Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleArticles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Identification of the Transmitter and Receptor Mechanisms Responsible for REM Sleep Paralysis

Patricia L. Brooks and John H. Peever
Journal of Neuroscience 18 July 2012, 32 (29) 9785-9795; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0482-12.2012
Patricia L. Brooks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. Peever
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Drug interventions preferentially target trigeminal motoneurons. a, A histological example showing the tip of a probe tract (red circle) in the trigeminal motor pool (blue circle). Scale bar, 500 μm. b, Locations of the 31 probe tracts in the trigeminal motor pool plotted on standardized brain maps. Red dots represent probe tip locations in the trigeminal motor pool. Although probes were only placed in the left motor pool, we plotted probe locations in both left and right motor pools in this figure for the sake of visual clarity. c, EEG and EMG traces (top) and group data (bottom) showing that inserting a probe into the left trigeminal motor pool only increases left masseter muscle activity (left EMG), right masseter (right EMG) activity is unaffected. d, EEG and EMG traces (top) and group data (bottom) showing that AMPA perfusion at the left motor pool only increases left masseter muscle activity. *p < 0.05. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Drug manipulations do not affect REM-generating circuits. a, REM sleep paralysis is abolished by preventing GABA and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition of trigeminal motoneurons. EEG and EMG traces (i.e., masseter muscle) showing that blockade of GABAB/GABAA/glycine receptors on trigeminal motoneurons reversed and prevented masseter REM sleep paralysis. Neither REM sleep amounts (b) nor REM sleep EEG spectral power (c) were affected when ionotropic GABAA/glycine and metabotropic GABAB receptors were antagonized at the trigeminal motor pool. Perfusion of either 0.1 mm bicuculline/strychnine or 0.2 mm CGP52432 and 0.1 mm strychnine/bicuculline at the trigeminal nucleus had no affects on REM sleep amounts or EEG power, indicating that applied drugs did not spread to and influence REM-regulating circuits in the nearby sublaterodorsal nucleus. However, metabotropic GABAB and ionotropic GABAA/glycine receptor antagonism on trigeminal motoneurons had profound affects on masseter tone during REM sleep (a). All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    GABAB receptor activation on trigeminal motoneurons reduces masseter tone, but does not trigger muscle paralysis. a, EEG and EMG traces showing that GABAB receptor agonism by baclofen (0.5 mm) perfusion at the left trigeminal motor pool markedly reduces (compared with baseline) left masseter tone (left EMG) during waking. Right masseter muscle tone is unaffected. b, Group data (n = 5) showing that compared with baseline baclofen-induced activation of GABAB receptors on trigeminal motoneurons reduces waking masseter tone. However, this intervention does not reduce waking masseter tone to normal REM sleep levels. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    GABAB receptor antagonism on trigeminal motoneurons does not prevent REM paralysis. a, EEG and EMG traces showing that GABAB receptor blockade by CGP52432 perfusion (0.2 mm) at the trigeminal motor pool causes robust increases in masseter activity during both waking and NREM sleep, but it does not affect levels of masseter tone during REM sleep. b, Group data (n = 7) showing that CGP52432 perfusion (0.01–0.2 mm) heightens masseter EMG activity during waking and NREM sleep, but it does not prevent REM atonia. *p < 0.004. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Ionotropic GABAA/glycine receptor-mediated inhibition functions to suppress REM muscle twitches. a, EMG and EEG traces illustrating how masseter muscle twitches during REM sleep are affected by antagonism of GABAB (0.2 mm CGP52432), GABAA/glycine (0.1 mm bicuculline/strychnine) and GABAB/GABAA/glycine (0.2 mm CGP52432 and 0.1 mm bicuculline/strychnine) receptors at the trigeminal motor pool. b–d, Group data (n = 14) demonstrating how metabotropic, ionotropic, and combined metabotropic/ionotropic receptor blockade on trigeminal motoneurons affects the duration (b), frequency (c) and amplitude (d) of REM muscle twitches. *p < 0.05. