Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 3 April 2013, 33 (14) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Histone Deacetylase Can Enhance Inhibitory Transmission

Jesse E. Hanson, Lunbin Deng, David H. Hackos, Shih-Ching Lo, Benjamin E. Lauffer, et al.

(see pages 5924–5929)

Transcription factors bind to regulatory elements in DNA and activate or suppress gene transcription. DNA is tightly wound around histone proteins, however, and before transcriptional regulators can bind, histones must loosen their grip. This is achieved by acetylation, which is mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and reversed by histone deacetylases (HDACs). Both HATs and HDACs have roles in neuronal plasticity; HDAC2, for example, appears to limit memory formation, because exogenous HDAC inhibitors enhance memory formation in mice. Furthermore, overexpression of HDAC2 reduces dendritic spine density, synapse number, and synaptic plasticity, whereas HDAC2 knock-out increases excitatory synapse number and facilitates long-term potentiation (LTP). Hanson et al. now show that HDAC2 regulates inhibitory, as well as excitatory synaptic transmission. Overexpressing HDAC2 in a subset of rat hippocampal neurons reduced the amplitude of miniature (m) EPSCs and increased the amplitude of mIPSCs. HDAC2 knockdown had the opposite effects. The reduction in mIPSC amplitude appeared to result in part from reduced synaptic targeting of GABAA receptors.

Embedded Image Systems/Circuits

Morphine Has Opposite Effects on Spinal Pain and Itch Neurons

Hannah R. Moser and Glenn J. Giesler, Jr.

(see pages 6093–6101)

Itch and pain pathways have much in common: both are unpleasant; both are sensed by TRPV1-expressing C-fibers; and itch-responsive spinal cord neurons also respond to stimuli that activate nociceptors. Interestingly, itch and pain seem antagonistic: scratching relieves itch, but activates pain pathways; and morphine suppresses pain, but can produce itch. To investigate how pain and itch are distinguished, Moser and Giesler first identified dorsal horn neurons that responded to noxious mechanical stimuli and then tested their responses to pruritic agents. Pruriceptive (itch-sensitive) neurons were indistinguishable from itch-insensitive nociceptive neurons in their somata position, terminal projection region in the thalamus, and responses to mechanical stimuli. But whereas intrathecal morphine application suppressed responses of itch-insensitive nociceptive neurons to skin pinches, it did not affect pruriceptive neurons' responses to pinching, and it significantly increased pruriceptive neurons' responses to intradermal application of pruritic agents and to innocuous brushing. Whether morphine increased firing of pruriceptive neurons by directly exciting the neurons or by suppressing inhibitory inputs remains unknown, however.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Cognitive

CRF and NPY Have Opposing Roles in Pain-Induced Aversion

Soichiro Ide, Taiki Hara, Atsushi Ohno, Ryuta Tamano, Kana Koseki, et al.

(see pages 5881–5894)

Nociceptor activation produces not only pain sensation, but also unpleasant affective experiences that lead to subsequent avoidance of the pain-inducing stimulus. For example, injection of formalin into rodents' paws induces nocifensive behaviors (e.g., licking) and subsequent avoidance of the chamber where the injection was received (i.e., conditioned place aversion; CPA). CPA requires the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), a part of the extended amygdala in which the neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is involved in inducing, and neuropeptide Y (NPY) is involved in reducing negative affective states. Injection of CRF into the BNST induces CPA, and Ide et al. now show that intraplantar injection of formalin caused a transient increase in BNST CRF. Injection of CRF antagonists or NPY into BNST reduced formalin-induced CPA without affecting nociceptive behaviors. The effects of CRF and NPY on CPA appeared to result from opposing effects on the same BNST neurons: CRF depolarized and increased spiking of type II neurons, whereas NPY hyperpolarized the neurons and reduced spiking.

Embedded Image Neurobiology of Disease

PERK Protects Oligodendrocytes from Autoimmune Attack

Wensheng Lin, Yifeng Lin, Jin Li, Ali G. Fenstermaker, Sharon W. Way, et al.

(see pages 5980–5991)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease in which immune cells attack oligodendrocytes, causing apoptosis, demyelination, and ultimately, axonal degeneration. Preventing oligodendrocyte apoptosis might slow or stop the progress of MS. In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of MS, the inflammatory cytokine interferon-γ protected oligodendrocytes via activation of pancreatic endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK); but whether PERK was activated in oligodendrocytes or other cell types, e.g., microglia, was unresolved. Therefore, Lin et al. generated mice in which PERK could be activated selectively in mature oligodendrocytes in vivo. PERK activation had no apparent effects on oligodendrocytes or myelin in healthy adults, but injecting PERK after EAE induction reduced demyelination, oligodendrocyte apoptosis, and axonal degeneration in the spinal cord, and it prevented limb paralysis. The treatment used to activate PERK in oligodendrocytes did not appear to affect inflammatory responses in the periphery or in the spinal cord, further indicating that PERK activation in oligodendrocytes was responsible for the protective effects.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Neurofilament staining (red) shows that activation of PERK selectively in oligodendrocytes (right) reduces spinal axon degeneration after EAE (left, control). See the article by Lin et al. for details.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (14)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 14
3 Apr 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 3 April 2013, 33 (14) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 3 April 2013, 33 (14) i
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Systems/Circuits
    • Behavioral/Cognitive
    • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.