt5a favors GABA+ differentiation both in dissociated OB neurons and in organ-type cultures.

Materials and Methods

Mouse lines.

Mice with targeted disruption of Dlx5 and Dlx5;Dlx6 have been previously reported (Acampora et al., 1999; Merlo et al., 2002b). The Dlx5 null allele harbors a knock-in insertion of the lacZ reporter, which allows for detection of the Dlx5-expressing cells by β-galactosidase (β-gal) immunostaining. The Dlx5;Dlx6 double KO mice carry an allele with a large deletion encompassing both genes. β-actin-eGFP mice (Okabe et al., 1997) were used as donors in the grafting experiments. Animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee and the Italian Ministry of Health.

Culture and transduction of neurospheres.

Brains of E18.5 wild-type, Dlx5+/−, and Dlx5−/− mice were dissected to obtain the rostral periventricular region. The tissue was dissociated in PBS with 10 mm glucose and 0.1% trypsin, cells were collected and resuspended in serum-free NSA medium (Euroclone) supplemented with N2 (Invitrogen), 2 mm glutamine, 20 ng/ml EGF, and 10 ng/ml bFGF (Peprotech). Neurospheres formed after 3–5 d and were mechanically dissociated twice a week and replated. Neurosphere from Dlx5−/− brains were transduced with a retroviral vectors expressing wild-type murine Dlx5, as previously reported (Perera et al., 2004), to obtain the cells denominated Dlx5−/−Dlx5exp.

Microarray profiling and validation.

Neurospheres cells from wild-type and Dlx5−/− brains, as well as Dlx5−/−Dlx5exp cells, were used to purify total RNA. cDNA and biotinylated cRNA samples were generated as previously described (Gangemi et al., 2006), and used to hybridize on Affymetrix murine genome U74Av2 GeneChips. Quality controls and normalization were done using standard statistical methods. Only genes whose expression was altered at least twofold (log2 = 1) were considered. Next, genes were filtered for coherent expression changes in the Dlx5−/− Dlx5exp cells, i.e., a downregulation in Dlx5−/− cells corresponding to an upregulation in Dlx5−/− Dlx5exp cells, and vice versa. The concordance between the two comparisons was highly significant (for downregulated, p = 8.8 × 10−111; for upregulated, p = 8.1 × 10−135). Differential expression of 20 selected mRNAs was confirmed by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR on total RNA from wild-type and Dlx5−/− neurospheres. The following genes survived this technical validation analysis: Wnt5a, Fzd9, R-cadherin, Neurexophilin, Sema6a, PlexinB2 (downregulated), Fibulin2, Thy1.2, Ulip4, and Dhh (upregulated). In situ hybridization was done to detect Wnt5a, Fzd9, R-cadherin, Neurexophilin, Sema6a, PlexinB2, Fibulin2, Thy1.2, and Ulip4 mRNA on sections of normal and Dlx5−/− brains. Only Wnt5a was validated in situ.

Derivation, characterization, and differentiation of brain-derived neural stem cells.

Embryos at day 12.5 of gestation were collected by cervical dislocation, genotyped for the presence of the Dlx5;6− allele, and used to derive adherent cultures of neural stem (NS) cells, as described previously (Conti et al., 2005; Pollard et al., 2006; Spiliotopoulos et al., 2009). Briefly, the entire forebrain was dissected, the tissue was dissociated with Accutase (Sigma), and cells were plated on plastic dishes in Euromed-N Medium (Euroclone) supplemented with 1% N2 (Invitrogen) and 20 ng/ml of both FGF2 and EGF and expanded adherently for 10 passages. Three clones were selected, expanded, and shown to have identical properties. Absence of Dlx5 and Dlx6 expression in mutant cells was verified by qPCR. Cells at the passage 12 were examined for the expression of Nestin (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, 1:10), Sox2 (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, 1:1000), BLBP (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, 1:500), Olig2 (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, 1:2000), GFAP (DAKO, 1:2000), βIII-tubulin (TuJ1, Promega, 1:2000), glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 (GAD67) (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, 1:2000), GABA (Sigma, 1:1000), CR (Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents, 1:2000), and anti-dll (pan-Dlx, gift from Dr. Grace Boekhoff-Falk, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI, 1:1000). Immunofluorescence was performed using mouse AlexaFluor-488 (Invitrogen) and rabbit AlexaFluor-568 (Invitrogen) secondary antibodies, followed by nuclear counterstaining with DAPI. Cells were also examined for expression of Dlx2, Pax6, Emx1, Emx2, and Oct4 by RT-PCR. NS cells were induced to differentiate following the described protocols (Spiliotopoulos et al., 2009), essentially consisting in adhesion on laminin-coated slides, removal of the growth factors, and addition of BDNF.

Coculture experiments were done by mixing 20% of LC1-GFP cells (Conti et al., 2005) with 80% of either wild-type (WT) or Dlx5;Dlx6 mutant (GFP−) brain-derived NS cells, followed by standard differentiation protocol, immunostaining, and counting the number of GFP+/GAD67+ cells over the number of GFP+ cells. Results are expressed as percentages.

Organotypic cultures of embryonic FB.

Cultures of brain slices were prepared essentially as described previously (Zaghetto et al., 2007). Briefly, embryonic heads at E16.5 were dissected in cold PBS+0.6% glucose, embedded in warm 3% LMP agarose, and let harden at room temperature. The gel blocks were vibratome-sectioned (thickness 200 μm), kept in cold PBS-glucose for 1 h, and placed on Millicell CM culture plate membranes (Millipore) in 35 mm plastic dishes containing Neurobasal medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with 1% N2, 25 μg/ml gentamycin (Sigma), and 0.5 mm glutamine, and maintained for 48–72 h at 37°C in standard conditions. For the coculture experiment, COS7 cells were transfected with 4 μg of Wnt4-, Wnt5a-, and Wnt7b-mycTAG expression vectors (provided by Dr. Yimin Zou, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA) and used as feeder layer. Slices were placed on top and incubated for 48 h. Acrylic beads were saturated for 12 h at 4°C with 500 ng/ml purified recombinant Wnt5a protein (R&D Systems) or PBS, then applied onto the OB slices using a thin needle. Slices were incubated for 72 h, and the OB was then excised and used to extract total RNA for real-time analyses. For the graft experiments, a small portion of the LGE near the ventricle was excised from E14.5 β-actin-eGFP embryos and transferred on the ascending section of the RMS of neonatal brain slices prepared on the same day. Following 7 d in vitro, the slices were fixed and used for immunofluorescent staining to detect GAD67.

Culture and differentiation of dissociated OB cells.

WT and Dlx5−/− OBs were excised from E16.5 brains, mechanically dissociated, and plated on poly-lysine-coated slides in Neurobasal medium supplemented with 1% B27, gentamycin, and glutamine, for 48 h. Cells were then fixed with PFA 4% and stained for βIII-tubulin, GAD67, and CR as above. Positive cells were counted, and the number of positive cells was expressed relative to the number of DAPI+ nuclei. For coculture experiments, 24 h before OB dissociation HeLa cells were transfected with 4 μg of Wnt5a-mycTAG expression vectors (above), plated on six-well cluster dishes, and allowed to adhere for 12 h. Dissociated OB cells were then placed on top, maintained for 48 h, and processed.

In situ hybridization.

For in situ hybridization (ISH), embryos were collected between ages E14.5 and P0, and heads were either immersion-fixed in 4% PFA/0.1 m phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) or perfused. The brains were dissected, washed in PBS, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose for 24 h, frozen in OCT, and sectioned at 12 μm. Hybridization was performed with DIG-labeled riboprobes corresponding to the antisense sequence of the following murine cDNAs: Dlx2 (1600 nt of the ORF), Dlx5 (780 nt of the ORF), Wnt5a (360 nt of the ORF, provided by Dr. Yingzi Yang, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and Wnt5b (1600 nt of the ORF, from Dr. Yang). The hybridization signal obtained with these probes was consistent with published and online data (www.genepaint.org). Hybridization was done on 14 μm cryostatic sections, processed as described. Briefly, sections were permeabilized with 3 μg/ml proteinase K, washed in PBS, and deacetylated with 1.3% triethanolamine and 0.25% acetic anhydrate at room temperature. Sections were prehybridized in 50% formamide at 60°C, hybridized with the DIG-labeled probes for 16 h, washed, incubated with an anti-DIG-AP antibody (Roche), and developed with NBT-BCIP (Sigma). Digital micrographic images were contrast balanced, color matched, and rotated using Photoshop CS3 (Adobe).

RT and real-time qPCR.

OB and GE were excised from the E14.5 or neonatal brains of WT and Dlx5−/− animals, transferred in Trizol (Invitrogen), and used to extract total RNA according to standard procedures. Cultured cells were harvested in PBS, centrifuged, resuspended in Trizol, and processed. For real-time qPCR, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed at 42°C for 50 min in the presence of 500 ng/μl random hexamers and 10 mm each of dNTPs, RNasin, and SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). Relative cDNA abundance was determined using the LightCycler System and the TaqMan Master kit (Roche). Specific cDNAs were amplified using primers and probes designed according the Universal ProbeLibrary system (Roche). Dilution curves were set up for every amplicon. Experiments were repeated at least twice on independent samples, every point was done in triplicate, and results were normalized to the level of TATA-binding protein (TBP) mRNA. Data analysis was performed with ABI software, version 2.1 (Applied Biosystems). All primer sequences are provided as supplemental Tables I–III (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).

