Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Articles, Development/Plasticity/Repair

PIP3 Regulates Spinule Formation in Dendritic Spines during Structural Long-Term Potentiation

Yoshibumi Ueda and Yasunori Hayashi
Journal of Neuroscience 3 July 2013, 33 (27) 11040-11047; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3122-12.2013
Yoshibumi Ueda
1Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
2RIKEN-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasunori Hayashi
1Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
2RIKEN-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, and
3Saitama University Brain Science Institute, Saitama University, Saitama 338-8570, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effect of PIP3 levels on spinule formation in spines induced by sLTP. A–C, The effect of PIP3 levels on spinule formation during sLTP using glutamate uncaging (Ctrl 0.4% DMSO; A), a PTEN inhibitor–1 μm BpV(HOpic; B), and a PI3K inhibitor, 30 μm LY294002 (C). Each drug was added over 30 min before induction of sLTP. Red spots on baseline images indicate the points that were subjected to glutamate uncaging. Spinules are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 1 μm. D, Time course of the enlargement of GFP-expressing spines following the induction of sLTP. The red bar indicates the time period of glutamate uncaging. First and second black bars indicate early (0–7 min) and (10–30 min) late phases, respectively. E, Time course of the formation of spinule-positive spines; n = the number of spines subjected to glutamate uncaging. F, The occurrence of spinule-positive spines in early and late phases in the presence of each drug. Asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) from the value in the spine that was subjected to sLTP. G, H, The effect of PH domain on spinule formation. mCherry-PH and mCherry-PH (R284C) were overexpressed with mEGFP as a volume marker.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Characterization of FLIMPA3 in living cells. A, Principle of FLIMPA3 for visualizing PIP3. PIP3 production induces a conformational change in FLIMPA3 through the binding of the PH domain to PIP3, leading to an increase in FRET and a decrease in fluorescence lifetime. B, Fluorescence lifetime image of FLIMPA3 in PDGFR-expressed CHO cells. A color gradient was used to represent PIP3 levels, with a warmer color indicating a shorter fluorescence lifetime and higher PIP3 levels. The images before (0 min), and 5.5, 10.5, 15.5, and 20. 5 min after addition of 50 ng/ml PDGF were shown. Scale bar, 1 μm. C, Time course of the fluorescence lifetime change of FLIMPA3 in CHO cells after the addition of HBSS, or 50 ng/ml PDGF with or without pre-incubation with 100 μm LY294002. D, Time course analysis of the fluorescence lifetime change of FLIMPA3 mutant in CHO cells after administration of HBSS or 50 ng/ml PDGF. E, F, Effect of FLIMPA3 on PIP3 signaling assessed by PDGF-induced Akt phosphorylation. Akt phosphorylation at serine residue 473 was detected with Alexa 555-conjugated anti-phospho 473 antibody. Bottom, Indicates immunostaining signal taken from white lines in top.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    PIP3 accumulation in spines at static state. A, Fluorescence lifetime imaging of FLIMPA3 and FLIMPA3 mutant (R284CK343A), where PIP3 binding was abolished. A color gradient was used to represent PIP3 levels with a warmer color indicating a shorter fluorescence lifetime and higher PIP3 levels. Scale bar, 1 μm. B, Asterisk denotes a statistically significant difference between the fluorescence lifetime of spines and dendritic shafts of FLIMPA3 (p < 0.05); n means the number of spines. The number of neurons observed is 25 and 12 in FLIMPA3 and FLIMPA3 mutant, respectively. C, D, Fluorescence lifetime imaging of PIP3 after addition of PTEN inhibitor, BpV(HOpic), and PI3K inhibitor, LY294002. Drugs were administered during the period indicated by the red line. Scale bar, 1 μm. E–H, Time course of the fluorescence lifetime change of FLIMPA3 in spines and dendritic shafts after addition of 1 μm BpV(HOpic), 30 μm LY294002, 0.4% DMSO (Ctrl), or 1 μm BpV(HOpic) and 30 μm LY294002. I, The fluorescence lifetime change averaged >40–60 min. N.S., Not significant. Asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). J, Time course of the change in spine size based on FLIMPA3 intensity after the addition of each inhibitor.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Spatiotemporal dynamics of PIP3 in spines subjected to sLTP. A, Fluorescence lifetime imaging of FLIMPA3 during sLTP of a single spine induced by two-photon glutamate uncaging. The red spot in the −2 min image indicates the location of the uncaging laser point. White scale bar, 1 μm. The red line indicates the time period of glutamate uncaging. B, Time course of fluorescence lifetime change of FLIMPA3 in a spine subjected to glutamate uncaging, a neighboring spine (within 5 μm of the stimulated spine), and a region of the dendritic shaft next to the stimulated spine. The time course of FLIMPA3 mutant was also shown; n indicates the number of spines. The red line indicates the time of glutamate uncaging. Time course of FLIMPA3 intensity change in spines is shown on the right y-axis. C, Relationship between PIP3 concentration at the 2 min time point (y-axis) and basal PIP3 enrichment at basal state. The linear regression line is shown.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Subspine PIP3 imaging following sLTP stimulation. A–C, Subspine distribution of PIP3 by fluorescence lifetime imaging during sLTP (Ctrl 0.4% DMSO (A), 1 μm BpV(HOpic) (B), and 30 μm LY294002 (C), each drug was added >30 min before glutamate uncaging). Red spots on baseline images show the points that were subjected to glutamate uncaging. Arrows show PIP3 accumulation in spinules. Scale bar, 1 μm. D, Time course of PIP3 change in spinules; n = number of spines. The red bar indicates the time period of glutamate uncaging. In the case of LY294002, 7–10, 15–20, and 25–30 min, were averaged out due to the smaller dataset. E, Comparison between fluorescence lifetime change in FLIMPA3 (black line) and spinule length (red line) after sLTP in spines pre-incubated with BpV(HOpic). F, Fluorescence lifetime of spinules and spines that exhibit spinules during sLTP was averaged during the early phase and the late phase. Asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (27)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 27
3 Jul 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PIP3 Regulates Spinule Formation in Dendritic Spines during Structural Long-Term Potentiation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
PIP3 Regulates Spinule Formation in Dendritic Spines during Structural Long-Term Potentiation
Yoshibumi Ueda, Yasunori Hayashi
Journal of Neuroscience 3 July 2013, 33 (27) 11040-11047; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3122-12.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
PIP3 Regulates Spinule Formation in Dendritic Spines during Structural Long-Term Potentiation
Yoshibumi Ueda, Yasunori Hayashi
Journal of Neuroscience 3 July 2013, 33 (27) 11040-11047; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3122-12.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Development/Plasticity/Repair

  • Reduced Post-Activation Depression in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury is not related to Stretch Reflex Hyperexcitability
  • Dysfunction of Unc119, a Transducin-Binding Protein, Leads to Cone–Rod Dystrophy through Activating JAK-Stat and NF-κB Inflammatory Pathways in the Mouse Retina
  • Distinct Ultrastructural Properties and Plasticity of Synapses Formed by Adult-Born and Early-Born Interneurons in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb
Show more Development/Plasticity/Repair
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.