Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

In for a Penny, in for a Pound: Methylphenidate Reduces the Inhibitory Effect of High Stakes on Persistent Risky Choice

Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn, Arndis Simonsen, Jørgen Scheel-Krüger, Victoria Wohlert, Trine Gjerløff, Chris D. Frith, Robert D. Rogers, Andreas Roepstorff and Arne Møller
Journal of Neuroscience 19 September 2012, 32 (38) 13032-13038; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0151-12.2012
Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
2Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York 10003,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arndis Simonsen
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jørgen Scheel-Krüger
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victoria Wohlert
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trine Gjerløff
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris D. Frith
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
3Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom,
4All Souls College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4AL, United Kingdom,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert D. Rogers
5Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Roepstorff
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
6Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arne Møller
1Centre of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The options for each choice—Play or Quit—appeared randomly on the left and right side of the computer display during the decision phase. Each round began with a loss (also the stake) displayed for 3 s. This was followed by a choice to accept that loss (Quit) and end the round or to risk the value of the loss (Play) to try and recover it. Subjects responded by pressing keys on a mouse corresponding to the side of their desired choice. Choices were randomly assigned to sides of the display from round to round. Outcome displays (2 s) indicated whether subjects had won a gamble and that no money was lost (Play & Win); whether they had lost a gamble and the amount lost (Play & Lose); or the amount lost from assets if subjects chose to give up (Quit). If the loss reached 6400 kr, the round automatically ended with no chance of recovery (Play & Lose Max). At the end of each round, subjects were informed of the amount that would be taken off their final total as a result of that round. There was no time limit for making a decision. The dotted line indicates the subject's choice but was not displayed to subjects. Words were translated to Danish. Displays were presented to subjects in color with losses, negative outcomes, and Quit displays indicated in red font. Positive outcomes were indicated in green.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Interaction of drug and stake on risky persistence. Probability of decision to accept a double-or-nothing gamble across various magnitudes of stake. Gambling probability was reduced with increasing stakes in the placebo group but not the MPH group (see Table 2). This led to a significant difference of gambling probability at high stakes (1600 kr). Error bars are ±1 SE (between subjects). *p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    General persistence measures

    MeasureDrug group
    PlaceboMPH
    MeanSDMeanSD
    Plays: all choices0.690.140.730.12
    Switches from previous: all choices0.440.160.400.14
    Mean stake Play: mean overall stake0.870.221.030.15
    Mean stake Quit: mean overall stake1.120.410.930.41
    Deliberation time, Play (ms)10452961329549
    Deliberation time, Quit (ms)11964141434500
    Money lost (kr)47,03116,98858,84317,239
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Effects of stake and drug on choice

    βSEZp > zSDRE
    Stake × drug
        Intercept1.13150.16586.8260.000.92
        Stake (100 kr units)−0.45950.2609−1.7610.081.41
        Drug: MPH (1) /placebo (−1)0.13870.16580.8370.40
    Drug × stake0.6330.26092.4260.015*
        MPH
            Intercept)1.240.177.290.00*0.59
            Stake0.160.380.430.661.40
        Placebo
            Intercept0.960.313.040.002*1.34
            Stake−1.140.44−2.590.009*1.78
    • ↵*p < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Effects of game losses and drug on choice

    βSEZp > zSDRE
    Game losses × drug group
        Intercept0.960.127.80.000.75
        Game losses (1000 kr units)−0.010.00−2.40.02*0.00
        Drug: MPH (1)/placebo (−1)0.110.120.860.39
    Game losses × drug0.010.002.180.03*
        MPH
            Intercept1.080.157.010.000.55
            Game losses0.000.000.011.000.00
        Placebo
            Intercept0.840.204.245.060.81
            Game losses−0.0140.004−3.380.00*0.00
    • ↵*p < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Effect of stake and reward responsiveness on choice

    βSEzp > zSDRE
    BASR × stake
        Intercept1.120.166.8900.95
        Stake (100 kr units)−0.530.25−2.090.04*1.45
        BAS-R0.070.110.730.47
    BASR × stake0.480.172.850.004*
    • ↵*p < 0.05.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 32 (38)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 32, Issue 38
19 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In for a Penny, in for a Pound: Methylphenidate Reduces the Inhibitory Effect of High Stakes on Persistent Risky Choice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
In for a Penny, in for a Pound: Methylphenidate Reduces the Inhibitory Effect of High Stakes on Persistent Risky Choice
Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn, Arndis Simonsen, Jørgen Scheel-Krüger, Victoria Wohlert, Trine Gjerløff, Chris D. Frith, Robert D. Rogers, Andreas Roepstorff, Arne Møller
Journal of Neuroscience 19 September 2012, 32 (38) 13032-13038; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0151-12.2012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
In for a Penny, in for a Pound: Methylphenidate Reduces the Inhibitory Effect of High Stakes on Persistent Risky Choice
Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn, Arndis Simonsen, Jørgen Scheel-Krüger, Victoria Wohlert, Trine Gjerløff, Chris D. Frith, Robert D. Rogers, Andreas Roepstorff, Arne Møller
Journal of Neuroscience 19 September 2012, 32 (38) 13032-13038; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0151-12.2012
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Choice Behavior Guided by Learned, But Not Innate, Taste Aversion Recruits the Orbitofrontal Cortex
  • Maturation of Spontaneous Firing Properties after Hearing Onset in Rat Auditory Nerve Fibers: Spontaneous Rates, Refractoriness, and Interfiber Correlations
  • Insulin Treatment Prevents Neuroinflammation and Neuronal Injury with Restored Neurobehavioral Function in Models of HIV/AIDS Neurodegeneration
Show more Articles

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation
  • Identification and Characterization of a Sleep-Active Cell Group in the Rostral Medullary Brainstem
  • Gravin Orchestrates Protein Kinase A and β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Critical for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Show more Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.