Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleBrief Communications

Histone Deacetylase 2 Cell Autonomously Suppresses Excitatory and Enhances Inhibitory Synaptic Function in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons

Jesse E. Hanson, Lunbin Deng, David H. Hackos, Shih-Ching Lo, Benjamin E. Lauffer, Pascal Steiner and Qiang Zhou
Journal of Neuroscience 3 April 2013, 33 (14) 5924-5929; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3162-12.2013
Jesse E. Hanson
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lunbin Deng
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David H. Hackos
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shih-Ching Lo
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin E. Lauffer
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pascal Steiner
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiang Zhou
Department of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    HDAC2 suppresses excitatory transmission. A, Western blots of lysates from HEK293 cells expressing HDAC2 probed with anti-FLAG to assess HDAC2 expression or anti-β-actin as a loading control. Examples of KD with the four different HDAC2 shRNA or HDAC1 shRNA sequences are shown, as well as samples lacking HDAC2 (GFP) or with scrambled shRNA as a control. B, Quantification of KD of HDAC2 protein by the four HDAC2 shRNAs (n = 5). C, Western blot analysis of HDAC1 KD with examples of KD using four different HDAC1 shRNA or HDAC2 shRNA sequences and samples lacking HDAC1 (GFP) or with scrambled shRNA as a control. D, Quantification of KD of HDAC1 protein by the four HDAC1 shRNAs (n = 5). E, HDAC2 KD increased mEPSC amplitude compared with neighboring untransfected CA1 neurons, seen as a rightward shift of the cumulative amplitude distribution and a significantly increased mean mEPSC amplitude (p < 0.05, n = 9 and 12). F, HDAC2 KD did not significantly alter mEPSC frequency (n = 9 and 12). G, HDAC1 KD did not significantly alter mEPSC amplitude (n = 10 and 12). H, HDAC1 KD did not significantly alter mEPSC frequency (n = 10 and 12). I, HDAC2 OE reduced mEPSC amplitude compared with neighboring untransfected CA1 neurons (p < 0.05, n = 14 and 14). J, HDAC2 OE did not significantly alter mEPSC frequency (n = 14 and 14). K, GFP expression alone did not significantly alter mEPSC amplitude (n = 12 and 11). L, GFP expression alone did not significantly alter mEPSC frequency (n = 12 and 11). All data are plotted as mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    HDAC2 KD lowers the threshold for synaptic potentiation without affecting synaptic depression. A, Using a subthreshold induction protocol, no LTP was observed in neurons transfected with HDAC1 shRNA (104 ± 2%, n = 8), whereas neurons transfected with HDAC2 shRNA exhibited robust LTP (155 ± 2%, n = 12). Example EPSC traces before and after induction are shown inset. B, Neurons transfected with HDAC1 shRNA or HDAC2 shRNA were equally capable of expressing robust LTD (HDAC1, 63 ± 1%, n = 6; HDAC2, 64 ± 2%, n = 10). Calibration: 50 pA, 20 ms. All data are plotted as mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    HDAC2 enhances inhibitory synaptic transmission. A, HDAC2 KD reduced mIPSC amplitude compared with neighboring untransfected CA1 neurons (*p < 0.05, n = 12 and 15). B, HDAC2 KD significantly decreased mean mIPSC frequency (*p < 0.05, n = 12 and 15). C, HDAC1 KD did not significantly alter mIPSC amplitude (n = 8 and 7). D, HDAC1 KD did not significantly alter mIPSC frequency (n = 8 and 7). E, HDAC2 OE enhanced mIPSC amplitude compared with neighboring untransfected CA1 neurons (*p < 0.05, n = 12 and 12). F, HDAC2 OE did not significantly alter mean mIPSC frequency (p < 0.05, n = 12 and 12). G, GFP expression alone did not significantly alter mIPSC amplitude (n = 15 and 12). H, GFP expression alone did not significantly alter mIPSC frequency (n = 15 and 12). I, Transfection of neuronal cultures using virus expressing HDAC2 shRNA resulted in a significant reduction in HDAC2 (**p < 0.01, n = 3) but not HDAC1 (p > 0.05, n = 3) protein levels. J, Viral HDAC2 KD reduced mIPSC amplitude compared with cultures transfected with the control virus (*p < 0.05, n = 10 and 7). K, Viral HDAC2 KD did not significantly alter mIPSC frequency (n = 7 and 10). L, HDAC2 KD did not significantly alter tonic GABAAR current (n = 6 and 7). Calibration: 50 pA, 10 s. All data are plotted as mean ± SEM. BIC, Bicuculline.