Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE

User menu

  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Neuroscience
  • Log out
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Neuroscience

Advanced Search

Submit a Manuscript
  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
    • Information for Authors
    • Fees
    • Journal Clubs
    • eLetters
    • Submit
    • Special Collections
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • Editorial Board
    • ECR Advisory Board
    • Journal Staff
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Advertise
    • For the Media
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Feedback
    • Accessibility
  • SUBSCRIBE
PreviousNext
This Week in The Journal

This Week in The Journal

Journal of Neuroscience 18 September 2013, 33 (38) i
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image Cellular/Molecular

Persistent Na+ Current Enables Acetylcholine to Induce Spiking

Jason Yamada-Hanff and Bruce P. Bean

(see pages 15011–15021)

Acetylcholine modulates neuronal activity throughout the brain, and loss of cholinergic signaling contributes to cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. In the hippocampus, acetylcholine acts primarily on muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) and increases excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons, often resulting in spontaneous spiking. Yamada-Hanff and Bean investigated the ionic basis of this effect in mouse hippocampal slices. Acetylcholine did not change the threshold for spike generation, but shifted the balance of inward and outward currents at all voltages. Unlike in control cells, where net current was outward at the resting membrane potential, net current was inward at all holding potentials below −40 mV in acetylcholine-treated neurons. As a result, the neurons depolarized to spike threshold from any subthreshold membrane potential and thus exhibited spontaneous spiking. Although spontaneous activity depended on the voltage-dependent activation of the persistent sodium current (INaP), acetylcholine did not affect this current. Instead, it likely activated a nonselective cation conductance that allowed slow depolarization to the INaP activation voltage.

Embedded Image Development/Plasticity/Repair

Death Receptor 6 Has a Role in Axonal Pruning in Adult Mice

Sally A. Marik, Olav Olsen, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, and Charles D. Gilbert

(see pages 14998–15003)

Loss of peripheral input to regions of primary sensory cortex causes sprouting and pruning of cortical axons in adjacent regions; this allows spared sensory inputs to make use of functionally deafferented cortex. After whiskers are plucked in adult mice, for example, regions of somatosensory barrel cortex that represent removed whiskers shrink, whereas barrels representing adjacent whiskers expand. Brain derived neurotrophic factor is thought to trigger axonal sprouting after deafferentation, and Marik et al. now provide evidence that death receptor 6 (DR6) is involved in axonal pruning. Although death receptors are thus named because they trigger apoptosis when activated by extracellular ligands, DR6 was previously found to regulate axonal pruning during development. Marik et al. show that this role persists in adults. Unlike wild-type animals, adult DR6-null mice exhibited almost no axonal pruning in barrel cortex after whiskers were removed. Even before whisker removal, more axons projected horizontally between barrels in DR6-null mice than in controls, suggesting developmental pruning was also deficient.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Reconstructions of axonal arbors in barrel cortex 1 d after whiskers were plucked. In wild-type mice (left), many axonal segments had been added (yellow) or pruned (red). Although axons were also added in DR6-null mice (right), few were pruned, and most were unchanged between imaging sessions (blue). See the article by Marik et al. for details.

Embedded Image Systems/Circuits

Mice Lacking MNTB Can Still Localize Sounds

Walid Jalabi, Cornelia Kopp-Scheinpflug, Paul D. Allen, Emanuele Schiavon, Rita R. DiGiacomo, et al.

(see pages 15044–15049)

Mammals localize sounds by comparing the amplitude and time of arrival of sounds at each ear. Interaural level differences (ILDs) are particularly important in small-headed mammals, in which interaural time disparities are small. ILDs are computed by neurons in the lateral superior olive (LSO), which integrate excitatory input from the ipsilateral ear with inhibitory input from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB), which receives inputs from the contralateral ear. Jalabi et al. were therefore surprised to find that knocking out the transcription factor En1, which prevented formation of the MNTB, had relatively minor effects on sound localization in mice. Although the ability to detect rapid shifts in sound location was impaired, spatial acuity did not differ significantly from controls. Moreover, although MNTB was previously thought to provide the main glycinergic inhibition to the LSO, the number of glycinergic terminals in LSO was reduced by only ∼30% in mutant mice, indicating LSO receives substantial glycinergic innervation from an unknown source.

Embedded Image Behavioral/Cognitive

Contrast Sensitivity Exhibits Circadian Oscillation

Christopher K. Hwang, Shyam S. Chaurasia, Chad R. Jackson, Guy C.-K. Chan, Daniel R. Storm, et al.

(see pages 14989–14997)

Contrast sensitivity, the ability to discriminate spatial variations in light intensity, is a critical component of visual processing in mammals. Dopamine, released by amacrine cells in the retina, increases contrast sensitivity by acting on D4 receptors (D4Rs). Dopamine synthesis and release and D4R expression are modulated by circadian clocks and Hwang et al. propose that contrast sensitivity also has a circadian rhythm in mice. The daytime peak in contrast sensitivity was significantly reduced in D4R-null mice, as was circadian oscillation in expression of the clock-regulating transcription factor neuronal PAS-domain protein 2 (NPAS2). NPAS2 was detected almost exclusively in a subset of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), and it was required to drive circadian oscillation of adenylyl cyclase type 1 (AC1). Knocking out either of these proteins reduced the daily peak in contrast sensitivity. It should be noted, however, that because contrast sensitivity was tested using bands moving in a single direction, reduced ability to detect such movement might underlie the observed effects.

Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Neuroscience: 33 (38)
Journal of Neuroscience
Vol. 33, Issue 38
18 Sep 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Neuroscience article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
This Week in The Journal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Neuroscience
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Neuroscience.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 18 September 2013, 33 (38) i

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Request Permissions
Share
This Week in The Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 18 September 2013, 33 (38) i
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Cellular/Molecular
    • Development/Plasticity/Repair
    • Systems/Circuits
    • Behavioral/Cognitive
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
  • This Week in The Journal
Show more This Week in The Journal
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Issue Archive
  • Collections

Information

  • For Authors
  • For Advertisers
  • For the Media
  • For Subscribers

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Accessibility
(JNeurosci logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
JNeurosci Online ISSN: 1529-2401

The ideas and opinions expressed in JNeurosci do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the JNeurosci Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in JNeurosci should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in JNeurosci.