Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Cellular/Molecular

Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement

M. R. Hutchinson, A. L. Northcutt, T. Hiranita, X. Wang, S. S. Lewis, J. Thomas, K. van Steeg, T. A. Kopajtic, L. C. Loram, C. Sfregola, E. Galer, N. E. Miles, S. T. Bland, J. Amat, R. R. Rozeske, T. Maslanik, T. R. Chapman, K. A. Strand, M. Fleshner, R. K. Bachtell, A. A. Somogyi, H. Yin, J. L. Katz, K. C. Rice, S. F. Maier and L. R. Watkins
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 2012, 32 (33) 11187-11200; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0684-12.2012
M. R. Hutchinson
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
4Disciplines of Physiology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. L. Northcutt
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Hiranita
7Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Intramural Research Program, Biomedical Research Center MDRB, Baltimore, Maryland 21224,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Wang
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
3Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Neuroscience and the Biofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. S. Lewis
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Thomas
5Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. van Steeg
4Disciplines of Physiology and
6Division of Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3805 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. A. Kopajtic
7Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Intramural Research Program, Biomedical Research Center MDRB, Baltimore, Maryland 21224,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. C. Loram
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Sfregola
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Galer
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. E. Miles
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. T. Bland
8Department of Psychology, University of Colorado-Denver, Denver, Colorado 80217, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Amat
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. R. Rozeske
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Maslanik
2Integrative Physiology, Center for Neuroscience, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. R. Chapman
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. A. Strand
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Fleshner
2Integrative Physiology, Center for Neuroscience, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. K. Bachtell
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. A. Somogyi
5Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Yin
3Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Neuroscience and the Biofrontiers Institute, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. L. Katz
7Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Intramural Research Program, Biomedical Research Center MDRB, Baltimore, Maryland 21224,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. C. Rice
9Chemical Biology Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. F. Maier
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. R. Watkins
1Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Opioid action was thought to exert reinforcing effects solely via the initial agonism of opioid receptors. Here, we present evidence for an additional novel contributor to opioid reward: the innate immune pattern-recognition receptor, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), and its MyD88-dependent signaling. Blockade of TLR4/MD2 by administration of the nonopioid, unnatural isomer of naloxone, (+)-naloxone (rats), or two independent genetic knock-outs of MyD88-TLR4-dependent signaling (mice), suppressed opioid-induced conditioned place preference. (+)-Naloxone also reduced opioid (remifentanil) self-administration (rats), another commonly used behavioral measure of drug reward. Moreover, pharmacological blockade of morphine-TLR4/MD2 activity potently reduced morphine-induced elevations of extracellular dopamine in rat nucleus accumbens, a region critical for opioid reinforcement. Importantly, opioid-TLR4 actions are not a unidirectional influence on opioid pharmacodynamics, since TLR4−/− mice had reduced oxycodone-induced p38 and JNK phosphorylation, while displaying potentiated analgesia. Similar to our recent reports of morphine-TLR4/MD2 binding, here we provide a combination of in silico and biophysical data to support (+)-naloxone and remifentanil binding to TLR4/MD2. Collectively, these data indicate that the actions of opioids at classical opioid receptors, together with their newly identified TLR4/MD2 actions, affect the mesolimbic dopamine system that amplifies opioid-induced elevations in extracellular dopamine levels, therefore possibly explaining altered opioid reward behaviors. Thus, the discovery of TLR4/MD2 recognition of opioids as foreign xenobiotic substances adds to the existing hypothesized neuronal reinforcement mechanisms, identifies a new drug target in TLR4/MD2 for the treatment of addictions, and provides further evidence supporting a role for central proinflammatory immune signaling in drug reward.

View Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 32 (33)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 32, Issue 33
15 Aug 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement
M. R. Hutchinson, A. L. Northcutt, T. Hiranita, X. Wang, S. S. Lewis, J. Thomas, K. van Steeg, T. A. Kopajtic, L. C. Loram, C. Sfregola, E. Galer, N. E. Miles, S. T. Bland, J. Amat, R. R. Rozeske, T. Maslanik, T. R. Chapman, K. A. Strand, M. Fleshner, R. K. Bachtell, A. A. Somogyi, H. Yin, J. L. Katz, K. C. Rice, S. F. Maier, L. R. Watkins
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 2012, 32 (33) 11187-11200; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0684-12.2012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Opioid Activation of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Contributes to Drug Reinforcement
M. R. Hutchinson, A. L. Northcutt, T. Hiranita, X. Wang, S. S. Lewis, J. Thomas, K. van Steeg, T. A. Kopajtic, L. C. Loram, C. Sfregola, E. Galer, N. E. Miles, S. T. Bland, J. Amat, R. R. Rozeske, T. Maslanik, T. R. Chapman, K. A. Strand, M. Fleshner, R. K. Bachtell, A. A. Somogyi, H. Yin, J. L. Katz, K. C. Rice, S. F. Maier, L. R. Watkins
Journal of Neuroscience 15 August 2012, 32 (33) 11187-11200; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0684-12.2012
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

  • Immune-Brain Loop: Toll-Like 4 receptor and opiod-system communication route
    Roberto Lozano
    Published on: 04 September 2012
  • Published on: (4 September 2012)
    Page navigation anchor for Immune-Brain Loop: Toll-Like 4 receptor and opiod-system communication route
    Immune-Brain Loop: Toll-Like 4 receptor and opiod-system communication route
    • Roberto Lozano, Clincal Pharmacist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Reyes Marin, M-Jesus Santacruz

    Dear Editor,

    After having read this interesting article about TLR4-MyD88 dependent signaling and its role in the central proinflammatory immune response to drug reward, I would like to discuss the influence and role of proline-rich peptidic sequences, present in the adapter-accessory/scaffolding proteins at opioid and Toll-Like 4 receptor signaling complexes in inmuno-brain loop (particularly immune-opioid l...

