Abstract
The prairie vole is a socially monogamous species in which breeder pairs typically show strong and selective pair bonds. The establishment of a pair bond is associated with a behavioral transition from general affiliation to aggressive rejection of novel conspecifics. This “selective aggression” is indicative of mate guarding that is necessary to maintain the initial pair bond. In the laboratory, the neurobiology of this behavior is studied using resident-intruder testing. Although it is well established that social behaviors in other species are mediated by endogenous opioid systems, opiate regulation of pair bond maintenance has never been studied. Here, we used resident-intruder testing to determine whether endogenous opioids within brain motivational circuitry mediate selective aggression in prairie voles. We first show that peripheral blockade of κ-opioid receptors with the antagonist norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI; 100 mg/kg), but not with the preferential μ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1, 10, or 30 mg/kg), decreased selective aggression in males. We then provide the first comprehensive characterization of κ- and μ-opioid receptors in the prairie vole brain. Finally, we demonstrate that blockade of κ-opioid receptors (500 ng nor-BNI) within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell abolishes selective aggression in both sexes, but blockade of these receptors within the NAc core enhances this behavior specifically in females. Blockade of κ-opioid receptors within the ventral pallidum or μ-opioid receptors with the specific μ-opioid receptor antagonist H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-PenThr-NH2 (1 ng CTAP) within the NAc shell had no effect in either sex. Thus, κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell mediate aversive social motivation that is critical for pair bond maintenance.
Introduction
The socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) is an excellent model system to study the neurobiology of social attachment (Young and Wang, 2004; Young et al., 2005; Aragona and Wang, 2009). Prairie voles show species typical pair bonds characterized by sharing territory, nests, and parental responsibilities (Getz et al., 1981, 1993). Initial pair bond formation involves prosocial behaviors that are reliably assayed with the partner preference test (Williams et al., 1992). This behavior is regulated by the processing of social reward within motivational circuitry (Aragona et al., 2003; Liu and Wang, 2003; Lim and Young, 2004; Curtis and Wang, 2005). For example, pair bond formation is facilitated by activation of D2-like dopamine (DA) receptors within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell during the initial hours of cohabitation and mating (Aragona et al., 2006). In contrast, the long-term maintenance of the bond requires increases in aversive motivational behavior, such as mate guarding. This is studied in the lab using tests of selective aggression toward unfamiliar conspecifics (Gavish et al., 1983; Winslow et al., 1993; Young et al., 1997), and it is known that this behavior is regulated by D1-like receptors within the NAc shell (Aragona et al., 2006). Thus, D1- and D2-like receptors within the NAc shell—a region important for processing social incentives (Li and Fleming, 2003; Champagne et al., 2004; Trezza et al., 2011)—exert differential regulation over the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds (Aragona et al., 2006).
Differential regulation over pair bonding by D1- and D2-like receptors is significant because these receptors are primarily expressed on distinct neuron populations (Le Moine and Bloch, 1995; Perreault et al., 2011). D2-like receptors are expressed on neurons that contain enkephalin, an endogenous ligand for μ-opioid receptors that mediate motivation and positive hedonics (Bozarth and Wise, 1981; Gerfen and Young, 1988; Pecina and Berridge, 2005). Conversely, D1-expressing neurons contain dynorphin, the endogenous ligand for κ-opioid receptors that mediates aversion and negative affect (Chavkin et al., 1982; Mucha and Herz, 1985; Pfeiffer et al., 1986). Moreover, activation of D1-like receptors increases dynorphin levels (Gerfen et al., 1990), indicating a direct interaction between these systems. Given this interaction and κ-opioid regulation over aversion (van Ree et al., 1999; Le Merrer et al., 2009), we hypothesized that κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell mediate selective aggression and are therefore important for aversive social motivation.
Here, we conducted a series of experiments to examine opioid regulation of selective aggression in male and female prairie voles. We first tested the effects of global κ- and μ-opioid receptor blockade on this behavior and then characterized central opioid receptor distributions in prairie voles. Finally, we tested the involvement of opioid receptors specifically within the NAc shell, NAc core, or ventral pallidum (VP) on the expression of selective aggression. Our studies demonstrate that κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell mediate selective aggression and thus provide the first evidence that this region mediates the aversive social motivational processing critical for pair bond maintenance.
Materials and Methods
Subjects.
Subjects were adult male and female prairie voles (90–150 d old) initially obtained from Florida State University and bred in a laboratory colony at the University of Michigan. Subjects were weaned at 21 d of age and housed with same-sex cage mates (two per cage, typically siblings) in a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle (lights on at 6:00 A.M. and off at 8:00 P.M.), and all experiments were conducted in the light phase of the animals. Food and water were available ad libitum. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the animal care guidelines of the University of Michigan.
Cohabitation, mating, and pregnancy.
Adult males and intact, non-estrogen primed females were paired for a 2 week cohabitation period (Aragona et al., 2006; Gobrogge et al., 2009). This length of cohabitation, as well as the occurrence of mating during this period, has been used to infer pair bonding as characterized by selective affiliation toward the familiar partner and selective aggression toward novel conspecifics (Aragona et al., 2006; Gobrogge et al., 2009). However, recent data show that mating alone is not sufficient for reliable pair bonding (Curtis, 2010). This study demonstrates that for a pair bond to be consistently established, the pair must achieve estrous, mating, ovulation, and impregnation within an optimal time frame (Curtis, 2010). For this reason, the present study characterized the relationships between mating onset and pregnancy as well as the relationship between pregnancy status of the female and selective aggression (i.e., the behavioral index of pair bond maintenance) (Carter and Getz, 1993; Aragona and Wang, 2009).
Social interactions were recorded for the first 72 h of the cohabitation period, and the latency to initiate mating as well as the number of mating bouts were quantified for this entire period. Once behavioral testing was completed, we determined whether females were pregnant and estimated the duration of the pregnancy by measuring neonatal weight. While mating onset and neonatal weight were positively correlated (r(52) = −0.40, p = 0.0024; data not shown), there were instances wherein mating occurred but no pregnancy resulted. Importantly, males in these pairs were less likely to show selective aggression (below). It was therefore determined that rapid and successful establishment of pregnancy as measured by neonatal weight is a better method to assess whether a cohabitation is likely to be associated with pair bonding rather than relying on the onset of mating behavior during the cohabitation. Thus, the current and previous studies (Curtis, 2010) indicate that future studies of pair bonding should quantify pregnancy, rather than simply determining copulatory behavior during the cohabitation period, when attempting to approximate the likelihood of a pair bond.
To directly determine the relationship between pregnancy and selective aggression, the stage of pregnancy was estimated based on neonatal weight and characterized as optimally pregnant (pregnancy achieved shortly following the onset of cohabitation) or suboptimally pregnant (delayed pregnancy onset) (Curtis, 2010). Previous studies have used neonatal length to categorize the stage of pregnancy in prairie voles (Curtis, 2010); therefore, in a subgroup of animals, we also measured the length of the fetus at the time of testing and plotted these values against the weight of the fetus. We found that weights >0.3 g corresponded to lengths of 10 mm (>10 d pregnant) and therefore were indicative of optimal impregnation, while ∼0.165 g corresponded to lengths of 5 mm (3–5 d pregnant) and were thus indicative of suboptimal pregnancy (Curtis, 2010). Subjects were then categorized as either optimally (neonatal weight >0.3 g) or suboptimally (neonatal weight of 0–0.3 g) pregnant, and mean selective aggression frequencies between these groups were compared with a t test.