Expression vectors, transfection, and luciferase assay.

The DLX5-myc and DLX2-myc expression vectors (OriGene) containing, respectively, the full-length human DLX5 and DLX2 cDNA with an in-frame insertion of the myc-TAG at the C terminus, were used. From these, N terminus-tagged versions of the same vectors were generated. To verify expression and activity of the exogenous DLX2 and DLX5 proteins, we performed immunostaining and Western analyses of transfected cells with anti-myc antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and luciferase reporter assays using the Dlx2 cis-response conserved enhancer from Arx (provided by Dr. Broccoli, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy). Wnt4-, Wnt5a-, and Wnt7b-mycTAG expression vectors were previously reported and tested for biological activity (Lyuksyutova et al., 2003; Zaghetto et al., 2007), and kindly provided by Dr. Yimin Zou.

The following Wnt5a-promoter-luc reporter vectors were constructed (further details are provided as supplemental Fig. 4, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material): a 2000 bp fragment of the murine Wnt5a promoter and 5′ UTR was inserted upstream of the luc expression cassette of pGL3-basic (Promega) to generate the reporter “A.” Upstream of this, three Wnt5a genomic fragments, comprising respectively intron II, intron III, and intron IV, and containing putative homeodomain binding sites (Iler and Abate-Shen, 1996), were inserted to generate reporters named A1, A2, and A3. Initial transfection assays were done on HeLa (human) cells, by Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). For the NS cells, nucleofection (mouse NSC Nucleofector Kit, Amaxa) was used to transduce 500 ng of expression plasmid, 1 μg of reporter vector, and 50 ng of pRL-TK vector (Renilla luciferase control reporter vector) as a control for transfection efficiency. Results are expressed as fold activation compared to the same reporter vectors cotransfected with empty expression plasmids.

ChIP for Dlx binding.

ST14A rat striatal cells (Cattaneo and Conti, 1998), which express Dlx5 and Wnt5a mRNA endogenously, were used to transfect 8 μg of the DLX2- and DLX5-myc TAG expression vectors (above). Transfection consistently yielded an efficiency of 35% and 20%, respectively (number of myc-positive cells over total number of nuclei). Chromatin was crosslinked, sonicated, immunoprecipitated with anti-myc TAG, and de-crosslinked, according to instructions (EZ Magna ChipG, Millipore). Fragments of the murine Wnt5a locus were PCR-amplified and analyzed by electrophoresis. Total chromatin was used as positive control (input). Irrelevant IgG was used as negative control. Primer sequences are provided in supplemental Tables I–III (available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).

Immunoblotting analyses of JnK and β-catenin.

The OB and hippocampus were quickly dissected from neonatal mouse brains and either frozen in liquid N2 or directly extracted in RIPA lyses buffer, supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitors. As positive control for phosphorylated JnK, HeLa cells were UV irradiated (40 mJ/cm2) and lysed 20 min later. As a control for β-catenin activation, NS cells were treated with 200 ng/ml purified Wnt3 (R&D Systems) for 12 h in growth medium. Total proteins were separated and blotted by standard Western methods, and developed with the ECL system (GE Healthcare). The antibodies used were as follows: anti-active β-catenin (Millipore Biotechnology), anti-pan JnK1–3, anti-phospho-JnK1–3 (9252 and 9251, respectively, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Microscope and image capture.

Fluorescence images were acquired using an inverted microscope (Axio Observed Z1, Zeiss). Images were digitally captured using a cooled color 16-bit camera (Axio MRM, Zeiss) with Axio Vision Release 4.7.1 software. Images were optimized for color balance, brightness, and contrast using Photoshop CS3 (Adobe) and assembled into figures using QuarkXPress 7.2 (Quark). No additional digital manipulation was done.

Results

The environment of a Dlx5 null OB is unfavorable for GABA+ differentiation

To get insight on how Dlx genes may control interneuron differentiation, we grafted fragments of the embryonic LGE taken from the forebrain of β-actin-GFP (normal) E14.5 embryos onto thick longitudinal brain slices, maintained in culture. The donor tissue was excised as near to the ventricle as possible, was placed at the base of the RMS of the host slices, and contained little or no CR+, CB+, or GABA+ neurons [confirmed by immunostaining (supplemental Fig. 1, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material)]. The host slices were set up either from WT or from Dlx5−/− neonatal brains, maintained for 7 d after the graft, and examined for the number GFP+/GAD67+ cells (an example is shown in Fig. 1B). The cumulative result of five independent experiments indicate that, while the total number of GFP+ cells in the OB did not significantly differ, the number of GFP+/GAD67+ over the total number of GFP+ cells was significantly reduced in the Dlx5−/− OB, compared to the WT OB (Fig. 1C). This result suggests that the Dlx5−/− OB constitutes an environment unfavorable for GABA+ differentiation.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Grafting of normal subpallial progenitors in Dlx5−/− forebrain, to reveal non-cell-autonomous regulations. A, Scheme illustrating the experimental strategy. Fragments of the LGE from GFP+ (normal) E14.5 embryos were used as donors to graft onto cultures of brain slices set up from neonatal WT or Dlx5−/− mice. After 7 d in culture, GFP+/GAD67+ cells present in the host OB were counted. A comparable number of GFP+ cells were found in the WT and in the Dlx5−/− OB; thus, migration seems to be unaffected. Scale bar, 100 μm. B, Micrograph of a GFP/GAD67 double-positive cell, within the host OB, detected by confocal microscopy. Merged signal is in yellow. Scale bar, 5 μm. C, Number of GFP+/GAD67+ donor cells in WT (solid black bars) or Dlx5−/− (open bars) OB. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. Differences indicated with * were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Wnt5a is downregulated in neurospheres from Dlx5 mutant brain

Comparing expression profiles of neurospheres derived from WT and Dlx5−/− embryonic brains [G.R.M., M.P., G.C., and P. Provero (University of Torino), unpublished work, supplemental Tables IV, V, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material, and Gene Ontology files], Wnt5a was found to be downregulated (twofold reduction) in the Dlx5 null cells, and upregulated (threefold increase) in Dlx5 null cells re-expressing Dlx5. Next, using an algorithm that surveys large sets of expression profiles (Pellegrino et al., 2004), Wnt5a ranked in the first 1% of genes coregulated with Dlx5 (data not shown). These data represented the starting point of our search to evaluate whether Wnt5a could be a putative transcriptional target of Dlx proteins in NPCs.

Wnt5a expression in normal and Dlx5 mutant brains

We examined the expression and localization of Wnt5a, Wnt5b, Dlx2, and Dlx5, by ISH on sections of murine embryonic (E14.5) and neonatal OB, and compared the expression in normal versus Dlx5−/− specimens. In the embryonic OB, Wnt5b is expressed in the periventricular [ventricular zone (VZ)–subventricular zone (SVZ)] region, where neurogenesis occurs; conversely, Wnt5a is not present in this region and instead is expressed in the differentiating anlage (future granule, mitral, and glomerular layers). In the ventral–medial OB Dlx2, but not Dlx5, is expressed in the VZ–SVZ region, and overlaps with Wnt5b. Dlx2 and Dlx5 are both expressed in the differentiating anlage of the OB, overlapping with Wnt5a (Fig. 2A). More posteriorly, Wnt5b expression is detected in the VZ–SVZ of the GE of the embryonic subpallium, while Wnt5a is nearly undetectable in this region (supplemental Fig. 3, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). In the neonatal OB, we observed a similar colocalization of Wnt5a, Dlx2, and Dlx5 expression in the differentiated layers (Fig. 2B), while expression of Wnt5b was mainly restricted to the VZ–SVZ.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Expression of Wnt5a and Wnt5b in normal and Dlx5−/− OB. A, B, ISH on coronal sections of E14.5 (A) and neonatal (B) OB of WT and Dlx5−/− specimens (genotypes are reported on top). Expression of Wnt5b (a, b, a′, b′), Wnt5a (c, d, c′, d′), Dlx2 (e, f, e′, f′), Dlx5 (g, g′), and Dlx5-lacZ (X-gal staining) (h) is shown. In the WT embryonic OB, Wnt5b is expressed in VZ–SVZ region; conversely, Wnt5a is not expressed in this region and instead is expressed in a region overlapping with both Dlx2 and Dlx5 in the ventral–medial OB. In the neonatal brain (left), coexpression of Wnt5a, Dlx2, and Dlx5 is observed in the differentiated layers of the OB. The expression of Wnt5a is reduced in the Dlx5−/− specimens at both ages (black arrows). C, ISH for Wnt5a (left) or Wnt5b (right) on coronal sections of E14.5 OB from Dlx5-lacZ+/− embryos (blue signal), followed by immunostaining for β-gal (brown signal). Lower (i, i′) and higher (j, j′) magnification micrographs are shown. D, Diagram illustrating the overlapping expression of Wnt5a (green bar), Wnt5b (yellow bar), Dlx2 (red bar), and Dlx5 (blue bar) in the embryonic OB, and their position relative to the VZ–SVZ. The layers and neurons indicated in the scheme refer to the situation at P0. GCL, Granule cell layer; GL, glomerular layer; LV, lateral ventricle; MCL, mitral/tufted cell layer; ONL, olfactory nerve layer. E, Real-time qPCR analyses on RNA extracted from WT and Dlx5−/− OBs at E14.5 (left) and at birth (right). Reduced expression of Wnt5a, but not Wnt5b, is observed in both cases. Samples are from pools of tissues (at least 3). Error bars represent the mean ± SD of two independent experiments. Differences were statistically significant as measured by a two-tailed Student's t test (*p < 0.001). Scale bars: 400 μm (a–h, i, i′), 200 μm (a′–g′), 100 μm (j, j′).

