Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
Featured ArticleArticles, Cellular/Molecular

Goofy Coordinates the Acuity of Olfactory Signaling

Tomomi Kaneko-Goto, Yuki Sato, Sayako Katada, Emi Kinameri, Sei-ichi Yoshihara, Atsushi Nishiyori, Mitsuhiro Kimura, Hiroko Fujita, Kazushige Touhara, Randall R. Reed and Yoshihiro Yoshihara
Journal of Neuroscience 7 August 2013, 33 (32) 12987-12996; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4948-12.2013
Tomomi Kaneko-Goto
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuki Sato
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sayako Katada
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
2Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emi Kinameri
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sei-ichi Yoshihara
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atsushi Nishiyori
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuhiro Kimura
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroko Fujita
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazushige Touhara
2Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan,
3ERATO Touhara Chemosensory Signal Project, JST, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Randall R. Reed
4Center for Sensory Biology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshihiro Yoshihara
1RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,
3ERATO Touhara Chemosensory Signal Project, JST, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Discovery of Goofy (#123) by signal sequence trap screening. A, Strategy of the signal sequence trap screening for identification of novel transmembrane and secreted molecules expressed in the OE. B, A summary table for individual 49 cDNA clones obtained by the signal sequence trap screening. C, mRNA expression patterns of six novel genes in P3 OE coronal sections assessed by in situ hybridization analysis. The clone #123 (Goofy) is abundantly and specifically expressed in the OE. NG, Nasal gland. Scale bar: C, 500 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Structure of Goofy protein. A, Hydrophobicity plot of mouse Goofy protein. Two highly hydrophobic regions are present: one at the N terminus and the other around amino acid number 400, which potentially serve as a signal peptide (SP) and a transmembrane segment (TM), respectively. B, Amino acid sequence of mouse Goofy protein. Red underline, Signal peptide; blue underline, transmembrane segment; green double underline, canonical SH3-binding motif; black triangles, potential Asn-linked glycosylation sites. Ser, Thr, and Pro residues are highlighted in blue, green, and red letters, respectively. C, A schematic diagram depicting the domain structure of Goofy protein. Goofy consists of an N-terminal signal peptide (SP, red), a Ser/Thr/Pro-rich extracellular region (yellow) with three potential glycosylation sites (black triangles), a transmembrane segment (TM, blue), and a Pro-rich cytoplasmic region (green).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expression of Goofy mRNA. A, Tissue distribution of Goofy mRNA in adult mouse assessed by Northern blot analysis. Top, Autoradiogram of a blot probed with 32P-labeled Goofy cDNA. Bottom, Same blot stained with methylene blue. Goofy mRNA is specifically expressed in the olfactory epithelium. B–K, Ontogenic expression of Goofy and OMP mRNAs assessed by in situ hybridization analysis. Coronal sections containing the OE and VNO from E13 (B, G), E15 (C, H), P0 (D, I), and P14 (E, F, J, K) mice were hybridized with 35S-labeled Goofy (B–F) and OMP (G–K) cRNA probes. In both OE and VNO, the expression of Goofy mRNA precedes that of OMP mRNA. Scale bar: B–K, 500 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Promoter analysis of Goofy gene. A, Organization of mouse Goofy gene (top). Exons are indicated by boxes with numbers: light blue boxes indicate the open reading frame, and white boxes represent 5′-nontranslated and 3′-nontranslated regions. Red asterisks denote canonical Olf-1-binding sites. Transgene construct (bottom). The Goofy gene's 5′-flanking region (3 kb) was fused to rabbit β-globin intron (gray bar), membrane-targeted Venus cDNA [gapVenus (gV)], and polyadenylation (pA) signals. B, C, Whole-mount fluorescence views of Goofy-gV transgenic mouse at E15.5. Intense gapVenus fluorescence is specifically observed in the olfactory axons projecting from OE to OB even from the outside of embryo. A merged view of fluorescence and visible light is shown in C. D–G, Whole-mount fluorescence views of OE, VNO, OB (D, E), and brain (F, G) from adult Goofy-gV transgenic mouse. Specific and intense fluorescence of gapVenus is detected in the olfactory and vomeronasal axons in all the transgenic mice examined (n = 5). Merged views of fluorescence and visible light are shown in E and G. Cx, Cerebral neocortex; Cb, cerebellum. Scale bars: B, C, 1 mm; D–G, 2 mm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Localization of Goofy protein. A–F, Double immunofluorescence labeling of a coronal section of P3 mouse head with anti-Goofy (A, C, D, F) and anti-OMP (B, C, E, F) antibodies. D–F, Higher magnification of OE. C, F, Merged images showing Goofy (red), OMP (green), and DAPI (blue). G–R, Double fluorescence labeling of adult OE sections with various organelle markers (green) and anti-Goofy antibody (M–R, magenta). The organelle markers include anti-BiP (G, M, endoplasmic reticulum;), anti-GM130 (H, N, cis-Golgi), WGA (I, O, trans-Golgi), anti-EEA1 (J, P, early endosome), anti-Lamp-1 (K, Q, lysosome), and anti-Mcl-1 (L, R, mitochondria). Goofy is predominantly localized to cis-Golgi and trans-Golgi apparatus (N, O). Reproducibility of the result was confirmed for individual markers in at least three experiments. Scale bars: A–C, 500 μm; D–F, 100 μm; G–R, 20 μm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Generation of Goofy-deficient mice. A, Gene targeting strategy to generate Goofy-deficient mice. A pgk-neo selection marker was inserted into the Goofy gene. DTA, Diphtheria toxin A subunit. B, PCR genotyping of wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/−), and homozygous (−/−) mice. C, Immunoblot analysis of Goofy protein. Goofy protein is absent in OE homogenates from mutant mice. D–I, Nissl-stained sections of OE (D, E, G, H) and OB (F, I) from wild-type (D–F) and Goofy-deficient (G–I) mice. No obvious difference in gross anatomy is observed at both low (D, F, G, I) and high (E, H) magnifications. J–Y, Immunofluorescence labeling of OB sections from wild-type (J–Q) and Goofy-deficient (R–Y) mice with antibodies against NCAM (J, R), OCAM (K, S), NQO1 (L, T), neuropilin-1 (M, U), neuropilin-2 (N, V), BIG-2 (O, W), Olfr73 (P, X), and Olfr1507 (Q, Y). No difference is observed in the expression of cell adhesion molecules (J–O, R–W) and the olfactory axon convergence to both lateral and medial target glomeruli (P, Q, X, Y). Scale bars: D, G, J–O, R–W, 500 μm; E, H, P, Q, X, Y, 200 μm.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Abnormal localization of ACIII in Goofy-deficient mice. A–J, Immunofluorescence labeling of OE (A–D, F–I) and OB (E, J) sections with antibodies against Goofy (A, F), Golf (B, G), CNGA2 (C, H), and ACIII (D, E, I, J). In wild-type mice, Golf, CNGA2, and ACIII are highly localized to olfactory cilia, while strong ACIII immunoreactivity is observed also in olfactory axons and glomeruli of mutant mice. K, Immunoblot analysis of ACIII protein in olfactory cilia, whole OE, and OB from three individual mice of each genotype. In Goofy-deficient mice, ACIII is significantly decreased in the cilia (60 ± 7%), slightly decreased in the OE (94 ± 2%), and dramatically increased in the OB (496 ± 41%), compared with wild-type mice (n = 3). L–N, Double immunofluorescence labeling of wild-type OE section with anti-Goofy (L, N) and anti-ACIII (M, N) antibodies. N, A merged image showing colocalization of Goofy (magenta) and ACIII (green) at Golgi apparatus in OSNs. Scale bars: A–D, F–I, 200 μm; E, J, 500 μm; L–N, 20 μm.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Shortened olfactory cilia in Goofy-deficient mice and dnPKA-expressing transgenic mice. A, B, Whole-mount OE preparations from wild-type (A) and Goofy-deficient (B) mice immunolabeled with anti-Olfr2 (I7, magenta) and anti-Olfr6 (M50, green) antibodies. The length of both Olfr2-expressing and Olfr6-expressing olfactory cilia in Goofy-deficient mice is markedly shorter than that in wild-type mice. C–E, Double immunofluorescence labeling of an OE section from Olfr73-ires-gapEGFP transgenic mouse on Goofy-deficient background with anti-Olfr73 (C, E) and anti-GFP (D, E) antibodies. E, A merged image showing perfect overlapping of Olfr73 (magenta) with GFP (green) in the olfactory cilia. F–K, Immunofluorescence labeling of OE sections from wild-type (F–H) and Goofy-deficient (I–K) mice with antibodies against Olfr2 (I7; F, I), Olfr17 (P2; G, J), and Olfr73 (mOR-EG; H, K). L–N, Cumulative frequency plot for length of olfactory cilia expressing Olfr2 (L), Olfr17 (M), and Olfr73 (N) in wild-type (blue) and Goofy-deficient (red) mice. Thin broken lines represent the results from individual mice (n = 3 mice for each genotype; n = 259–805 OSNs for each mouse), while bold lines represent pooled data (n = 1196–1815 OSNs). Insets, Averages of cilia length. For all the three ORs, the length of olfactory cilia in Goofy-deficient mice is significantly shorter than that in wild-type mice. O, Cumulative frequency plot for length of rat I7-expressing olfactory cilia in I7-ires-ECFP (light blue) and I7-ires-dnPKA-ires-EYFP (green) transgenic mice. Thin broken lines represent the results from individual mice (n = 3 mice for each genotype; n = 292–693 OSNs for each mouse), while bold lines represent pooled data (n = 1538 for I7-ires-ECFP; n = 1229 for I7-ires-dnPKA-ires-EYFP). Insets, Averages of cilia length. P, Q, Immunofluorescence labeling of coronal sections of OE from I7-ires-ECFP (P) and I7-ires-dnPKA-ires-EYFP (Q) transgenic mice with anti-rat I7-specific antibody. **p < 0.01 (2-tailed t test). Scale bars: A, B, 20 μm; C–K, P, Q, 50 μm.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Reduced olfactory sensitivity in Goofy-deficient mice. A–C, Electrophysiological properties of OSNs assessed by measurement of odor-evoked EOG responses (A, B). Representative EOG traces to eugenol, 2-heptanone, and 1-heptanol in wild-type (A) and Goofy-deficient (B) mice. C, Relationship between applied eugenol concentrations and EOG responses in wild-type (blue) and Goofy-deficient (red) mice (n = 12 for each genotype). *p < 0.05 (2-tailed t test). D, E, Behavioral responses of wild-type (blue) and Goofy-deficient (red) mice to an aversive odor TMT stimulation (n = 8–10 for each genotype and each TMT concentration). Freezing time (D) and avoidance index (E) were measured for the two genotypes to different amounts of TMT. *p < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney U test).