Resident-intruder test.
Resident-intruder testing was conducted between 14 and 17 d into the cohabitation. Both members of the breeder pair were tested, males and females were tested in counterbalanced fashion, and there was no order effect. Before the resident-intruder test, the first test subject of the pair received either a peripheral or site-directed injection of an opiate receptor antagonist (see Peripheral drug administration, below) and was returned to the home cage with its partner. The second test subject received an injection 30 min following the first subject so that behavioral tests occurred within 30 min of each other. The resident-intruder test occurred 1 h following drug administration and began with a 10 min habituation period in the testing room. Before the 10 min habituation period, the member of the breeder pair that was not being tested first was removed from the home cage and placed in a novel cage for no more than 30 min. During the habituation period, locomotor activity was recorded, and the number of cage crossings during the last 10 min of this period was scored by an experimentally blind observer using Behavior Tracker 1.0 software to determine whether opiate receptor antagonists altered general locomotor activity.
Following the habituation period, the resident-intruder test was initiated by placing a same-sex intruder into the test subject's home cage, and behavioral interactions were recorded for 10 min (Gobrogge et al., 2009). Same-sex intruders were chosen because previous research has shown that pair-bonded animals show consistently high levels of aggression toward same-sex intruders, whereas this behavior is more modest and variable with opposite-sex intruders (Firestone et al., 1991a; Wang et al., 1997; Aragona et al., 2006). The frequency of aggressive interactions (lunges, bites, chases, offensive rears) and duration of affiliative behaviors (olfactory investigation, anogenital sniff, side-by-side contact) were quantified using Behavior Tracker 1.0 software by an experimentally blind observer. Immediately following the test, stimulus animals were removed, and subjects were killed via rapid decapitation, and trunk blood was collected; for animals in the site-specific study, brains were rapidly removed and frozen.
Peripheral drug administration.
To determine whether global blockade of κ- or μ-opioid receptors alter selective aggression, either the κ-opioid receptor antagonist [norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI] (Portoghese et al., 1987) or the preferential μ-opioid receptor antagonist (naloxone) (Magnan et al., 1982) was administered intraperitoneally 1 h before the resident-intruder test. To control for vehicle injection, a 0.2 ml injection of sterile saline was given (n = 9 male; n = 11 female). All drugs were dissolved in sterile saline and mixed up fresh on the day of use. In addition to saline controls, we ran a separate group of handled, but not injected, controls (n = 9 male; n = 9 female) and found no behavioral difference between saline or noninjected controls (male, t(16) = 0.92, p = 0.37; female, t(18) = 0.63, p = 0.57; control groups were therefore combined for statistical analysis).
The doses of nor-BNI tested were as follows: 10 mg/kg (n = 10 male; n = 10 female), 32 mg/kg (n = 10 male; n = 11 female), 50 mg/kg (n = 10 male; n = 9 female), or 100 mg/kg (n = 7 male; n = 10 female) (Broadbear et al., 1994). While the higher doses used in this study (50 and 100 mg/kg) are higher than those used in rats and mice, prairie voles remain ambulatory and show species typical social interactions at these doses. Additionally, to validate the use of high doses of nor-BNI for behavioral studies in prairie voles, we conducted additional behavioral tests using behavioral assays for which the effects of opioid drugs in other species have been well established (tests for locomotor activity and analgesia; described below).
The doses of naloxone used were as follows: 1 mg/kg (n = 11 male; n = 12 female), 10 mg/kg (n = 10 male; n = 10 female), or 30 mg/kg (n = 11 male; n = 12 female). These doses were chosen because 1 mg/kg (but not lower doses) of naloxone has been shown to decrease aggression in mice (Haug et al., 1986). While this dose (1 mg/kg) has also been shown to decrease locomotor behavior in rats (Sisti and Lewis, 2001), it had no effect on either locomotor activity or selective aggression in prairie voles (see below). We therefore used two higher doses, 10 mg/kg (Grimm et al., 2007) and 30 mg/kg, and these doses ensured that the lack of effect on selective aggression by naloxone treatment was not due to using a behaviorally ineffective dose because these higher doses significantly decreased general locomotor activity in females (Table 1).
Number of cage crosses in home cage 1 h following peripheral injections of nor-BNI
Stereotaxic cannulation and microinfusion.
Following 14 d of cohabitation, both males and females received stereotaxic surgery and then recovered together for 3 d in their home cage. Consistent with the methods established by previous studies (Liu and Wang, 2003; Aragona et al., 2006), subjects were implanted with 26-guage bilateral guide cannulae (Plastics One) anchored to the skull with stainless-steel screws and dental cement and aimed at the NAc shell (+1.6 mm AP; ±1 mm ML; −4.5 mm DV), NAc core (+1.6 mm AP; ±1 mm ML; −3.5 mm DV), or the VP (+0.45 mm AP; ± 1 mm ML; −4.5 mm DV). Injection sites for both the NAc and the VP corresponded to regions in which autoradiography determined that κ-opioid receptor binding was dense (see Figs. 5, 6).
On the test day, a 33-guage injector was used to infuse either artificial CSF (ACSF; male, n = 8, NAc shell; n = 6, NAc core; female, n = 6, NAc core; n = 7, NAc shell), ACSF containing 500 ng of nor-BNI (male, n = 7, NAc core; n = 8, NAc shell; n = 8, NAc VP; female, n = 7, shell; n = 6, core; n = 6, VP), or ACSF containing 1 ng of the highly selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 CTAP (Pelton et al., 1986) into the NAc shell (male, n = 5; female, n = 5) (Simmons and Self, 2009). Following behavioral testing, stimulus animals were removed, subjects were killed via rapid decapitation, trunk blood was obtained, and brains were extracted and frozen for subsequent histological verification of cannulae placements. Only subjects whose cannulae placements were in the target region were included in the study.
Receptor autoradiography.
At 90 d of age, sexually naive male and female prairie voles were killed via rapid decapitation. Brains were rapidly removed, frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80°C. Brains were sectioned on a cryostat at 15 μm in four serial sections (i.e., 60 μm intervals) and placed back in the −80°C freezer until all samples were ready to be processed. On the day of processing, slides were washed twice in room temperature 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 for 10 min. Samples were then incubated in either μ-opioid receptor ligand (DAMGO; PerkinElmer, catalog #NET 902; lot #3615807) for 1 h or with the κ-opioid receptor ligand (C22H32N2O2; U69,593; PerkinElmer; catalog #NET 952; lot #3615650) for 2 h. The incubation period was followed by a series of washes that are listed as follows: ice-cold Tris buffer (two times for 5 min each), chilled Tris-buffer while stirring (two times for 10 min each), dipping in ice-cold distilled water (three times), and then drying under a cool stream of air. Nonspecific binding was determined by incubating a subset of slides with 1 μm naloxone for μ receptors or 1 μm nor-BNI for κ receptors. Kodak BioMax MS film was then laid on the slides and exposed for 6 months. Film images were captured using a Scan Maker 1000XL Microtek scanner.
