Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Neurobiology of Disease

Role of Rhodopsin and Arrestin Phosphorylation in Retinal Degeneration of Drosophila

Inga Kristaponyte, Yuan Hong, Haiqin Lu and Bih-Hwa Shieh
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 2012, 32 (31) 10758-10766; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0565-12.2012
Inga Kristaponyte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuan Hong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haiqin Lu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bih-Hwa Shieh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Association and dissociation between Rh1 and modified Arr2 in vitro. 35S-Arr2 (wt) binding and release from membranes containing either activated (blue-light-treated, B) or inactivated Rh1 (orange-light-treated, O) were analyzed by SDS/PAGE followed by autoradiography (top). Modified Arr2s containing Asp substitution at residue 366 mimicking phosphorylated Ser (Arr2S366D, middle) or missing the C terminus (Arr21–356, bottom) display similar binding specificity toward activated Rh1 (lane 3), like wt Arr2. Moreover, dissociation of modified Arr2 from inactivated Rh1 (lane 2) is similar to that of wt Arr2. Binding assays were performed using membranes from arr21 that contain 10% of endogenous Arr2 and membranes from ninaEI17 were used for the negative control. A representative autoradiograph is shown.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Interaction between activated Rh1 and wt Arr2 or Arr2S366D in vivo. The interaction between activated Rh1 and Arr2 was investigated by fluorescence microscopy in live flies. A, The distribution of wt Arr2-eGFP is predominantly in the rhabdomere of R1–6 photoreceptors. B, The subcellular localization of Arr2S366D-eGFP is similar to that of wt Arr2-eGFP. C, The rhabdomeric distribution of wt Arr2-eGFP is greatly diminished in the ninaEI17 background lacking endogenous Rh1. D, In isolated ommatidia, wt Arr2-eGFP fusion proteins are highly concentrated in rhabdomeres, but display uniform distribution in the absence of Rh1 (ninaE) (E). F, The steady-state level of both Arr2-eGFP fusion proteins is ∼12.1 ± 3.3% (n = 3) of endogenous Arr2 by Western blotting. Three-day-old flies of various genotypes were used for the microscopic and Western analyses.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Progression of retinal degeneration in live retinas of norpAP24 photoreceptors. A, Degeneration was characterized by the age-dependent deterioration of rhabdomeres in R1–6 photoreceptors. Rhabdomeres are visualized by wt Arr2-eGFP that binds to activated Rh1. An almost complete loss of wt Arr2-eGFP is evident at 8–9 d posteclosion. Insets depict fdpp. B, Decline of the mean cross-sectional area of rhabdomeres was compared with the intensity of Arr2-eGFP-labeled rhabdomeres from multiple ommatidia (“fluorescent dpp,” see insets in A for depiction of dpp). The age-dependent reduction of dpp and rhabdomere exhibit a similar time course. Data were normalized to 2-d-old norpAP24 and represent means ± SEM (n = 4). C, The age-dependent decrease of the Rh1 level. Rh1, Arr2, and INAD were measured by Western blotting and expressed as a percentage of the 2-d-old flies of the same genotype. The Rh1 content was gradually diminished, while the Arr2 level remained constant in degenerating norpAP24 flies. The level of INAD, a membrane-associated cytosolic protein, served as a positive control. INAD remains constant but starts to decline only at the later stages of degeneration in norpA flies. Values represent means ± SEM (n = 4), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Suppression of CaMKII alone does not promote retinal degeneration. Morphology of rhabdomeres in ala1 flies overexpressing an inhibitory peptide for CaMKII was monitored by wt Arr2-eGFP for up to 4 weeks posteclosion. Ten-day-old wt control (A), 10-d-old ala1 (B), and 28-d-old ala1 (C). D, Comparison of rhabdomere area, intensity of fdpp, and the Rh1 level in ala1 flies. Data were normalized as a percentage of the 2-d-old flies of the same genotype and represent as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05. At 4 weeks posteclosion, ala1 flies displayed a significant reduction in both rhabdomere area and intensity of fluorescent dpp but not in the Rh1 level, when compared with 2-d-old ala1 flies. All flies tested were red eyed. In red-eyed background, the shape of rhabdomeres usually appears more elongated, when compared with that of white-eyed flies (see Fig. 2).