We next examined coexpression of Dlx2, Dlx5, Wnt5a, and Wnt5b with greater details, by carrying out ISH on sections of Dlx5-lacZ+/− (heterozygous, phenotypically normal) embryonic brains, followed by immunohistochemical detection of the Dlx5-expressing cells with anti-β-gal antibody. Dlx5 and Wnt5a were found to be coexpressed in the differentiating region of embryonic OB, but neither one was found to be expressed in the VZ–SVZ (neurogenic) region. On the contrary, expression of Wnt5b was detected in the VZ–SVZ region but not in the differentiating region (Fig. 2C). All these results, summarized in the scheme in Figure 2D, are fully compatible with the possibility that Dlx2 and Dlx5 may regulate Wnt5a expression in differentiating cells of the OB.

Next, we compared expression of Dlx2, Wnt5a, and Wnt5b on sections of WT and Dlx5−/− OB from E14.5 and neonatal brains. In the Dlx5 null OB, the nerve layer is absent and cellular layering is disorganized (evident in Fig. 2Bb′,Bf′) (Levi et al., 2003). The expression of Wnt5b and Dlx2 did not change in the absence of Dlx5, while the expression of Wnt5a was visibly reduced in the neonatal OB (Fig. 2B). Reduced Wnt5a expression was also observed in the embryonic OB, although less evident (Fig. 2A). Considering that ISH is not quantitative, we performed real-time qPCR to quantify expression of Wnt5a on RNA extracted from WT or Dlx5−/− OB, at E14.5 and at birth. Wnt5a expression was significantly reduced in the Dlx5−/− OB at both ages (−30% and −55%, respectively) (Fig. 2E), while expression of Wnt5b did not significantly change. Expression of PlexinB2 and Fzd9, two genes found to be differentially expressed in the expression profiles from neurospheres, did not change in the Dlx5−/− samples.

The role of Dlx5 and Wnt5a in neural stem cells

Neurospheres are not an adequate model to address the role of Dlx5 and Wnt5a during NPC differentiation because they are heterogeneous and differentiate more efficiently in astrocytes. Therefore we switched to adherent NS cells: a stable, homogeneous, symmetrically dividing multipotent NPC population, prone to GABA+ differentiation (Conti et al., 2005; Pollard et al., 2006; Spiliotopoulos et al., 2009). Originally obtained from embryonic stem (ES) cells, these cells can be directly derived from embryonic and neonatal brains, with indistinguishable properties (Pollard et al., 2006; Fig. 3; supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material). First we used murine ES-derived NS cells to determine whether this cell model is adequate to examine the Dlx5-Wnt5a regulation and the function of Wnt5a for interneuron differentiation. We measured by real-time qPCR the mRNA abundance of Nestin, Dlx2, Dlx5, GAD-1, GAD-2, and CR at different time points following a differentiation stimulus. Dlx2 is expressed in proliferating cells, while Dlx5 is upregulated during differentiation, followed by GAD-1, GAD-2, and CR. In the same assay, we examined the expression of Wnt5a, observing that also Wnt5a is upregulated during differentiation, with kinetics similar to that of GAD1, GAD2, and CR (Fig. 3A). Next, we performed immunocytochemical detection of Dlx (anti Dll, pan-Dlx antibody), GABA, GAD67 (the protein coded by GAD-1), and CR on differentiating cells. We observed that Dlx is coexpressed with GABA, GAD67, and CR (Fig. 3B). Note that few GAD67+/dll− cells were observed in these cultures (<5% of all GAD+ cells) (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that the NS cells are an appropriate model in which to examine the role of Dlx-Wnt regulation for the initial steps of GABAergic differentiation.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Expression of Dlx, Wnt5a, and differentiation markers in NS cells. A, Real-time qPCR analysis for the expression of Nestin, Dlx2, Dlx5, GAD1, GAD2, CR, and Wnt5a mRNA in NS cells, at two time points (T4 and T10, indicating 4 and 10 d in vitro) following the application of a differentiation stimulus (see Materials and Methods). T0 corresponds to proliferating cells. Dlx2 is expressed in proliferating cells, while Dlx5 is upregulated during differentiation, followed by GAD-1, GAD-2, CR, and Wnt5a. One “referee” sample was introduced in every experiment, and used for normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Differences were statistically significant as measured by a two-tailed Student's t test (p < 0.05). B, Top row, Immunostaining on proliferating NS cells (maintained in EGF + FGF2) to show absence of pan-Dlx staining (a), CR (b), and GABA (c). Middle row, Immunostaining on differentiating cells (10 DIV) showing expression of pan-Dlx proteins (d), CR (e), and GABA (f). Bottom row, Double immunostaining to confirm the coexpression of Dlx proteins (nuclear staining) with CR (g), GABA (h), and GAD67 (i). Few GAD67+/Dlx− cells were observed in these cultures (h′). Scale bar (in a), 50 μm.

We next derived NS lines from the subpallium (LGE+MGE) of E12.5 WT, Dlx5 null, or Dlx5;Dlx6 double-null embryos (Merlo et al., 2002a), following described procedures (Conti et al., 2005; Pollard et al., 2006). This was done to confirm that the observed properties are not due to ES–NS conversion, and to have an in vitro model in which to study the role of Dlx5. All the obtained NS cell lines appeared very similar to the ES-derived NS in terms of immunochemical properties: in proliferating conditions, they express Sox2, BLBP, Nestin, and Olig2, and lack expression of βIII-tubulin, GFAP, GAD67, and GABA. Under differentiation conditions, the WT cells readily express βIII-tubulin, GABA, and GAD67 (supplemental Fig. 2, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) and CR (data not shown), and display dynamic changes of GAD1, GAD2, and CR mRNA abundance similar to that of ES-derived NS cells (data not shown). Dlx5 null cells after few passages showed only minor differences in their GABA+ differentiation efficiency, compared to WT. Instead, the Dlx5;Dlx6 mutant NS cells, after 15 and 20 d of culture in differentiation conditions showed, respectively, a 55% and a 70% reduction of GAD67+ neurons (Fig. 4A). Under the same conditions, expression of Wnt5a, but not Wnt5b, mRNA was reduced by 45% in Dlx mutant NS cells compared to WT ones.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

GABA+ differentiation of normal and Dlx mutant NS cells reveals non-cell-autonomous regulations. A, GAD67 expression of NS cells derived from WT (top row) or Dlx5;Dlx6 null (bottom row) embryonic brains, following 15 or 20 d in differentiating medium. The histogram on the left reports the number of GAD67+ cells over the total number of nuclei, as a percentage. B, Coculture experiments in which 20% of EGFP-labeled LC1 (normal) NS cells were mixed with 80% of either WT or Dlx5;Dlx6 mutant NS cells (top row); after 20 d in differentiating medium, cells are immunostained for GAD67 (bottom row). Only double GFP+/GAD67+ cells were counted and expressed as a percentage of the total number of GFP+ cells (histogram on the right). Scale bar, 5 μm.

To show that Dlx-dependent non-cell-autonomous regulations take place in vitro and influence cell differentiation, we set up a coculture experiment in which a minority (20%) of normal EGFP-expressing NS cells (denominated LC1-EGFP) were used as “sensors” to monitor the environment provided by the presence of either WT or Dlx5;Dlx6 mutant NS cells, representing the remaining 80% (majority) of the initial population (as shown in Fig. 4B, top). After 20 d in differentiation conditions, many fewer EGFP/GAD67 double-positive cells were observed in the Dlx mutant cell environment, compared to the WT cell environment (−70%) (Fig. 4B). In the same experiment, the Dlx5;Dlx6 mutant (EGFP−) cells yielded fewer GAD67+ cells, as expected.