Cortisol assay.
Previous studies have demonstrated that although nor-BNI blocks the negative behavioral and physiological consequences of stress, it does not itself decrease corticosterone levels (McLaughlin et al., 2006b). Given that this was the first study using nor-BNI in prairie voles and the aversive nature of selective aggression, we determined the relationship between the actions of nor-BNI on corticosterone in prairie voles as there is in mice. Following rapid decapitation, trunk blood was collected from each subject in tubes containing heparin-coated rings and placed on ice until all behavioral tests for that day were complete (maximum of 4 h). Samples were centrifuged at 2000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and plasma was immediately frozen. Plasma (5 μl plasma/10 ml buffer) was later assayed for corticosterone using a radioimmunoassay [MP Biomedicals corticosterone (rat); catalog #07-120103]. Given that this is the first time the MP Biomedicals corticosterone antibody has been used for prairie voles, it was analytically validated for use on this species. The slope of the line for serial dilutions of vole serum (plotted as dose per unit volume) was both linear (R2 = 0.994, p < 0.0001) and parallel to the standard curve. Mean accuracy (determined by spiking kit standards with a high and low vole serum samples) was 95.9% for the high sample (N = 6) and 94.0% for the low sample (N = 6). The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV; determined by running six duplicates in the same assay) for a high kit control was 3.1% (N = 6), and a low kit control it was 5.1% (N = 6). The interassay CVs for high and low kit controls were 5.7% (N = 4) and 6.3% (N = 4), respectively.
Testosterone assay.
In other species, testosterone is known to regulate aggressive behavior (Edwards, 1968; Bronson and Desjardins, 1969; Schuurman, 1980). To determine whether testosterone is important for the display of selective aggression in pair-bonded prairie voles, plasma samples were collected from control subjects (male, n = 14; female, n = 18) and processed as described above and assayed for testosterone (Calbiotech 96-well Testosterone ELISA Kit (mouse/rat); catalog #TE187S-100).
Validation of κ-opioid receptor drug dosing.
As our initial behavioral pharmacology testing indicated that prairie voles require high doses of κ-opioid receptor drugs, we determined the behaviorally effective dose of nor-BNI necessary to block well established motor inhibitory and analgesic effects of a selective κ-opioid receptor agonist in prairie voles. The use of these validated behavioral assays in prairie voles allowed us to compare the response to κ-opioid receptor drugs in prairie voles to those of other species with established dose–response curves.
The selective κ-opioid receptor agonist C19H26Cl2N2O × HCl × H2O U50,488 (Von Voigtlander and Lewis, 1982) was dissolved in sterile saline and administered by intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 0 mg/kg (male, n = 7; female, n = 7), 5 mg/kg (male, n = 7; female, n = 7), 10 mg/kg (male, n = 8; female, n = 6), or 25 mg/kg (male, n = 5). The 25 mg/kg dose was not tested in females because a significant effect was achieved following a 10 mg/kg administration of U50,488. The doses of U50,488 used in the present study were chosen because they have been demonstrated previously to decrease motor activity (Ukai and Kameyama, 1985; Schnur and Walker, 1990; Leyton and Stewart, 1992; Brent, 1993; Kuzmin et al., 2000; Mague et al., 2003) and enhance analgesia (Kuzmin et al., 2000; McLaughlin et al., 2006b) in other species.
Following identification of the dose of U50,488 that significantly decreased locomotor activity (25 mg/kg for males and 10 mg/g for females), subjects were administered intraperitoneal injections of nor-BNI 1 h before U50,488 at a dose of 0 mg/kg (male, n = 6; female, n = 6), 10 mg/kg (male, n = 6; female, n = 6), 50 mg/kg (male, n = 9; female, n = 6), or 100 mg/kg (male, n = 7; female, n = 6). Control subjects received saline injections 1 h before and immediately before testing (male, n = 11; female, n = 6). Locomotor activity was assessed with an open-field test, and analgesia was measured with a tail flick assay.
Open-field and tail flick: for open-field testing, subjects were placed in a 75 × 25 cm open-field chamber for 1 h immediately following drug administration (Kuzmin et al., 2000; Mague et al., 2003). Behavior during the open-field test was recorded and later scored for the duration of time spent in forward locomotion and wall climbing. The total duration spent in forward locomotion and wall climbing were combined for a measure of total activity. For tail flick, antinociceptive measurements were made 1 h following administration of U50,488 by immersing the tail in 55°C water for a maximum of 15 s (McLaughlin et al., 2006a,b). Because baseline analgesia measures of male and female prairie voles were higher than those reported for other species (Butelman et al., 1993; McLaughlin et al., 2006b), C57BL/6 mice were also tested under control conditions (i.e., 1 h following an intraperitoneal injection of saline). Adult male (n = 5) and female (n = 7) C57BL/6 mice were housed in a 12 h reversed light/dark cycle with ad libitum food and water. For detailed analysis, see Tables 2 and 3 as well as Figure 3. Briefly, these experiments confirm that high doses of κ-opioid receptor drugs are needed for behavioral manipulations using prairie voles.
Mean latency to withdraw tail following peripheral injections of U50,488
Mean latency to withdraw tail following pretreatment with nor-BNI and peripheral injections of U50,488 (male, 25 mg/kg; female, 10 mg/kg)
Statistics.
A linear regression analysis was computed to determine the relationship between neonatal weight and mating and to determine whether neonatal weight was associated with levels of selective aggression. A linear regression analysis was also used to determine the relationship between neonatal weight and mating onset as well as the relationship between hormone (corticosterone and testosterone) levels and aggression and pregnancy stage. Since previous studies have demonstrated that male prairie voles are generally more aggressive than females (Winslow et al., 1993), we used a t test to compare attack frequencies and affiliation levels during resident-intruder testing between control males and females. Regarding pharmacological manipulations of selective aggression, it was hypothesized that blockade of κ- but not μ-opioid receptors would interfere with selective aggression. Therefore, a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's post hoc test was used to assess the pharmacological effects of peripheral opioid receptor blockade on selective aggression. Additionally, since multiple doses were used, a series of planned contrast was used to determine whether peripheral opioid receptor blockade decreased aggression in a dose-dependent manner (Zhang and Kelley, 1997). For site-specific comparisons, it was hypothesized that blockade of κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell, but not other regions, would significantly decrease aggression compared to saline controls. Given the Levene test of homogeneity of variances failed for site-specific data, a one-way ANOVA could not be used, and thus a Mann–Whitney U test (Stribley and Carter, 1999) was conducted to test whether site-directed blockade of opioid receptors decreased aggression levels compared to controls. Plasma corticosterone levels following nor-BNI treatments were compared to controls using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's post hoc test. A one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's post hoc test was also used to determine the effects of a κ-opioid receptor agonist or antagonist on locomotor activity and analgesia. A t test was used to compare sex and species differences in baseline analgesia. All analysis was performed with the use of SPSS Statistics 17.0 software.