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (32)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 32
7 Aug 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Goofy Coordinates the Acuity of Olfactory Signaling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Goofy Coordinates the Acuity of Olfactory Signaling
Tomomi Kaneko-Goto, Yuki Sato, Sayako Katada, Emi Kinameri, Sei-ichi Yoshihara, Atsushi Nishiyori, Mitsuhiro Kimura, Hiroko Fujita, Kazushige Touhara, Randall R. Reed, Yoshihiro Yoshihara
Journal of Neuroscience 7 August 2013, 33 (32) 12987-12996; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4948-12.2013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
Goofy Coordinates the Acuity of Olfactory Signaling
Tomomi Kaneko-Goto, Yuki Sato, Sayako Katada, Emi Kinameri, Sei-ichi Yoshihara, Atsushi Nishiyori, Mitsuhiro Kimura, Hiroko Fujita, Kazushige Touhara, Randall R. Reed, Yoshihiro Yoshihara
Journal of Neuroscience 7 August 2013, 33 (32) 12987-12996; DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4948-12.2013
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Articles

  • Memory Retrieval Has a Dynamic Influence on the Maintenance Mechanisms That Are Sensitive to ζ-Inhibitory Peptide (ZIP)
  • Neurophysiological Evidence for a Cortical Contribution to the Wakefulness-Related Drive to Breathe Explaining Hypocapnia-Resistant Ventilation in Humans
  • Monomeric Alpha-Synuclein Exerts a Physiological Role on Brain ATP Synthase
Show more Articles

Cellular/Molecular

  • Widely Used CaMKII Regulatory Segment Mutations Cause Tight Actinin Binding and Dendritic Spine Enlargement in Unstimulated Neurons
  • High-Pressure Freezing EM Tomography of Entire Ribbon Synapses in the Retina
  • Identifying Key Regulators in Odorant Receptor Trafficking
Show more Cellular/Molecular
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.