Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Load-independent connectivity maps, separately for each condition and for the contrast antagonist > placebo. Bar graphs show average connectivity with right DLPFC (mean Z score with SE) for all frontal ROIs where a significant difference in connectivity between conditions was found.
- Figure 2.
Contrast map for the comparison of load-dependent PPI connectivity maps between antagonist and placebo conditions. Bar graphs show average connectivity of right DLPFC (mean Z score and SE) for frontal and parietal ROIs. Negative effects in blue (antagonist < placebo) reflect reduced connectivity for the high-load compared with the low-load condition under the antagonist, whereas positive effects (antagonist > placebo) reflect stronger connectivity during the high-load condition compared with the low-load condition under the antagonist.
- Figure 3.
Correlations between the effect of the antagonist on functional connectivity and performance. x-axes denote differences in accuracy between conditions (antagonist − placebo), averaged across load to the left and for high-load trials only to the right. y-axes denote differences in functional connectivity estimates (Z scores) of right DLPFC to left DLPFC (top) and ventromedial PFC (bottom) between antagonist and placebo conditions.