Results
Fecundity and pair bonding
While prairie voles are socially monogamous, males of this species display important individual variation in reproductive strategy (Getz et al., 1993; Solomon et al., 2009). In natural prairie vole populations, approximately one-half of males “wander” across multiple female territories attempting to mate with multiple females (Getz et al., 1993; Solomon and Jacquot, 2002), and the biological basis of this variation continues to be studied (Fink et al., 2006; Young and Hammock, 2007; Ophir et al., 2008; Mabry et al., 2011). It was shown previously that environmental factors also contribute to mating strategy in this species as male prairie voles do not show partner preferences after long-term cohabitation unless pregnancy is established soon after pairing (Curtis, 2010). However, the relationship between fertility and selective aggression has never been formally assessed. In previous studies of selective aggression, pairs that failed to achieve pregnancy following a 2 week cohabitation were simply excluded from the studies (Aragona et al., 2006; Gobrogge et al., 2009). Here, we provide the first examination of the relationship between pregnancy and selective aggression by comparing neonatal weight at the time of testing to attack frequency in both male and female subjects.
In males, neonatal weight was positively correlated with attack frequency (R2 = 0.28, F(1,19) = 7.55, p = 0.01) (Fig. 1A). Consistent with a previous study (Curtis, 2010), pregnancy was considered optimal if offspring size indicated that the pair achieved behavioral estrous, ovulation, and fertilization with minimal delay following the onset of the cohabitation. This corresponded to an average neonatal weight of >0.30 g at the time of resident-intruder testing. Males whose females were in an optimal stage of pregnancy were significantly more aggressive than males whose females were suboptimally pregnant (t(19) = 2.67, p = 0.02) (Fig. 1B). However, there was no difference in selective aggression in female subjects depending on optimal versus suboptimal pregnancy (t(22) = 0.78, p = 0.44) (Fig. 1D). There was also no correlation between neonatal weight and aggression in females (R2 = 0.01, F(1,22) = 0.29, p = 0.59) (Fig. 1C). This is similar to previous laboratory studies showing that long-term cohabitation, but not mating, was correlated with aggression in females (Bowler et al., 2002) as well as data from the field that show no correlation between stage of pregnancy and wounding (a proxy for aggressive encounters) (Rose and Gaines, 1976). These data suggest that it is adaptive for males, but not females, to form pair bonds depending on reproductive success. This is reasonable if indeed the function of selective aggression is primarily mate guarding to increase assurance of paternity. Conversely, the decision for females to bond may be based heavily on the degree of male investment, which is held constant under the preset experimental conditions (a continual presence for 2 weeks). Thus, more naturalistic circumstances may be needed to examine variation in selective aggression shown by females.
Selective aggression in males is associated with the pregnancy status of the female. A, B, Aggression in males is related to neonatal weight at the time of testing (n = 21; A), and males whose females are farther along in gestation are more aggressive than males (n = 14) whose females have more recently become pregnant (n = 7; B). C, D, Conversely, aggression levels in females has no relation to pregnancy status (n = 24; C) as females who are farther along in pregnancy (n = 14) do not become more aggressive than females who have more recently become pregnant (n = 7; D). *p < 0.05. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.
As we describe below, an important component of this study was to determine whether opioid receptor manipulations altered corticosterone levels. Additionally, the presence of acute aversive stimuli, including those of a social nature, increase plasma corticosterone levels (Schuurman, 1980; Buwalda et al., 2011). The resident-intruder paradigm can also be aversive in nature, and this also provided a need for the relationship between selective aggression and corticosterone levels to be determined in the present study. In males, attack frequency was positively correlated with plasma corticosterone levels (R2 = 0.33, F(1,17) = 8.23, p = 0.01). However, there was no relationship between attack frequency and plasma corticosterone levels in females (R2 = 0.005, F(1,21) = 0.12, p = 0.74; data not shown).
Additionally, because testosterone has been implicated in general aggression in other species (Beeman, 1947; Edwards, 1968; Bronson and Desjardins, 1969; Schuurman, 1980), the relationship between selective aggression and plasma testosterone was also assessed. There was no relationship between plasma testosterone and attack frequency in males (R2 = 0.004, F(1,13) = 0.06, p = 0.82) and females (R2 = 0.16, F(1,17) = 3.15, p = 0.09; data not shown). This is consistent with previous reports that have indicated that testosterone does not mediate selective aggression in pair bonded prairie vole (Carter and Getz, 1993). These data support the contention that this behavior is not representative of generalized aggression. Rather, selective aggression is indicative of the behavioral transformation that is associated with the development of a pair bond.
Effect of peripheral blockade of opioid receptor on selective aggression
Although there are quantitative differences in selective aggression between male and female prairie voles, both sexes show this behavior (Getz et al., 1981). Initially, sexually naive prairie voles are quite affiliative toward novel conspecifics (Aragona et al., 2006). However, once pair bonded, such affiliation is directed more selectively toward familiar conspecifics, especially the breeding partner. Thus, there is a behavioral transition in selective affiliation and aggression, with non-pair-bonded voles being generally affiliative and then becoming more aggressive once pair bonded (Getz, 1978; Carter and Getz, 1993; Young et al., 1998; Aragona et al., 2006; Aragona and Wang, 2009). In the laboratory, resident-intruder testing using unfamiliar same-sex stimulus animals is used to quantify selective aggression in both male and female prairie voles (Carter et al., 1997) and provides a quantification of mate guarding and thus pair bond maintenance. Consistent with previous studies that have shown that males are more aggressive than females (Gavish et al., 1981; Firestone et al., 1991b; Carter et al., 1997), we found a significant sex difference in the magnitude of selective aggression with control males showing significantly greater attack frequency compared to control female subjects (Fig. 2C,D) (t(58) = 2.97, p = 0.004). However, there was no sex difference in affiliative behavior toward resident-intruders (Figs. 2A,B) (t(58) = 0.54, p = 0.59).
Selective affiliation and selective aggression in male and female prairie voles. A, Diagram of prairie vole engaging in one type of affiliative behavior measured in the present study, side by side contact. B, Pair-bonded male (n = 18) and female (n = 21) prairie voles do not differ in the amount of social affiliation with novel individuals. C, Pair-bonded prairie vole (right) lunging at a resident intruder (left) who responds by displaying a characteristic submissive posture. D, Following pair bond formation, both sexes of the breeding pair show selective aggression to novel conspecifics. However, males of the breeding pair become significantly more aggressive than females. **p < 0.005. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Given that selective aggression is a form of aversive motivation and that κ-opioid receptors mediate aversion (van Ree et al., 1999; Le Merrer et al., 2009), we hypothesized that these receptors would be important for selective aggression, whereas μ-opioid receptors (i.e., receptors that mediate reward) would not be involved in this behavior. Consistent with this hypothesis, peripheral injections of the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI dose-dependently reduced the frequency of attacks in male prairie voles (F(4,50) = 3.22, p = 0.02) (Fig. 3A). Post hoc tests revealed that animals receiving the highest dose of nor-BNI showed significantly lower levels of selective aggression (p = 0.02), and planned contrast comparisons indicated that nor-BNI decreased aggression in a linear manner (t(50) = −3.40, p = 0.001) (Fig. 3A). Groups did not differ in attack latency (F(4,50) = 2.29, p = 0.07) (Fig. 3B), affiliation (F(4,50) = 1.30, p = 0.28) (Fig. 3D), or general locomotor activity (F(4,50) = 0.69, p = 0.08) (Table 1). In contrast to κ-opioid receptor blockade, blockade of μ-opioid receptors in males with the preferential μ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone had no effect on attack frequency (F(3,46) = 0.71, p = 0.55) (Fig. 4A), attack latency (F(3,46) = 2.3, p = 0.90) (Fig. 4B), affiliative behavior (F(3,46) = 0.33, p = 0.80) (Fig. 4C), or locomotor behavior (F(3,46) = 0.21, p = 0.89) (Table 1).