DLX2 and DLX5 transcriptionally regulate Wnt5a expression

The Wnt5a locus contain several predicted homeobox binding sites, conserved in the mammalian and in the chicken genomes, some of which are also predicted with a Dlx-specific Position Weight Matrix [G.R.M. and P. Provero (University of Torino), unpublished work; supplemental Fig. 4, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material]. Furthermore, Wnt5a has been shown experimentally to be a downstream target for the Msx homeoproteins (Iler and Abate-Shen, 1996), although Msx genes are not expressed in the subpallium. Dlx proteins are closely related to the Msx proteins; therefore, we raised the hypothesis that in the OB Wnt5a may be regulated by Dlx proteins, via these conserved homeobox sites. To address this, we constructed a series of luciferase-reporter vectors containing a 1100 kb fragment of the murine Wnt5a promoter, alone or in combination with one of three evolutionarily conserved fragments within a 3.4 kb intron of Wnt5a, named A1, A2, and A3, harboring several homeobox binding sequences (Fig. 5D). We transfected brain-derived NS cells with the reporter vectors indicated above and either DLX5- or DLX2-mycTAG expression vectors (Fig. 5A–C). These vectors were previously tested for protein expression and for transcriptional activity on the UAS3 Arx enhancer-luc vector (Cobos et al., 2005; Colasante et al., 2008), as a control. The results indicate that in brain-derived NS cells, both DLX2 and DLX5 act on Wnt5a expression through these three fragments. Exogenous expression of DLX5 resulted in a 2-, 1.5-, and 2.5-fold increase in reporter transcription in the presence of the A1, A2, and A3 fragments, respectively, while expression of DLX2 induced a 3-, 3.5-, and 4-fold increase on the same fragments (Fig. 5D).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Dlx proteins regulate Wnt5a transcription and bind to the Wnt5a locus in native chromatin. A, NS cells nucleofected with EGFP (a), Dlx2-mycTAG (b), or Dlx5-mycTAG (c) expression vector, stained with anti-mycTAG antibody (green arrows). Scale bar (in a), 100 μm. B, Western blot analysis on total proteins from NS cells nucleofected with Dlx2-mycTAG, Dlx5-mycTAG, or the empty vector (mock), revealed with anti-mycTAG antibody. C, Luc-reporter transcription activity of Dlx2- and Dlx5-mycTAG proteins on the Dlx-responsive element of Arx. Experiments were done by nucleofecting NS cells. Values are expressed as relative Luc activity (RLU), normalized against mock nucleofection and Renilla expression. Mean values of three experiments are shown. D, Top, Diagram of the Wnt5a locus to report the position and sequence of the putative homeodomain binding sites in the A1, A2, and A3 fragments. Bottom, Luc transactivation activity of Dlx2- and Dlx5-mycTAG proteins on the A1, A2, and A3 fragments of the Wnt5a locus, inserted in combination with the Wnt5a promoter. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Differences were statistically significant as measured by a two-tailed Student's t test (*p < 0.05). E, ChIP analysis on chromatin from the ST14A cells transfected with the Dlx2- and the Dlx5-mycTAG vectors, precipitated with anti-mycTAG antibody, followed by PCR analysis with primers for fragments in the A2 and A3 regions of the Wnt5a locus. As negative control, cells were transfected with the empty vector, and the ChIP was performed with anti-IgG alone. As input, unprecipitated chromatin was used for PCR amplification. The signals were quantified by digital densitometry using the Quantity One software (version 4.5.2). Enrichment is observed upon transfection with both Dlx2-myc and Dlx5-myc with both primers used. Quantification is reported on the histograms on the right; values were normalized against empty vector. Errors bars represent the mean ± SD of two independent experiments.

We next performed ChIP analysis, to determine whether Dlx proteins directly associate with the Dlx-response elements in the Wnt5a locus. We used the ST14A cell line, consisting in immortalized embryonic subpallial neural precursors capable of migration and neuronal differentiation, and easily transfectable (Cattaneo and Conti, 1998). ST14A cells were transfected with DLX2-mycTAG or DLX5-mycTAG, followed by ChIP with anti-myc. Fragments A2 and A3 were precipitated by the anti-myc antibody after transfection with either expression vectors (Fig. 5E). In the presence of DLX2 the fragments A2 and A3 were detected, respectively, with a 2.5- and a 2-fold increase, while in the presence of DLX5 the same fragments were detected with a 22- and a 12-fold increase, compared to empty vector. These results indicate that DLX5 and DLX2 are physically associated to homeobox binding sites present in the Wnt5a locus, in the chromatin of subpallial precursors.

Reduced JnK activation in the Dlx5−/− OB

We then determined whether the loss of Dlx5 and reduced Wnt5a expression in the OB results in altered intracellular Wnt signaling. It is widely assumed that noncanonical ligands act independently of the β-catenin pathway and signal either via JnK phosphorylation or via Ca2+ release and activation of calmodulin kinase II (Zou, 2004; Lyu et al., 2008; Farías et al., 2009). We therefore compared normal and Dlx5−/− OB specimens for possible reductions in JnK and β-catenin activity, as previously done (Shihabuddin et al., 2000; Miquelajauregui et al., 2007). At P0, the OB of the Dlx5−/− mice showed a 50% decrease of the phosphorylated form of JnK1–3 when compared with normal samples, while the total level of JnK1–3 protein was unchanged (Fig. 6A). As further controls, we detected an increase of phospho-JnK1–3 in HeLa cells irradiated with UV (known to induce JnK phosphorylation), and we easily detected phospho-JnK1–3 in the hippocampus, a location where it is abundant. On the contrary, the level of dephosphorylated (active) β-catenin protein was unchanged between the WT and the Dlx5−/− OB samples. We also examined the level of active β-catenin in normal NS cells treated with purified Wnt3a or Wnt5a. We observed an increase in active β-catenin upon treatment with Wnt3a, but not upon treatment with Wnt5a (Fig. 6B). These results indicate that the β-catenin pathway is unaffected by the absence of Dlx5 and reduced Wnt5a expression.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Reduced phospho-JnK in Dlx5−/− OB. A, Western blot analysis of total proteins extracted from the OBs of two individual WT or Dlx5−/− animals, and a normal hippocampus, to detect phospho-JnK1–3 (pJunk-SapK, top panel), or to detect all forms of JnK1–3 (Junk-SapK, middle panel) with a pan-JnK antibody. Actin was used as loading control (bottom panel). While the total level of JnK1–3 is unchanged, the level of pJunk-SapK is reduced ∼50% in the Dlx5−/− extracts. (Numbers below each lane indicate the densitometric ratios; the signals were quantified by the Quantity One 4.5.2 software.) As a further control, we verified the expected increase of pJnK1–3 in UV-irradiated HeLa cells. B, Western blot analysis to detect the level of active (dephosphorylated) β-catenin protein. No change is observed in the Dlx5 mutant OBs compared to WT. Right, As a control, we verified the increase of active β-catenin in brain-derived NS cells exposed to recombinant Wnt3a, but not Wnt5a. C, Western blot analysis to detect the level phospho-JnK (top blot) following treatment (for 30 or 60 min) of brain-derived NS cells with a conditioned medium prepared from HeLa cells transfected with an empty vector or with a Wnt5a-mycTAG expression vector, normalized with the level of total JnK (middle blot).

To further support a link between Wnt5a expression and JnK phosphorylation, we examined the level of phospho-JnK in WT brain-derived NS cells treated with a conditioned medium prepared from cells transfected with either an empty vector or a Wnt5a-mycTAG expression vector. The level of phospho-JnK increased by 50% in cells transfected with the Wnt5a-mycTAG vector, relative to the control sample (Fig. 6C).

Wnt5a promotes interneuron differentiation in cultured OB slices

To test whether Wnt5a stimulates interneuron differentiation in vivo, we set up organotypic slice cultures of the FB of E16.5 embryos, obtained from either WT or Dlx5−/− mice. The cultures were exposed to exogenous Wnt5a and examined for expression of the interneuron markers GAD-1, GAD-2, and CR, by real-time qPCR. Wnt5a was provided in two ways: in the first, we layered brain slices on top of a feeder layer of COS7 cells previously transfected with vectors expressing Wnt5a-, Wnt4-, and Wnt7a-mycTAG fusion proteins (Lyuksyutova et al., 2003; Zaghetto et al., 2007). Wnt5a-, but not Wnt4- or Wnt7a-myc, resulted in significant increased expression of GAD-1, GAD-2, and CR, both in the normal and in the Dlx5−/− OB (respectively, +30%, +70%, and +30% for the WT and +60%, +80%, and +40% for the mutant) (Fig. 7A). In the second strategy, we applied purified recombinant Wnt5a directly onto cultured Dlx5−/− OBs; in the presence of (500 ng/ml) Wnt5a, GAD-1, GAD-2, and CR expression was increased (+50%, +60%, and +70%, respectively) as compared to control (PBS only) (Fig. 7B). In a similar experimental setting, we examined whether Wnt5a may induce endogenous expression of Dlx2 and Dlx5. Using cultures of brain slices from WT animals, we found that treatment with Wnt5a had no effect on Dlx2 expression but resulted in a reduced (−35%) Dlx5 expression (supplemental Fig. 5, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material), suggesting the possibility that these molecules participate in a negative feedback loop.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Wnt5a promotes expression of interneuron differentiation markers in vitro. A, Top panel, COS7 cells transfected with Wnt5a-, Wnt4-, and Wnt7b-mycTAG expression vectors, immunostained with anti-mycTAG antibody, and used as a feeder layer for organotypic cultures. Thick longitudinal sections from the FB of WT and Dlx5−/− embryos, at the age of E16.5, were cultured on top of transfected COS7 cells. Bottom panel, Real-time analysis for the expression of the IN differentiation markers GAD1, GAD2, and CR in the cultured OBs comparing WT (black bars) and Dlx5−/− (open bars). In the presence of Wnt5a, but not Wnt4 or Wnt7b, expression of GAD1, GAD2, and CR increased both in the WT and in the Dlx5−/− samples. Values are normalized against mock/WT. B, Sagittal slices from Dlx5−/− E16.5 FB, maintained in organotypic culture and exposed to purified Wnt5a protein (PBS is used as negative control), followed by real-time analysis for the expression of the IN differentiation markers GAD1, GAD2, and CR in the OB. Wnt5a resulted in increased expression of GAD1, GAD2, and CR. Values are normalized against PBS. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Wnt5a promotes interneuron differentiation in primary cultures of dissociated OB cells

