Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Brief Communications

Earlier Speech Exposure Does Not Accelerate Speech Acquisition

Marcela Peña, Janet F. Werker and Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 2012, 32 (33) 11159-11163; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6516-11.2012
Marcela Peña
1Laboratorio de Neurociencias Cognitivas, Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago, Chile,
2Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste 34014, Italy,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet F. Werker
3Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
4INSERM, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit and
5CEA, NeuroSpin, IFR 49, F91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, and
6Université Paris XI, 91405 Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Duration of exposure to broadcast speech (gray symbols) and postterm maturational age (black symbols) for each participant in function of the groups. In full-term infants, age from birth (corresponding to the duration of exposure) and postterm maturational age overlap within ±15 d of variability. In contrast, in preterm infants, the age from birth and thus the exposure to broadcast speech is nearly 3 months greater than the age after term.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Mismatch responses to a change of syllable. B, Scalp topography of the values of Student's t test obtained by comparing the mean of deviant and standard trials of all participants, regardless of the group and condition (p < 0.05, two-tailed t test after false discovery rate correction, q < 0.05). A, C, Grand averages of the deviant and standard trials (in cyan and magenta lines, respectively) computed across all participants over the anterior and posterior clusters of electrodes. The electrodes of the anterior and posterior clusters correspond to the red circles in the red and blue areas of the scalp map, respectively. The x-axes indicate the onset of each of the four syllables presented in each trial. Dashed rectangles indicate the time window when deviant and standard trials were significantly different.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Voltage value of the mismatch response at the anterior positive cluster for native (dark gray line) and nonnative (light gray line) phonetic contrasts for each group. Vertical lines indicate the standard error. Asterisks indicate significant differences between native and nonnative contrasts within a group.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 32 (33)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 32, Issue 33
15 Aug 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Earlier Speech Exposure Does Not Accelerate Speech Acquisition
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Earlier Speech Exposure Does Not Accelerate Speech Acquisition
Marcela Peña, Janet F. Werker, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 2012, 32 (33) 11159-11163; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6516-11.2012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Earlier Speech Exposure Does Not Accelerate Speech Acquisition
Marcela Peña, Janet F. Werker, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 2012, 32 (33) 11159-11163; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6516-11.2012
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.