Peripheral administration of a κ-opioid receptor antagonist has sex-specific effects on selective aggression. A, B, D, The highest dose of the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI significantly decreased aggression in pair-bonded males without affecting attack latency (B) or affiliation levels (n = 7 to 11; D). C, In males, 25 mg/kg of the κ-opioid receptor agonist U50,488 significantly decreased motor activity during an open-field test (n = 5 to 7). E, The motor inhibitory effects of U50,488 were reversed by 50 and 100 mg/kg nor-BNI, but not by 10 mg/kg nor-BNI (n = 6 to 11). F, G, I, Peripheral doses of nor-BNI failed to decrease aggression in pair-bonded females (F) and had no significant effect on attack latency (G) or affiliation (n = 10 to 11; I). H, J, 10 mg/kg U50,488 decreased motor activity in females (n = 6 to 7; H) and this effect was reversed by 50 and 100 mg/kg nor-BNI (n = 6/group; J). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.
μ-Opioid receptors do not regulate selective aggression in prairie voles. A–C, Peripheral administration of the μ-opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, had no effect on selective aggression, attack latency (B), or affiliative behavior (n = 10 to 11; C). D–F, Similarly, peripheral administration of naloxone failed to block aggression in pair-bonded females and had no effect on attack latency (E) or affiliation levels (n = 10 to 12; F). Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.
In females, peripheral administration of nor-BNI did not significantly alter attack frequency (F(4,54) = 1.65, p = 0.19) (Fig. 3F). However, nor-BNI caused a significant increase in latency to attack (F(4,54) = 2.89, p = 0.03) (Fig. 3G), although post hoc tests did not identify a specific dose that was most effective. There was no effect on affiliative behavior (F(4,54) = 0.60, p = 0.67) (Fig. 3I) or locomotor activity (F(4,54) = 2.07, p = 0.10) (Table 1). Naloxone had no effect on selective aggression in females (F(3,50) = 1.03, p = 0.40) (Fig. 4D), and this was despite that the higher dose of naloxone caused a significant decrease in locomotor activity in females (F(3,50) = 4.75, p = 0.005) (Table 1).
The behaviorally effective dose of nor-BNI (100 mg/kg; i.e., the dose that decreased selective aggression) was 10-fold higher than doses reported to be effective in other rodent species (mice and rats) (Lindholm et al., 2001; McLaughlin et al., 2003; McCurdy et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2007). To validate the need for higher doses in prairie voles, we determined the dose of nor-BNI that reversed the inhibitory motor effects of the κ-opioid receptor agonist U50,488 in an open-field apparatus.
In males, the highest dose of U50,488 (25 mg/kg) significantly decreased total activity in the open-field test (F(3,26) = 5.69, p = 0.009) (Fig. 3C), and this was reversed by 50 mg/kg (F(4,38) = 9.335, p = 0.328) and 100 mg/kg nor-BNI (p = 0.246), but not 10 mg/kg nor-BNI (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3E). Thus, higher doses of nor-BNI are needed to alter motor activity compared to other rodent species (Lindholm et al., 2001; McLaughlin et al., 2003; McCurdy et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2007). Behavioral assays of analgesia also demonstrated species differences in κ-opioid receptor pharmacology. Voles have higher baseline analgesia compared to mice (Table 2), and higher doses of the κ-opioid receptor agonist were needed to enhance antinociception (Tables 2, 3) (McLaughlin et al., 2006b).
In females, a lower dose of U50,488 was needed to decrease locomotor activity than was necessary compared to how this drug impacted male prairie voles. Specifically, 10 mg/kg U50,488 significantly decreased total activity (F(2,19) = 7.05, p = 0.02) (Fig. 3H), and this decrease was reversed by 50 mg/kg (F(4,29) = 10.14, p = 0.46) and 100 mg/kg nor-BNI (p = 0.76), but not 10 mg/kg (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3J). With respect to the tail withdrawal assay, female prairie voles showed a significantly higher baseline level of analgesia compared to male prairie voles (t(12) = 2.322, p = 0.0386) (Table 2) as well as female C57BL/6 mice (t(12) = 3.380, p = 0.0055) (Table 2). Moreover, in contrast to males, peripheral administration of the κ-opioid receptor agonist had no effect on the tail withdraw latency at any of the doses tested (F(2,19) = 1.97, p = 0.17) (Table 2). Together, these data demonstrate that male and female prairie voles require higher doses of nor-BNI compared to rats and mice for behavioral studies.
κ-Opioid and μ-opioid receptor binding patterns in prairie voles
The peripheral manipulations of selective aggression described above demonstrate that κ- but not μ-opioid receptors mediate this behavior. To ultimately identify the central location of κ-opioid receptor regulation of selective aggression, it was first necessary to determine the distribution of opioid receptors within prairie vole brains. Since very limited knowledge exists with respect to opioid receptor distributions in the vole brain (Insel and Shapiro, 1992; Burkett et al., 2011), we conducted a detailed analysis of μ- and κ-opioid receptor binding for this species.
Overall, κ-opioid receptor binding is quite sparse compared to μ-opioid receptor expression (compare Figs. 5, 6). However, consistent with other species, including humans (Mansour et al., 1987, 1988; Quirion et al., 1987), there is dense κ-opioid receptor binding throughout the striatum. This distribution pattern is similar to that of other rodents (guinea pig, rabbit, mouse, and rat) that also show dense binding within the striatum (Robson et al., 1985; Wang et al., 2011).
A–G, Distribution of κ-opioid receptors in prairie voles. Cl, Claustrum; CP, caudate–putamen; IC, insular cortex; IPAC, interstital nucleus of the posterior limb of the anterior commissure; LGP, lateral globus pallidus; MG, medial geniculate nucleus; PMCo, posterior medial cortical amygdala; Pir, piriform cortex; S1, primary somatosensory cortex; S2, secondary somatosensory cortex; SNC, substantia nigra compacta; SNR, substantia nigra reticulata.
A–G, Distribution of μ-opioid receptors in prairie voles. Au, Auditory cortex; AVVL, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; AVDM, anteroventral thalamic nucleus; Cgl, cingulate cortex; CM, central medial thalamic nucleus; CP, caudate–putamen; DMh, dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus; Ent, entorhinal cortex; IF, interfascicular nucleus; IMD, intermediodorsal thalamic nucleus; IPAC, interstital nucleus of the posterior limb of the anterior commissure; IPC, interpeduncular nucleus, caudal subnucleus; LGP, lateral globus pallidus; LH, lateral hypothalamic area; LHb, lateral habenular nucleus; LS, lateral septum; MD, medial dorsal nucleus; MG, medial geniculate nucleus; MHb, medial habenular nucleus; NAc, nucleus accumbens; PAG, periaqueductal gray; PMCo, posterior medial cortical amygdala; PC, paracentral thalamic nucleus; Pir, piriform cortex; PN, paranigral nucleus of the VTA; Re, reuniens thalamic nucleus; Rh, rhomboid thalamic nucleus; SN, substantia nigra; SuC, suprachiasmatic nucleus; V1, primary visual cortex, lateral area; VM, ventromedial thalamic nucleus; ZI, zona incerta.