We compared the efficiency of βIII-tubulin+, GABA+, and CR+ differentiation of primary cultures of OB cells obtained from WT or Dlx5−/− E16.5 embryos, maintained in differentiating medium. Compared to WT cells under the same conditions, Dlx5−/− cells consistently displayed a reduced number of GABAergic neurons (−40%) (Fig. 8A), while the number of βIII-tubulin+ and CR+ neurons did not significantly change. Next, we cocultured dissociated cells from WT or Dlx5−/− OB with HeLa cells previously transfected with Wnt5a-mycTAG expression vector. In the presence of Wnt5a-expressing cells, the number of GABA+ cells increased both in the WT (+50%) and in the Dlx5−/− (+50%) cultures, compared to the same cultures exposed to mock-transfected cells (Fig. 8B). The number of CR+ cells both in the WT and in the Dlx5−/− cultures did not significantly change. Thus, Wnt5a promotes GABA+ differentiation and rescues the lower differentiation efficiency observed in the absence of Dlx5−/−.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Wnt5a promotes GABA+ differentiation of cultured OB cells. A, Left, Staining for βIII-tubulin (TuJ1) (a, b) and double staining for GAD67 (red fluorescence) and CR (green) (a′, b′) of primary cultures of OB cells obtained from WT or Dlx5−/− E16.5 embryos, after 48 h in differentiating medium. Right, Counting of the number of GAD67+ and CR+ neurons, indicated as a percentage of the number of nuclei counted (DAPI staining). Compared to the WT cultures, Dlx5−/− ones yielded a reduced number of GAD67+ cells (−40%), while the number of βIII-tubulin+ and CR+ cells did not significantly change. B, Left, Double staining for GAD67 (red) and CR (green) of primary cultures of OB cells obtained from WT (a, a′) or Dlx5−/− (b, b′) embryos, cocultured with HeLa cells transfected with Wnt5a-mycTAG expression vector. Right, Counting of the number of GAD67+ and CR+ neurons after 48 h of differentiating culture, indicated as a percentage of the number of nuclei counted. Compared to mock-transfected cells, Wnt5a-expressing cells yielded an increased number of GAD67+ cells both in the WT (+50%) and in the Dlx5−/− (+50%) cultures. The number of CR+ cells both in the WT and in the Dlx5−/− cultures did not change. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05. Scale bar (in a), 50 μm.

Discussion

In the developing forebrain, environmental cues and transcription factor-based cell-autonomous regulations cooperate to enable interneuron precursors to undertake region- and time-specific programs of migration and differentiation (Morrison, 2001; Allen et al., 2007; Balordi and Fishell, 2007; Batista-Brito et al., 2008). How these modes of regulation result in the generation of a fixed number and variety of neurochemically defined subtypes is far from being understood. Published works have so far emphasized the role of cell-autonomous regulation, and in particular the Dlx homeoproteins have been shown to play a key role in the control of migration and differentiation of subpallial interneuron precursors (Panganiban and Rubenstein, 2002; Stenman et al., 2003; Kohwi et al., 2005; Waclaw et al., 2006; Flames et al., 2007; Kohwi et al., 2007). On the other side, the identity and activity of signaling molecules and environmental cues participating in these processes are seldom examined and remain underestimated, as these cues cannot be easily reproduced or manipulated in vitro. Here we uncover a transcriptional link between the Dlx activity and the differentiation-promoting function of Wnt5a, in vitro and in vivo, establishing that the Dlx-dependent control over interneuron differentiation entails non-cell-autonomous functions. In addition we show that the noncanonical ligand Wnt5a contributes to GABAergic differentiation. A model of the interplay between Dlx genes and Wnt signaling is proposed in Figure 9.

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Model of regulation of GABA+ neuron differentiation in the olfactory bulb by Dlx and Wnt5a. The activity of canonical (represented by Wnt3a) and noncanonical (Wnt5a) Wnt signaling is regionally and functionally separated (indicated on the top). Transcriptional regulations are represented by solid arrows, and ligand–receptor interactions or other non-cell-autonomous regulations are represented by dashed arrows. Dlx2 is generally considered transcriptionally upstream of Dlx5 and Dlx6, but our data suggest that it may also regulate transcription of Wnt5a.

Dlx genes are essential to orchestrate interneuron migration and differentiation in the subpallium, acting at distinct time points and cell stages. While Dlx1−/− and Dlx2−/− mice show only minor deficiencies in GABA+ neuron formation, Dlx5−/− mice show a more severe interneuron deficit in the OB, and Dlx1;Dlx2 double-null mice show extensive defects in their migration and differentiation (Anderson et al., 1997; Levi et al., 2003; Long et al., 2003; Perera et al., 2004; Cobos et al., 2005). The observation that forced expression of Dlx2 or Dlx5 in embryonic cortical NPCs induces the expression of GAD genes (Stühmer et al., 2002) has justified the proposition that Dlx genes cell-autonomously confer to NPCs the ability to differentiate toward the GABAergic phenotype. However, other observations challenge this simplistic view. First, the role of Dlx5 is not strictly specific for GABA+ phenotype, as in the Dlx5−/− OB both CR+ and GABA+ interneurons are affected (Levi et al., 2003; Long et al., 2003), and these markers are known to identify two widely distinct populations (5% double labeling in late embryos, 10% postnatally) (Kosaka et al., 1995, 1997; Kosaka and Kosaka, 2005; Parrish-Aungst et al., 2007). Second, published results (Long et al., 2007) and our (unpublished) data indicate that Dlx genes are dispensable for GABA+ and CR+ differentiation in the OB, as few differentiated interneurons can be detected that lack expression of Dlx gene (dll−). Third, GABA+ differentiation takes place in Dlx-negative territories of the CNS (Leto et al., 2009). Fourth, we show here that the mutant environment of the Dlx5 null OB is unfavorable to GABAergic differentiation. Therefore, our key finding that Dlx genes work (at least in part) via regulation of Wnt5a, hence non-cell-autonomously, is very compatible with previous observations.

Wnt ligands participate in non-cell-autonomous regulations and influence nearly all aspects of neurogenesis, from NPC proliferation to neuronal differentiation and maturation (Ille and Sommer, 2005). Non-cell-autonomous signals are typically region- and time/age-specific, and are best examined in experimental systems that closely resemble the brain tissue in which endogenous NPCs are found. For this reason, we have adopted three distinct assays to show the GABA-promoting function of the Dlx-Wnt5a regulation and obtained equivalent results: (1) organotypic slice cultures of late embryonic FB; (2) primary cultures of dissociated OB cells at late embryonic ages, and (3) adherent NS cells derived from WT or Dlx5;6−/− embryonic brains, capable of GABA+ differentiation in vitro.

It is widely accepted that “canonical” β-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling (typically initiated by Wnt1, Wnt3, and Wnt7) promotes the expansion of neural progenitors, and in particular contributes to maintain subpallial NPC proliferation without grossly altering the fate of differentiating interneurons (Gulacsi and Anderson, 2008). Conversely, a role of “noncanonical” β-catenin-independent Wnt signaling (typically initiated by Wnt5a and Wnt11) to promote neuronal differentiation is increasingly being recognized. Treatment with Wnt5a induces neuronal differentiation of ES cells and of telencephalic NPCs (Muroyama et al., 2004; Israsena et al., 2004; Otero et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2006; Lyu et al., 2008), promotes differentiation of mesencephalic DA neurons in a β-catenin-independent fashion (Schulte et al., 2005; Castelo-Branco and Arenas, 2006; Andersson et al., 2008), and promotes olfactory GABAergic differentiation (our data). Thus, noncanonical Wnt signaling participates in neuronal differentiation, an issue to be further investigated on other neuronal cell types.