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Arr2 binds to phosphorylation-deficient Rh1 in vitro and in vivo. A, Interaction between Arr2 and phosphorylation-deficient Rh1 in vitro by membrane binding assays. 35S-Arr2 binding to either Rh1Δ356 or Rh1CT S>A was similar to 35S-Arr2 binding to wt Rh1, whereas binding was greatly reduced when membranes prepared from ninaEI17 were used. A representative autoradiograph depicting the bound 35S-Arr2 is shown (top) and the results from three independent experiments are quantitated, normalized to binding to wt Rh1, and shown as means ± SEM in the histogram. *p < 0.05. B, The in vivo interaction between wt Arr2-eGFP and modified Rh1 lacking the C terminus, Rh1Δ356, or the putative phosphorylation sites, Rh1CT S>A (C), was examined by fluorescence microscopy in 5-d-old live flies. Shown is a representative image from each interaction.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Expression of phosphorylation-deficient Rh1 prevents degeneration of norpAP24 photoreceptors while co-expression greatly delays degeneration. Shown are retinal morphology monitored by wt Arr2-eGFP in norpAP24 flies expressing either Rh1Δ356 (A) or Rh1CT S>A (B) at 20 d posteclosion. Co-expression of Rh1CT S>A greatly delayed degeneration (C, at 21 d; D, at 28 d). Comparison of rhabdomere areas and intensities of fdpp (E) and Rh1 levels (F) of norpAP24 flies co-expressing wt and Rh1CT S>A. Data were normalized as a percentage of the 2-d-old flies of the same genotype and represent as mean ± SEM (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    A hypothetical mechanism of enhanced internalization and degradation of phosphorylated Rh1 leading to retinal degeneration of norpA photoreceptors. In norpA photoreceptors, the lack of Ca2+ influx renders Rh1 phosphatase RDGC inactive resulting in an increased level of phosphorylated and activated Rh1 (Rh1*). Phosphorylated Rh1 forms stable complexes with Arr2 that promotes the endocytosis of Rh1*. Following internalization, Rh1* may be ubiquitinated and subsequently is trafficked to lysosomes for degradation. A reduction of Rh1 that is critical for the maintenance and function of photoreceptors results in loss of rhabdomeres and eventually, degeneration of photoreceptors. Filled circles denote phosphorylation at the C terminus of Rh1, and filled triangles denote ubiquitination of Rh1.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 32 (31)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 32, Issue 31
1 Aug 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of Rhodopsin and Arrestin Phosphorylation in Retinal Degeneration of Drosophila
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Role of Rhodopsin and Arrestin Phosphorylation in Retinal Degeneration of Drosophila
Inga Kristaponyte, Yuan Hong, Haiqin Lu, Bih-Hwa Shieh
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 2012, 32 (31) 10758-10766; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0565-12.2012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Role of Rhodopsin and Arrestin Phosphorylation in Retinal Degeneration of Drosophila
Inga Kristaponyte, Yuan Hong, Haiqin Lu, Bih-Hwa Shieh
Journal of Neuroscience 1 August 2012, 32 (31) 10758-10766; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0565-12.2012
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Neurobiology of Disease

  • The psychedelic psilocin suppresses activity of central amygdala corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1 neurons and decreases ethanol drinking in female mice
  • Noninvasive Biomarkers for Assessing the Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance in Children with Epilepsy
  • Common Mechanism Underlying Synaptic Dysfunction Caused by Preformed Fibril-Induced Accumulation of α-Synuclein or Tau in a Culture Propagation Model
Show more Neurobiology of Disease
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.