In rostral portions of the striatum (i.e., rostral to the corpous callosum genu), κ-opioid receptor binding is prominent within the dorsal striatum and very dense within the ventral striatum, in particular, the NAc shell and olfactory tubercle (OT) (Fig. 5A). There is also κ-opioid receptor binding in the claustrum at this rostrocaudal level (Fig. 5A). Within more caudal regions of the striatum (nearing the genu of the corpus callosum), κ-opioid receptor binding within the dorsal striatum is less pronounced (particularly within the dorsomedial striatum), whereas binding within the NAc shell and OT remains quite dense (Fig. 5B).
There is also a moderate level of κ-opioid receptor binding within the rostral VP (Fig. 5C,D), which is notable since this region is important for vasopressin regulation of pair bonding (Lim and Young, 2004). κ-Opioid receptor binding is also present in caudal VP as well as the external globus pallidus (also known as the dorsal pallidum) (Fig. 5E). In contrast to rats, prairie voles do not have high densities of κ-opioid receptor binding in the hypothalamus (Robson et al., 1985). Additionally, κ-opioid receptors are quite strongly expressed within the substantia nigra pars reticulata (Fig. 5G) and posterior medial cortical amygdala (Fig. 5G). Finally, within cortical regions, light κ-opioid receptor binding occurs in the insular cortex and regions of the somatosensory cortex (Fig. 5A–F). Overall, these data provide additional data showing the tremendous species-specific variation in κ-opioid receptor binding patterns among rodent species. While rats and mice show very high densities in the hypothalamus and midbrain, and guinea pigs show very high levels in the striatum and cortex (Robson et al., 1985), κ-opioid receptor binding in prairie voles is most dense in the striatum and substantia nigra.
Relative to κ-opioid receptor expression, μ-opioid receptors are much more widely spread throughout the prairie vole brain. A previous study provided a very cursory initial description of μ-opioid receptor distributions for prairie voles (Insel and Shapiro, 1992), and a more recent study described the distribution of μ-opioid receptors within the striatum (Burkett et al., 2011). Here, we significantly extend these previous findings by providing the first description of μ-opioid receptor binding throughout the prairie vole brain (Fig. 6). Within the rostral striatum there is dense μ-opioid receptor binding in the dorsal striatum as well as the NAc core and NAc shell (Fig. 6). Unlike κ-opioid receptors, there is no μ-opioid receptor binding in the claustrum or olfactory tubercle (Fig. 6A,B). Importantly, as in other rodent species (Pert et al., 1976; Herkenham and Pert, 1981; Gerfen and Young, 1988; Mansour et al., 1994; Brown et al., 2002; Crittenden and Graybiel, 2011), a clear patch-matrix pattern of μ-opioid receptor distribution can be seen throughout the striatum (Fig. 6A–C). Voles also show typical variability in patch size, and most patches are located in the dorsal striatum. There is also variability of μ-opioid receptor density in the ventral striatum, including robust μ-opioid receptor binding in the dorsomedial NAc shell (Fig. 6B). In contrast to a previous study which claimed that μ-opioid receptor binding was found within the VP (Insel and Shapiro, 1992), we saw no μ-opioid receptor binding within this region (Fig. 6C,D). Moderate μ-opioid receptor binding was present in the lateral septum, which is of interest because this region is involved in pair bonding (Fig. 6B,C) (Liu et al., 2001). This binding pattern contrasts that of other rodent species, such as rats, who have μ-opioid receptors in the medial septum, but not in the lateral septum (Mansour et al., 1987). μ-Opioid receptor binding was also seen in the interstital nucleus of the posterior limb of the anterior commissure, the amygdala/striatum transition zone (Fig. 6D,E), and the endopiriform nucleus (Fig. 6).
Consistent with rats, μ-opioid binding within the hypothalamus is light and is present in the ventromedial nucleus, dorsomedial nucleus, and lateral hypothalamic area (Fig. 6F) (Mansour et al., 1987). The general distribution of μ-opioid receptors in the thalamus overlaps with that of rats (Mansour et al., 1987) and can be seen in the mediodorsal, intermediodorsal, centromedial, paracentral, rhomboid, reuniens, and ventromedial thalamic nuclei, as well as light opioid receptor binding within the zona incerta (Fig. 6E,F). There is dense μ-opioid receptor binding within the medial habenula and light μ-opioid receptor binding within the lateral habenula and fasciculus retroflexus of the habenula (Fig. 6F). There is also substantial μ-opioid receptor binding in the posterior medial cortical amygdaloid nucleus of the midbrain (Fig. 6G). μ-Opioid receptor binding is also densely expressed within sensory processing systems, the superior colliculus (visual) and medial geniculate nucleus (auditory) (Fig. 6G). There is very dense expression of μ-opioid receptors within subregions of the ventral tegmental area including the paranigral nucleus (Fig. 6G) and the caudal and lateral interpeduncular nuclei (Fig. 6G), and additional binding within the medial nuclei of the A10 region, such as the interfascicular nucleus (Fig. 6G). There is only light binding within the periaqueductal gray and substantia nigra, which is consistent with other rodent species (Mansour et al., 1988; Laprairie and Murphy, 2009) (Fig. 6G). Similar to rabbits and guinea pigs, very little μ-opioid receptor binding is seen in the hippocampus (Robson et al., 1985). Finally, within cortical regions, μ-opioid receptor binding occurs in the cingulate, entorhinal, and striate cortices (Fig. 6G).
Region-specific κ regulation of selective aggression
The peripheral behavioral pharmacology experiments described above indicate that κ- but not μ-opioid receptors mediate selective aggression. However, it is difficult to interpret data resulting from peripheral injections of antagonists because this manipulation blocks receptors globally in both the peripheral nervous system and the CNS (Wittert et al., 1996). Furthermore, opioid receptors are distributed across many brain regions that differ greatly in their regulation of behavior (Mansour et al., 1987, 1988, 1994). In prairie voles, κ-opioid receptors are densely expressed within two brain regions that are very important for pair bonding, the NAc and VP (Fig. 5). To determine whether κ-opioid receptors within these brain regions mediate selective-aggression, we selectively blocked κ-opioid receptors within these regions (Fig. 7A) of pair-bonded prairie voles before resident-intruder tests and measured the corresponding effects on selective aggression.