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    GABAA and glycine receptor antagonism increases masseter tone during waking and NREM sleep, but it does not prevent REM atonia. a, An EMG and EEG trace showing the abrupt loss of masseter tone on entrance into REM despite continued antagonism of GABAA/glycine receptors. b, Group data (n = 14) showing that bicuculline and strychnine perfusion (0.1 mm for each) onto trigeminal motoneurons increases masseter EMG activity during both waking and NREM sleep. However, this same intervention has no affect on basal levels of muscle tone during REM sleep. *p < 0.001. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Activation of both metabotropic GABAB and ionotropic GABAA/glycine receptors is required for REM sleep paralysis. a, EMG and EEG traces illustrating that masseter REM atonia remains intact when only GABAA/glycine receptors are antagonized, but prevented and overridden when both GABAB and GABAA/glycine receptors are simultaneously antagonized on trigeminal motoneurons. b, Group data showing that bicuculline and strychnine (0.1 mm) applied onto trigeminal motoneurons during REM sleep cannot prevent REM inhibition (n = 12). However, blockade of both metabotropic GABAB and ionotropic GABAA/glycine receptors by perfusion of CGP52432 (0.2 mm), bicuculline and strychnine (0.1 mm) abolishes masseter REM atonia (n = 13). c, Antagonism of GABAB, GABAA and glycine receptors at the trigeminal motor pool elevates REM masseter tone to baseline NREM sleep levels. However, despite continued receptor antagonism REM masseter tone remains below normal (i.e., baseline) waking levels that occur immediately after REM episodes. This finding indicates that loss of motoneuron excitation helps to reinforce REM muscle paralysis. d, REM paralysis is still triggered even after antagonism of both GABAA/glycine receptors. This graph shows the normal drop in masseter tone when NREM sleep is exited and REM sleep is entered despite continued ionotropic receptor blockade. *p < 0.004. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Antagonism of GABAB, GABAA and glycine increases basal masseter tone during waking, NREM and REM sleep. a, An EMG and EEG trace showing that REM masseter atonia is not triggered on entrance into REM despite when both metabotropic and ionotropic receptors are antagonized. This is in marked contrast to the complete loss of masseter tone that occurs on entrance into REM sleep when only GABAA/glycine receptors are blocked. b, Group data (n = 13) showing that CGP52432 (0.2 mm) and bicuculline/strychnine perfusion (0.1 mm for each) at the trigeminal motor pool significantly increases basal levels of masseter EMG activity not only during waking and NREM sleep, but also during REM sleep. *p < 0.001. All values are mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    REM atonia is triggered by activation of both metabotropic GABAB and iontotropic GABAA/glycine receptors on trigeminal motoneurons. a, EMG and EEG traces showing that REM atonia is reversed when GABAB, GABAA and glycine receptors are antagonized at the trigeminal motor pool; however, atonia remains intact when only GABAA and glycine receptors are blocked. b, Group data showing that even high concentrations of bicuculline and strychnine (0.3 mm) applied onto trigeminal motoneurons during REM sleep cannot prevent REM inhibition (n = 12). However, blockade of both metabotropic GABAB and ionotropic GABAA/glycine receptors by microinjection of CGP52432 (0.6 mm), bicuculline and strychnine (0.2 mm) abolishes masseter REM atonia (n = 13). *p < 0.003. All values are mean ± SEM.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 32 (29)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 32, Issue 29
18 Jul 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of the Transmitter and Receptor Mechanisms Responsible for REM Sleep Paralysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of the Transmitter and Receptor Mechanisms Responsible for REM Sleep Paralysis
Patricia L. Brooks, John H. Peever
Journal of Neuroscience 18 July 2012, 32 (29) 9785-9795; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0482-12.2012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Identification of the Transmitter and Receptor Mechanisms Responsible for REM Sleep Paralysis
Patricia L. Brooks, John H. Peever
Journal of Neuroscience 18 July 2012, 32 (29) 9785-9795; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0482-12.2012
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.