    Show More

    Dear Editor,

    After having read this interesting article about TLR4-MyD88 dependent signaling and its role in the central proinflammatory immune response to drug reward, I would like to discuss the influence and role of proline-rich peptidic sequences, present in the adapter-accessory/scaffolding proteins at opioid and Toll-Like 4 receptor signaling complexes in inmuno-brain loop (particularly immune-opioid loop) communication.

    We know that mental illnesses induce alterations of immune function, and immune system disorders cause changes in behavior. For example, SSRI, SNRI and tricyclic antidepressants, acting on serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine receptors, have been shown to possess immunomodulatory and antinflammatory effects in processes governed by pro-inflammatory cytokines. We do not know the full extent of these interrelationships in normal and pathophysiological states, however.

    Moreover, as an integrated system, the immune system responds to a number of signals that originate in the neuroendocrine system, and the immunomodulatory potency of hormones and neuropeptides have been extensively described by several authors. These communication routes are characterized by common receptors for cytokines, hormones, and neuropeptides present on cells of both the immune and nervous systems.

    Given that opioid receptors are expressed in peripheral afferent nerves and the antibodies against membrane and intracellular autoantigens have been observed in healthy people(Mace et al., 2002), and that TLR4 receptors responding to specific ligands produce proinflammatory mediators and play a critical role in innate immunity and affect adaptive immunity, the endogenous opioid system constitutes a good model for study a neuroimmunologic relationship.

    Regarding this point, having evaluated the 100 SNPs most closely associated with disease in schizophrenic patients (Need, et al., 2009), we concluded that these polymorphisms affected proline-containing peptidic sequences present in different adapter-accessory/scaffolding protein isoforms of the neurological and immunological receptor signalling complexes(Lozano et al., 2012).

    Adapter-accessory/scaffolding proteins are important modulators of opioid receptor-agonist signaling, either by inhibiting OP-stimulated G protein activation or by associating with a signal transduction mechanism, in which proteins to OP-mediated stimulation of ERK/MAPK containing a SH3 domain that interacts with the proline-rich N-terminus of the scaffold protein RanBPM (Talbot et al., 2009). In signal transduction of TLR4, through a MyD88-dependent pathway, a proline-rich SH3-binding motif in TRAF6 interacts directly with activated SFKs to couple LPS engagement of TLR4 to SFK activation (Liu, et al., 2012). And finally, in MyD88-independent pathway, TICAM-1, an adapter molecule with a Pro- rich region and multiple potential isoform variants, mediates TLR4 signaling (Seya, et al., 2005).

    Therefore, it seems reasonable to ask first, do proline-rich regions and/or motifs present in adapter-Accessory/scaffolding proteins of the opioid and Toll-Like 4 receptor signalling complexes on neurological and immunological cells bind similar proteins and could be one of the links between the immune and opioid systems? And second, is the internalization of adapter-Accessory/scaffolding receptor proteins, with domains or that binding proline-rich motifs/ regions, associate with opioid and TLR4 receptor signalling complexes, a mechanism for the regulation of the abundance of these interacting proteins?

    References

    Mace G, Jaume M, Blanpied C, Stephan L, Coudert JD, Druet P and Dietrich G (2002) Anti-opioid-receptor IgG antibodies are commonly present in serum from healthy blood donors: evidence for a role in apoptotic immune cell death. Blood 100(9):3261-8.

    Need AC, Ge D, Weale ME, Maia J, Feng S, Heinzen EL, Shianna KV, Yoon W, Kasperavici?te D, Gennarelli M, Strittmatter WJ, Bonvicini C, Rossi G, Jayathilake K, Cola PA, McEvoy JP, Keefe RS, Fisher EM, St Jean PL, Giegling I, Hartmann AM, M?ller HJ, Ruppert A, Fraser G, Crombie C, Middleton LT, St Clair D, Roses AD, Muglia P, Francks C, Rujescu D, Meltzer HY, Goldstein D.B (2009) A genome-wide investigation of SNPs and CNVs in schizophrenia. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000373. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000373.

    Lozano R, Marin R, Freire I, Sebastian F, Santacruz MJ and Velilla A (2012) Schizophrenia: influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms on peptidic sequence. XXV Congress of Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology,(in press).

    Talbot JN, Skifter DA, Bianchi E, Monaghan DT, Toews ML, and Murrin LC (2009) Regulation of mu opioid receptor internalization by the scaffold protein RanBPM. Neurosci Lett. 466(3): 154-158. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.09.048.

    Liu A, Gong P, Hyun SW, Wang KZ, Cates EA, Perkins D, Bannerman DD, Puch? AC, Toshchakov VY, Fang S, Auron PE, Vogel SN and Goldblum SE (2012) TRAF6 protein couples Toll-like receptor 4 signaling to Src family kinase activation and opening of paracellular pathway in human lung microvascular endothelia.. J Biol Chem. 287(20):16132-45.

    Seya T, Oshiumi H, Sasai M, Akazawa T and Matsumoto M (2005) TICAM-1 and TICAM-2: toll-like receptor adapters that participate in induction of type 1 interferons. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 37(3):524-9.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Depolarizing NaV and hyperpolarizing KV channels are co-trafficked in sensory neurons
  • Dendritic inhibition by Shh signaling-dependent stellate cell pool is critical for motor learning
  • Human APOER2 Isoforms Have Differential Cleavage Events and Synaptic Properties
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.