κ-Opioid receptors within the NAc shell mediate selective aggression. A, Sites of injections of ACSF and the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI. B, Consistent with data from peripheral experiments, aggression in males is significantly higher in pair-bonded males (n = 16) than females (n = 16). C, Injections of nor-BNI into the NAc shell significantly decreased aggression compared to control injections and injections of nor-BNI in the NAc core. D, E, Additionally, nor-BNI in the NAc shell trended toward increasing attack latency and had no effect on affiliation levels in males (n = 6 to 8; E). F, Blockade of κ-opioid receptors in the NAc shell and core had opposing effects on aggression levels in females. Injections of nor-BNI in the NAc shell significantly decreased aggression levels, while injections of nor-BNI in the NAc core increased aggression levels compared to controls. G, H, No effects on attack latency (G) or affiliation levels (H) occurred in females (n = 6 to 8). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM.
Control subjects that received aCSF infusions into the NAc shell, NAc core, or VP showed robust selective aggression, and males showed significantly higher attack frequency compared to females (Fig. 7B) (t(30) = 2.32, p = 0.03). There was no difference between control injections of aCSF between these brain regions in males (F(2,15) = 0.68, p = 0.52) or females (F(2,15) = 1.52, p = 0.26). Therefore, data from these regions were combined to generate an aCSF control group (male, n = 16; female, n = 16).
In males, Mann–Whitney U test for nonparametric data revealed a significant decrease in aggression when κ-opioid receptors were blocked in the NAc shell (U = 20.50, p = 0.008) (Fig. 7C). However, the κ antagonist had no effect when infused into the NAc core (U = 46.50, p = 0.55) or VP (U = 44.00, p = 0.24) (Fig. 7C). Site-directed infusion of nor-BNI had no effect on attack latency (U = 49.50, p = 0.40) (Fig. 7D), affiliative behavior (U = 49.00, p = 0.37) (Fig. 7E), or locomotor activity (U = 43.50, p = 0.92) (Table 4). Thus, site-specific behavioral pharmacology identified κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell—a key brain region in mediating unconditioned motivational responses (Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999; Kelley and Berridge, 2002)—as important for aversive social motivation in pair-bonded prairie voles.
Number of cage crosses in home cage 1 h following site-specific injection
In contrast to the sex differences following global blockade of κ-opioid receptors (Fig. 3), blockade of κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell (U = 21.00, p = 0.02) also prevented selective aggression in females. However, unlike in males, nor-BNI injections into the NAc core significantly increased this behavior (Fig. 7F) (U = 20.5, p = 0.05). As with males, κ-opioid receptor blockade within the VP had no effect on selective aggression in females (U = 45.50, p = 0.88). In females, central infusions of nor-BNI showed no significant effects on attack latency (U = 32.00, p = 0.15) (Fig. 7G), affiliation levels (U = 32.00, p = 0.82) (Fig. 7H), or locomotor behavior (U = 33.50, p = 0.32) (Table 4). Together, these data show that κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell mediate selective aggression in both male and female prairie voles.
The κ-opioid receptor antagonist used in this study, nor-BNI, also has affinity for μ-opioid receptors initially following its delivery (Endoh et al., 1992). Thus, our site-directed nor-BNI data alone do not rule out the possible involvement of μ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell. To test whether the reduction of selective aggression by nor-BNI was due to blockade of μ-opioid receptors, a separate experiment was conducted in which the highly selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist, CTAP (Crain and Shen, 1992; Nestler, 1993), was infused into the NAc shell before resident-intruder testing. Consistent with the peripheral study using naloxone, blockade of μ-opioid receptors directly in the NAc shell had no effect on selective aggression in males (U = 35.00, p = 0.36) or females (U = 32.50, p = 0.56; data not shown).
Finally, since our data indicate that κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell mediate selective aggression through modulation of aversive social motivation, and aversive stimuli are known to increase corticosterone signaling, we determined whether blockade of κ-opioid receptors alters selective aggression indirectly though a reduction in corticosterone (DeVries et al., 1996; Bosch et al., 2009). As determined previously, plasma corticosterone levels of male and female prairie voles were high compared to those in other rodent species (DeVries et al., 1997; Taymans et al., 1997; Campbell et al., 2009) (Table 5). Consistent with studies in other rodent species (McLaughlin et al., 2006b), nor-BNI had minimal to no effect on plasma corticosterone levels. In males, there was no difference between the plasma corticosterone levels of control subjects and those that had received peripheral nor-BNI (F(2,26) = 2.06, p = 0.15) (Table 5) or nor-BNI infused centrally (F(2,23) = 0.42, p = 0.66) (Table 6). In females, due to a slight increase in corticosterone following peripheral nor-BNI, the overall ANOVA for subjects in the peripheral study was significant (F(2,28) = 3.69, p = 0.04) (Table 5), but post hoc tests revealed no significant differences between control subjects and those treated with nor-BNI. Similar to males, there was no difference in plasma corticosterone levels between females who had received site-specific administration of aCSF or nor-BNI in the NAc core or shell (F(2,22) = 1.52, p = 0.24) (Table 6). Together, these data suggest that nor-BNI does not reduce selective aggression through changes in corticosterone signaling.
Mean concentration of plasma corticosteroid (nanograms per milliliter) in pair-bonded prairie voles treated with either saline or nor-BNI 1 h prior to a 10 min resident-intruder test
Mean concentration of plasma corticosteroid (nanograms per milliliter) in pair-bonded prairie voles receiving site specific injections of either ACSF or nor-BNI into the NAc 1 h prior to the resident-intruder test
Discussion
While sexually naive prairie voles are initially highly affiliative toward novel conspecifics, once pair bonded, they show selective aggression toward unfamiliar conspecifics, and this is indicative of mate guarding behavior necessary for pair bond maintenance. Mate guarding is adaptive for males because it helps to ensure paternity (Stehn and Jannett, 1981; Heske and Nelson, 1984; Wolff and Dunlap, 2002). In the laboratory, this behavior is studied using resident-intruder tests of selective aggression (Carter and Getz, 1993), and this represents a circumstance in which novel social stimulation generates negatively valenced motivational behavior, aggressive rejection, that is herein regarded as “aversive.” Here, we demonstrate that blockade of κ-opioid receptors (known to mediate aversion) (Mucha and Herz, 1985; Pfeiffer et al., 1986), but not μ-opioid receptors (known to mediate reward and positive hedonics) (Weeks, 1962; Bozarth and Wise, 1981), prevents selective aggression. These effects are specific to the NAc shell, a component of brain motivational circuitry that is critical for neural processing of both social bonding (Li and Fleming, 2003; Champagne et al., 2004; Aragona et al., 2006; Aragona and Wang, 2007) and unconditioned incentives, including those of an aversive nature (Kalivas and Duffy, 1995; Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999; Kelley and Berridge, 2002; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Becker, 2009). As such, the current data suggest that κ-opioid receptors within this region may facilitate the tagging of social stimuli as aversive and cause novel conspecifics to be aggressively rejected.