However, a general rule cannot be drawn as yet. In fact, and surprisingly, the activation of the β-catenin pathway can induce neuronal differentiation of cortical NPCs derived from late developmental ages (Hirabayashi et al., 2004; Hirabayashi and Gotoh, 2005). To explain this apparent paradox, it has been proposed that the cellular response to a Wnt signal relies to a limited extent on the identity of the ligand and to a larger extent on the cell type, developmental stage, receptor context/availability, and the presence of concomitant signals (Viti et al., 2003; Israsena et al., 2004; Kléber and Sommer, 2004; Mikels and Nusse, 2006; Li et al., 2009). A logical consequence of this notion is that Wnt function/signaling should be worked out in each specific cell type. We show here that during GABA+ differentiation of subpallial NPC, Wnt5a activates a phospho-JnK-dependent pathway, while the β-catenin pathway is not (directly) involved. Further experimental work is needed to finely dissect the Wnt5a-JnK pathway in NPCs. Conversely, we show that Wnt3a activates the β-catenin pathway, a finding that together with the results reported by Gulacsi and Anderson (2008) clearly points to a role of β-catenin transduction to promote proliferation of NPC in the basal forebrain and OB, as depicted in Figure 9.

The identity and activity of Wnt5a receptor(s) has been characterized only in part. Wnt5a binds to ryk and ror2 single-membrane pass receptors as well as to the Frizzled receptors (Bovolenta et al., 2006; Keeble et al., 2006; Mikels and Nusse, 2006; Mikels et al., 2009). Ryk is a bona fide Wnt5a receptor both in Drosophila (Wouda et al., 2008) and in mammalian immature neurons (Miyashita et al., 2009) and ryk mRNA is expressed in the OB and GE (Kamitori et al., 1999), as well as in cultured NS cells (our unpublished data); thus, a role of ryk for interneuron differentiation is plausible but yet to be demonstrated.

Intracellularly, Wnt5a can use a JnK-dependent pathway (Wang et al., 2001; Yamanaka et al., 2002); consistently, we show here that reduced Wnt5a expression in the Dlx5−/− OB is associated with reduced JnK phosphorylation. We therefore propose that in NS cells Wnt5a operates via JnK phosphorylation. A novel pathway has been recently uncovered, which entails cleavage and nuclear translocation of the ryk C-terminal domain (Lyu et al., 2008). However, in this study Wnt5a was not tested, and therefore the role of ryk to transduce the differentiation-promoting activity of Wnt5a in NPC remains to be defined. We expect that more than one receptor and/or pathway could transduce Wnt5a signaling and that distinct cellular responses can be elicited depending on the cell context and the presence of concomitant signals.

In conclusion, our results strongly support a direct Wnt5a role in GABAergic differentiation and demonstrate that Wnt5a expression is directly regulated by the Dlx5 transcription factor. However, our data cannot take activity in consideration, while Wnt signaling has been shown to be involved in activity-dependent synapse plasticity and network structure in the hippocampus (Gogolla et al., 2009). Since Dlx5 null mice have a denervated OB (Levi et al., 2003; Long et al., 2003), we cannot exclude a similar role of Wnt5a in vivo.

Footnotes

  • G.R.M. is recipient of a Career Award from Telethon-Italy (TCP99003), and is supported by Fondazione Cariplo (S00083FCRC) and Fondazione Ricerca Biomedica (University of Torino). We thank Dr. Yingzi Yang (National Institutes of Health) for the Wnt5a and Wnt5b probes, Dr. V. Broccoli (Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele) for the Arx-luc reporter, and Dr. Yimin Zou (University of California, San Diego) for the Wnt-mycTAG expression vectors. We thank Dr. F. DiCunto, P. Provero, and G. Garaffo (University of Torino) for bioinformatic analyses, and Dr. A. P. Puche (University of Maryland School of Medicine) for comments and criticism on the manuscript.

  • This paper is dedicated to the memory of Giorgio Corte, who passed away before this publication.

  • Correspondence should be addressed to Giorgio R. Merlo, Dulbecco Telethon Institute c/o Molecular Biotechnology Center, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Torino, Italy. gmerlo{at}dti.telethon.it