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    HDAC2 regulates synaptic abundance of GABAARs. A, Viral-mediated HDAC2 shRNA expression in primary neuronal cultures resulted in a strong reduction of HDAC2 but not HDAC1 mRNA levels (p < 0.001, n = 3). HDAC2 KD also resulted in a significant decrease in the GABAAR γ2 subunit mRNA levels (p < 0.01, n = 3) but not the GABAAR α1, α2, β2, or δ subunits, GABAAR AP (adaptor protein), BIG2 (brefeldin A-inhibited GDP/GTP exchange factor 2), or Gephyrin. B, HDAC2 KD resulted in reduced total and surface expression of the γ2 subunit (p < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively) and reduced surface expression of the α2 subunit (p < 0.05) but not the total α2 subunit expression or total or surface expression of the α1 subunit (n = 3–4). C, Broad HDAC2 KD using viral transfection reduced the abundance of synaptic GABAAR α2 subunit labeling (green, GABAAR α2; red, vGAT). The total fluorescence intensity of α2 subunit puncta that were colocalized with vGAT staining was significantly reduced (p < 0.05, n = 3), whereas the density of α2 puncta and the intensity and density of vGAT staining were not significantly altered. D, Sparse HDAC2 KD significantly reduced the intensity of synaptic α2 subunit staining in transfected neurons identified by GFP expression (p < 0.05, n = 3), whereas the intensity of vGAT staining was not significantly altered. The density of α2 subunit and vGAT puncta were significantly reduced at 4 d but not 2 d after transfection (p < 0.01, n = 3). E, Sparse HDAC2 OE resulted in significantly increased intensity of synaptic α2 subunit but not vGAT staining (p < 0.05 n = 3). The density of α2 subunit but not vGAT puncta was significantly increased (p < 0.01 n = 3). Scale bars, 10 μm. All data are plotted as mean ± SEM. Con, Control. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 14
3 Apr 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Histone Deacetylase 2 Cell Autonomously Suppresses Excitatory and Enhances Inhibitory Synaptic Function in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Histone Deacetylase 2 Cell Autonomously Suppresses Excitatory and Enhances Inhibitory Synaptic Function in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
Jesse E. Hanson, Lunbin Deng, David H. Hackos, Shih-Ching Lo, Benjamin E. Lauffer, Pascal Steiner, Qiang Zhou
Journal of Neuroscience 3 April 2013, 33 (14) 5924-5929; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3162-12.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Histone Deacetylase 2 Cell Autonomously Suppresses Excitatory and Enhances Inhibitory Synaptic Function in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
Jesse E. Hanson, Lunbin Deng, David H. Hackos, Shih-Ching Lo, Benjamin E. Lauffer, Pascal Steiner, Qiang Zhou
Journal of Neuroscience 3 April 2013, 33 (14) 5924-5929; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3162-12.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning
  • Pharmacologically Counteracting a Phenotypic Difference in Cerebellar GABAA Receptor Response to Alcohol Prevents Excessive Alcohol Consumption in a High Alcohol-Consuming Rodent Genotype
  • Neuromuscular NMDA Receptors Modulate Developmental Synapse Elimination
Show more Brief Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.