κ-Opioid receptors mediate pair bond maintenance
Peripheral blockade of κ-opioid (but not μ-opioid) receptors prevented aversive social motivation in pair-bonded male prairie voles as indicated by a decrease in selective aggression. It is not surprising that peripheral blockade of μ-opioid receptors failed to inhibit selective aggression since previous studies have demonstrated that blockade of these receptors is aversive (van Ree et al., 1999; Kenny et al., 2006; Le Merrer et al., 2009). In contrast to negative affective states induced by μ-opioid-receptor blockade, activation of these receptors is associated with positive hedonics and mediates the rewarding properties of positive social incentives such as play and contact comfort (Panksepp et al., 1980; Vanderschuren et al., 1995; Trezza et al., 2011). Moreover, activation of μ-opioid receptors is important for the early stages of pair bond formation, as blockade of these receptors within the striatum inhibits the formation of a partner preference (Burkett et al., 2011). This is especially interesting given the relationship between μ-opioid receptors and D2-like receptors, which also facilitate pair bond formation (Gingrich et al., 2000; Aragona et al., 2006). Enkephalin, an endogenous ligand for μ-opioid receptors, is found in D2-expressing medium spiny neurons, and stimulation of D2-like receptors increases enkephalin expression (Gerfen et al., 1990). Thus, these systems may interact to mediate social reward necessary for pair bond formation (Aragona et al., 2009), while those that mediate negative affect and stress are important for aversive social encounters that are important for maintaining the bond.
Unlike μ-opioid receptors, κ-opioid receptors antagonize reward (Shippenberg et al., 1996; Carlezon and Miczek, 2010; Wee and Koob, 2010) and are thus a candidate to mediate aversive motivational social interactions, such as aggressive interactions. Indeed, peripheral blockade of κ-opioid receptors decreased selective aggression in male prairie voles, identifying the importance of this system in aversive social motivation. Consistent with previous studies, males were more aggressive than females (Gavish et al., 1981), and mate guarding helps ensure the male that his partner will not mate with novel males (Wolff et al., 2002). Thus, they risk devoting time and energy into offspring that are not their own if males allow another male to enter their territory. Consistent with this, we found that pregnancy was positively correlated with selective aggression, indicating that motivation to guard females increases if the reproductive potential is known to be high (Curtis, 2010).
Pair bond maintenance is mediated by κ-opioid receptors in the NAc shell
The maintenance of a pair bond requires mate guarding, which is associated with novel social stimuli to be processed as aversive. Previous studies have shown that aversive social motivation in prairie voles is mediated by activation of D1-like receptors within the NAc shell, as blockade of these receptors prevents selective aggression (Aragona et al., 2006). Here we show that κ-opioid receptors within this region are also critical for this behavior, as blockade of κ- but not μ-opioid receptors specifically within the NAc shell mediate this behavior in both sexes. Given that κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell are important for processing aversion, the present study suggests that these receptors are important for signaling negative social incentives and may be key to generating the aversive motivation toward an unfamiliar conspecifc expressed by pair-bonded prairie voles.
While the NAc shell is well known to play a critical role in the processing of unconditioned rewarding and aversive stimuli (Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999; Ito et al., 2000; Di Chiara et al., 2004; Everitt and Robbins, 2005; Aragona et al., 2008, 2009), the neural mechanisms within this brain region that promote approach versus avoidance behavior are not well understood. For example, both unconditioned rewarding and aversive stimuli increase DA in the NAc shell (Kalivas and Duffy, 1995; Ikemoto, 2007), and this increase is associated with aspects of both approach and avoidance behaviors (Ikemoto and Panksepp, 1999; Di Chiara and Bassareo, 2007; Oleson et al., 2012). Thus, while aversive chemical stimuli have been shown to decrease DA transmission in the NAc shell (Roitman et al., 2008; Wheeler et al., 2011), there are many conditions in which DA release in the NAc shell is critical for the attribution of motivational salience to unconditioned salient stimuli regardless of the valence (Kelley and Berridge, 2002). While recent data have demonstrated that different subsets of DA containing neurons within the VTA are activated by rewarding versus aversive stimuli (Brischoux et al., 2009; Matsumoto and Hikosaka, 2009; Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010; Lammel et al., 2011), it has yet to be determined how this may be associated with social incentives. The present study suggests that for aversive motivation, κ-opioid receptor activation is also necessary to tag a conspecific with aversive motivational salience. Indeed, in addition to enhancing DA release within the NAc shell, exposure to stress is known to increase prodynorphin signaling (Chartoff et al., 2009) and activation of κ-opioid receptors within this region (Land et al., 2008). Together, data from the current study and previously published work suggest that novel conspecific exposure to pair-bonded voles increases DA transmission within the NAc shell, which then activates D1-like receptors that may promote dynorphin release (Gerfen et al., 1991). Subsequent κ-opioid receptor activation may then directly facilitate the perception of the stimulus as aversive, and continued κ-opioid receptor activation will then decrease DA transmission (Heijna et al., 1990; Spanagel et al., 1992), and this may be involved in the termination of the aggressive interaction via DA regulation over general motivation (Kelley and Berridge, 2002).
While blockade of κ-opioid receptors within the NAc shell decreased selective aggression in both sexes, blockade of these receptors within the NAc core had sex-specific effects. Blockade of κ-opioid receptors within the NAc core increased aggression in females, but had no effect on the behavior of males. Previous studies suggest that DA transmission within this region is not important for pair bonding (Aragona et al., 2006). However, females were not studied in these previous experiments (Aragona et al. 2006), and since the NAc core receives direct input from the NAc shell (van Dongen et al., 2005), it is possible that increased DA transmission in the NAc shell drives core-mediated behavior important for pair bonding in females. Studies using rats have indeed implicated the NAc core in sex differences in other motivated behavior (van Haaren and Meyer, 1991; Li et al., 2004; Wissman et al., 2011). However, additional experiments in voles are needed to determine whether the NAc core is important for female pair bonding.
Conclusion
Although negative affective states induced by κ-opioid receptor activation are usually associated with maladaptive conditions such as depression (Shirayama et al., 2004; Carlezon et al., 2006; Chartoff et al., 2011), anxiety (Bruchas et al., 2007; Knoll et al., 2007; Land et al., 2008), or drug-related behaviors (Bruchas et al., 2010, 2011; Schindler et al., 2010; Walker et al., 2011), acute activation of this system evolved to signal avoidance of potentially harmful stimuli (Amit and Galina, 1988; Teskey and Kavaliers, 1988; Yamada and Nabeshima, 1995). This suggests that κ-opioid receptor activation plays a critical role in encoding aversive properties of environmental stimuli. A similar phenomenon may also occur in pair-bonded voles in that activation of κ-opioid receptors may signal when a social stimulus should be avoided or prevented from entering a home territory. Thus, activation of aversive processing systems has adaptive properties, and the neurobiology of aversive social motivation can be reliably studied using prairie vole pair bonding. Such studies are important because neural mechanisms that evolved to invigorate adaptive behavioral responses to aversive stimuli can also negatively impact mental health under conditions of chronic or abnormal activation.
Footnotes
This work was supported by NSF Grant 0953106 to B.J.A. and a Rackham Merit Fellowship to S.L.R. We acknowledge Zuoxin Wang and Yan Liu (Florida State University) for their assistance with the opiate receptor autoradiography, Jacinta Beehner and Teera Par (Core Assay Facility, University of Michigan) for running the corticosterone assay, Kirsten Alexandra Porter-Stransky for statistical consulting, Dante Bugli for his technical assistance, and Brittany Mash for her illustrations.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to either Dr. Brandon J. Aragona or Shanna L. Resendez, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. aragona{at}umich.edu or slharkey{at}umich.edu
References
In this issue