References

  1. ↵
    1. Acampora D,
    2. Merlo GR,
    3. Paleari L,
    4. Zerega B,
    5. Postiglione MP,
    6. Mantero S,
    7. Bober E,
    8. Barbieri O,
    9. Simeone A,
    10. Levi G
    (1999) Craniofacial, vestibular and bone defects in mice lacking the Distal-less-related gene Dlx5. Development 126:3795–3809.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  2. ↵
    1. Adachi K,
    2. Mirzadeh Z,
    3. Sakaguchi M,
    4. Yamashita T,
    5. Nikolcheva T,
    6. Gotoh Y,
    7. Peltz G,
    8. Gong L,
    9. Kawase T,
    10. Alvarez-Buylla A,
    11. Okano H,
    12. Sawamoto K
    (2007) Beta-catenin signaling promotes proliferation of progenitor cells in the adult mouse subventricular zone. Stem Cells 25:2827–2836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Allen ZJ 2nd.,
    2. Waclaw RR,
    3. Colbert MC,
    4. Campbell K
    (2007) Molecular identity of olfactory bulb interneurons: transcriptional codes of periglomerular neuron subtypes. J Mol Histol 38:517–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Anderson SA,
    2. Qiu M,
    3. Bulfone A,
    4. Eisenstat DD,
    5. Meneses J,
    6. Pedersen R,
    7. Rubenstein JL
    (1997) Mutations of the homeobox genes Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 disrupt the striatal subventricular zone and differentiation of late born striatal neurons. Neuron 19:27–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Andersson ER,
    2. Prakash N,
    3. Cajanek L,
    4. Minina E,
    5. Bryja V,
    6. Bryjova L,
    7. Yamaguchi TP,
    8. Hall AC,
    9. Wurst W,
    10. Arenas E
    (2008) Wnt5a regulates ventral midbrain morphogenesis and the development of A9–A10 dopaminergic cells in vivo. PLoS One 3:e3517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Balordi F,
    2. Fishell G
    (2007) Hedgehog signaling in the subventricular zone is required for both the maintenance of stem cells and the migration of newborn neurons. J Neurosci 27:5936–5947.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Barker N
    (2008) The canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. Methods Mol Biol 468:5–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Batista-Brito R,
    2. Close J,
    3. Machold R,
    4. Fishell G
    (2008) The distinct temporal origins of olfactory bulb interneuron subtypes. J Neurosci 28:3966–3975.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Bovolenta P,
    2. Rodriguez J,
    3. Esteve P
    (2006) Frizzled/RYK mediated signalling in axon guidance. Development 133:4399–4408.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Castelo-Branco G,
    2. Arenas E
    (2006) Function of Wnts in dopaminergic neuron development. Neurodegener Dis 3:5–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cattaneo E,
    2. Conti L
    (1998) Generation and characterization of embryonic striatal conditionally immortalized ST14A cells. J Neurosci Res 53:223–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chenn A,
    2. Walsh CA
    (2003) Increased neuronal production, enlarged forebrains and cytoarchitectural distortions in beta-catenin overexpressing transgenic mice. Cereb Cortex 13:599–606.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Ciani L,
    2. Salinas PC
    (2005) WNTs in the vertebrate nervous system: from patterning to neuronal connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:351–362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cobos I,
    2. Calcagnotto ME,
    3. Vilaythong AJ,
    4. Thwin MT,
    5. Noebels JL,
    6. Baraban SC,
    7. Rubenstein JL
    (2005) Mice lacking Dlx1 show subtype-specific loss of interneurons, reduced inhibition and epilepsy. Nat Neurosci 8:1059–1068.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Colasante G,
    2. Collombat P,
    3. Raimondi V,
    4. Bonanomi D,
    5. Ferrai C,
    6. Maira M,
    7. Yoshikawa K,
    8. Mansouri A,
    9. Valtorta F,
    10. Rubenstein JL,
    11. Broccoli V
    (2008) Arx is a direct target of Dlx2 and thereby contributes to the tangential migration of GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci 28:10674–10686.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Conti L,
    2. Pollard SM,
    3. Gorba T,
    4. Reitano E,
    5. Toselli M,
    6. Biella G,
    7. Sun Y,
    8. Sanzone S,
    9. Ying QL,
    10. Cattaneo E,
    11. Smith A
    (2005) Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell. PLoS Biol 3:e283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Doe CQ
    (2008) Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation. Development 135:1575–1587.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Eisenmann DM
    (2005) Wnt signaling. WormBook (The C. elegans Research Community, ed) doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.7.1.
  19. ↵
    1. Farías GG,
    2. Alfaro IE,
    3. Cerpa W,
    4. Grabowski CP,
    5. Godoy JA,
    6. Bonansco C,
    7. Inestrosa NC
    (2009) Wnt-5a/JNK signaling promotes the clustering of PSD-95 in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem 284:15857–15866.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Flames N,
    2. Pla R,
    3. Gelman DM,
    4. Rubenstein JL,
    5. Puelles L,
    6. Marín O
    (2007) Delineation of multiple subpallial progenitor domains by the combinatorial expression of transcriptional codes. J Neurosci 27:9682–9695.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Fogarty M,
    2. Grist M,
    3. Gelman D,
    4. Marín O,
    5. Pachnis V,
    6. Kessaris N
    (2007) Spatial genetic patterning of the embryonic neuroepithelium generates GABAergic interneuron diversity in the adult cortex. J Neurosci 27:10935–10946.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Fukuda S,
    2. Taga T
    (2005) Cell fate determination regulated by a transcriptional signal network in the developing mouse brain. Anat Sci Int 80:12–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Gangemi RM,
    2. Daga A,
    3. Muzio L,
    4. Marubbi D,
    5. Cocozza S,
    6. Perera M,
    7. Verardo S,
    8. Bordo D,
    9. Griffero F,
    10. Capra MC,
    11. Mallamaci A,
    12. Corte G
    (2006) Effects of Emx2 inactivation on the gene expression profile of neural precursors. Eur J Neurosci 23:325–334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gogolla N,
    2. Galimberti I,
    3. Deguchi Y,
    4. Caroni P
    (2009) Wnt signaling mediates experience-related regulation of synapse numbers and mossy fiber connectivities in the adult hippocampus. Neuron 62:510–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Gordon MD,
    2. Nusse R
    (2006) Wnt signaling: multiple pathways, multiple receptors, and multiple transcription factors. J Biol Chem 281:22429–22433.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Guillemot F
    (2007) Spatial and temporal specification of neural fates by transcription factor codes. Development 134:3771–3780.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Gulacsi AA,
    2. Anderson SA
    (2008) Beta-catenin-mediated Wnt signaling regulates neurogenesis in the ventral telencephalon. Nat Neurosci 11:1383–1391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Hämmerle B,
    2. Tejedor FJ
    (2007) A novel function of DELTA-NOTCH signalling mediates the transition from proliferation to neurogenesis in neural progenitor cells. PLoS One 2:e1169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Hébert JM,
    2. Fishell G
    (2008) The genetics of early telencephalon patterning: some assembly required. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:678–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Hirabayashi Y,
    2. Gotoh Y
    (2005) Stage-dependent fate determination of neural precursor cells in mouse forebrain. Neurosci Res 51:331–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hirabayashi Y,
    2. Itoh Y,
    3. Tabata H,
    4. Nakajima K,
    5. Akiyama T,
    6. Masuyama N,
    7. Gotoh Y
    (2004) The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway directs neuronal differentiation of cortical neural precursor cells. Development 131:2791–2801.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Huang H,
    2. He X
    (2008) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: new (and old) players and new insights. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20:119–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Iler N,
    2. Abate-Shen C
    (1996) Rapid identification of homeodomain binding sites in the Wnt-5a gene using an immunoprecipitation strategy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 227:257–265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ille F,
    2. Sommer L
    (2005) Wnt signaling: multiple functions in neural development. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:1100–1108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Israsena N,
    2. Hu M,
    3. Fu W,
    4. Kan L,
    5. Kessler JA
    (2004) The presence of FGF2 signaling determines whether beta-catenin exerts effects on proliferation or neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells. Dev Biol 268:220–231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Kamitori K,
    2. Machide M,
    3. Osumi N,
    4. Kohsaka S
    (1999) Expression of receptor tyrosine kinase RYK in developing rat central nervous system. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 114:149–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Keeble TR,
    2. Halford MM,
    3. Seaman C,
    4. Kee N,
    5. Macheda M,
    6. Anderson RB,
    7. Stacker SA,
    8. Cooper HM
    (2006) The Wnt receptor Ryk is required for Wnt5a-mediated axon guidance on the contralateral side of the corpus callosum. J Neurosci 26:5840–5848.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Kléber M,
    2. Sommer L
    (2004) Wnt signaling and the regulation of stem cell function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:681–687.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Kohwi M,
    2. Osumi N,
    3. Rubenstein JL,
    4. Alvarez-Buylla A
    (2005) Pax6 is required for making specific subpopulations of granule and periglomerular neurons in the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 25:6997–7003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Kohwi M,
    2. Petryniak MA,
    3. Long JE,
    4. Ekker M,
    5. Obata K,
    6. Yanagawa Y,
    7. Rubenstein JL,
    8. Alvarez-Buylla A
    (2007) A subpopulation of olfactory bulb GABAergic interneurons is derived from Emx1- and Dlx5/6-expressing progenitors. J Neurosci 27:6878–6891.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Kosaka K,
    2. Kosaka T
    (2005) synaptic organization of the glomerulus in the main olfactory bulb: compartments of the glomerulus and heterogeneity of the periglomerular cells. Anat Sci Int 80:80–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Kosaka K,
    2. Aika Y,
    3. Toida K,
    4. Heizmann CW,
    5. Hunziker W,
    6. Jacobowitz DM,
    7. Nagatsu I,
    8. Streit P,
    9. Visser TJ,
    10. Kosaka T
    (1995) Chemically defined neuron groups and their subpopulations in the glomerular layer of the rat main olfactory bulb. Neurosci Res 23:73–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Kosaka K,
    2. Fujii M,
    3. Toida K,
    4. Kosaka T
    (1997) Differentiation of chemically defined neuronal populations in the transplanted olfactory bulb without olfactory receptor innervation. Neurosci Res 28:11–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Leto K,
    2. Bartolini A,
    3. Yanagawa Y,
    4. Obata K,
    5. Magrassi L,
    6. Schilling K,
    7. Rossi F
    (2009) Laminar fate and phenotype specification of cerebellar GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci 29:7079–7091.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Levi G,
    2. Puche AC,
    3. Mantero S,
    4. Barbieri O,
    5. Trombino S,
    6. Paleari L,
    7. Egeo A,
    8. Merlo GR
    (2003) The Dlx5 homeodomain gene is essential for olfactory development and connectivity in the mouse. Mol Cell Neurosci 22:530–543.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Li XJ,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Johnson MA,
    4. Wang ZB,
    5. Lavaute T,
    6. Zhang SC
    (2009) Coordination of sonic hedgehog and Wnt signaling determines ventral and dorsal telencephalic neuron types from human embryonic stem cells. Development 136:4055–4063.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Lie DC,
    2. Colamarino SA,
    3. Song HJ,
    4. Désiré L,
    5. Mira H,
    6. Consiglio A,
    7. Lein ES,
    8. Jessberger S,
    9. Lansford H,
    10. Dearie AR,
    11. Gage FH
    (2005) Wnt signalling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Nature 437:1370–1375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Long JE,
    2. Garel S,
    3. Depew MJ,
    4. Tobet S,
    5. Rubenstein JL
    (2003) DLX5 regulates development of peripheral and central components of the olfactory system. J Neurosci 23:568–578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Long JE,
    2. Garel S,
    3. Alvarez-Dolado M,
    4. Yoshikawa K,
    5. Osumi N,
    6. Alvarez-Buylla A,
    7. Rubenstein JL
    (2007) Dlx-dependent and -independent regulation of olfactory bulb interneuron differentiation. J Neurosci 27:3230–3243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Lyu J,
    2. Yamamoto V,
    3. Lu W
    (2008) Cleavage of the Wnt receptor Ryk regulates neuronal differentiation during cortical neurogenesis. Dev Cell 15:773–780.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Lyuksyutova AI,
    2. Lu CC,
    3. Milanesio N,
    4. King LA,
    5. Guo N,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. Nathans J,
    8. Tessier-Lavigne M,
    9. Zou Y
    (2003) Anterior-posterior guidance of commissural axons by Wnt-frizzled signaling. Science 302:1984–1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Malaterre J,
    2. Ramsay RG,
    3. Mantamadiotis T
    (2007) Wnt-Frizzled signalling and the many paths to neural development and adult brain homeostasis. Front Biosci 12:492–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Marín O,
    2. Rubenstein JL
    (2003) Cell migration in the forebrain. Annu Rev Neurosci 26:441–483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Merlo GR,
    2. Paleari L,
    3. Mantero S,
    4. Zerega B,
    5. Adamska M,
    6. Rinkwitz S,
    7. Bober E,
    8. Levi G
    (2002a) The Dlx5 homeobox gene is essential for vestibular morphogenesis in the mouse embryo through a BMP4-mediated pathway. Dev Biol 248:157–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Merlo GR,
    2. Paleari L,
    3. Mantero S,
    4. Genova F,
    5. Beverdam A,
    6. Palmisano GL,
    7. Barbieri O,
    8. Levi G
    (2002b) A mouse model of split hand/foot malformation type I. Genesis 33:97–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Métin C,
    2. Baudoin JP,
    3. Rakić S,
    4. Parnavelas JG
    (2006) Cell and molecular mechanisms involved in the migration of cortical interneurons. Eur J Neurosci 23:894–900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Mikels AJ,
    2. Nusse R
    (2006) Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits beta-catenin-TCF signaling depending on receptor context. PLoS Biol 4:e115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Mikels A,
    2. Minami Y,
    3. Nusse R
    (2009) Ror2 receptor requires tyrosine kinase activity to mediate Wnt5A signaling. J Biol Chem 284:30167–30176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Miquelajauregui A,
    2. Van de Putte T,
    3. Polyakov A,
    4. Nityanandam A,
    5. Boppana S,
    6. Seuntjens E,
    7. Karabinos A,
    8. Higashi Y,
    9. Huylebroeck D,
    10. Tarabykin V
    (2007) Smad-interacting protein-1 (Zfhx1b) acts upstream of Wnt signaling in the mouse hippocampus and controls its formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:12919–12924.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Miyashita T,
    2. Koda M,
    3. Kitajo K,
    4. Yamazaki M,
    5. Takahashi K,
    6. Kikuchi A,
    7. Yamashita T
    (2009) Wnt-ryk signaling mediates axon growth inhibition and limits functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 26:955–964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Morrison SJ
    (2001) Neuronal potential and lineage determination by neural stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:666–672.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Muroyama Y,
    2. Kondoh H,
    3. Takada S
    (2004) Wnt proteins promote neuronal differentiation in neural stem cell culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313:915–921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Nguyen L,
    2. Besson A,
    3. Roberts JM,
    4. Guillemot F
    (2006) Coupling cell cycle exit, neuronal differentiation and migration in cortical neurogenesis. Cell Cycle 5:2314–2318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Nusse R
    (2008) Wnt signaling and stem cell control. Cell Res 18:523–527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Okabe M,
    2. Ikawa M,
    3. Kominami K,
    4. Nakanishi T,
    5. Nishimune Y
    (1997) “Green mice” as a source of ubiquitous green cells. FEBS Lett 407:313–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Otero JJ,
    2. Fu W,
    3. Kan L,
    4. Cuadra AE,
    5. Kessler JA
    (2004) Beta-catenin signaling is required for neural differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Development 131:3545–3557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Panganiban G,
    2. Rubenstein JL
    (2002) Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes. Development 129:4371–4386.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Parrish-Aungst S,
    2. Shipley MT,
    3. Erdelyi F,
    4. Szabo G,
    5. Puche AC
    (2007) Quantitative analysis of neuronal diversity in the mouse olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol 501:825–836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Pellegrino M,
    2. Provero P,
    3. Silengo L,
    4. Di Cunto F
    (2004) CLOE: identification of putative functional relationships among genes by comparison of expression profiles between two species. BMC Bioinformatics 5:179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Perera M,
    2. Merlo GR,
    3. Verardo S,
    4. Paleari L,
    5. Corte G,
    6. Levi G
    (2004) Defective neuronogenesis in the absence of Dlx5. Mol Cell Neurosci 25:153–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Pollard SM,
    2. Conti L,
    3. Sun Y,
    4. Goffredo D,
    5. Smith A
    (2006) Adherent neural stem (NS) cells from fetal and adult forebrain. Cereb Cortex 16(Suppl 1):i112–i120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Schulte G,
    2. Bryja V,
    3. Rawal N,
    4. Castelo-Branco G,
    5. Sousa KM,
    6. Arenas E
    (2005) Purified Wnt-5a increases differentiation of midbrain dopaminergic cells and dishevelled phosphorylation. J Neurochem 92:1550–1553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Shihabuddin LS,
    2. Horner PJ,
    3. Ray J,
    4. Gage FH
    (2000) Adult spinal cord stem cells generate neurons after transplantation in the adult dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 20:8727–8735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Spiliotopoulos D,
    2. Goffredo D,
    3. Conti L,
    4. Di Febo F,
    5. Biella G,
    6. Toselli M,
    7. Cattaneo E
    (2009) An optimized experimental strategy for efficient conversion of embryonic stem (ES)-derived mouse neural stem (NS) cells into a nearly homogeneous mature neuronal population. Neurobiol Dis 34:320–331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Stenman J,
    2. Toresson H,
    3. Campbell K
    (2003) Identification of two distinct progenitor populations in the lateral ganglionic eminence: implications for striatal and olfactory bulb neurogenesis. J Neurosci 23:167–174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Stühmer T,
    2. Anderson SA,
    3. Ekker M,
    4. Rubenstein JL
    (2002) Ectopic expression of the Dlx genes induces glutamic acid decarboxylase and Dlx expression. Development 129:245–252.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Viti J,
    2. Gulacsi A,
    3. Lillien L
    (2003) Wnt regulation of progenitor maturation in the cortex depends on Shh or fibroblast growth factor 2. J Neurosci 23:5919–5927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Waclaw RR,
    2. Allen ZJ 2nd.,
    3. Bell SM,
    4. Erdélyi F,
    5. Szabó G,
    6. Potter SS,
    7. Campbell K
    (2006) The zinc finger transcription factor Sp8 regulates the generation and diversity of olfactory bulb interneurons. Neuron 49:503–516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Ikeda S,
    3. Kanno S,
    4. Guang LM,
    5. Ohnishi M,
    6. Sasaki M,
    7. Kobayashi T,
    8. Tamura S
    (2001) Activation of c-Jun amino-terminal kinase is required for retinoic acid-induced neural differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. FEBS Lett 503:91–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Wichterle H,
    2. Turnbull DH,
    3. Nery S,
    4. Fishell G,
    5. Alvarez-Buylla A
    (2001) In utero fate mapping reveals distinct migratory pathways and fates of neurons born in the mammalian basal forebrain. Development 128:3759–3771.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Wigle JT,
    2. Eisenstat DD
    (2008) Homeobox genes in vertebrate forebrain development and disease. Clin Genet 73:212–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Wonders CP,
    2. Anderson SA
    (2006) The origin and specification of cortical interneurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:687–696.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Woodhead GJ,
    2. Mutch CA,
    3. Olson EC,
    4. Chenn A
    (2006) Cell-autonomous beta-catenin signaling regulates cortical precursor proliferation. J Neurosci 26:12620–12630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Wouda RR,
    2. Bansraj MR,
    3. de Jong AW,
    4. Noordermeer JN,
    5. Fradkin LG
    (2008) Src family kinases are required for WNT5 signaling through the Derailed/RYK receptor in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system. Development 135:2277–2287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    1. Yamanaka H,
    2. Moriguchi T,
    3. Masuyama N,
    4. Kusakabe M,
    5. Hanafusa H,
    6. Takada R,
    7. Takada S,
    8. Nishida E
    (2002) JNK functions in the non-canonical Wnt pathway to regulate convergent extension movements in vertebrates. EMBO Rep 3:69–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  86. ↵
    1. Yu JM,
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Song GS,
    4. Jung JS
    (2006) Increase in proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells isolated from postnatal and adult mice brain by Wnt-3a and Wnt-5a. Mol Cell Biochem 288:17–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Zaghetto AA,
    2. Paina S,
    3. Mantero S,
    4. Platonova N,
    5. Peretto P,
    6. Bovetti S,
    7. Puche A,
    8. Piccolo S,
    9. Merlo GR
    (2007) Activation of the Wnt-beta catenin pathway in a cell population on the surface of the forebrain is essential for the establishment of olfactory axon connections. J Neurosci 27:9757–9768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Zaki PA,
    2. Quinn JC,
    3. Price DJ
    (2003) Mouse models of telencephalic development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13:423–437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Zechner D,
    2. Fujita Y,
    3. Hülsken J,
    4. Müller T,
    5. Walther I,
    6. Taketo MM,
    7. Crenshaw EB 3rd.,
    8. Birchmeier W,
    9. Birchmeier C
    (2003) β-Catenin signals regulate cell growth and the balance between progenitor cell expansion and differentiation in the nervous system. Dev Biol 258:406–418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Zou Y
    (2004) Wnt signaling in axon guidance. Trends Neurosci 27:528–532.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 31 (7)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 31, Issue 7
16 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Wnt5a Is a Transcriptional Target of Dlx Homeogenes and Promotes Differentiation of Interneuron Progenitors In Vitro and In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Wnt5a Is a Transcriptional Target of Dlx Homeogenes and Promotes Differentiation of Interneuron Progenitors In Vitro and In Vivo
Sara Paina, Donatella Garzotto, Silvia DeMarchis, Marco Marino, Alessia Moiana, Luciano Conti, Elena Cattaneo, Marzia Perera, Giorgio Corte, Enzo Calautti, Giorgio R. Merlo
Journal of Neuroscience 16 February 2011, 31 (7) 2675-2687; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3110-10.2011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Wnt5a Is a Transcriptional Target of Dlx Homeogenes and Promotes Differentiation of Interneuron Progenitors In Vitro and In Vivo
Sara Paina, Donatella Garzotto, Silvia DeMarchis, Marco Marino, Alessia Moiana, Luciano Conti, Elena Cattaneo, Marzia Perera, Giorgio Corte, Enzo Calautti, Giorgio R. Merlo
Journal of Neuroscience 16 February 2011, 31 (7) 2675-2687; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3110-10.2011
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Post-synaptic NMDA Receptor Expression Is Required for Visual Corticocollicular Projection Refinement in the Mouse Superior Colliculus
  • Spatiotemporal Developmental Gradient of Thalamic Morphology, Microstructure, and Connectivity fromthe Third Trimester to Early Infancy
  • Loss of motor cortical inputs to the red nucleus after central nervous system disorders in non-human primates
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.